簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 周志遠
Chih-yuan Chou
論文名稱: 工作狂傾向量表心理計量特質之複核效化研究
A Cross-Validation Study on the Psychometric Properties of the Workaholism Battery
指導教授: 胡昌亞
Chang-Ya Hu
口試委員: 葉穎蓉
Ying-jung Yeh
吳宗祐
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 工作狂複核效化分析
外文關鍵詞: workaholism, cross-validation analysis
相關次數: 點閱:218下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究探討由Spence & Robbins (1992)所發展之工作狂量表(WorkBAT)的心理計量特質與複核效化之程度。有鑑於過去研究大多無法支持WorkBAT三因子模式之構念效度,因此本研究使用經McMillan (2002) 修改後的兩構面(工作樂趣,趨力)模型為理論模型。為檢驗理論模型的穩定度,將整體樣本(N=841)隨機切割成測定樣本(N=421)與效度樣本(N=420),進行信度、效度分析及複核效化分析。分析結果顯示:(1)在內部一致性方面,除效度樣本中的「趨力」構面外,在兩樣本中之兩構面的信度係數皆高於.70;(2)在效標關聯效度方面,工作樂趣與三類效標(工作滿意、工作投入以及情緒耗竭)皆有顯著的相關;而趨力與三類效標(工作滿意、工作投入以及每週工作時數)則均有顯著的正相關;(3)在複核效化方面,於溫和複核效化策略下,二樣本間的理論模型具有穩定度。因此,本研究並根據效標關聯度效度與複核效化的分析結果,來討論管理實務意涵。


This study is aimed to investigate the psychometric properties and a test of cross-validation of Spence & Robbins (1992) Workaholism Battery (WorkBAT). Because past studies failed to support the three-factor structure of the WorkBAT, a shortened two-factor model (enjoyment of work, driven) by McMillan (2002) was chosen. Using a random split, the sample (N=841) was divided into a calibration sample (N=421) and a validation sample (N=420). Results of internal consistency analyses indicate that except the “driven” dimension in validity sample, the reliability coefficients of the two dimensions in these two samples are higher than .70. Criterion related validity was supported as “enjoyment of work” related significantly to all the three criteria (work satisfaction, work involvement, exhaustion) and “driven” was positively related to all three criteria (work satisfaction, work involvement, hours worked per week). The results of cross-validation suggest that the two-factor model were supported in both samples only under the moderate replication strategy. On the basis of the study’s findings, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

摘要I AbstractII 目次III 表目次VI 第一章、緒論1 第一節、研究動機1 第二節、研究目的3 第二章、文獻探討4 第一節、工作狂之概念與相關研究4 第二節、效標10 一、工作滿意之概念與研究10 二、工作投入之概念與研究11 三、情緒耗竭之概念與研究12 四、平均每週工作總時數之概念與相關研究13 第三節、研究問題14 第三章、研究方法15 第一節、研究對象與程序15 一、研究對象15 二、研究程序15 第二節、研究變項之定義與衡量方法17 一、工作狂17 二、效標17 第三節、資料分析方法19 一、敘述性統計分析19 二、信度分析19 三、效度分析19 四、複核效化分析19 第四章、研究結果21 第一節、測定樣本21 一、人口統計變項21 二、驗證性因素分析26 三、信度分析27 四、效度分析28 第二節、效度樣本31 一、人口統計變項31 二、信度分析36 三、效度分析37 第三節、單樣本CFA分析40 第四節、複核效化分析41 一、寬鬆複核策略41 二、溫和複核策略41 三、嚴緊複核策略42 四、複核效化的證據42 五、不同複核效化檢驗策略的比較43 第五章、研究結論與建議45 第一節、研究結論45 一、效標關聯效度45 二、模型契合度45 三、複核效化分析46 第二節、研究建議46 第三節、管理意涵47 參考文獻48

參考文獻
邱皓政. (2003). 結構方程式模式:LISREL的理論技術與應用 (1 ed.). 台北: 雙葉書廊有限公司.
邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析 (3 ed.). 台北: 五南圖書出版有限公司.
張春興. (1989). 張氏心理學辭典 (1 ed.). 台北: 東華書局股份有限公司.
郭素蘭. (2003). 影響高科技研發人員過度工作因素及工作類型之探討. 國立政治大學心理學研究所.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Aziz, S., & Zickar, M. J. (2006b). A Cluster Analysis Investigation of Workaholism as a Syndrome. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 52-62.
Bonebright, C. A. (2001). The relationship of workaholism with stress, burnout, and productivity. University of Iowa.
Burke, R. J. (1999). It's Not How Hard You Work But How You Work Hard:Evaluating Workaholism Components. International Journal of Stress Management, 6(4), 225-239.
Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism and extra-work satisfactions, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis (Vol. 7, pp. 352-364).
Burke, R. J. (2001a). Spence and Robbins' measures of workaholism components: Test-retest stability, Psychological Reports (Vol. 88, pp. 882-888).
Burke, R. J. (2001b). Workaholism Components, Job Satisfaction, and Career Progress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(11), 2339-2356.
Burke, R. J., Zena, B., & Barry, F. (2006). Workaholism among Australian female managers and professionals: Job behaviors, satisfactions and psychological health. Equal Opportunities International, 25(3), 200-213.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkis, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. New York: John Wiley.
Flowers, C. P., & Robinson, B. (2002). A Structural and Discriminant Analysis of the Work Addiction Risk Test. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 62(3), 517.
Harpaz, I., & Snir, R. (2003). Workaholism: Its definition and nature. Human Relations, 56(3), 291.
Jackson, S. E., Schwab, R. L., & Schuler, R. S. (1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 630-640.
Kanai, A., Wakabayashi, M., & Fling, S. (1996). Workaholism among employees in Japanese corporations: An examination based on the Japanese version of the workaholism scales, Japanese Psychological Research (Vol. 38, pp. 192-203).
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 53-61.
Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics: Living with them, working with them B2 - Workaholics: Living with them, working with them. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99-113.
McMillan, L. H. W., Brady, E. C., O'Driscoll, M. P., & Marsh, N. V. (2002). A multifaceted validation study of Spence and Robbins' (1992) Workaholism Battery. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 357-368.
McMillan, L. H. W., O'Driscoll, M. P., Marsh, N. V., & Brady, E. C. (2001). Understanding workaholism: Data synthesis, theoretical critique, and future design strategies. International Journal of Stress Management, 8, 69-91.
Meier, S. T. (1983). Toward a theory of burnout. Human Relations, 36, 899-910.
Mudrack, P. E., & Naughton, T. J. (2001). The Assessment of Workaholism as Behavioral Tendecies: Scale. International Journal of Stress Management.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Oates, W. E. (1971). Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction B2 - Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction. New York, NY: World.
Porter, G. (1996). Organizational impact of workaholism: Suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 70-84).
Robinson, B. E. (1998). The workaholic family: a clinical perspective. The American Journal of Family Therpay, 26, 65-75.
Robinson, B. E. (1999). The Work Addiction Risk Test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism, Perceptual and Motor Skills (Vol. 88, pp. 199-210).
Robinson, B. E. (2000). Workaholism: Bridging the Gap Between Workplace, Sociocultural, and Family Research. Journal of Employment Counseling, 37(1), 31-47.
Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), MBl manual B2 - MBl manual (Vol. 3rd). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Scott, K. S., Moore, K. S., & Miceli, M. P. (1997). An Exploration of the Meaning and Consequences of Workaholism. Human Relations, 50(3), 287-314.
Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, Measurement, and Preliminary Results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160.
Zena, B., Ronald, J. B., & Fay, O. (2006). Workaholism among Australian psychologists: gender differences. Equal Opportunities International, 25(1), 48-59.

QR CODE