本篇研究主要是透「炬輪技藝發展協會-小可樂果劇團」的個案內容為例，闡述組織或團體的創立者，如何運用『群體凝聚力』的各項必要的因素，來促成組織或團體的成立;並運用最無形但又是最有效的管理力 -『群體凝聚力』，來經營及維運整個公益劇團。而「小可樂果劇團」本身是為一個利他組織，在面臨資源有限及短缺的情況下，如何運用『資源拼湊』的策略來渡過每一個困境，並創造出組織所需要的資源。另外劇團成員的家長們，卻有辦法透過「社交平台」來主動拓展劇團的『社會網絡』，以超越原本傳統的人際關係範疇，去擴展劇團的名聲與曝光度，並且為劇團帶來了許多的機會及資源，也運用了「虛擬社群」，創造組織或團隊更緊密的凝聚力，也促使整個劇團的整體成長。最後當「小可樂果劇團」逐漸成長茁壯後，劇團領導人以「價值共創」的理念，帶領劇團從事各種公益慈善活動，並與許多公益團體合作，維持長期且緊密的夥伴關係，故可讓「小可樂果劇團」再次創造嶄新的成長動能，並真正達到社會共好的win-win雙贏境界。
本論文採用哈佛式個案研究法，包含個案本文及教學手冊兩部份，教學手冊針對個案中的討論內容做詳細說明，主要議題有『群體凝聚力』、『資源拼湊』、『社會網絡』與『價值共創』，其分別就文獻學說及個案分析做整理，以期達到理論與實務相結合之目的。

This study is mainly based on the case content of the "Flaming Wheel Skills Development Association - Little Happy Nuts Troupe" as an example, describing how the founders of troupe can use the necessary elements of "Group Cohesion" to promote the establishment of an organization, and the use of the most invisible but effective management force - "group cohesion" to operate and manage the entire public welfare troupe. The "Little Happy Nuts Troupe" itself is an altruist organization, in the face of limited resources and shortages, how to use the "Resource Bricolage" strategy to overcome every difficult situation and create the resources the troupe needs.
In addition, the parents of the troupe members have the means to actively expand the "Social Network" of the troupe through the "Social Platform" in order to go beyond the traditional categories of interpersonal relationships, to expand the reputation and exposure of the troupe, and to bring many opportunities and resources to the troupe, but also to use "Virtual community" creates closer cohesion of the organization, and also promotes the overall growth of the entire troupe.
Finally, as the "Little Happy Nuts Troupe" grew and thrived, the troupe's leaders using the concept of " Value Co-creation", led the troupe to engage in various charitable activities and worked with many public welfare groups to maintain a long-term and close partnership, so that "Little Happy Nuts Troupe" once again to create a new growth momentum, and really achieve a good social win-win situation.
This dissertation adopts the Harvard Case Study method, which includes two parts of the case content and the preparation guide. The preparation guide for the discussion of the case to do a detailed description, the main topics are “Group cohesion”, “Resource Bricolage”, “Social Network”, “Value Co-creation”, respectively on the management theory and case analysis, in order to achieve the combination of theory and practice.

中文文獻
[1]余銘倫(2014)，探討顧客互動性、媒體同步力、對顧客親密感與忠誠度的影響-以資訊服務業為例。[2]國立高雄第一科技大學大學未出版碩士論文。
[3]林福鈿(2018)，科技是否能夠建立社會幸福感?以facebook使用為案例。國立高雄第一科技大學大學未出版碩士論文。
[4]邱國碩(2014)，創業資源、創業階段與資源拼湊之研究：以微型創業為例。淡江大學資訊傳播學系碩士班學位論文。
[5]姜志明(2017)，探討LINE作為班級群組溝通之用對於班級凝聚力的影響：以社會資本與社會臨場感觀點。南臺科技大學未出版碩士論文。
黃楓原(2017)，虛擬社群中影響知識分享意圖之因素：以社會閒散與團體凝聚力角度。國立成功大學未出版碩士論文。
[6]葉乃菁(2001)，從「群體動力學」探討個人對虛擬社群之接受度─以『cityfamily』為例。國立臺灣科技大學未出版碩士論文。
[7]鄭硯中(2014)，兩個資源拼湊觀點下的創業歷程。國立成功大學企業管理學系學位論文。

英文文獻
[1]"Facebook says there are only 3.57 degrees of separation". Retrieved 4 February 2016.
[2]"Six Degrees on Facebook - Facebook". facebook.com.
[3]"Six Degrees: come in, your time is up". K! - the blog of Karl Bunyan.
[4]"Three and a half degrees of separation – Facebook Research". Retrieved 9 July 2017.
[5]Baker, T. and Nelson, Reed E. (2005), “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage,” in Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
[6]Barnes, John (1954), “Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish,” in Human Relations, (7): 39–58.
[7][Beal, D. J., Cohen, R., Burke, M. J. and McLendon, C. L. (2003), “Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relation,” in Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 989–1004.
[8]Berkowitz, L. (1954), “Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity,” in Human Relations, 7 (4), 509–519.
[9]Bruhn, John (2009), “The Group Effect: Social Cohesion & Health Outcomes,” in Springer, p. 39
[10]Bukowski WM and Cillessen AH (1998), “Sociometry Then and Now: Building on Six Decades of Measuring Children's Experiences with The Peer Group: New Directions for Child,” in Jossey-Bass, ISBN 978-0787912475.
[11]Burt, Ronald. S. (1992), “Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition,” in Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[12]Carron, A. V. and Spink, K.S. (1995), “The group-size cohesion relationship in minimal groups,” in Small Group Research, 26 (1), 86–105.
[13]Carron, A.V. and Brawley, L.R. (2000), “Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues,” in Small Group Research, 31 (1), 89–106.
[14]Effron, Daniel, Hemant Kakkar and Eric D. Knowles (2018), “Group Cohesion Benefits Individuals Who Express Prejudice, but Harms Their Group,” in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79(November), 239-251.
[15]Festinger, L., Schachter, S. and Back, K. (1950), “The spatial ecology of group formation,” in Social Pressure in Informal Groups, Chapter 4.
[16]Forsyth, D.R. (2010), “Components of cohesion,” in Group Dynamics, 5th Edition, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 118–122.
[17]Forsyth, D.R., Zyzniewski, L.E. and Giammanco, C.A. (2002), “Responsibility diffusion in cooperative collectives,” in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (1): 54–65.
[18]French, J.R.P. and Jr. (1941), “The disruption and cohesion of groups,” in Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36 (3), 361–377.
[19]Garcia-Martinez, Jose A. and Fernando Vega-Redondo, (2015), "Social Cohesion and The Evolution of Altruism," in Games and Economic Behavior, 92(July), 74-105.
[20]Garud, R. and Karnøe, P., (2003), “Bricolage Versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship,” in Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 277-300.
[21]Giordano, P.C. (2003), “Relationships in adolescence,” in Annual Review of Sociology, 29 (1), 257–281.
[22]Granovetter, M. S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” in American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
[23]Gully, S.M., Devine, D.J. and Whitney, D.J. (1995), “A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence,” in Small Group Research, 26 (6), 497–520.
[24]Hogg, M. A. (1993), “Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions,” in European Review of Social Psychology, 4 (1), 85–111.
[25]Jure Leskovec and Eric Horvitz (2007), “Planetary-Scale Views on an Instant-Messaging Network,” arXiv:0803.0939, Bibcode:2008arXiv0803.0939L.
[26]Kambil, A., Ginsberg, A., and Bloch, M. (1996), “Re-inventing value propositions,” in New York University: Stern Working Paper, IS-96–21.
[27]Kambil, A., Friesen G.B. and Sundaram A. (1999), “Co-creation: A New Source of Value” in Accenture Outlook, 2
[28]Karinthy, Frigyes. (1929), “Chain Links,” translated from Hungarian and annotated by Adam Makkai and Enikö Jankó.
[29]Langfred, C.W. (1998), “Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance,” in Small Group Research, 29 (1), 124–143.
[30]Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966), “The Savage Mind,” in University of Chicago Press.
[31]]Lin, Nan., Walter M. Ensel, and John C. Vaughn. (1981), “Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment,” in American Sociological Review, 46: 393-405.
[32]Lott, A. J. and Lott, B. E. (1965), “Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables,” in Psychol. Bull, 64 (4): 259–309.
[33]Milgram, Stanley (1967), “The Small World Problem,” in Psychology Today, 2: 60–67.
[34]Mitchell, J. C. (1969), “Social Networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in central African towns,”in England Manchester University Press.
[35]Mullen, Brian and Carolyn Copper (1994), “The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration,” in Psychological Bulletin, 115 (2): 217.
[36]Oliver, Laurel W. (1988), “The Relationship of Group Cohesion to Group Performance: A Research Integration Attempt,” in Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 11-13.
[37]Pattison, P. (1993), “Algebraic Models for Social Networks”, in Cambridge University Press.
[38]Prahalad, C.K. (2004), “The Cocreation of Value in ‘Invited Commentaries’ on ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’,” in Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, pp. 18–27.
[39]Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004), “The Future of Competition,” in Harvard Business School Press, pp. 8.
[40]Ramaswamy, Venkat., Gouillart and Francis (2010), “The Power of Co-Creation: Build It with Them to Boost Growth, Productivity, and Profits”.
[41]Six Degrees: “Urban Myth? Replicating the small world of Stanley Milgram. Can you reach anyone through a chain of six people". Psychology Today. March 1, 2002.