簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃百立
Bai-Li Hwang
論文名稱: 翻轉教室品質改善:研究發展軌跡及數位可供性
Comprehending the Quality Improvement of Flipped Classroom: The Research Trajectory and Digital Affordance Perspective
指導教授: 周子銓
Tzu-Chuan Chou
口試委員: 蘇國瑋
Kuo-Wei Su
吳清炎
Ching-Yan Wu
周子銓
Tzu-Chuan Chou
羅乃維
Nai-Wei Lo
黃世禎
Sun-Jen Huang
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 翻轉教室數位可供性工件制定主路徑分析
外文關鍵詞: Flipped Classroom, Digital Affordance, Affordance Enactment, Main Path Analysis (MPA)
相關次數: 點閱:675下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 提供好的教育已是全世界永續發展之目標,亦是當今世界上最重要的議題。而以資通訊技術(ICT)為基礎之「翻轉教室」教育模式相關議題,也因ICT的長足進步及日益重要的數位教育需求得到了許多教育研究者的關注,相關研究文獻數量亦快速成長。回顧近年相關議題的文獻,改善翻轉教室的品質為近年來的重要課題,然而多數文獻著重於討論使用者方面的體驗及品質提升,較缺乏由設計者角度討論如何提升翻轉教室的品質,對於改善翻轉教室品質顯然需要投入更多的研究。
    為了能深化對於改善翻轉教室服務品質的相關研究,本研究依研究問題需要,分別採用文獻研究法、個案研究法兩種研究方法。先透過以數據為基礎且能全面性觀察「翻轉教室」發展軌跡之系統化文獻分析方式-主路徑分析法(Main Path Analysis, MPA),追蹤過往15年間相關研究主題之發展軌跡、用以理解瞭解翻轉教室發展至近期的「改善品質」研究軌跡及特別受到重視的議題。再基於PZB觀點,理解到數位科技設計者對於產品之感知與使用者實際之感知,兩者之間存在著感知落差,故為了改善翻轉教室品質,服務的設計者與使用者間對於數位科技的感知落差已成為當前至關重要的挑戰。
    據此,基於資訊領域設計科學工件(Artifact)的觀點,本研究提出數位可供性缺口(Digital Affordance Gap, DAG) 的觀點,以深化使用者對於科技物質性的感知(Perceived Materiality)及對數位科技可供性真實感受與科技設計者所感知的落差的研究,並透過個案研究方式探索翻轉教室服務設計者如何縮短可供性缺口。
    本研究進一步藉由制定(Enactment)觀點分析設計者在縮短落差的實踐過程中,如何透過工件認知(Artifact Cognition)以及工件設計(Artifact Design)來回校準;最終,本研究提出了一數位可供性缺口模型(Digital Affordance Gap Model, DAGM),藉以橋接數位科技設計者與使用者間對於科技感知之落差,以深化翻轉教室品質改善研究。在實務上,本文在翻轉教室、數位可供性的相關研究做出了重要貢獻。


    Providing good education is the goal of sustainable development globally and is one of the most important focuses in the world today. The Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-based flipped classroom education model has received considerable attention from educational researchers due to the significant progress of ICT and the increasing demand for digital education, resulting in a growing number of related papers. This study finds that improving the quality of flipped classrooms has been a compelling topic in recent years, however, most of the literature focuses on user experience and quality improvement instead of how to enhance the quality of flipped classrooms from the designer’s perspective. It is obvious that more research needs to be invested in improving the quality of flipped classrooms.
    In order to intensify the research on lifting the quality of flipped classroom services, this study adopts two research methods: document analysis method and case study method, according to the needs of the research question. First, this study uses Main Path Analysis (MPA), a systematic data-based literature analysis method that can comprehensively observe the developmental trajectory of flipped classrooms, to trace the developmental trajectory of related research topics over the past 15 years and to further understand the recent trajectory of quality improvement research and the issues that have received special attention in the development of flipped classrooms. Based on the PZB perspective, there is a perceptual gap between the perceptions of the digital technology designer and the actual perceptions of the users. Therefore, the perceptual gap between the designers and users of digital technology has become a critical challenge in strengthening the quality of flipped classrooms.
    Based on the Artifacts of Design Science in the information field, this study proposes the Digital Affordance Gap (DAG) to deepen users’ perceived materiality and the gap between the real perceptions of digital technology affordance and those of technology designers. This study also explores how flipped classroom service designers can shorten the affordances gap through case studies.
    This study further analyzes how designers calibrate their practices in closing the gap through Artifact Cognition and Artifact Design via an Enactment perspective. This study also proposes a Digital Affordance Gap Model (DAGM) to bridge the disparity between digital technology designers and users’ perceptions of technology so as to escalate the research on quality improvement of flipped classrooms. In practical terms, this study makes an important contribution to the research on flipped classrooms and digital affordance.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT III ACKNOWLEDGEMENT V TABLE OF CONTENTS VI LIST OF TABLES IX LIST OF FIGURES X CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION 1 1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND PURPOSES 2 1.3 RESEARCH SCOPE AND PROCESS 4 1.4 DISSERTATION STRUCTURE 9 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 11 2.1 FLIPPED CLASSROOM 12 2.1.1 Definition of Flipped Classroom 12 2.1.2 Flipped Classroom Benefits and Trends 14 2.2 SERVICE QUALITY 15 2.2.1 Definition of the Service 15 2.2.2 Service Quality Gap 17 2.3 DESIGN SCIENCE 18 2.4 IT ARTIFACTS 19 2.5 AFFORDANCE 21 2.6 ENACTMENT 23 2.6.1 Definition of the Enactment 23 2.6.2 Enactment and Competence Development 24 2.7 TRAJECTORIES 25 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODS 27 3.1 SETTING 27 3.2 THE METHODS 28 3.2.1 Computational Methodology 28 3.2.2 Main Path Analysis (MPA) 29 3.2.3 Grounded Theory 31 3.2.4 Case Study Method 32 3.3 DATA COLLECTION 34 3.3.1 Literature Search 34 3.3.2 Case Study 35 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS APPROACH 38 CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS 40 4.1 FC TRAJECTORY & CURRENT RESEARCH FOCUS 40 4.1.1 Key-route MPA 40 4.1.2 Multiple global MPA 48 4.2 BRIDGING THE FC AFFORDANCE GAP: A CASE STUDY 57 4.2.1 Design Phase 59 4.2.2 Development Phase 62 4.3 CASE STUDY SUMMARY 67 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 70 5.1 THE ROLES OF TECHNOLOGY DURING THE FC RESEARCH TRAJECTORY 70 5.2 THE PHENOMENA OF ARTIFACT COGNITION 71 5.2.1 Making Sense of Perceived Materiality 74 5.2.2 Making Sense of Perceived Affordance 74 5.3 THE PHENOMENA OF ARTIFACT DESIGN 75 5.3.1 Re-designing Artifact Approach 75 5.3.2 Embedding Flipped Factors 75 5.4 AFFORDANCE ENACTMENT 76 5.5 DIGITAL AFFORDANCE GAP MODEL 77 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION 80 6.1 LESSONS REGARDING RESEARCH QUESTIONS 80 6.1.1 Lesson 1: Learn about the Development Journey of FC’s Research Themes 80 6.1.2 Lesson 2: Mitigate the Digital Affordance Gaps between Designers and Users 82 6.2 THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONTRIBUTION 83 6.3 LIMITATION AND FUTURE RESEARCH 84 6.3.1 Limitation 84 6.3.2 Future Research 85 REFERENCES 86

    Agarwal, R., & Lucas Jr, H. C. (2005). The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS quarterly, 381-398.
    Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345.
    Amendola, M., & Gaffard, J.-L. (1988). The innovative choice. An economic analysis of the dynamics of technology.
    Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 394-405.
    Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603.
    Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
    Ba, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design—the case for incentive alignment. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 225-239.
    Baker, J. W. (2000). The" classroom flip. Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side, 9-17.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
    Batagelj, V. (1991). Some mathematics of network analysis. Network Seminar, Department of Sociology, University of Pittsburgh,
    Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A., & De Nooy, W. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. In: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bego, C. R., Ralston, P. A. S., & Thompson, A. K. (2022). Improving performance in a large flipped barrier mathematics course: a longitudinal case study [Article]. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1916-1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2020.1850899
    Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS quarterly, 183-194.
    Berente, N., Seidel, S., & Safadi, H. (2019). Research commentary—data-driven computationally intensive theory development. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 50-64.
    Bernardi, R., Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2019). The role of affordances in the deinstitutionalization of a dysfunctional health management information system in Kenya: An identity work perspective. MIS quarterly, 43(4), 1177-1200.
    Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The chronicle of higher education, 12(19), 1-3.
    Berry, L. L., Zeithaml, V. A., & Parasuraman, A. (1985). Quality counts in services, too. Business horizons, 28(3), 44-52.
    Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,
    Bjørn-Andersen, N., Eason, K., & Robey, D. (1986). Managing computer impact: An international study of management and organizations. Intellect Books.
    Bouwmeester, R. A., de Kleijn, R. A., van den Berg, I. E., ten Cate, O. T. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Westerveld, H. E. (2019). Flipping the medical classroom: Effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Computers & Education, 139, 118-128.
    Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory research: Methods and practices. The Sage handbook of grounded theory, 1, 29.
    Burns, J. (2012). Critical care in the age of the duty hour regulations: circadian-based scheduling, standardized handoffs, and the flipped classroom? Critical care medicine, 40(12), 3305-3306.
    Ch, G. (1982). Strategic management and marketing in the service sector. Helsingfors, Finland.
    Chan, C. M. L., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T. C. (2011). Managing e-Government system implementation: a resource enactment perspective [Article]. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529-541. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.19
    Chari, S., Katsikeas, C. S., Balabanis, G., & Robson, M. J. (2014). Emergent marketing strategies and performance: The effects of market uncertainty and strategic feedback systems. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 145-165.
    Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta‐analysis. Medical Education, 52(9), 910-924.
    Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students' learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793-824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
    Chou, T.-C., Weng, P.-D., & Wu, T.-C. (2013). Exploring design-fits for the strategic alignment of information systems with business objectives.
    Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56-68.
    Chung, C.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Roles and research trends of flipped classrooms in nursing education: a review of academic publications from 2010 to 2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(6), 883-904.
    Ciborra, C. U. (1996). Teams, markets and systems: Business innovation and information technology. Cambridge university press.
    Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
    Danneels, E. (2003). Tight–loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 559-576.
    DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational psychology review, 29(1), 141-151.
    Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
    Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162.
    Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2016). Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. In M. Augier & D. J. Teece (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management (pp. 1-12). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_733-1
    Drozdikova-Zaripova, A. R., & Sabirova, E. G. (2020). Usage of Digital Educational Resources in Teaching Students with Application of" Flipped Classroom" Technology. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2).
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. (1989). Theory building from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
    Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world, 237, 258.
    Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1).
    Fooladvand, M. (2017). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in academic achievement: A systematic review. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 313-322.
    Ganbari-Taleb, M., Ghanbari, A., Yousefi, Z., & Botlani, S. (2013). Cognitive strategies instruction: Attitudes toward learning and academic functioning in science. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 7(1), 104.
    Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5259), 669-671.
    Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science.
    Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2014). Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry. MIS quarterly, 38(3), 849-A812.
    Gibson, J. (1979). The Theory of Affordance, in the People, Place, and Space Reader.
    Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109-114.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, lL: Aldine Publishing Company.
    Green, D. E., & McNeeley, M. F. (2013). Practice corner: is radiology education ready for a flipped classroom? In (Vol. 33, pp. 533-534): Radiological Society of North America.
    Högström, C., & Tronvoll, B. (2012). The enactment of socially embedded service systems: Fear and resourcing in the London Borough of Sutton. European Management Journal, 30(5), 427-437.
    Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network. George Mason University: Harper and Row Ltd.
    Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82-92.
    Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative science quarterly, 716-749.
    Harré, R. (2002). Material objects in social worlds. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5-6), 23-33.
    Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 75-105.
    Hu, R., Gao, H., Ye, Y., Ni, Z., Jiang, N., & Jiang, X. (2018). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of nursing studies, 79, 94-103.
    Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
    Hwang, B.-L., Chou, T.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2020). Actualizing the affordance of mobile technology for classroom orchestration: A main path analysis of mobile learning.
    Juran, J. M. (1986). The quality trilogy: A universal approach to managing for quality. Quality progress, 19(8), 19-24.
    Kaiser, G., & Presmeg, N. (2019). Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education. Springer Nature.
    Khanova, J., Roth, M. T., Rodgers, J. E., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2015). Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical Education, 49(10), 1038-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12807
    Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
    Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS quarterly, 67-93.
    Koh, J. H. L., Scott, N., Lucas, A., Kataoka, M., & MacDonell, S. (2020). Developing dietetic students’ confidence in multicultural communication through flipped learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 33(1), 67-77.
    Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2007). Marketing Management. Prentice-Hall of India. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=rBkengEACAAJ
    Kurup, V., & Hersey, D. (2013). The changing landscape of anesthesia education: is Flipped Classroom the answer? Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 26(6), 726-731.
    López Núñez, J. A., López Belmonte, J., Moreno Guerrero, A. J., & Pozo Sánchez, S. (2020). Effectiveness of innovate educational practices with flipped learning and remote sensing in earth and environmental sciences—An exploratory case study. Remote Sensing, 12(5), 897.
    Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The journal of economic education, 31(1), 30-43.
    Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of management review, 24(4), 691-710.
    Lee, A. S., Thomas, M. A., & Baskerville, R. L. (2013). Going back to basics in design: From the IT artifact to the IS artifact.
    Leonardi. (2011). When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS quarterly, 35(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
    Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world, 25(10), 1093.
    Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances. MIS quarterly, 37(3), 749-775. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.04
    Lewis, R. C., & Booms, B. H. (1983). The marketing aspects of service quality. Emerging perspectives on services marketing, 65(4), 99-107.
    Leydesdorff, L., & Amsterdamska, O. (1990). Dimensions of citation analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(3), 305-335.
    Liao, S.-C., Chou, T.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2022). Revisiting the development trajectory of the digital divide: A main path analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121607.
    Lin, H.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1011-1027.
    Lin, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Hsu, Y.-D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners' nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 139, 207-221.
    Lin, Y.-N., Hsia, L.-H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Promoting pre-class guidance and in-class reflection: A SQIRC-based mobile flipped learning approach to promoting students’ billiards skills, strategies, motivation and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104035.
    Liu, J. S., & Kuan, C. H. (2016). A new approach for main path analysis: Decay in knowledge diffusion. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23384
    Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542.
    Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W.-M., & Lin, B. J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-15.
    Lopez Belmonte, J., Pozo Sanchez, S., Fuentes Cabrera, A., & Lopez Nunez, J. A. (2019). Content creation and flipped learning: a necessary pairing for education in the new millennium. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 77(274).
    Louhab, F. E., Bahnasse, A., Bensalah, F., Khiat, A., Khiat, Y., & Talea, M. (2020). Novel approach for adaptive flipped classroom based on learning management system [Article]. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 755-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09994-0
    Lovelock, C. H. (1991). Developing frameworks for understanding service marketing. Services marketing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Lovelock, C. H., & Yip, G. S. (1996). Developing global strategies for service businesses. California management review, 38(2), 64-86.
    Lu, L. Y., Hsieh, C.-H., & Liu, J. S. (2016). Development trajectory and research themes of foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 347-356.
    Lu, L. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2013). An innovative approach to identify the knowledge diffusion path: the case of resource-based theory. Scientometrics, 94(1), 225-246.
    March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4), 251-266.
    Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. Ieee Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435.
    McKeachie, W. J. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature.
    McKinley, W. (2011). Organizational contexts for environmental construction and objectification activity. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 804-828.
    Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance learning, 9(3), 85.
    Moffett, J. (2015). Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Medical teacher, 37(4), 331-336. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.943710
    Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. Bmc Medical Education, 15(1), 1-10.
    MSNBC. (2016). U.N. global survey: Education top priority despite wealth. https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/united-nations-my-world-survey-education-priority-msna339766
    Murdick, R., Render, B., & Russell, R. (1990). Service Operations Management Technical Texts. In: Inc.
    Namaziandost, E., & Cakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners' self-efficacy and gender in the Flipped Classroom Model [Article]. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4041-4055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10167-7
    Nations, U. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
    Naveed, R. T., Hameed, W., Albassami, A., & Moshfegyan, M. (2019). Online Tax System (OTS) in Pakistan: The role of Tax Service Quality (TSQ) and Information Communication Technology (ICT). Pacific Business Review International, 11(12), 78-86.
    Nelson, C. E. (2008). Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. American Zoologist, 48(2), 213-225.
    Nolan, E., Brady, M., Rienties, B., & Héliot, Y. (2021). Once more on the rollercoaster: loses and gains from the rapid shift to online delivery during Covid. Academy of Management Proceedings,
    Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things, New York, Basic Book. paperback as the Design of Everyday Things, 1990).
    Norman, D. A. (2008). The way I see IT signifiers, not affordances. interactions, 15(6), 18-19.
    O'Connor, E. E., Fried, J., McNulty, N., Shah, P., Hogg, J. P., Lewis, P., . . . Reddy, S. (2016). Flipping radiology education right side up. Academic radiology, 23(7), 810-822.
    O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
    Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS quarterly, 309-340.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies, 28(9), 1435-1448.
    Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research–a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
    Pan, S. L., & Tan, B. (2011). Demystifying case research: A structured–pragmatic–situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Information and Organization, 21(3), 161-176.
    Pandit, N. R. (1995). Towards a grounded theory of corporate turnaround: A case study approach The University of Manchester].
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. 1988, 64(1), 12-40.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77.
    Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2014). How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organization science, 25(6), 1785-1806.
    Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10).
    Pozo-Sánchez, S., López-Belmonte, J., Rodríguez-García, A.-M., & López-Núñez, J.-A. (2020). Teachers’ digital competence in using and analytically managing information in flipped learning (Competencia digital docente para el uso y gestión analítica informacional del aprendizaje invertido). Culture and Education, 32(2), 213-241.
    Pozo Sanchez, S., Lopez Belmonte, J., Moreno Guerrero, A. J., & Lopez Nunez, J. A. (2019). Impact of educational stage in the application of flipped learning: A contrasting analysis with traditional teaching. Sustainability, 11(21), 5968.
    Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD. Retrieved April, 14(2020), 2020-2004.
    Robey, D. (1981). Computer information systems and organization structure. Communications of the ACM, 24(10), 679-687.
    Schlairet, M. C., Green, R., & Benton, M. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: strategies for an undergraduate nursing course. Nurse educator, 39(6), 321-325.
    Scott, J. E. (1998). Organizational knowledge and the intranet. Decision support systems, 23(1), 3-17.
    Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 758-768. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00136f
    Simon, H. (1996). The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial, The Sciences of the Artificial. In: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Simon, H. A. (1977). The theory of problem solving. In Models of discovery (pp. 214-244). Springer.
    Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 67-82.
    Smith, C. M., & McDonald, K. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development: Part II. Making podcasts and videos. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(11), 486-487.
    Sánchez-Romero, J.-L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., & Mora-Mora, H. (2019). Design and application of Project-based Learning Methodologies for small groups within Computer Fundamentals subjects. IEEE Access, 7, 12456-12466.
    Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
    Strayer, J. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system The Ohio State University].
    Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning environments research, 15(2), 171-193.
    Strong, D. M., Volkoff, O., Johnson, S. A., Pelletier, L. R., Tulu, B., Bar-On, I., . . . Garber, L. (2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the association for information systems, 15(2), 2.
    Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 31(2), 193-224.
    Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2016). Elementary school teachers' ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 65-75.
    UNESCO. (2021). ICT in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved 2022/5/10 from https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education
    van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281.
    Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in complex systems, 10(01), 93-115.
    Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1437-1448.
    Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations [1]. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305-317.
    Wunderlich, P., Veit, D. J., & Sarker, S. (2019). Adoption of Sustainable Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Study of German Households. MIS quarterly, 43(2).
    Xiao, Y., Lu, L. Y., Liu, J. S., & Zhou, Z. (2014). Knowledge diffusion path analysis of data quality literature: A main path analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 594-605.
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.

    無法下載圖示
    全文公開日期 2027/09/23 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2027/09/23 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE