本研究應用層級分析法探討智能家居產品研發專案的關鍵成功因素。透過文獻探討，本研究彙整出六大構面及18項因素以建構層級分析法的層級架構。藉由分析專家意見，層級分析法得到各個關鍵成功因素的權重，可以作為制定決策的參考。本研究之結果顯示，將近75%的權重集中在品質、市場環境、研發技術這三大構面。此外，其中七項因素，包括客戶品質要求、市場商機和銷售需求、產品整合和系統驗證能力、生產製程能力/良率、競爭者與替代品、政府的長照政策和產業發展、關鍵性技術、專利、料件掌握，共佔整體權重的67.8%，是智能家居產品研發專案最關鍵的成功因素。

This research applies the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to investigate key success factors of smart home products R & D projects. Through literature review, six dimensions and 18 factors are selected to construct the hierarchical structure of AHP. By analyzing experts’ opinions, AHP obtains the weights of key success factors to support decision-making. The results of this study show that nearly 75% of dimension weight concentrates on the quality, market environment, and research and development dimensions. In addition, the seven most important success factors, including customer quality requirements, market opportunities and sales needs, product integration and system validation capabilities, production process capability/yield, competitors and alternatives, government policy for long-term care and industry development, and critical technologies, patents, and materials, account for 67.8% of the total weight.

參考文獻
中文部分：
李慧菁（2007），資訊科技產業產品研發專案關鍵成功因素之研究－AHP方法之應用，大同大學事業經營研究所，碩士論文。
孫瑋佑、李建宜（2011），研發型專案風險關鍵要因之研究，台北，第14屆科際整合管理研討會，頁238-252。
翁振益、周瑛琪（2006），決策分析方法與應用，華泰文化。
高璿智（2016），應用層級分析法探討設備採購之關鍵因素：以FPC產品之直接成像設備為例，國立臺灣科技大學工業管理研究所EMBA在職專班，碩士論文。
張保隆、鄭毅萍（1996），專案管理與環境特性因素對專案執行的影響，科技管理學刊，第一卷，第一期，頁161-177。
陳玉蕙（2005），影響專案成功因素之探討，真理大學管理科學研究所，碩士論文。
陳適鴻、林永仁（2013），新產品開發跨職能團隊的成功關鍵因素研究-以A科技公司為例，管理資訊計算，第二卷，第一期，頁105-127。
傅旭昇等譯（2013），專案管理知識體指南（中文繁體PMBOK® Guide）-第五版，社團法人國際專案管理學會台灣分會。
黃曉菁（2015），消費者使用物聯網產品之動機與選擇－以智慧家庭產品為例，國立政治大學資訊管理學系，碩士論文。
簡昕潔（2005），顧客關係管理系統開發專案風險之研究，國立中央大學，企業管理研究所碩士論文。
鄧振源、曾國雄（1989），層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上），中國統計學報，27卷6期，頁5-22。 
英文部分：
Baloi, D. and Price, A. D. （2003）, “Modeling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 261–269.
Chapman, R. J. （2001）, “The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 147-157.
Jaques, N. and Morgan, C. （2004）, “Adapting the analytical hierarchy process to identify inventory risk,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 93-105.
Kenny, J. （2002）, “Management innovation in educational institutions,” Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.359-376.
Lester, D. H. （1998）, “Critical success factors for new product development,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 36-43.
Pinto, J. K. and Slevin, D. P. （1987）, “Critical factors in successful project implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 22-27.
Project Management Institute. （2008）, A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK （®） Guide, 4th ed., Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
Saaty, T. L., （1980）, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 9-26.
Saaty, T. L., （2001）, Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision in a Complex World, 3rd ed., RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. （1982）, The Logic of Priorities, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Shi, Q., Zhou, Y., Xiao, C., Chen, R., and Zuo, J. （2014）, “Delivery risk analysis within the context of program management using fuzzy logic and DEA: A China case study,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 341-349. 
網址部分：
Zion Market Research （2017）. Global Smart Home Market is Set for a Rapid Growth and is Expected to Reach around USD 53.45 Billion by 2022. Abstract retrieved January 18, 2017, from https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/news/smart-home-market