研究生: |
陳玉龍 YU-LUNG CHEN |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台商跨國併購的關鍵成功因素之個案研究
-以明基併購西門子手機業務為例 A Study Of the Key Success Factors On Cross-Border Mergers & Acquisitions For Taiwanese-Based Company – Case Study of BenQ-Siemens |
指導教授: |
廖文志
Wen-Chih Liao |
口試委員: |
欒斌
Pin Luarn 吳克振 Couchen Wu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 76 |
中文關鍵詞: | 整合 、併購 、西門子 、明基 、台商 |
外文關鍵詞: | Combination, Aquire, Siemens, BenQ, Taiwanese-Based company |
相關次數: | 點閱:279 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業併購是為了將來發展及結合策略上的應用,而跨國併購的方式已經逐漸變成FDI的應用形式,也是跨區域國界快速擴張版圖的一種方法。綜觀企業併購的成功機率,依據不同的研究統計指出成功併購的比例只約佔全部總數的30%左右,對規模較大及併購經驗較多的企業,其成功機率則相對提高接近50%左右。然而,台商想要藉由跨國收購快速建立品牌知名度,擴充規模的策略,並非想像中的容易,且由於經驗不足,而往往需要付出更多的學習時間及成本。
併購整合工作影響著併購是否能夠成功,也是創造併購後價值的極重要階段。本研究彙整其他個案研究失敗及成功案例中,影響整合執行的相關因素,藉由明基併購西門子手機業務個案發現,影響併購整合的成功關鍵因素有文化面、組織及制度面的整合、專案整合團隊,而資訊系統的整合則不能肯定為成功關鍵因素之一。
個人嘗試從建立完善的整合型組織、適時推動組織變革與制度創新、在以人為本的基礎上全面整合人力資源、大力推動企業文化重組與融合、重建企業管理資訊系統與危機預警機制五大面向,提出建議作為企業併購整合時的參考。
Merges and acquisitions is the purpose of corporate future development and strategic application, nowadays most merges and acquisitions cases gradually adopt FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) method, one of the fast merges and acquisitions way in extend territory worldwide. Only 30% of company acquisition cases are successful among all, according to the research, 50% of successful ratio in some bigger scale of merges and acquisitions cases or executing by experienced corporate. However, Taiwanese-based company is more difficult to get benefits from company merges and acquisitions, building up brand name due to long learning curve and with less acquisition experiences.
Integration is the key factor of of merges and acquisitions. It also the most important phase to create values during executing merges and acquisitions. The study collects related criteria of successful acquisition cases to verify BenQ acquiring Siemens Mobile case, found culture; organization; system integration & project integrated task team are the key successful factors in merges and acquisitions. Yet I.T system integration is not sure to be one of the key successful factors.
The study tries to represent five aspects of key factors in well integrated management structure; fulfill organized change and system innovation in right time period; well-integrated human sources under humanity basis; re-organization and melt in corporate culture; re-build up corporate management system; risk prediction mechanism. Above conclusions can be referred as corporate practices merges and acquisition.
中文部分
1.J.Fred Weston & Samuel C. Weaver,(2002),「企業併購:全方位評估並掌握當前M&A環境」,陳儀 譯,麥格羅.西爾國際(股)公司,台北.
2.薛明玲、廖烈龍、林宜賢,(2006),「企業併購策略與最佳實務」,資誠教育基金會,台北.
3.薛明玲,(2008),「國際企業併購策略與實務:常見併購型態介紹」,資誠會計事務所,台北.
4.林昭穆,(2007),「企業併購關鍵因素之研究:以鴻海個案為例」,國立高雄第一科技大學碩士論文,pp. 11-40
5.謝巧玲,(2007),「跨國併購之研究-以台彎企業併購歐美先進國家企業為例」, 國立中山大學大學碩士論文,pp.10-15
6.盧韋丞,(2008),「企業併購個案研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學碩士論文,pp. 4-9
7.廖雙利,(2008),「跨國併購與文化整合的研究」,國立政治大學碩士論文,pp. 8-19
8.陳子房,(2005.11),「併購起風雲-攪翻企業心」,貿協商情周報。
9.林仁菁,(2007.01),「跨國併購成敗學」,卓越國際媒體月刊。
10.吳慧玲,(2007),「全球化下影響企業跨國併購成敗的文化因素:為例以Yahoo!併購Kimo與BenQ併購Siemens」,銘傳大學碩士論文,pp. 79-118
11.馮震宇,(2006.11),「從明基看跨國併購的成與敗」,能力雜誌。
12.陳昆谷,(2007),「企業併購關鍵成功因素之個案研究-以個案公司併購為例」,國立台灣科技大學碩士論文, pp. 1-21
13.柯俊民,(2007),「企業併購後之設計知識移轉-以明基西門子為例」,國立台灣科技大學碩士論文, pp 23-29, pp. 54-57
14.楊文華,(2007),「外商企業併購台彎企業之個案探討」,國立清華大學碩士論文, pp. 71-75
15.汪蘭芬,(2008),「併購執行策略之個案研究-以台彎特易購為例」,國立台灣科技大學碩士論文, pp. 22-31
16.鄭凱元,(2007),「併購關鍵成功因素之研究:以明基西門子為例」,國立政治大學碩士論文, pp. 7-36
17.黃偉峯,(2002),「併購實務的第一本書」,商周出版,台北.
18.EMBA世界經理文摘,(2009.03),「管理集短篇:組織績效-搶當十分之三的成功併購案」
19.范琪茹,(2008),「企業併購成效失敗分析-以我國主機板產業個案C公司為例」,國立台灣科技大學碩士論文, pp. 20-25
20.Carey、Dennis C…等,(2002),「哈佛商業評論-合併與收購」,李田樹 譯,天下遠見出版,台北.
21.余尚武、江玉柏,(1998.08),「經濟情勢暨評論季刊-影響企業購併成敗之因素與策略探討」
22.張福成,(2000),「企業併購之個案研究」,國立台灣大學碩士論文, pp. 71-79
23.吳芳銘,(2006),「併購成長:面對中國高速經濟成長的策略」, 時英出版社,台北.
英文部分
1. Angwin, Duncan.,(2004),Speed in M&A Integration:The First 100 Days,European Management Journal, 22(4),pp.418
2.Birkinshaw,J.,H. Bresman & L. Hakanson.,(2000),Managing the post-acquisition integration process, Journal of Management Studies,vol.37, pp.395-423
3.Bradley,J.W & Korn,D.H.,(1979),Acquisition and Merger: A shifting route to corporate growth. Management Review,68(3), pp.46-51
4.Brouthers, K.D.,Hastenburg, P.V. & Joran, V.D.,(1998) ”If most mergers fail why are they so popular ?” Long Range Planning, vol.31, iss.3, pp.347-353
5. Carleton,J. Robert and Alan Stevens.,(2004), When Worlds Collide:The Need for Cultural Assessment and Integration, Performance Improvement,43(6),pp. 38-43
6. Haspeslagh, P.C. and Jemison, D.B.,(1991),Managing Acquisition: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal,New York:The Free Press
7. Hitt, Michael A., and Vincenzo Pisano., (2003), “The Cross-Border Merger and Acquisition Strategy: A Research Perspective,” Management Research, 1(2), pp.133
8.Pareto, V. & J.E. Huston.,(1995),Realizing value from acquisitions,The Electricity Journal, vol.20, pp.38-43
9.Perriello, Brad., (2007), “Successfully integrating an acquisition,” Industrial Distribution, 96(2), pp.34
10.Robb,D.,(2003),Winning their hearts, their minds, and their database ,Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, vol.21, pp. 12-17
11.Schraeder, Mike, and Dennis R. Self., (2003), “Enhancing the success of mergers and acquisitions: An organizational culture perspective,” Management Decision, 41(5/6), pp.511-522
12.Sumi,T. & M. Tsuruoka J.Eng.,(2002),Ramp new enterprise information systems in merger and acquisition environment a case study, Techno Manage.,vol.19, pp.93-104
13.Weber,R.A. & C.F Camerer.,(2003), Cultural conflict and merger failure:An experimental approach. Management Science 49(4),pp. 400-415
14.Zaheer, S., M. Schomaker & H. Genc.,(2003), “Identity versus culture in mergers of equals”, European Management Journal,vol.21,pp.185-191
網站部分
1.明基公司網站http://www.benq.com.tw
2.Siemens公司網站http://www.siemens.com
3.聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS
4.中華民國經濟部http://w2kdmz1.moea.gov.tw/
5.BAIN & COMPNANY網站http://www.bain.com/bainweb/home.asp
6.百度網搜索 http://www.baidu.com/
7.Google搜索 http://www.google.com.tw/