簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃柏叡
Bo-Ruei Huang
論文名稱: 應用AHP層級分析法 評估Facebook粉絲專頁經營績效之研究
A Study on Evaluating the Performance of Facebook Fan Pages Based on AHP
指導教授: 欒斌
Pin Luarn
口試委員: 陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
葉瑞徽
Ruey-HueiYeh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 57
中文關鍵詞: 臉書粉絲專頁評估指標AHP績效
外文關鍵詞: Facebook, Fan Page, Evaluation Indicator, AHP, Performance
相關次數: 點閱:305下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

近年來,由於社群網站的蓬勃發展,許多研究開始探討以社群網絡的經營方式和行銷策略的議題,而企業積極利用社群網站平台與消費者建立新管道,與顧客進行新的互動模式,對消費者說明其經營理念。但目前還未能有一套完整的企業經營社群績效評估指標概念模式,因此本研究目的為探討企業經營Facebook粉絲專頁,進而建構企業經營粉絲專頁的關鍵成功因素。
本研究以財團法人資訊工業策進會提供三大粉絲專頁產業別-美食餐飲、美妝時尚、服飾配件的數據資料為研究樣本並結合網路公關的相關文獻進行歸納及彙整,建構出企業經營粉絲專頁關鍵成功因素的三大構面與十四項指標。接著透過專家問卷調查,將蒐集的問卷資料採用AHP層級分析法處理,分析出各構面及指標的權重。
本研究結果顯示,企業經營粉絲專頁關鍵成功因素的三大構面,重要程度依序為:內部互動面、集客面、基本面;而前五項重要的指標依序為:每週粉絲成長率、每週發文的分享總數、粉絲專頁總粉絲數、每週發文的按讚總數、每週發文的回應總數,而在這五項中大都是屬於內部互動面的指標。上述的研究結果,可以做為企業經營Facebook粉絲專頁的關鍵參考指標及行銷決策參考。


In recent years, due to the development in online social network, many studies that focus on the operating effectiveness and consequences of online social networking have been done. Therefore, by utilizing the social networking websites such as Facebook etc., plenty of the corporations nowadays set up online fan pages to communicate and interact with their customers and also convey their business philosophy, promote their products and service. But frequently the relevant studies do not provide a complete and comprehensive model of enterprise operating evaluation standard and user intention. So, this research aimed to investigate and enhance the critical success factors of enterprise’s Facebook fan pages.
The research objects are managers of Facebook fan pages of Food / Beverages, Health / Beauty and Clothing industry adopting from the Institute for Information Industry. We summarize literatures about internet public relations and decompose the critical success factors of firm-managed fan pages, that comprise three dimensions and fifteen indicators. Then, we conclude to a questionnaire from expert visit and implement the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to analyze questionnaire data. Finally, derive the optimal dimension, indicators and indicator loading.
The results show the importance of three dimensions is ordered as follows: interaction, attraction and fundamental. Moreover, the importance of top five indicators is ordered as follows: shares per week, post content, comments per week, posts with picture per week, talking about this and most indicators above are belong to interaction dimension. These results can be as a reference to the critical indicators of managing Facebook fan pages and marketing decisions.

目 錄 中文摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌 謝 III 目 錄 I 圖表索引 II 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 3 1.3 研究目的 4 第2章 文獻探討 5 2.1 虛擬社群的經營 5 2.2 Facebook 粉絲專頁 7 2.3 網站績效評估 8 2.3.1 網站公關 9 2.3.2 Facebook粉絲專頁績效評估計算工具 12 第3章 研究方法 15 3.1 研究程序 15 3.2 層級架構 17 3.3 問卷設計與指標權重 20 3.4 粉絲專頁績效計算與驗證 22 第4章 研究結果 23 4.1 經營粉絲專頁表現之綜合指標分析 23 4.2 利用綜合指標進行粉絲專頁評分 25 第5章 結論與建議 29 5.1 研究結論 29 5.2 研究貢獻 30 5.2.1 管理意涵 30 5.2.2 實務意涵 31 5.3 研究限制與未來研究建議 31 參考文獻 32 附錄 「Facebook粉絲專頁經營績效評估」專家問卷 39

一、英文參考文獻
1. Ancu, M., & Cozma, R. (2009). Myspace politics: Uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 567-583.
2. Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317-319.
3. Carver, C.(1999)“Building a virtual community for a tele-learning environment,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, no. 3, 1999, pp. 114-188.
4. Chiagouris, L. &Wansley, B. (2000). Branding on the Internet.Marketing Management, 9,34-38.
5. David G. Taylor, J. E. (2011). Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks? How Gender and Age Shape Receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research , 258-275.
6. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. G., (1955), “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influence upon Individual Judgment”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol.51, pp.629-636.
7. Diga, M., & Kelleher, T. (2009). Social media use, perceptions of decision-making power, and public relations roles. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 440-442.
8. Esrock, S. L., &Leichty, G. B. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24, 3, 305-319.
9. Figallo, C.(1998)Hosting Web Communities: Building Relationships, Increasing Customer Loyalty, and Maintaining A Competitive Edge, John Wiley & Sons,.
10. Fishbein, M.. and Ajzen. I. (1975), “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Addison Wesley.
11. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737.
12. Ghose, S., & Dou, W. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the on the appeal of Internet presents sites. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(2), 29-34.
13. Griffith, D. A. (1998). An emerging model of web site design for marketing.Communications of the ACM, 41, 44-51.
14. Hagel, J. &Armstong, A. G. (1997). Net gains: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
15. Hagel, J. and Armstrong, A. G.(1996)“The Real Value of On-line Communities,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 74, no. 3, 1996, pp. 134-141.
16. Hagel, J. and Armstrong, A. G.(1997) Net gains: Expanding markets through virtual communities, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
17. Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Jiinpo, W. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139-154.
18. Henning-Thurau, F. T., K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, and D. D. Gremler.(2004), “Electronic Word- of-Mouth Via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52
19. Jin, X.-L., Lee, M.K.O., & Cheung, C.M.K.(2009). How to keep members using the information in a compute rsupported social network. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (5), 1172-1181.
20. Kang, Y. S., & Lee, H. (2010). Understanding the role of an IT artifact in online service continuance: An extended perspective of user satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 353-364.
21. Kaplan A.M. and Haenlein. M. (2010), “Users of the World Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media,” Business Horizons, 53, pp. 59-68.
22. Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172-188.
23. Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395-414.
24. Kelman, H.C. (1961), “Processes of Opinion Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 25,winter, pp. 57-78.
25. Kent, M. L. (2008). Critical analysis of blogging in public relations. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 32-40.
26. Kent, M. L., Taylor, M. & White, W. J. (2002). The relationship between web site designand organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Paper presented at the PublicRelations Division of International Communication Association annual conferencein Seoul, Korea, July 15-19, 2002.
27. Kent,. M.L., &Taylor, M.(1998).Builiding Dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web.Public Relations Review
28. Kitchin, R. (1998). Cyberspace. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley., Keller (2002), “Strategic Brand Management, Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity”, 3rd edition,Pearson Education.
29. Komito, L.(1998). “The net as a foraging society: Flexible communities,” The Information Society, Vol. 14, pp. 97-106.
30. Komito, L.(1998)“The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities,” The Information Society, vol. 14, 1998, pp. 97-106.
31. Kuan-Yu Lin & His-Peng Lu (2001), Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating, Computer in Human Behavior, 27, 1152-1161.
32. Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010), “An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use,” Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 254-263.
33. Lee, J. M. (2000). Assessing web site effectiveness. Direct Marketing, 63, 30-33.
34. Lin, C.P., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2008), Elucidating individual intention to use interactive information technologies: the role of network externalities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(1), 85-108.
35. Lin, H. F.(2006) “Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 995 , pp. 540-547.
36. Lisette de Vries and Sonja Gensler and Peter S. H. Leeflang (2012), “Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 83-91.
37. Lu, H. P., & Su, Y. J. P. (2009). Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Research, 19(4), 442-458.
38. McAlexander, James H., John W. Schouten, and Harold F. Koenig (2002). “Building Brand Community,” Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-54
39. Muniz Jr., Albert M. and Thomas C. O’Guinn (2001), “Brand Community,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.
40. Olorunniwo, F., Hsu, M. K., & Udo, G. J. (2006). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in the service factory. The Journal of Services Marketing, 20(1), 59-72.
41. Preece, J. (2001) . Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behavior &; Information Technology, 20(5) , 347-356.
42. Rafaeli, S. (1990). Interactivity with media: Para-social interaction and real interaction, in B. D. Ruben and L. A. Liverouw Pingree(eds.), Mediation information and communication: Information and behavior, 13, 125-181. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publisher.
43. Rybalko, S., &; Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 336-341.
44. SAS HBR (2010), “The New Conversation: Taking Social Media from Talk to Action,” Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, 1-24.
45. Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using social network sites: the effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context .Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 74-83.
46. Strand, John L. (2011). Facebook: Trademarks, Fan Pages, and Community Pages.Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 23(1), 10-13.
47. Sweetser,K.,&Lariscy,R.W.(2008)Candidates make good friends: An analysis of candidates’uses of Facebook.,International Journal of Strategic Communciation,2(3),175-198.
48. Sweetser,K.,&Metzger,E.(2007).Communicating during crisis: Use of blogs as a relationship management tool.,Public Relations Review,33(3).340-342.
49. Tauber, Edward M. (1972), “Why do people shop?”, Journal of Marketing, 36, 46-59
50. Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27(3), 263.
51. Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. A. (2005). Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: a social perspective. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 52(1), 85-101.
52. Traynor,J.,Poitevint,M.,Bruni,B.,Stiles,H.,Raines,K.,Clay,K.D.,et al.(2008).,On the ballot and in the loop: The dialogic capacity of campaign blogs in the 2008 election.,Paper presented at the AEJMC annual conference,August2008, Chiacgo.
53. Vorvoreanu, M. (2009). Perceptions of corporations on Facebook: An analysis of Facebook social norms. Journal of New Communications Research, 4(1), 67-86.
54. Waite, K. & Harrison, T. (2002). Consumer expectations of online information providedby bank website. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6, 309-322.
55. Waltz, M. (1997). Key to Web-site design: Remembering the user, Seybold SF Publishing 97 Show Daily, p.18.
56. White, C, & Raman, N. (1999). The World Wide Web as a public relations medium: The use of research, planning, and evaluation in web site development. Public Relations Review, 25(4), 405-419.
57. Wright,D.K.,Hinson,M.D.(2010)An analysis of new communications media use in public relations: Results of a five-year trend study.,Public Relations Journal,4(2).
58. Wu. J. J., and Tsang, A. S. L.(2008) "Factor affecting members trust belief and behavior intention in virtual communities," Behavior & Information Technology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 155-125.
59. Xifra, J., & Huertas, A. (2008). Blogging PR: An exploratory analysis of public relations weblogs. Public Relations Review, 34(3), 269-275.
60. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through Web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 30(4), 362-375.
61. Zhang, J. (2010). To play or not to play: An exploratory content analysis of branded entertainment in Facebook. American Journal of Business, 25(1), 53.
二、中文參考文獻
1. 江俊均(2012)。探討Facebook 粉絲專頁使用意圖對直銷產品購買意願之影響:以美國Forever Living Products 公司為例,國立中央大學企業管理研究所
2. 吳苑如(2001)。《網路互動性與企業公關管理之研究》。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
3. 孫傳雄(2009)。FACEBOOK 行銷大補帖,孫傳雄的中時部落格
4. 莊宜軒(2012)。企業Facebook粉絲專頁之公關策略分析,國立政治大學傳播學院廣告學系碩士論文
5. 曾英玲(2010)。網路公關工具效益評估指標建構之研究,輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文
6. 楊雲竹(2010)。企業經營Facebook粉絲專頁成功關鍵因素之探討,中國文化大學商學院資訊管理研究所
7. 資策會創新應用服務研究所,social insight
8. 鄭阿雪(2002)。《網路公共關係運作機制之研究》。私立長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2020/01/23 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE