簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳岱倫
Dai-Luen Wu
論文名稱: eData資料分析對審計風險影響之個案研究
A Case Study of eData Analysis on Audit Risk
指導教授: 張順教
Shun-Chiao Chang
口試委員: 張光第
Guangdi Chang
吳克振
Couchen Wu
張瑞娟
Jui-Chuan Chang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 78
中文關鍵詞: D & AeData 資料分析審計風險重大不實表達風險
外文關鍵詞: D & A, eData data analysis, Audit risk, Material misstatement risk
相關次數: 點閱:143下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要之目的在於探討會計師事務所查核團隊在審計過程中,如何運用資料分析方法及工具,辨識個案公司提供資料之完整及正確性,透過全母體資料分析測試方法,篩選出異常資料,針對異常資料執行證實性測試程序,以期降低審計風險,提升審計品質。本研究之個案公司案件查核團隊擬定之查核策略著重在各階段查核工作,以高度使用數據分析技術搭配eData資料分析項目為主,並評估重大科目相關之交易流程資訊化程度與可執行eData資料分析項目之可行性,分別在審計案件之規劃、內部控制、證實測試及報告完成等各階段擬定查核工作內容與資源分配計畫,全母體資料測試之查核方法對應於傳統抽樣查核結果衡量對於審計風險之影響。
    本研究個案公司透過查核項目採用數據分析採用全母體測試程序,篩選出來差異項目產生的差異金額,比起傳統查核採用人工抽樣方式發現之差異金額換算成整個母體之差異金額具有較高信賴度,有效降低審計風險。最後,本研究亦建議對於資訊化程度高之企業應在擬定查核策略前,先了解受查者及其環境,召開案件查核啟動會議,說明與溝通數據分析與傳統人工查核之差別及效益,清楚定義提供資料之欄位及其定義,將有助於案件查核團隊執行數據分析程序,達到提升查核效率,有效降低審計風險之目標。
    本研究實證結果發現,針對個案公司實施eData資料分析程序對於降低審計風險有正面影響。


    The primary objective of our research is to discuss how data analytical methodology and technique are being applied in audit engagements among accounting firms, in order to verify the completeness and accuracy of information provided by the case company. In expectation of lowering audit risk and improving audit quality, audit procedures are conducted by analyzing population, extracting abnormal transaction data, and performing further substantive procedures. In our case, audit programs are designed to adopt data analytic techniques and eData data analytical procedures. With the assessment of information of the process of transactions and the feasibility of performing eData analytical procedures, we draw up the audit scope and resource distribution plan throughout stages of planning, internal control, substantive testing, and reporting. Additionally, we demonstrate the comparison of audit methodologies between testing the population and the traditional way of sampling, and further evaluate the influence of both on audit risk.
    In our case, it is more reliable and more applicable to detect the abnormal items and related amounts and to lower audit risk when adopting data analytical audit procedures with the test of population than performing traditional sampling. Last but not the least, we suggest that for those highly informatized companies, in order to better audit efficiency and lower audit risk, it is critical to understand the audit client and its business environment, to hold the audit kick off meeting, to elaborate and communicate the different benefits between auditing with data analytics technique and conventional audit, and to clearly define fields in transaction data.
    In our empirical result, we discover that applying eData analytical procedure is positively related to lowering audit risk.

    摘 要 i Abstract ii 誌 謝 iii 目 錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍與限制 2 第四節 研究流程與論文架構 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 審計及審計風險 6 第二節 數據分析技術 13 第三節 大數據與審計查核程序 14 第三章 數據分析查核技術 17 第一節 KPMG數據分析查核技術之應用 17 第二節 D & A查核指引 17 第三節 eData資料分析程序之說明 26 第四章 個案研究 30 第一節 個案公司背景 30 第二節 個案公司審計查核策略 30 第三節 個案公司eData資料分析程序 34 第五章 結論 60 第一節 研究結論 60 第二節 研究建議 61 參考文獻 63

    一、 中文部分
    1、 審計準則公報及審計實務指引合訂本(2017)。財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。
    2、 證券暨期貨月刊 第三十四卷 第九期 專題三 審計準則公報第五十八號「查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通」之內容、影響與建議。
    二、 英文部分
    1、 Alles, M. G. 2015. Drivers of the use and facilitators and obstacles of the evolution of Big Data by the audit profession. Accounting Horizons , 29,(2), 439-449.
    2、 Alles, M. G., A. Kogan, and M.A. Vasarhelyi. 2008. Audit Automation for Implementing Continuous Auditing: Principles and Problems. Working paper, Rutgers University. Newark, N.J. USA.
    3、 American Institute of Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA). 2015. Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future, New York, NY
    4、 Appelbaum, D. 2016. Securing Big Data Provenance for Auditors: The Big Data Provenance Black Box as Reliable Evidence. Working paper, Rutgers Business Scool, Newark N.J.
    5、 Appelbaum,D., D.S.Showalter, T. Sun, and M.A. Vasarhelyi. 2015. “Analytics Knowledge Required of a Modern CPA in this Real-Time Economy: A Normative Position”. Presented at the Accounting Information Systems Educator Conference, June 25-28, 2015. Colorado Springs。
    6、 Brown-Liburd, H., and M.A. Vasarhelyi. 2015. Big Data and Audit Analytics. Journal of Emerging technologies in Accounting, Forthcoming.
    7、 Bumgarner,N. and M.A Vasarhelyi. 2015. Auditing—A New View. Audit Analytics, p.3.
    8、 Byrnes, P. 2014. Developing Automated Applications for Clustering and Outlier Detection: Data Mining Implications for Auditing Practice, PhD Dissertation, Rutgers Business School, Continuous Audit and reporting Lab, Newark, NJ, 2014
    9、 Christensen, C. 2013. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
    10、 Church, B. K., J.J.McMillan and A. Schneider. 2001. Factors affecting internal auditors' consideration of fraudulent financial reporting during analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20 (1) , 65-80
    11、 Cukier,K., and V. Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. Rise of Big Data: How it's Changing the Way We Think about the World, The. Foreign Affairs, 92, p.28
    12、 Davenport, T. H., and J. Kim. 2013. Keeping Up with the Quants. Harvard Business Review Press, USA.
    13、 Delen,D., and H. Demirkan. 2013. Data, information and analytics as services. Decision Support Systems, 55 (1) , 359-363
    14、 Dohrer, R., M.A. Vasarhelyi, and P.McCollough. 2015. Audit Data Analytics. Presentation delivered to the IAASB, September 23.
    15、 Dzuranin, A. C., and I. Malaescu. 2016. The Current State and Future Direction of IT Audit: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 30, (1) , Spring 2016, 7-20.
    16、 Evans, J. R., and C. H. Lindner. 2012. Business Analytics: The Next Frontier for Decision Sciences. Decision Line, 43, (2), 4-6.
    17、 Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Fees in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies?
    18、 Geerts, G. L., L. E. Graham, E. G. Mauldin, W. E. McCarthy, and V. J. Richardson. 2013. Integrating information technology into accounting and practice. Accounting Horizons. 27 , (4) , 815-840.
    19、 KPMG Taiwan. 2014. eData 程序範例─銷售與應收帳款查核
    20、 Krahel J.P. and W.R. Titera. 2015. Consequences of Big Data and Formalization on Accounting and Auditing Standards. Accounting Horizons, 29, (2) , 409-422.
    21、 Kuenkaikaew, S., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2013). The Predictive Audit Framework. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 13, 37-71.
    22、 Kuhn, J. R., and S. G. Sutton. 2010. Continuous Auditing in ERP System Environments: The Current State and Future Directions. Journal of Information Systems, 24, (1) , 91-112.
    23、 Li,H., J.Dai, T.Gershberg, and M.A.Vasarhelyi. 2015. Understanding Usage and Value of Audit Analytics in the Internal Audit: An Organizational Approach. Working paper, Continuous Auditing and Reporting Laboratory, 2013.
    24、 Liddy, J. P. 2015. The Future of Audit. Available at: www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/08/04/thefuture-of-audit/
    25、 Liu, Q .2014. The application of exploratory Data Analysis in Auditing. PhD Dissertation, Rutgers Business School, Continuous Audit and reporting Lab, Newark, NJ, 2014
    26、 Schneider, G., J. Dai, D.Janvrin, K.Ajayi, and R.L. Raschke. 2015. Infer, Predict, and Assure: Accounting Opportunities in Data Analytics. Accounting Horizons , 29, (3) , 719-742.
    27、 Srivastava, R. P., and G. Shafer. 1992. Belief-Function Formulas for Audit Risk. The Accounting Review, April: 249-283.
    28、 Stewart, T. 2015. Data analytics for financial-statement Audits, Chapter 5 in AICPA, Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future, American Institute of Certified Public accountants. New York, N.Y.
    29、 TDWI BesT PracTIces report BIG DATA ANALYTICS
    30、 Tschakert, N., J. Kokina, S.Kozlowski, and Vasarhelyi, M.A. 2016. CPAs and Data Analytics. The Journal of Accountancy, forthcoming.
    31、 Vasarhelyi, M. A. and S. Romero. 2014. Technology in audit engagements: a case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29,(4) , 350-365
    32、 Vasarhelyi, M.A. 2013. Formalization of Standards, Automation, Robots, and IT Governance. Journal of Information Systems, 27, (1) , 1-11.
    33、 Vasarhelyi, M.A. 2015. The new scenario of business processes and applications on the digital world. Working Paper, CarLab.
    34、 Vasarhelyi, M.A., A. Kogan, and B.M. Tuttle. 2015. Big data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 29, (2) , 381-396.
    35、 Wang, T., and R. Cuthbertson. 2015. Eight Issues on audit data analytics we would like researched. Journal of Information Systems 29, (1), 155-162.
    36、 Warren Jr, J.D., Moffitt, K.C. and Byrnes, P., 2015. How Big Data will change accounting. Accounting Horizons, 29, (2) ,397-407.
    37、 Yue, D., X.Wu, Y.Wang, Y.Li, and C.H.Chu. 2007. A review of data mining-based financial fraud detection research. In Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom. International Conference on (pp. 5519-5522) . IEEE
    38、 Zhang, J., X.Yang, and D.Appelbaum. 2015. Toward Effective Big Data Analysis in Continuous Auditing. Accounting Horizons 29, (2), 469-476.
    39、 Zhang, L., A.R.Pawlicki, D.McQuilken, and W.R.Titera. 2012. The AICPA assurance services executive committee emerging assurance technologies task force: The audit data standards (ADS) initiative. Journal of Information Systems, 26,(1), 199-205.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/06/24 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE