在知識經濟的時代下，個人與組織若想要在社會上立足，就必須積極的獲取知識以增加自身的競爭優勢，而獲取知識最普遍的方法就是學習。知識在社會建構主義中被認為是一個群體當中的共識，而知識的學習則是人與人彼此在群體中互相影響，最後逐漸建構而成的。

　　本研究嘗試以這一種社會建構的觀點作為基礎，發展一套以參與成員交流彼此想法來互相建構知識，最後逐漸協商出共識的協作學習方法，在協作的過程中，使用概念圖來協助學習者進行想法的表達與呈現，使用匿名的方式來創造無同儕壓力干擾的環境，並且透過協作前與協作後的概念圖結構比較來協助參與成員瞭解協作的收穫。本研究期望透過這套方法能協助個人學習知識，並協助組織團體凝聚建構出對議題的共識。

　　在經過本研究的實驗後，結果顯示這套方法能夠協助學習者提升彼此的知識，並凝聚出團體內的共識，且使用概念圖來表達與呈現想法的方式受到參與成員們的認同，整體來說參與成員對本研究提出的方法表示滿意，但在以匿名方式減少同儕壓力影響的作法上，大多成員仍舊在協作中感覺到同儕壓力的存在，因此在後續的研究中，仍需對這部分進行改善。

In the age of knowledge-based economy,individual and organization must actively acquire knowledge to create competitive advantage,and the most common method of acquiring knowledge is to learn.The knowledge is defined as consensus of group by social constructivism, and the learn is defined as constructed through the social interactions of group.

The Objective of this study is use social constructivism as a basis for the development of a collaborative learning approach, this collaborative learning use concept map to help learners express and present ideas, use anonymous discussion to reduce peer pressure, and through compare the knowledge structure of before studying and after studying to assist participating members know outcome of studying.

This study is hoped that through this method can help individuals learn and help organize groups create a consensus on the issue.

After experiments in this study, the results show that this method can help learners to improve their knowledge and gather a consensus within the group. And use concept map to express and present ideas is agree with participating members. Overall, participating members expressed satisfaction with the method of this study design. But in the way of use anonymous discussion to reduce peer pressure, mostly members still can feel the presence of peer pressure. So this method still need to improve in follow-up study.

中文參考資料：
1.高宜敏(2001)。合作競爭式的網路分享建構學習環境。國立交通大學資訊科學系碩士論文。
2.邱上真(1989)。知識結構的評量：概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。特殊教育學報，4，215-254頁。
3.余民寧，陳嘉成和潘雅芳(1996)。概念構圖法在測驗教學上的應用。測驗年刊，43輯，195-221頁。
4.Robert J. Sternberg著，李玉琇、蔣文祁譯，認知心理學，第1∼36頁，新加坡商聖智學習亞洲私人有限公司台灣分公司，西元2010年。
5.張淇瑞(2005)。康德啟蒙思想及其全人教育意義。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文。
6.楊慧鉑(2001)。建構論地理環境資源較學研究。國立台灣大學 (Doctoral dissertation, 博士論文)。
7.舒煒光、邱仁宗(1990)。當代西方科學哲學述評，台北：水牛。
8.劉宏文(1996)。建構主義的認識論觀點及其在科學教育上的意義。科學教育月刊，193；8-26。
9.郭重吉、江武雄、王夕堯(2000)。從理論到實務談建構主義。89年度台中縣建構教學觀摩及台中市小班教學研習會。
10.郭實渝(2008)。教學建構主義的哲學基礎。臺東大學教育學報, 19(2), 119-142。
11.張靜嚳(1995)。何謂建構主義。國立彰化師範大學理學院科學教育研究所科學教育中心，建構與教學期刊第三期。
12.張春興(2000)。現代心理學:現代人研究自身問題的科學。台北:東華書局
13.康雅菁(2009)。維基百科社群知識建構歷程之研究─ 社會建構主義觀點。 臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系學位論文, 1-236.
14.簡淑真(1998)。建構論及其在幼兒教育上的應用。課程與教學期刊。
15.許育彰(2012)。三階段學習環在數學領域之教學應用－以圓周率為例。科學教育期刊346期,28-33。
16.王文科(1982)。認知發展理論與教育。台北：五南圖書出版社。
17.張世中(1997)。建構主義與科學教學。科學教育,202,16-24。
18.林妙真(2005)。由小組討論爭議性科技議題探究國小高年級學生之知識建構—以台灣能源的開發與利用為例。
19.段曉林(1996)。我的教學符合建構主義嗎？。建構與教學,5,1。
20.謝建成，吳佳典(2010)。以協同合作模式建構研究者知識之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,48(2),203-246.
21.張清濱(1999)。怎樣實施協同教學？。師友,387,43-47。
22.林薏昕(2013)。同儕壓力與知覺風險對於消費者滿意度之影響分析-以科技接受模式為中介變項。
23.朱玉珍(1996)。同儕團體的影響過程及同儕壓力之處理。台灣教育，43-45。
24.林志隆(2003)。概念構圖教學策略與不同性別對國小五年級學童在社會科學習成就與學後保留之探究。
25.陳裕芳(2000)。國民小學教師認知教學策略運用之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
26.張春興(1996)。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
27.宋德忠、陳淑芬和張國恩(1998)。電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量上的應用。測驗年刊，45輯2期，37-56。
28.吳惠婷(2009)。小組合作概念構圖融入國小一年級生活課程之行動研究。
29.林少軍(2008)。以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型-一個資源與概念合作聯結工具。
30.施彥如(2012)。以概念圖為基礎之無所不在協圖學習心智工具。
31.陳珮華(2008)。線上德爾菲法於技術前瞻之研究。
32.張宜慶(1998)。電腦網路德菲研究系統之建構及其可行性研究。
33.徐美惠(1996)。中等學校實習教師評鑑量表之發展研究。
34.鄭炳強(2007)。軟體工程-從實務出發。智勝文化。
35.許伯曲(2011)。以專家知識建構玻璃家具之研究創作－以玻璃桌設計為例。
36.葉千綺(2008)。以客為尊？探討航空公司經營導向之研究。
37.宋德忠,林世華,陳淑芬,張國恩(1998)。知識結構的測量：徑路搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。
38.吳柏翰(2007)。以德懷術為基礎之多專家數位訓練課程輔助設計系統。
39.戴智啟(2007)。行政機關國會聯絡人工作績效評估指標建構之研究。
40.董郁芬(2008)。協作的概念構圖應用於國小學童寫作歷程之研究。
41.林東清(2003)。知識管理。智勝文化出版。
42.林生傳(1998)。建構主義的教學評析。課程與教學季刊，1(3)，1-14。
43.鄭明長(1999)。教學創新－從改變教室言談型態做起。新世紀中小學課程改革與創新教學學術研討會，263。
44.江淑卿(2001)。經驗式與統計式概念構圖對兒童的知識結構與理解能力之影響。
45.洪麗卿(2002)。社會科概念構圖教學策略之建構。
46.陳俊智、郭小菁(2001)。應用概念構圖法於造形課程教學之研究。
47.張智鈞(2011)。以大型多點觸控螢幕進行數位遊戲式協同學習活動之研究。
48.吳承翰(2009)。合作學習教學法應用於國中學生科技概念學習之成效分析。
49.林俊光(1997)。建構結合層級分析法及德菲法之群體決策支援環境。
50.蔡麗萍、吳麗婷、陳明聰(2004)。從概念構圖研究探討其在教學上之應用。
51.黃祈翰(2013)。迴圈式概念圖運用在高中公民與社會科經濟部份對學生的學習影響分析。
52.何治鈴(2001)。概念構圖與合作學習應用於綜合高中會計科目教學成效之研究。

英文參考資料：
1. Panitz, T. (1999). “Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning.”
2.Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993a). “The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 503-534.
3.Steiner,I,D.(1972). “Group process and productivity.” New York: Academic Press.
4. Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994). “Structural knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 303-311.
5. Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). “Learning how to learn.” Cambridge University Press.
6.Collins,A.M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975).”A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.” Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
7.Anderson, J.R.(1983). “The architecture of cognition.” Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
8. Anderson, J.R.(1995). ”Cognitive psychology and it’s implication.” New York: Freeman and company.
9. Von Glasersfeld,E.(1993). “Questions and answers about radical constructivism.” In K. Tobin (Ed.). The Practice of constructivism in science education,23-38.
10.Von Glasersfeld,E.(1995). “A constructivist approach to teaching.” In Leslie P. Steffe & Jerry Gale (Eds), Constructivism in education, 3-16. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
11.Vygotsky,L.S.(1978). “Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes.” Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
12.Wood,D.J. & Middleton,D.J. (1975). “A Study of assisted problem solving.” British Journal of Psychology,66,181-191.
13.Bruner,J.S. (1985). “Models of the learners.” Educational Researcher,14(6),5-8.
14.Lawson, A. E. (1988). “A better way to teach biology.” The American Biology Teacher, 50(5), 266-278.
15.Lawson, A., Abraham, M. & Renner, J.(1989). “A Theory of Instruction: Using the Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills.” Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
16.Wheatley,H.G.(1991). “Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning.” Science Education 75(1),9-21.
17.Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). “The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science.” Science Education,76,531-557.
18.Knorr-Cetina,K.D.(1981).”The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science.” Oxford: Pergamon Press.
19.Brady,I. & Kumar,A.(2000).”Some Thoughts on Sharing Science.” Science Education,84(4),507-523.
20.Solomon,J.(1989).”The social construction of school science.” In R.Millar(Ed.), Doing science:Images of science in science education. London:Falmer Press.
21.Gallas,K.(1995).”Talking their way into science.” New York: Teachers College Press.
22.Sotiriou,P.E.(1998).”CT & Popular culture.” Wadsworth Publishing company. New York.
23.Allchin,D.(1999).”Values in Science: An Educational Perspective.” Science & Education,8,1-12.
24.Dana,T.M. & Davis,N.T.(1993). “On Considering Constructivism for Improving Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning.” In K. Tobin(Ed.). The Practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 325-333). New Jersey:Hillsdale.
25.Rogoff,B.(1990).”Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.” New York: Oxford University Press.
26.Hong,H.Y.,Scardamalia,M., & Zhang,J. (2007). “Knowledge Society Network:Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge.” Paper presented at the annual conference of AERA, Chicago.
27.Hoadley,C.M., & Pea,R.D.(2002). “Finding the ties that bind:tools in support of a knowledge-building community.” In K.A. Renninger & W.Shumar(Eds.), Building virtual communities:learning and change in cyberspace,321-354. NY:Cambridge University Press.
28.Scardamalia,M.,& Bereiter(2006). “Knowledge building:Theory,pedagogy, and technology.” In Sawyer(Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences,97-118.
29.Stahl,G., Koschmann,T., & Suthers,D.(2006). ”Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.” In Sawyer(Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences,409-425.
30.De Lisi.R., & Goldbeck,S.L.(1999). “Implication of Piagetian theory for peer learning.” In A.M. O’Donnell, & A. King(Eds.), Cognitive perspectiveson peer learning,3-37,Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.
31.Blaye, A.(1991). “Collaboration as a facilitator of planning and problem solving on a computer-based task.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology,9,471-483.
32. Boxtel,C.van.,van der Linden,J.,Roelofs,E., & Erkens,G.(2002). “Collaborative concept mapping: Provoking and supporting meaningful discourse.” Theory into Practice,41(1),40-46.
33.Madrazo,L., & Jordi, A.(2002). “Collaborative concept mapping in a web-based learning environment: A pedagogic experience in architectural education.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,11(4),345-362.
34.Roth,W.M.(1994). ”Students’ views of collaborative concept mapping:An emancipatory research project.” Science Education,78(1),1-34.
35.Stoyanova,N., & Kommers,P.(2002). “Concept mapping as medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research,13(1-2),111-133.
36.Berk,L.E.(1997). “Child Development.” Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
37.Ausubel,D.P.(1968).”Educational psychology:A cognitive view.” New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winton.
38.Chang.K.E.,Sung,Y.T., Chang,R.B., & Lin, S. C.(2005). “A new assessment for computer-based concept mapping.” Educational Technology & Society,8(3),138-148.
39.Dalkey,N.C.(1967).”Delphi.” Santa Monica,The RAND Corporation.
40.Simpson,R.D. & Smith,K.S. (1993).”Validating Teaching Competencies for Graduate Teaching Assistants: A National Study Using Delphi Method.” Innovative Higher Education,Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 133-146.
41.Gupta,U.G. & Clarke,R.E.(1996). "Theory and application of the Delphi Technique:A bibliography(1975-1994)." Technological Forecasting and Social Change,53,185-211.
42.Malone,J. & Dekker,J.(1984). “The Concept Map as an Aid to Instruction in Science and Mathematics.” School Science and Mathematics,84,220-231.
43.Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). “Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity.” In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition,331-348.
44.Okebukola,P.A.(1992). “Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in genetics and ecology: an examination of the potency of the concept-mapping technique.” Jurnal of Research in Science Teaching,27(5),493-504.
45.Novak,J.D., & Canas, A.J. (2006). “The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool.” Information Visualization,5,175-184.
46.Roschelle,J.(1992). “Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change.” The journal of the learning sciences, 2(3), 235-276.
47.Gilly, M.(1989). “The psychosocial mechanisms of cognitive constructions, experimental research and teaching perspectives.” International Jourrnal of Educational Research, 13(6),607-621.
48.Pea, R.D. (1993). “Learning scientific concepts through material and social activites: conversational analysis meets conceptual change.” Educational psychologist, 28(3), 265-277.
49.Roschelle, J. & Teasley S.D.(1995). “The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving.” In C.E. O’Malley(Ed), Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning, (pp. 69-197), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
50.Loye, D.(1978). “The Knowledge Future: a Pasychology of Forecasting and Prophecy.” NY: John Wiley and Sons.
51.Murry, J.W. and Hammons,J.O.(1995). “Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research.” The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 18, Issue 4, 423-436.
52.McKenna H.P. “The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing.” Journal of Advances Nursing, vol. 19,pp.1221-1225, 1994.
53.Delbecq, A. L. , Van de Ven, A.H. , Gustafson,D.H. (1975). “Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes.” Scott Foresman and Company, U.S.
54.Bolongaro, Gianni.(1994). “Dephi technique can work for new product development.” Marketing News,Vol.28 , Issue.12 , 32-34.
55.Pankratius, W.J. (1990). “Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 315-333.
56.Lambiotte,J.B. , Dansereau,D.F. , Cross,D.R. , Reynolds,S.B.(1989). “Mulitirelational sematic maps.” Educational Psychology Review,1,331-367.
57.Wiegmann,D.A. , Danrsereau,D.F. , McCagg,E.C. , Reway,K.L. , Pitre,U. (1992). “Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing.” Contemporary Educational Psychology,17,136-155.
58.Skaggs,L.P.(1988). “The effects of knowledge maps and pictures on the acquisition of scientific information.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth,TX.
59.Stuart,H.A.(1985). “Should concept maps be scored numerically?.” The European Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 73-81.