由於在工程設計上常常需要透過多領域之工程師將設計圖面做整合，除了溝通與開會協調外，其中還包括設計資料之傳遞，往往這些傳遞的過程中所花費之時間比設計圖面還要來的長。所以如何提升設計流程之管理績效，將有助於設計團隊間減少不必要之作業時程。
本研究將著重於設計活動間訊息傳遞之排程最佳化與改善，並建立與驗證排程系統分析與其模組。透過文獻回顧，瞭解設計結構矩陣之理論與邏輯，並結合矩陣運算之分解觀念與傳統撕裂演算法，解決不同耦合區塊所造成之資訊複雜情形。透過實際案例分析，整合出解決耦合區塊群組之方法，並建立其通用性與準則。

Engineers of the multi-domain needs to design frequently the plan to do the conformity in engineering design. Besides communicates with holds a meeting coordinated, also includes transmission of the design information. Often in these transmission's process time of the expenditure long which compared to the design plan. Then how to promote management of achievements the design process, it will be helpful in designs between the team to reduce work of time.
This study emphatically in design activity sequencing of regulation optimization and improvement. Then establishes sequencing system analysis and confirmation its model. By literature review, understanding design structure matrix of theory and logic, and matrix operation of decomposition associated tradition tear of calculating method to solve the different coupling sub-area to create the information complex situation. By actual case analysis, conformity method of the solution coupling sub-area group and establishes its versatility and the criterion.

1. Tyson R. Browning, “Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new direction,” IEEE transactions on engineering management, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 292-306, (2001).
2. Thomas A. Roemer and Steven Eppinger, Tools For Innovation: The Design Structure Matrix, Summer 02 15-761, (2002).
3. Thomas A. Roemer, “Managing Product Development Processcs,” The Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
4. Ali Yassine, and Dan Braha , “Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method ,” Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development (CTPID) , Center for Innovation in Product Development (CIPD), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
5. Ali A. Yassine, “An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method,” Quaderni di Management (Italian Management Review), No.9,( 2004).
6. Paul Waskett, John Newton and Andrew Steele, “Implementing DSM in a large fragmented engineering project team,” the 7th International Dependency Structure Matrix (DSM) Conference October 4 - 6, (2005), Seattle, Washington, USA.
7. Baldwin, A.N., Austin, S.A.A. Shen, L.Y., Poon, C.S. & Wong I. “DSM Application In Repetitive High-rise Building Construction,” the 7th International DSM Conference, (2005).
8. Travis P. Dunn and Joseph M. Sussman, “Using Design Structure Matrices to Improve Decentralized Urban Transportation Systems ,” (2005).
9. Tyson R. Browning , “Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) for Process Integration ” , (2000).
10. Chen, S.J., “Project Task Coordination and Team Organization in Concurrent Engineering,” doc-toral thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo,( 1999).
11. Rolstadas, A., “Planning and control of concurrent engineering projects,” The International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 38, (1995).
12. Steven D. Eppinger, “Innovation at the Speed Of Information,” HBR, (2001).
13. Donald V. Steward, “Partitioning and Tearing Systems of Equations,” Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Series B, Numerical Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 345-365 , (1965) .
14. John N. Warfield, “Binary Matrices in System Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and cybernetics, Vol.smc-3, No.5, September, (1973).
15. H. Weinblatt, “A new search algorithm for finding the simple cycles of finite directed graphs”, Journal of ACM, 19, pp.43-56, (1972).
16. Donald V. Steward, Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design, Petrocelli Books, New York, (1981).
17. A. Kusiak, and J. Wang, “Efficient organizing of design activities”, International Journal of Production Research, 31, pp.753-769, (1993).
18. Thomas U. Pimmler and Steven D. Eppinger, “Integration analysis of product decompositions”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1994).
19. Nader Sabbaghian and Steven Eppinger, “Product development process capture and display using Web-Based technologies”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1998).
20. Tyson R. Browning, “Sources of Schedule Risk in Complex System Development”, May 13, (1999).
21. 郭瑞乾，「反覆時程模式分析與應用」，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，(2007)。
22. 郭明祥，「高科技廠房統包工程之執行面缺失與設計作業間關聯性之探討」，國立交通大學土木工程系所碩士論文，(2005)。
23. 王思琳，「從資訊流建立規劃設計作業程序最佳化之模式」，國立成功大學土木工程系碩士論文，(2005)。
24. 黃鈵淞，「建築工程系統整合評估架構之研究」，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，(2006)。
25. 吳哲瑋，「多領域價值工程研析架構之探討 – 以建築工程整合為例」，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，(2006)。
26. 郭奉宜，「統包工程之進度規劃模式」，國立交通大學土木工程學系碩士論文，(2005)。
27. 陳俊伊，「同步工程應用於新產品開發專案工作協調之研究」，國立台北科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文，(2002)。
28. 黃意策，「應用資料採礦技術於貝氏網路架構之研究─線性代數與圖論之結合」，私立東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文，(2002)。
29. 林祥良，「矩陣的高度特徵數及階層特徵數之關係」，私立淡江大學數學研究所碩士論文，(1991)。
30. 鄭明淵，「建築設計施工電腦圖檔管理之研究」，國立台灣科技大學研究計劃，(2000)。
31. 劉慶男、葉世文，「建築管理請照網路作業系統之研究」，內政部建築研究所研究計劃，(2003)。
32. 施宣光，「建築設計專案組織溝通與知識創造」，國立台灣科技大學建築系碩士論文，(2003)。
33. 余仁彬，「建築設計階段專業分工之介面整合研究 – 以設備系統與建築介面之整合為例」，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文，(2004)。
34. 張志光，「應用設計架構矩陣分析協同設計流程之研究」，國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系，(2005)。
35. 張東民、廖文和、羅衍領，「基於設計結構矩陣的設計過程建模研究」，應用科學學報第22卷第4期，(2004)。
36. 謝哲光、陳嘉文，「線性代數與動態系統」，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，台北市，(2005)。
37. 設計結構矩陣網址，http://www.dsmweb.org/。