簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉伯祥
Bor-shong LIU
論文名稱: 使用行動電話於關鍵時刻駕駛行為之影響
Effects of Cellular Phone Use on Critical Driving Maneuvers
指導教授: 李永輝
Yung-hui Lee
口試委員: 紀佳芬
none
謝光進
none
王茂駿
none
游萬來
none
許尚華
none
林久翔
none
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 86
中文關鍵詞: 號誌路口工作負荷行動電話侵略性駕駛剎車傾向駕駛行為
外文關鍵詞: signalized intersection, aggressive driving, driving behaviors, cellular phone, topping propensity, workload
相關次數: 點閱:332下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

摘 要
本研究之目的係為探討使用行動電話之駕駛者,於接近十字路口時關鍵駕駛行為之影響,再者,特別強調具侵略性傾向駕駛者之行為差異。使用DBI (Driving Behaviour Inventory) 問卷遴選出6位具侵略性駕駛傾向之受試者與6位一般駕駛者,實驗時要求受試者駕駛行為研究車(Nissan Cefiro)行駛於市區道路上,並同時使用行動電話通話(數學加法作業)。藉由實驗人員及車內資訊蒐集系統量測答題表現(反應時間與正確率)、駕駛表現(如車速)、心率反應(如平均心率、心率增加量)與觀測駕駛適應行為等資訊。分析答題表現結果顯示,於實驗室內平均答題正確率為90\%,然而於市區行駛時正確率降為87.5\%,接近路口時更降低為75.8\%。此外,反應時間也有相同的結果,於實驗室內平均答題反應時間為3.8秒,於市區行駛時增加為4.5秒,接近路口時更增加為5.6秒。此結果證實使用行動電話行駛於於路口時會增加心智負荷,使肇事的危險性增加,因此駕駛者會試圖減少整體工作負荷而降低行駛車速,若駕駛通過綠燈路口且同時通話時,其車速比無通話時降低6.4\%。當駕駛者行駛車輛接近紅燈路口時,若同時執行通話時,其停車時間顯著較短、煞車斜率較陡峭、且心率增量較高。而探討侵略性駕駛傾向之影響時,具有侵略性傾向之駕駛者其煞車斜率顯著較為陡峭,以對應其行駛車速較快,而侵略性傾向與通話變項間,對煞車斜率具有顯著的交互作用影響,一般駕駛者無論有無通話其煞車斜率差異不顯著,然而當具侵略性傾向之駕駛者於行駛時同時通話,其車速仍然維持較快且較晚煞車,此意謂著其安全閾度降低。總而言之,安全駕駛為每位駕駛者之責任,當面臨較高的駕駛作業負荷時,必須採取適當措施以維持較高的安全閾度,如降低車速、禁用行動電話,同時必須教導駕駛者使用行動電話時需因交通環境變化而取捨,以維護行的安全。


ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to examine the effects of cellular phone communication on driving performance while approaching signalized intersections, with particular emphasis on individual aggressive disposition. In a pre-screen test, participant candidates were asked to complete a questionnaire containing a driving behaviour inventory (DBI) for assessment of aggression. Twelve participants (six aggressive and six non-aggressive) were recruited for the experiment. During the trials, the subjects were asked to drive across intersections or brake with or without concomitant cellular phone demand (mental addition tests). Measurements included task performance (response time, correct rate), driving performance (driving speed, stopping time, braking slope), physiological responses (mean heart rate, incremental heart rate), and compensatory behavior. Analysis of task performance revealed a mean correct rate of 90\% for addition tests in the laboratory; however, this decreased to 87.5\% in city traffic and 75.8\% at intersections. The mean (SD) response time for these addition tests was 3.8 (1.9) sec in the laboratory, 4.5 (1.9) sec in city traffic, and 5.6 (2.4) sec at the intersections. These results confirm the notion that the combination of decision making and cellular phone communication at signalized intersections increases accident risk. This study has examined compensatory behavior as drivers attempt to reduce workload. Driving speed while passing through green lights and simultaneously performing addition tests was 6.4\% lower (45.1 km/h) than in normal driving. This indicates that drivers adjust their speeds to keep subjective perception of risk levels constant. When they respond to a red light, distraction causes drivers to react later; to compensate, drivers brake harder. Present study also demonstrate that aggressive disposition may be associated with the erosion of these safety margins, which can differ significantly between individuals. In the final analysis, safe driving relies on good driving practice, prioritization of safety, and maintenance of adequate margins.

CONTENTS 摘 要 I ABSTRACT II 誌 謝 III CONTENTS IV LIST OF FIGURES VI LIST OF TABLES VII 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. The hypotheses and purposes of this research 4 1.3. The scope and limit of this research 6 1.4. Overview of thesis 9 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURES 11 2.1. Workload measurement 11 2.2. Cellular phone usage while driving 12 2.3. Aggressive driving 19 3. METHODS 25 3.1. Participants 25 3.2. Questionnaire 25 3.3. Experimental vehicle 27 3.4. Heart rate measurement 29 3.5. On-road tests 30 3.6. Dependent variables 32 3.7. Procedure 33 3.8. Data analysis 33 4. RESULTS 35 4.1. Number of experimental conditions 35 4.2. Task performance 37 4.3. Effects of phone use at intersections 38 4.4. Effects of Aggressive Disposition 40 4.5. Interaction between aggressive disposition and car-phone use 43 5. DISCUSSION 45 6. CONCLUSIONS 52 6.1 Conclusion and suggestion 52 6.2 Further researches 56 REFERENCE 60 APPENDIX 1: Questionnaire 68 APPENDIX 2: Subjects background 71 Section I: Background information 71 Section II: Habits of cellular phone usage 73 Section III: Driving Behaviour Inventory 74 Section IV: Driving Behavior 76 APPENDIX 3: Experimental consent 78 CURRICULUM VITAE 79

REFERENCE
林志隆 (2002)。汽車駕駛員在通話負荷下的目標管理。國立台灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
賴明昌 (2002)。行車時使用行動電話對駕駛行為的影響。國立台灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
American Automobile Association (1997). Aggressive driving: three studies. Washington, DC: American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Akamatsu, M., Kurahashi, T., & Ishibashi, M. (2003, August). Driver’s status assessment using physical measures. Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Seoul, Korea. (in CD-ROM)
Alicandri, E., Roberts, K., & Walker, J. (1986). A validation study of the DOT/FHWA highway simulator (HYSIM). (NTIS No. PB86-211778). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Al-Ghamdi, A. S. (2003). Analysis of traffic accidents at urban intersections in Riyadh. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 717-724.
Alm H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones-a simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(4), 441-451.
Alm H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(5), 707-715.
Ashley, S. (2001, October). Driving the info highway. Scientific American, 285(4), 52-58.
Bainbridge, L. (1974). Problem in the assessment of mental load. Le Travail Human, 37(2), 279-302.
Bainbridge, L. (1997). The change in concepts needed to account for human behavior in complex dynamic tasks. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics – Part A: Systems and humans, 27(3), 351-359.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: its cause, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Best, J. B. (1995). Cognitive psychology (4th ed.). St. Pual, MN: West Publishing.
Briem, V., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics, 38, 2536-2562.
Brookhuis, K. A., De Vries, G., & De Waard, D. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309-316.
Brown, I. D., Tickner, A. H., & Simmonds, D. C. V. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 419-424.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Perspectives on personality (4th ed.). Boston: Ally & Bacon.
Casali, J. G., & Wierwille, W. W. (1983). A comparison of rating scale, secondary-task, physiological, and primary-task workload estimation techniques in a simulated flight task emphasizing communications load. Human Factors, 25, 623-641.
Cnossen, F., Rothengatter, T., & Meijman, T. (2000). Strategic changes in task performance in simulated car driving as an adaptive response to task demands Transportation Research Part F, 3, 123-140.
Cohen, J. T., & Graham, J. D. (2003). A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving. Risk Analysis, 23, 1-14.
Connell, D. & Joint, M. (1997). Driver aggression. In AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Aggressive driving: three studies. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Consiglio, W., Driscoll, P., Witte, M., & Berg, W. P. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 495-500.
Cooper, P. J., Zheng, Y., Richard, C., Vavrik, J., Heinrichs, B., & Siegmund, G. (2003). The impact of hands-free message reception/response on driving task performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(1), 23-35.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.
Department of health (2004). Health Statistic and Analysis. (Retrieved March 20, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/衛生統計重要指標/1.xls).
Dingus, T., Antin, J., Hulse, M., & Wierwille, W. (1989). Attentional demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transportation Research Part A, 23, 301-315.
Directorate General of Telecommunications. (2003). The growth of cellular phone subscribers. Retrieved July 13, 2003 from http://www.dgt.gov.tw/English/Data-statistics/five-mobile-3625.html
Dula, C. S., & Ballard, M. E. (2003). Development and evaluation of a measure of dangerous, aggressive, negative emotional, and risky driving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 263-282.
Dula, C. S., & Geller, E. S. (2003). Risky, aggressive, or emotional driving: addressing the need for consistent communication in research. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 559-566.
Ellison-Potter, P. A. (1997). The effects of anonymity, aggressive stimuli, and trait anger on aggressive driving behaviour: a laboratory simulation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Colorado.
Evans, L. (1996). A crash course in traffic safety. Medical and Health Annual. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Gellatly, A., & Kleiss, J. (2000). Visual attention demand evaluation of conventional and multifunction in-vehicle information systems. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 3.282-3.285). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Glendon, A. I., Dorn, L., Matthews, G., Gulian, E., Davies, D. R., & Debney, L. M. (1993). Reliability of the driving behaviour inventory. Ergonomics, 36, 719-726.
Goodman, M. J., Tijerina, L., Bents, F. D., & Wierwille, W. W. (1999). Using cellular telephones in vehicle: safe or unsafe? Transportation Human Factors, 1, 3-42.
Green, P., Hoekstra, E., & Williams, M. (1993). On-the-road tests of driver interfaces: examination of a route guidance system and a car phone. (Tech. Rep. No. UMTRI-93-53). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A. I., Davies, D. R., & Debney L. M. (1989). Dimension of driver stress. Ergonomics, 32, 585-602.
Haigney, D. E., Taylor, R. G., & Westerman, S. J. (2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory process. Transportation Research Part F, 3, 113-121.
Haigney, D., & Westerman, S. J. (2001). Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics, 44, 132-143.
Harms, L. (1986). Drivers’ attentional response to environmental variations: a dual-task real traffic study. In A. G. Gale et al. (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles I (pp. 131-138). Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.
Harms, L. (1991). Variation in drivers’ cognitive load. Effects of driving through village areas and rural junctions. Ergonomics, 34, 151-160.
Hancock, P. A., Lesch, M., & Simmons, L. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 501-514.
Hancock, P., Simmons, L., Hasemi, L., Howarth, H., & Ranney, T. (1999). The effects of in-vehicle distraction on driver response during a crucial driving maneuver. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 295-309.
Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519-537.
Hartley, L. R., & Hassani, J. E. (1994). Stress, violations and accidents. Applied Ergonomics, 25, 221-230.
Hauber, A. R. (1980). The social psychology of driving behaviour and the traffic environment: research on aggressive behaviour in traffic. International Review of Applied Psychology, 29, 461-474.
Hockey, G. R. J. (1993). Cognitive-energetical control mechanisms in the management of work demands and psychological health. In: A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: selection, awareness, and control. (pp.328-345). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical approach. Biological Psychology, 45(1-3), 73-93.
James, L., & Nahl, D. (2000). Road rage and aggressive driving: Steering clear of highway warfare. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Jordan, P. W., & Johnson, G. I. (1993). Exploring mental workload via TLX: the case of operating a car stereo while driving. In: A. G. Gale et al. (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles IV (pp. 225-262). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kroemer, K. H. E., & Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the task to the human. (5th ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
Laberge-Nadeau, C., Maag, U., Bellavance, F., Lapierre, S. D., Desjardins, D., Messier, S., et al. (2003). Wireless telephones and the risk of road accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 649-660.
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M. and Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 617-623.
Lansdown, T. C., Brook-Carter, N., & Kersloot, T. (2004). Distraction from multiple in-vehicle secondary tasks: Vehicle performance and mental workload implications. Ergonomics, 47, 91-104.
Lee, J., Caven, B., Haake, S., & Brown, T. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based E-mail on drivers’ attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631-664.
Lee, J. D., & Strayer, D. L. (2004). Preface to the special section on driver distraction. Human Factors, 46, 583-586.
Lee, Y. H., Lin, C. L., & Lai, M. C. (2004). Adaptive safety strategies for car-phone use while driving. (Submitted to Human Factors).
Lee, Y. H., & Liu, B. S. (2003). In-flight workload assessment: comparison of subjective and physiological measurements. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 74(10), 1078-1084.
Liikenneturva (1997). Yksi autoilija kolmesta käyttää puhelinta ajaessaan. Lehdistötiedote, 26 May 1997 (The Central Office for Traffic Safety in Finland. One driver in three uses a mobile phone while driving. Press Release, May 26).
Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (1999). Eye movements of younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 41, 15-25.
Martinez, R. (1997). Testimony before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Surface Transportation. Retrieved September 28, 1998. (http://house.gov/transportation/surface/sthearin/ist717/martinez.htm).
Matthews, G., Dorn, L., & Glendon, A. I., (1991). Personality correlates of driver stress. Personality and Individual Difference, 12, 535-549.
Matthews, G., Dorn, L., Hoyes, T. W., Davies, D. R., Glendon, A. I., & Taylor, R. G. (1998). Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator. Human Factors, 40, 136-149.
Matthews, R., Legg, S., & Charlton, S. (2003). The effect of cell phone type on driver’s subjective workload during concurrent driving and conversing. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 451-457.
Matthews, G., Tsuda, A., Xin, G., & Ozeki, Y. (1999). Individual difference in driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. Ergonomics, 42, 401-415.
McCarley, J. S., Vais, M., Pringle, H., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Strayer, D. L. (2001, August). Conversation disrupts visual scanning of traffic scenes. Presented at the Ninth Vision in Vehicles Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
McGarva, A. R., & Steiner, M. (2000). Provoked driver aggression and status: a field study. Transportation Research Part F, 3, 167-179.
McLane, R. C., & Wierwille, W. W. (1975). The influence of motion and audio cues on driver performance in an automobile simulator. Human Factors, 17, 488-501.
McKnight, A. J., & McKnight, A. S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25, 259-265.
Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? In: L. Evans & R. C. Schwing (Eds.). Human behavior and traffic safety. (pp. 485-524). New York: Plenum Press.
Ministry of Transportation and Communication (2004). Statistic Report. (Retrieved January 22, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://www.motc.gov.tw/).
Mizell, L. (1997). Aggressive driving. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety (Retrieved June 30, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aaafts.org/Text/research/agdrtext.htm).
Monk, C. A., Boehm-Davis, D. A., & Trafton, J. G. (2004). Recovering form interruptions: implications for driver distraction research. Human Factors, 46, 650-663.
National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) (1997). An investigation of the safety implications of wireless communications in vehicles. Washington DC: NHTSA.
Nation Police Administration (2002). Traffic accident statistical and analysis reports.
O’Donnell, R. D., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.). Handbook of perception and performance (vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
Ogden, G. D., Levine, J. M., & Eisner, E. J. (1979). Measurement of workload by secondary tasks. Human Factors, 21, 529-548.
Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
Parry, M. H. (1968). Aggression on the road. London: Tavistock.
Patten, C. J. D., Kircher, A., Ostlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341-350.
Pepper, M. (1997, April). What about road rage. US News and World Report. Available at: http://www.drivers.com/issues/roadrage/pepper.html
Piersma, E. H. (1993). Adaptive interfaces and support systems in future vehicles. In: A. M. Parkes & S. Franzen (Eds.), Driving Future Vehicles (pp. 321-332). London: Taylor & Francis.
Ranny, T. A. (1994). Models of driving behavior: A review of their evolution. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 733-750.
Reason, J., Mansted, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction ? Ergonomics, 33, 1315-1332.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular telephone calls and motor vehicle accidents. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453-458.
Reed, M. P., & Green, P.A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42, 1015-1037.
Retting, R. A., Ulmer, R. G., & Williams, A. F. (1999). Prevalence and characteristics of red light running crashes in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 687-694.
Retting, R. A., & Williams, A. F. (1996). Characteristic of red light violators: results of a field investigation. Journal of Safety Research, 27, 9-15.
Richardson, B., & Green, P. (2000). Trends in North American intelligent transportation systems: A year 2000 appraisal (Tech. Report 2000-9). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Richter, P., Wagner, T., Heger, R., & Weise, G. (1998). Psychophysiological analysis of mental load during driving on rural roads – a quasi-experimental field study. Ergonomics, 41, 593-609.
RimmÖ, P. A. (2002). Aberrant driving behaviour: homogeneity of a four-factor structure in samples differing in age and gender. Ergonomics, 45, 569-582.
Roscoe, A. H. (1978). Stress and workload in pilots. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 49, 630-636.
Rosen, M. R. (1988). Links between basic and clinical cardiac electrophysiology. Circulation, 77, 251.
Sarkar, S., Martineau, A., Emami, M., Khatib, M., & Wallace, K. (2000). Spatial and temporal analyses of the variations in aggressive driving and road rage behaviors observed and reported on San Diego freeways. (Retrieved November 21, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aggressive.drivers.com/board/messages/25/50.html).
Serafin, C., Wen, C., Paelke, G., & Green, P. (1993). Development of human factors tests of car phones. (Tech. Rep. No. UMTRI-93-17). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
Shinar, D. (1998). Aggressive driving: the contribution of the drivers and the situation. Transportation Research Part F, 1, 137-160.
Shinar, D., & Compton, R. (2004). Aggressive driving: an observational study of driver, vehicle, and situational variables. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 429-437.
Shinar, D., Tractinsky, N, & Compton, R. (2005). Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 315-326.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-32.
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.
Summala, H. (1988). Risk control is not risk adjustment: zero risk theory of driver behaviour and its implications. Ergonomics, 31, 491-507.
Tasca, L. (2000). A review of the literature on aggressive driving research. Aggressive Driving Issues Conference. (Retrieved January 2, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aggressive.drivers.com/papers/tasca/tasca-paper.html).
Tijerina, L., Goodman, M., Johnson, S., Parmer, E., & Winterbottom, M. (2000). Driver distraction with wireless telecommunications and route guidance systems (DOT HS 809-069). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Admininstation.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (2001). An aging world: 2001. Washingtion, DC: Bureau of the Census.
Van Der Hulst, M., Meijman, T., & Rothengatter, T. (1999). Anticipation and the adaptive control of safety margins in driving. Ergonomics, 42, 336-345.
Van der Horst, R., & Wilmink, A. (1986). Drivers’ decision-making at signalized junctions: an optimization of yellow timing. Traffic Engineering and Control, 27, 615-622.
Vest, J., Cohen, W., & Tharp, M. (1997, June). Road rage. U.S. News Online. Available at: http://www.drivers.com/issues/roadrage/2driv.htm
Violanti, J. M., & Marshall, J. R. (1996). Cellular phones and traffic accidents: an epidemiological approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 265-270.
Wang, J., Knipling, R. R., & Goodman, M. J. (1996). The role of driver inattention in crashes: New statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system (CDS). In 40th Annual Proceedings: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (pp. 377-392). Des Plaines, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
Warshawsky-Livne, L., & Shinar, D. (2002). Effects of uncertainty, transmission type, driver age and gender on brake reaction and movement time. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 117-128.
Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wickens, C. D., Lee, J. D., Liu, Y., & Gordon-Becker, S. E. (2004). An introduction to human factors engineering (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Wilde, G. J. S. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2, 209-225.
Willumeit, H. P., Kramer, U., & Neubert, W. (1981). Methods of measuring driving performance under the influence of alcohol, drugs and fatigue. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman & F. M. Wade (Eed.), In Road Safety: Research and Practice (pp. 43-49). Eastbourne: Praeger.
Wilson, G. F. (1993). Air-to-ground training missions: a psychophysiological workload analysis. Ergonomics, 36, 1071-87.

QR CODE