在科技始終來自於人性一詞出現後，不少廠商紛紛加入人機大戰，究竟要如何設計出與人性相符的高科技產品，便是相當重要的課題。待科技產品漸漸被人類接受後，它所帶來前所未有的便利性，與沒有它生活將好似缺少什麼的現象，可能都會聽聞到。因此人類和機器(科技)怎麼樣好好的溝通，顯示介面拌演著重要的角色。
紙張在知識的傳承是不可或缺的，若是螢幕能做為資訊交換的中介媒體，加上速度的優勢，往後看到原為厚厚的一本書會裝進如電子書等產品內，趨勢將應行而生。所以視覺顯示器的良好設計不但帶來文明傳播，甚至能加強知識的吸收。本研究會針對二種螢幕顯示特性-目標/背景顏色組合與亮度對比之間的設定對於閱讀理解力的影響，輔以腦波的觀察，以了解大腦活動的變動，而上述兩種顯示特性對於視覺疲勞的影響程度為何，也是實驗所探討的問題。
實驗結果顯示目標/背景顏色組合與亮度對比對於理解力、視覺疲勞的影響皆不顯著，以腦波做為客觀佐證的方法也不明顯。是否在長時間的接觸電腦下，使人類的適應力變強，因此變項間沒有產生差異。而腦波做為客觀的生理反應也沒出現良好的訊號，所以往後的研究裡，腦波的代表性是值得更深入研究與思考的方向。

After the sentence “tech is from humanity”, many companies have fierce competition in human interface. They wonder how we can design man-suited high techs. It’s necessary to own tech products in normal life. The media play an important role in communication between human and computer because of it’s speed and efficiency. You will see a book all imbedded in e-paper. The study will investigate the effect of screens’s color combination and luminance contrast on reading comprehension, visual fatigue and EEG. The results showed the effect of screens’s color combination and luminance contrast on reading comprehension, visual fatigue and EEG are not significant. It may be the human’s adaptation in long-term contaction with computer. So It’s no differences. And the EEG also showed no significant signals. In the future, We need to have more knowledge and skills to research EEG phenomenon.

1. 朱祖祥、曹立人，民83，目標/背景色的配合對彩色CRT顯示功效的影響，心理學報，2期，128-134。
2. 江部充(原著)，林景福(主譯)，1985，圖解腦波入門。
3. 吳進安，1998，神經診斷學，台北市：揚智文化，59-109。
4. 吳東霖等人編著，SAS與統計模式建構，台北市:文魁資訊。
5. 洪敏聰，民87，腦波:探討運動及身體活動心理學的另一扇視窗，中華體育，44，63-74。
6. 彭昭英，2001，SAS與統計分析，台北市：儒林圖書。
7. 黃世賢，1983，圖解臨床腦波檢查法，台北市：合記圖書。
8. 國科會研究計畫-96WFA2500282。
9. 鄭昭明，2004，認知心理學，台北市：桂冠圖書。
10. 黎正中譯，原著Montgomery，民87，實驗設計與分析，台北市:高立圖書。
11. 謝光進、陳明德，民86，螢幕文字/背景色彩組合與相關作業特性對視覺績效與視覺疲勞影響之研究，台灣科技大學工業管理系博士論文。
12. 謝光進等人，民85，螢幕類型與作業特性對視覺績效及視覺疲勞影響之研究，台灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文。
13. 謝光進等人，民94，呈現介面與亮度對比對認知(記憶與概念形成)績效之影響與腦波反應，台灣科技大學工業管理系博士論文。

1. ANSI/HFS 100-1988. American National Standard for Human Factors Engineering of visual display terminal workstations Human Factors Society,Inc., Santa Monica,California.
2. Brown,R.O, and Macleod,D.I.A,1997,Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors. Current Biology,7:844-849.
3. Cushman, W. H. 1986, Reading from microfiche, a VDT, and a printed page: subjective fatigue and performance, Human Factors,28,1,63-73.
4. Dillon, A.1992, Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of empirical literature, Ergonomics, 35, 1297-1326.
5. Fukuzumi, S., Yamazaki, T., Kamijo, K. and Hayashi, Y. 1998, Physiological and psychological evaluation for visual display colour readability: A visual evoked potential study and a subjective evaluation study, Ergonomics, 41, 89-108.
6. Gould, J.D., Alfaro, L., Barnes, V., Finn, R., Grischknowsky, N. and Minuto, S. 1987, Reading is slower from CRT display than from paper: Attempts to isolate a single variable explanation, Human Factors, 29, 269-299.
7. Gunnarsson, E. and Soderberg I., 1983. Eye strain resulting form VDT work at the Swedish Telecommunications Administration. Applied Ergonomics,14,61-69.
8. Heuer,H.,Hollendiek,G.,Kroger,H.,Romer,T.,1989.Die Ruhelage der Augen und ihr Ein#uB auf Beobachtungsabatand und visuelle Ermudung bei Bildschirmarbeit.Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie,36,538-566.
9. Isono,H.,Takahashi,S.,Takiguchi,Y.,Yamada,C.,2004,Measurement of visual fatigue from reading on electronic paper, IDW 04,1647-1648.
10. Kak, A. V. ,1981, Relationships between readability of printed and CRT-displayed text, Proceedings of Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting, 137-140. Santa Monica, CA.
11. Mahnke, F. H. and Mahnke, R. H., 1987. Color and light in man-made environments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
12. Matthews, M. L., 1987, The influence of colour on CRT reading performance and subjective comfort under operational conditions. Applied Ergonomics,18,4,323-328.
13. Megaw, T., 1990. The definition and measurement of visual fatigue. In:J. R. Wilson and E.N.Corlett(Eds),Evaluation of human work. Taylor and Francis, London,683-702.
14. Murch, G.M., 1984 CRTs in avionics, Physics in Technology,15,270-271.
15. Muter, P., Latemouille, S. A., Treurniet, W. C. ,1982, Extended reading of continuous text on television screens, Human Factors, 24,5,501-508.
16. Muter, P. and Maurutto, P. ,1991, Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: the paperless office revisited? Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol.10,No.4, 257-266.
17. National Research Council, 1983, Video display, work and vision. National Academy Pres, Washinton,DC.
18. Ohlsson, Kjell, Nilsson, Lars-goran and Ronnberg, Jerker, 1981, Speed and Accuracy in Scanning as a Function of Combinations of Text and Background Colors., International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,14,2, 215-222.
19. Pastoor, S., 1990, Legibility and subjective preference for color combination in text. Human Factors,32,2,157-171.
20. Sanders, M.S., and Mccormick E.J., 1993, Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
21. Shieh, K. K, Chen M. H., Wang, Y. W., 2005, Effects of display medium and luminance contrast on memory performance and EEG response, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35,797-805.
22. Shieh, K. K, Chen M. H., 2005, Effects of display medium and luminance contrast concept formation and EEG response, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 943-954.
23. Shieh, K. K., Ko, YA. H., 2005, Effects of display characteristics and individual differences on preferences of VDT icon design, Perceptual and Motor Skills,100,2,305-318.
24. Shieh, K. K., and Lai, Y. K., 2007, Effects of color combination and luminance contrast on memory and preference of text presented on VDT, Proceedings of APIEM,2007, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
25. Shieh, K K, and Lin, C C, 2000, Effects of screen type, ambient illumination, and color combination on VDT visual performance and subjective preference, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,26,527-536.
26. Shieh, K. K., Shen, I. H., 2004. Report order and identification of multidimensional stimuli: a study of event-related brain potentials, Perceptual and motor skills, 98,1427-1437.
27. Shen, I. H., Shieh, K K., Ko, Y. H., 2006, Event-related potential as a measure of effects of report order and training on identification of multidimensional stimuli, Perceptual and Motor Skills,102,1,197-213.
28. Smid, H., Jacob, A and Heinze, H., 1999, An event-related brain potential study of visual selective attention to conjunctions of color and shape,Psychophysiology,36, 264-279.

29. Snyder, H. L., 1988,Image quality. In:Helander, M.(Ed), Handbook of human-computer interaction, Elsevier science publishers,Amsterdam.

30. Wang, A. H. and Chen, M. T., 2000. Effects of polarity and luminance contrast on visual performance and VDT display quality. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,25,415-421.
31. Weber, A, Jermini, C. and Grandjean, E. P., 1975. Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of experimentally induced fatigue. Ergonomicsd,18,151-156.
32. Zhu, Z., and Wu, J., 1990, On the standardization of VDT’s proper and optimal contrast range.Ergonomics,33,7,925-932.