簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡庭旖
TING-YI HU
論文名稱: 行動裝置輔助閱讀理解能力之後設量化分析
The Effects of Mobile Assisted Language Learning on Reading Comprehension: A Meta -Analysis
指導教授: 曾文鐽
Wen-Ta Tseng
口試委員: 陳秋蘭
Chiou-Lan Chern
田曉萍
Shiau-Ping Tian
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 應用外語系
Department of Applied Foreign Languages
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 84
中文關鍵詞: 閱讀理解閱讀行動裝置後設分析手機科技
外文關鍵詞: cellphones
相關次數: 點閱:286下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著科技的發達與進步,運用科技融入語言教學已成為課堂上不可或缺的輔助工具。從早期的電腦輔助演變至今,行動裝置如手機,平板等工具早已成為教師及學生拓展學習場域,增加學習機會的工具。眾多研究指出,行動裝置能有效增進閱讀理解能力,例如增強閱讀策略,提升學習興趣,加強合作學習,使學習更為個人化,最終促成自主學習。然而,在不同的學習情境下,行動裝置是否一如眾多研究結果都呈顯著的學習成效呢?
    本研究採用後設分析法,蒐集十九篇實證研究,擷取實驗之閱讀測驗結果,計算出總效果量,並根據學習情境、學習者教育程度、學習者語言程度、實驗實施長度、語源、目的語、應用程式主要設計特徵、實驗場域、閱讀測驗類型、多模態類型、程式系統類型及教學法共十二類,加以編碼,分析各類型的調節變項是否會影響行動裝置輔助閱讀理解能力之效果。研究結果顯示,運用行動裝置輔助閱讀理解能力,其效果量為接近中等效果量。簡言之,約有62%學習者能藉由行動裝置提升閱讀理解能力。另外,從調節變項之分析結果顯示,學習者教育程度、學習者語言程度、實驗實施長度、閱讀測驗類型、多模態類型、程式系統類型及教學法皆會影響行動裝置輔助閱讀理解之效果量。根據研究結論,研究者建議語言教學者須在恰當的學習場域裡用合宜的教學法搭配設計良好的閱讀應用程式,才能將行動裝置的優點發揮到最大化。


    With the development of modern technology, using technical devices in classrooms to teach language has become commonplace in recent years. From the introduction of computers until now, mobile devices such as cellphones and tablets have become vital in increasing learning opportunities. A number of empirical studies have indicated that mobile assisted language learning (MALL) can effectively facilitate improved reading comprehension. This includes improving reading strategies, increasing learning motivation, empowering collaborative learning so that learning becomes more individualized, and eventually achieving learning autonomy. Therefore, it is important to determine if MALL has positive effect in any learning context.
    The present study aims to calculate the overall effect size of MALL by analyzing the results of reading comprehension tests from 19 empirical studies through meta-analysis. Moreover, 12 potential moderator variables were categorized to identify significant moderators among variables. Results indicated that moderators such as education level, levels of readers, intervention duration, type of test, multimodal type, system type of the reading apps, and teaching method could successfully explain the variation in the effects of mobile devices on reading comprehension.
    According to the findings, a deliberate-designed reading app is suggested with appropriate teaching methods under informal or unrestricted settings that allows MALL to maximize its effect to reading comprehension.

    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1 Research background and motivation............................................................................1 Purpose of the study and research questions .................................................................4 Significance of the study…………………………...…………...………..…...……….4 Definition of key terms .................................................................................................4 Organization of the study ..............................................................................................5 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................6 Overview………………………....................................................................................6 Characteristics of mobile learning………………..................................................6 MALL advantages and challenges.........................................................................8 Reading comprehension in language learning..............................................................11 Definition of reading……………………….……….………….….……………11 Theoretical background of reading………………...………….……………...…12 A. Bottom-up processing…………..........…..……..…...……..…..……...13 B. Top-down processing….…………………..…..…..…...………..…….14 C. Schema theory ……………..……………..………..…...……..….…...15 D. Metacognition………………..……………………..……...………......17 . Factors affecting reading comprehension……………..…….……...….……..…19 Technology and reading comprehension…………………………….…..….………..24 MALL and reading comprehension………………………………….….…....………24 Meta- analysis in MALL and reading comprehension……………….….…….……..32 Summary…………………………………………………..………………...….…....36 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY ................................................................38 Data sources and search strategy…………………………..…………….….……….38 Criteria for inclusion and exclusion…………………….....………………..………..39 Coding procedure……………………………………………..………....…………...41 Effect size calculation and interpretation………………………....………..……….. 45 Fixed-effect model and random-effects model....…………………………………….46 Publication bias …………………………………..…..………………………….......46 CHAPTER FOUR RESULT…………………………...………………..………..48 Overall effect size of MALL on reading comprehension……………..……..…….49 Publication bias…………………………………..…………………….…….……..50 Subgroups of moderator variables…………………..….…………….…………….52 Insignificant moderator variables……………………………..…………..………..54 Significant moderator variables……………………………………....…………….55 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION…………………………………………………58 Research question one………………………………………………………………58 Research question two……………………………………………..…………….....59 Significant moderator variables……………………………………...……………..59 None significant moderator variables……………………………………...…….…64 Pedagogical implications……………………………………………..………..…...66 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION…………………………….……..……...,…….68 Limitations of the study…………………………………………………..…..…….69 Suggestions for future research…………………………………………..…..…….70 REFERENCES………………………..…………...……………………….…...…72

    REFERENCES

    Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.
    AbuSa'aleek, A. O. (2014). A review of emerging technologies: Mobile assisted language learning (MALL). Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning (ISSN: 2321–2454), 2(06), 469-475.
    Ahmed, M. D. (2015). An Analysis of Comprehension Performance of Sudanese EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 8(7), 133-151.
    Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1982). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 249.
    Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts, 29, 243-257.
    Anderson. R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255-292). New York: Longman.
    Arifani, Y. (2018, July). The Effectiveness of Pamanpintermu E-reading Program on EFL Learners’ Reading Performances. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering (ICESAME 2018). Atlantis Press.
    Auerbach, E. R., & Paxton, D. (1997). “It's not the English thing”: Bringing reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 237-261.
    Barnett, M. A. (1986). Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading: Importance and interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 343-349.
    Barry, S., & Lazarte, A. A. (1998). Evidence for mental models: How do prior knowledge, syntactic complexity, and reading topic affect inference generation in a recall task for nonnative readers of Spanish?. The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 176-193.
    Bransford, J., Stein, B., & Shelton, T. (1984). Learning from the perspective of the comprehended. In C. Alderson & A. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 28-44). New York: Longman.
    Brown, A., Armbruster, B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344-357.
    Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4-20.
    Carrell, P. L. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Reading in a foreign language, 1(2), 81-92.
    Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
    Carrell, P., 1985. Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure: classroom implications and applications. TESOL Quarterly 19, 441–469.
    Carrell, P. L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL quarterly, 21(3), 461-481.
    Carrell, P. L. (1988). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL/second language reading classrooms. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 239.Cambridge University Press, New York.
    Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. Tesol Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
    Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2016). Learning English using children's stories in mobile devices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 625-641.
    Chang, K. E., Lan, Y. J., Chang, C. M., & Sung, Y. T. (2010). Mobile‐device‐supported strategy for Chinese reading comprehension. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 69-84.
    Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14-30.
    Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18, 341-364.
    Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2017). Effectiveness of mobile learning application in improving reading skills in Chinese language and towards post-attitudes. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(3), 210-225.
    Chen, T. H., & Lin, C. C. (2018). Enhancing L2 English learning through mobile-assisted TBLT: EFL learners’ perspectives. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(2), 453-461.
    Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best‐evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277-299.
    Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies. Going to the mall: mobile assisted language learning. Language learning & technology, 10(1), 9-16.
    Cho, K., Lee, S., Joo, M. H., & Becker, B. (2018). The effects of using mobile devices on student achievement in language learning: A meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 8(3), 105.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
    Colpaert, J. (2004). From courseware to coursewear? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3-4), 261-266.
    Colwell, J., & Hutchison, A. C. (2015). Supporting teachers in integrating digital technology into language arts instruction to promote literacy. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(2), 56-63.
    Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Research Review, 25, 23-38.
    Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2012). Tablet vs. paper: The effect on learners' reading performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441-450.
    Eisenlauer, V. (2014, November). Multimodality in mobile-assisted language learning. In International Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 328-338). Springer, Cham.
    El-Hussein, M., Osman, M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3).
    Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and the teaching of L2 reading. TESOL journal, 11(1), 5-9.
    Fadjo, C., Friedman, B., Black, J., & Johnson, L. (2012, March). Improving reading comprehension skills using a touch-based interactive mobile app. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2519-2524). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
    Fisher, T., Pemberton, R., Sharples, M., Ogata, H., Uosaki, N., Edmonds, P., & Tschorn, P. (2009). Mobile learning of vocabulary from reading novels: a comparison of three modes. In Proceedings of 8th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Orlando, Florida (pp. 191-194).
    Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
    Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107-122.
    Ghasemi, B., Hashemi, M., & Bardine, S. H. (2011). The capabilities of computers for language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 58-62.
    Gheytasi, M., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (2015). The effect of smartphone on the reading comprehension proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 225-230.
    Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction, 6(4), 126-135.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
    Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
    Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge.
    Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The effectiveness of using mobile on EFL learners’ reading practices in Najran University. English language teaching, 9(5), 8-21.
    Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327-336.
    Hsueh-Chao, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a foreign language, 13(1), 403-430.
    Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt‐Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15-23.
    Idrus, M. M., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). Learning language through wireless technology: An impact study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 381-387.
    Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational psychologist, 22(3), 255-278.
    Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390-408.
    Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Psychology Press.
    Jones, A., Issroff, K., Scanlon, E., Clough, G., McAndrew, P., & Blake, C. (2006, July). Using mobile devices for learning in informal settings: is it motivating? In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning. International Association for the Development of the Information Society, Dublin, Ireland
    Keezhatta, M. S., & Omar, A. (2019). Enhancing Reading Skills for Saudi Secondary School Students through Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL): An Experimental Study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 437-447.
    Kent, D. (2019). Technique efficacy when using a student response system in the reading classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 26–35.
    Kim, H. S. (2014). Effects of using mobile devices in blended learning for English reading comprehension. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 64-85.
    Kim, N. Y. (2018). Effects of Reading Aloud Tasks through a Mobile Phone on EFL Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension Skills. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 57-76.
    Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31-57.
    Khubyari, L., & Narafshan, M. H. (2016). A study on the impact of MALL (Mobile Assisted Language Learning) on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 58-69.
    Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31-64). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169-187.
    Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education, 55(1), 24-31.
    Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2012). Direct and indirect teaching: Using e-books for supporting vocabulary, word reading, and story comprehension for young children. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 135-152.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning?. ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.
    Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile‐Assisted language learning. In C. Chapelle, A. Carol (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc..
    Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research: Insights from the research. ABC-CLIO.
    Kyongho, H., & Nation, P. (1989). Reducing the vocabulary load and encouraging vocabulary learning through reading newspapers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 6(1), 323-335.
    Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 130-151.
    Lee, J. W., & Schallert, D. L. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. Tesol Quarterly, 31(4), 713-739.
    Lin, C. C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48-59.
    Mahdi, H. S. (2018). Effectiveness of mobile devices on vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 134-154.
    Malatesha Joshi, R. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209-219.
    Manoli, P., & Papadopoulou, M. (2013). Strategic reading in multimodal texts: An application in EFL. In Electronic Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 3533-3540).
    Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E‐readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Applied cognitive psychology, 27(4), 512-519.
    Mayer, R., & Mayer, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge university press.
    Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Oren, A., & Lahav, O. (1999). Web-based learning environments (WBLE): Current implementation and evolving trends. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 22(4), 233-247.
    Motallebzadeh, K., & Ganjali, R. (2011). SMS: Tool for L2 Vocabulary Retention and Reading Comprehension Ability. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(5), 1111-1115.
    Naderi, N., & Akrami, A. (2018). EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Development through MALL: Telegram Groups in Focus. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 339-350.
    Nagy, W., & Herman, P. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Nation, I. S. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
    Nist, S., & Mealey, D. (1991). Teacher-directed comprehension strategies. In R. Flippo & D. Caverly (Eds.), Teaching reading and study strategies (pp. 42-85). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Oakley, G., Wildy, H., & Berman, Y. E. (2018). Multimodal digital text creation using tablets and open-ended creative apps to improve the literacy learning of children in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 0(0)1-25.
    Oberg, A., & Daniels, P. (2013). Analysis of the effect a student-centred mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 177-196.
    Ölmez, F. (2016). Exploring the interaction of L2 reading comprehension with text-and learner-related factors. Procedia–Social and Behavioural Sciences, 232, 719-727.
    Omaggio, M. A. 1993. Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle and Heinle
    O'Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., Lefrere, Lonsdale. P. & Waycott, J. (2005). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00696244/document
    Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 98(3), 554.
    Pardede, P. (2010). A Review on Reading Theories and its Implication to the Teaching of Reading. Retrieved from https://parlindunganpardede.wordpress.com/2010/11/20/a-review-onreading-theories-and-its-implication-to-the-teaching-of-reading/
    Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional children, 53(2), 118-124.
    Potocki, A., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Effects of computer-assisted comprehension training in less skilled comprehenders in second grade: A one-year follow-up study. Computers & Education, 63, 131-140.
    Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4)273-295.
    Ramalingam, Y., Naidu, R. S., Hariish, G., & Naidoo, J. P. (2018). Screen Reading vs Paper Reading: An Experimental Study on the Impact of Different Reading Materials on Recall and Comprehension Among Students. American Journal of Educational Science, 4(4), 136-143.
    Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(2), 177-196.
    Rivers, Wilga.M. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills in a foreign language skills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., & Gallagher, L. P. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833-878.
    Sackstein, S., Spark, L., & Jenkins, A. (2015). Are e-books effective tools for learning? Reading speed and comprehension: iPad® i vs. paper. South African Journal of Education, 35(4)1-14.
    Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39-56.
    Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1984). Models of the reading process. Handbook of Reading Research, 1, 185-224.
    Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific studies of reading, 3(3), 257-279.
    Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26-43.
    Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
    Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In Proceedings of mLearn,1(1)1-9.
    Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
    Smith, F. 1994. Understanding Reading. 5th ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Son, J. B. (2008). Using web-based language learning activities in the ESL classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and learning, 4(4), 34-43.
    Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 253-270.
    Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 16, 68-84.
    Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
    Sung, Y. T., Yang, J. M., & Lee, H. Y. (2017). The effects of mobile-computer-supported collaborative learning: Meta-analysis and critical synthesis. Review of educational research, 87(4), 768-805.
    Swaffar, J. K. (1988). Readers, texts, and second languages: The interactive processes. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 123-149.
    Swaffar, J. K., Arens, K., & Byrnes, H. (1991). Reading for meaning: An integrated approach to language learning. Pearson College Division.
    Taj, I. H., Sulan, N. B., Sipra, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2016). Impact of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on EFL: A meta-analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 76-83.
    Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 85(4), 698-739.
    Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & Asher, J. W. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension. In J. M. Norris, L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213-244). John Benjamins Publishing
    Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of computer assisted learning, 21(3), 217-228.
    Tingir, S., Cavlazoglu, B., Caliskan, O., Koklu, O., & Intepe‐Tingir, S. (2017). Effects of mobile devices on K–12 students' achievement: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 355-369.
    Wang, S. Y. (2013). Task Complexity and Media of L2 Reading Affecting Chinese Intermediate EFL Learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 211-230.
    Wang, Y. H. (2016). Integrating self-paced mobile learning into language instruction: impact on reading comprehension and learner satisfaction. Interactive learning environments, 25(3), 397-411.
    Wong, L. H., Boticki, I., Sun, J., & Looi, C. K. (2011). Improving the scaffolds of a mobile-assisted Chinese character forming game via a design-based research cycle. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1783-1793.
    Yang, X., Kuo, L. J., Ji, X., & McTigue, E. (2018). A critical examination of the relationship among research, theory, and practice: Technology and reading instruction. Computers & Education, 125, 62-73.
    Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., & Mahamod, Z. (2013). Managing problems and planning activities involving ICT tools in teaching ESL reading and writing. Asian Social Science, 9(10), 222.
    Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students' literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of educational computing research, 40(1), 47-87.

    QR CODE