本研究探討以LINE行動輔助學習策略結合日語電子書的學習，對於初學日語的大學生的影響。受試者為台中市西屯區25名非日語科系的大學生，分為控制組11人，實驗組14人。控制組與實驗組皆閱讀相同日語電子書，實驗組額外使用LINE即時通訊軟體輔助語言學習，研究活動為期兩週，接著進行問卷意見調查及第二外語能力測驗，以了解行動輔助學習策略對於語言學習者的學習動機、學習態度及學習成效方面的影響。研究結果顯示，相較於僅閱讀電子書的控制組，輔以LINE行動學習的實驗組，在學習動機及學習態度上，未有顯著差異。在涵蓋聽力、字彙與用法及閱讀題組的第二外語能力測驗中，僅發現實驗組在字彙與用法的成績上，和控制組有顯著的差異，表示使用LINE於語言學習中，可更加幫助學生學習字彙及語文用法。只閱讀電子書的控制組，在閱讀題組的後測成績上，較之前測有顯著的提升，顯示此研究之電子書可有效提升學生的閱讀能力。在學生的質性回饋中發現，使用LINE學習有方便、即時、貼近日常及易用等益處，LINE應用程式中的貼圖功能也能提升學生學習的興趣。未來相關的教學研究可善用LINE的優勢，並積極應用LINE的多媒體功能，以提升使用LINE學習的教學策略。

The effects of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) strategy using LINE on college students’ basic Japanese Learning with E-book is investigated in the study. There were 25 subjects participated and divided into two groups, with 11 in control group and 14 in experimental group. They were non-Japanese major recruited from Xitun District, Taichung City. Both groups read the same Japanese learning E-book, and the experimental group used LINE to assist learning in addition. The experimentation lasted for two weeks, followed by questionnaire survey and Japanese language tests to investigate the learners' motivation, attitude and test outcomes. The results showed that (1) the +LINE experimental group students scored significantly higher than the control group in Vocabulary and Grammar, one sub-test of the Japanese language test, and (2) the control group, reading the E-book only, showed significant improvement in sub-test Reading from pretest to post test, indicating the effectiveness of the E-book improving Reading of Japanese learning. The qualitative analysis from questionnaire survey showed that advantages of using LINE to assist language learning: Convenient, instant, close to daily lives, and easy to use as well as the stickers in LINE application. It is suggested that more LINE usage is applied to assist in learning strategies.

中文文獻
大新書局出版社編輯部（2015）「大家的日本語 初級Ⅰ（改訂版）」台北：大新書局。
中國58論文網（2017）。什麼是教材編排，教材編排是什麼意思。http://ybchuban.com/jcwt/2081.html
出口仁（2012）。大家學標準日本語【初級本】。新北：檸檬樹。
史美瑤（2012）。21世紀的教學：以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。評鑑雙月刊，36，42-44。
朱作仁（1987）。教學辭典。江西教育出版社。
吳美麗（2004）。教材編製之探討與教材編選原則。http://163.21.236.197/~envir2/biodiv/20040715/17.pdf
林士鈞（2014a）。新日檢句型‧文法，一本搞定！。台北：瑞蘭國際。
林士鈞（2014b）。善用30分鐘日檢N5楽楽過 （二版）。台北：考用。
柯宜青（2011）。電子書融入青年文學閱讀課程以增進非英語主修大學生之英語 能力和學習動機。國立屏東教育大學碩士論文，未出版，屏東縣。
范搌容（2015）。智慧型手機通訊軟體的使用者經驗之研究—以LINE 為例。世新大學碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
財團法人語言訓練測驗中心（2010）。第二外語能力測驗（基礎級）研發計畫研究報告。https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/SFLPT/report/Japanese.pdf
財團法人語言訓練測驗中心（2016a）。第二外語能力測驗-基礎級（SFLPT®-Basic）簡介。https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/SFLPT.htm
財團法人語言訓練測驗中心（2016b）。民國105年SFLPT統計報告。https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/academics/SFLPT_Doc/105%E5%B9%B4_%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E5%A4%96%E8%AA%9E%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B%E6%B8%AC%E9%A9%97%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf
財團法人語言訓練測驗中心（2017）。財團法人語言訓練測驗中心新聞稿—2017 年第 1 回「日本語能力試驗」（JLPT）4 月 1 日開始報名。https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/JLPT/2017JLPT1Ano.pdf
國際及兩岸教育司（2016）。105年度世界各主要國家之我留學生人數統計表。http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2500/News_Content.aspx?n=2D25F01E87D6EE17&sms=4061A6357922F45A&s=ECAAD5FFD81C8057
張鴻苓（1993）。語文教育學。北京師範大學出版社。
清川久慈（2014）。連日本小學生都在用的第一本日文動詞課本。台北：我識。
陳淑娟、李美麗與郭獻尹（2011）。台灣日語教學實踐研究之動向-分析論文架構。 台灣日語教育學報，16，1-25。
彭綉婷、何黎明（2013）。綜合高中商業服務學程與高職商業經營科學生之學習態度及學業成就分析－以南部地區為例。海洋休閒管理學刊，4，79-103。
黄淑妙、江俊杰（2003）。大學與技職院校日語多媒體教材使用現況之考察。台灣日本語文學報，18，341-365。
黃淑貞（2013）。教學電子書運用於國中生英語學習之成效。銘傳大學碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
劉文照、海老原博（2014）。新日本語能力試測驗N5必勝單字。台北：寂天文化。
劉惠婷（2012）。教學電子書運用於國小三年級英語學習成效之研究。國立嘉義大學碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。
潘東正（2016）。日檢N4、N5合格，文法完全學會（三版）。台北：書泉。
檸檬樹日語教學團隊、高島匡弘（2013）。專門替華人寫の圖解日語助詞：不需要動詞變化，就能清楚傳達句意的關鍵元素。新北：檸檬樹。
觀光局（2016）。近6年中華民國國民出國目的地人數統計。http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/statistics/year.aspx?no=134

英文文獻
Anuradha, K. T., & Usha, H. S. (2006). Use of e-books in an academic and research
environment: A case study from the Indian Institute of Science. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(1), 48–62.
Azar, A. S., & Nasiri, H. (2014). Learners’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of mobile assisted language learning (mall) in L2 listening comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1836-1843.
Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: xamining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 9-60.
Basogl, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 1–7.
Bearne, E. (2005). Multimodal texts: What they are and how children use them. In J. Evans (Ed.), Literacy moves on: Popular culture, new technologies, and critical literacy in the elementary classroom (pp. 13–29). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4-20.
Carden, M. T. J. (2008). E-books are not books. Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM workshop on Research advances in large digital book repositories (pp. 9–12). California: Association for Computing Machinery.
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies, going to the MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 9-16.
Chou, I. C. (2016). Reading for the purpose of responding to literature: EFL students’ perceptions of e-books. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 1-20.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.
Chuang, K. W. (2009). Mobile Technologies Enhance the E-Learning Opportunity. American Journal of Business Education, 2(9), 49-54.
Cojocnean, D. (2016). Factors Determining Students’ Low Usage of Mobile Tools in their English Vocabulary Learning. PORTA LINGUARUM, 1, 31-43.
Dinkelman, A., & Stacy-Bates, K. (2007). Accessing e-Books through academic library web sites. College and Research Libraries, 68(1), 45- 57.
Ferdig, R. E. (2007). Editorial: Examining social software in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 5-10.
Fojtik, R. (2015). Ebooks and mobile devices in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 742-745.
Gibson, C., & Gibb, F. (2011). An evaluation of second-generation ebook readers. The Electronic Library, 29(3), 303–319.
Hsieh, S. W. (2011). Effects of Cognitive Styles on an MSN Virtual Learning Companion System as an Adjunct to Classroom Instructions. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 161-174.
Hsieh, S. W., & Wu, M. P. (2013). Exploring Learning Performance toward Cognitive Approaches of a Virtual Companion System in LINE app for m-learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(4), 337-346.
Hsu, J. (2007). Innovative technologies for education and learning: Education and knowledge-oriented applications of blogs, wikis, podcasts, and more. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 70-89.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Martens, J. B. (2009, April). User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 729-738). ACM.
Kline, R. B., & Santor, D. A. (1999). Principles & practice of structural equation modelling. Canadian Psychology, 40(4), 381.
Kumar, V., Abbas, A. K., Fausto, N., & Aster, J. C. (2014). Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition E-Book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e‐book reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22.
LINE (2011). LINE. Retrieved from http://line.naver.jp/en/
Liu, P. L. (2016). Mobile English Vocabulary Learning Based on Concept-Mapping Strategy. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 128-141.
Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Vintage Books.
Nunberg, G. (1996). The future of the book (Vol. 3). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ozdogan, M., Basoglu, N., & Ercetin, G. (2012, July). Exploring major determinants of mobile learning adoption. Paper presented at the PICMET Conference: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, Vancouver, Canada. 
Palalas, A. (2011). Mobile-assisted language learning: designing for your students. In
S. Thouësny & L. Bradley (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: views of emergent researchers (pp. 71-94). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
Pinkwart, N., Hoppe, H.U., Milrad, M. & Perez, J. (2003) Educational scenarios for the cooperative use of Personal Digital Assistants. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 383-391.
Polsani, P. (2003). Network learning. In K Nyiri K (ed) Mobile learning essays on philosophy, psychology and education. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, 2003, 139–150. ISBN 3 85165 603 2.
Sharma, S. K., & Kitchens, F. L. (2004). Web services architecture for m-learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(1), 203-216.
Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34, 177–193.
Sharples, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 220–234.
Shih, R. C., Lee, C., & Cheng, T. F. (2015). Effects of English spelling learning experience through a mobile LINE App for college students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2634-2638.
Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Retrieved from http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning
Soleimani, E., Ismail, K., & Mustaffa, R. (2014). The acceptance of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) among post graduate ESL students in UKM. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 457-462.
Tai, Y. (2012). Contextualizing a MALL: Practice design and evaluation. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 220-230.
Talavan, N., & Ávila-Cabrera, J. J. (2015). Audiovisual reception and MALL: adapting technology to real needs. Porta Linguarum, 24, 33-46.
Tanah, L. (2009). Definition of learning achievement. Retrieved from
http://lantaitanah.blogspot.tw/2009/10/definition-of-learning-achievement.html
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of computer assisted learning, 21(3), 217-228.
Traxler, J. (2005) Mobile Learning: It’s here, but what is it? Interactions, 25. Retrieved from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/resource/interactions/archive/issue25/ traxler.
Trifanova, A., & Ronchetti, M. (2003). Where is mobile learning going? Proceedings of the E-learn Conference, 1795-1801. Retrieved from http://www.science.unitn.it/~foxy/docs/Where%20is%20Mobile% 20Learning%20Goi ng%20(E-Learn2003).pdf.
Ushioda, E. (2013). Motivation matters in mobile language learning: A brief commentary. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 1-5.
Verma, C. P. (2013). Intranet based messaging service on android smartphones and tablets. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(7), 1030–1032.
Viberg, O., & Gronlund, A. (2012, October). Mobile Assisted Language Learning: A literature review. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Helsinki, Finland.
Wehner, A., Gump, A., & Downey, S. (2011). Effects of Second Life on the motivation of undergraduate students learning a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 277–289.