簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 盧瑞琴
Ruey - Chen Lu
論文名稱： 圓錐貫入試驗土壤分類法的研究─以河川流域區分
A study on the Soil Classification Capabilities of CPT among Different River Basins in Taiwan
指導教授： 廖洪鈞
Hung Jiun Liao
口試委員: 蘇世豐
none
歐章煜
none
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年： 2005
畢業學年度： 93
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 106
中文關鍵詞： 摩擦比 、圓錐貫入試驗 、流域 、土壤分類圖 、有效錐尖阻抗
外文關鍵詞： Soil Classification chart, friction ratio, effective cone resistance, cone penetration test, Basin
相關次數： 點閱：171  下載：4 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 水壓錐貫入試驗(CPTu)為一優良的現地地質調查工具，只要配合少
    數傳統鑽孔取樣即可得到準確且經濟的大地地質調查工作；本研究採用
    平行鑽孔取樣，於試驗室完成土壤分類試驗，將實際的土壤類別與CPTu
    或者CPT 土壤分類圖法判釋的結果作比對，在八個不同地質環境的河川
    流域中，以有效錐頭阻抗(qE)及套筒摩擦力為基礎的Eslami - Fellenius 方
    法，在四種分析方法中判釋土壤類別的能力最佳，而且也易於使用；判
    釋能力次佳的是以正規化孔隙水壓為基礎的Robertson Bq 法，Begemann 方
    法的預測能力最低但很容易被修正以適合區域性使用。

    The piezocone penetration test (CPTu) is an excellent method for site
    investigation, that can determine geotechnical parameters correct and
    effective cost. This study select CPTu data among eight different river basins
    compare the labor soil classification test result from sampling next to CPTu
    location. There are four different soil classification charts to be evaluated
    within this research scope. Based on the results, the effective cone
    resistances qE classification chart by Eslami and Fellenius(1997) provided
    the most accurate classification. The next most accurate procedure was the
    pore pressure ratio based normalization chart by Robertson(1986). The
    Begemann method was the last accurate but could be modified to fit local
    application easily.

    第 一 章 緒論 1 1.1 前言................................................... 1 1.2 研究動機與目的......................................... 1 1.3 研究範圍............................................... 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 CPT/CPTU 土壤分類系統................................... 4 2.1.1 Begemann(1965) 法.................................. 5 2.1.2 Sanglerat et al., (1974)法........................ 7 2.1.3 Schmertmann 法.................................... 8 2.1.4 Douglas 與Olson 法................................. 9 V 2.1.5 Jones 與 Rust 法.................................. 10 2.1.6 Robertson et al. 法.............................. 11 2.1.7 Senneset et al. 法............................... 15 2.1.8 Eslami and Fellenius 法........................... 17 2.2 CPT/CPTU 土壤分類圖的選擇............................. 20 第三章 試驗儀器及試驗程序 22 3.1 儀器設備.............................................. 22 3.2、試驗步驟............................................. 25 3.3 術語.................................................. 26 2.4 CPT 的限制............................................ 28 第四章 CPT 試驗結果與土壤類別分析 29 4.1 概述.................................................. 29 4.2 蘭陽溪流域............................................ 32 4.2.1 CPTu 試驗結果..................................... 33 4.2.2 CPT/CPTu 土壤分類結果............................ 33 4.3 淡水河流域............................................ 38 4.3.1 CPTu 試驗結果..................................... 38 4.3.2 CPT/CPTu 土壤分類結果.............................. 38 4.4 桃園沿海河川流域...................................... 42 4.5 大肚溪流域............................................ 43 4.5.1 台中港區........................................... 44 4.5.2 大肚溪南岸........................................ 48 4.6 濁水溪流域............................................ 53 4.6.1 CPTu 試驗結果..................................... 53 VI 4.6.2 CPT/CPTu 土壤分類結果.............................. 54 4.7 八掌溪流域............................................ 58 4.7.1 CPTu 試驗結果..................................... 58 4.7.2 CPT/CPTu 土壤分類結果............................ 58 4.8 曾文溪流域............................................ 62 4.8.1 CPTu 試驗結果..................................... 62 4.8.2 CPT/CPTu 土壤分類結果.............................. 62 4.9 二仁溪流域............................................ 66 CPTu 試驗結果........................................... 66 4.9.2 CPT/CPTu 土壤分類結果............................. 66 4.10 綜合討論............................................. 70 第 五 章 結論與建議 81 結論...................................................... 81 建議.....................................................82VI 參考文獻 83 附錄A CPTU 試驗結果 86

    1. 何春蓀，”台灣地質概論”，第10~19 頁，中央地質調查所，民國七
    十五年。
    2. 蔡攀鰲，”工程地質學”增訂初版，第294~298 頁，三民書局，民國
    七十八年。
    3. 陳斗生，「電子式圓錐貫入儀之工程應用」，地工技術雜誌，第13 期，
    第62~76 頁，民國75 年1 月。
    4. 李延恭，李豐博，陳圭璋，「不同貫入試驗結果分析台中港區砂土層
    工程性質的比較」，地工技術雜誌，第16 期，第39~50 頁，民國75
    年10 月。
    5. 秦中天，「電子式兼測水壓貫入錐的應用」，地工技術雜誌，第16 期，
    第23~31 頁，民國75 年10 月。
    6. Mayne, P. W. Christopher, B. R. and DeJong, J. Subsurface
    Investigations. Federal Highway Administration, Report
    FHWA-NHI-01-031, Washington, P9-4 2002
    7. Begemann, H. K. S., 1965. The friction jacket cone as an aid
    in determining the soil profile. Proceedings of the 6th
    International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
    Engineering, ICSMFE, Montreal, September 8-15, Vol. 2, pp.
    17-20.
    8. ASTM D 5778-95., Standard Test Method for Performing Electronic
    84
    Friction Cone and Piezocone Penetration Testing of Soils.
    9. Tom Lunne , Peter K. Robertson, John J.M. Powell, Cone
    Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice, Blackie Academic
    & Professional, London, UK, pp1~56(1997).
    10. Campanella, R, G., Gillespie, D., and Robertson, P. K. Pore
    pressures during cone penetration testing, Proceedings of the
    2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing ESOPT-2,
    Amsterdam, May 24-27, Vol. 2 pp. 507-512, 1982
    11. Campanella, R. G., and Robertson, P. K. Current status of the
    piezocone test, Proceedings of First Intermational Symposium
    on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, Mach 22-24, Vol. 1,
    pp.93-116, 1988.
    12. Schmertmann, J. H., Guidelines for cone test, performance, and
    design. Federal Highway Administration, Report FHWA-TS-78209,
    Washington, 145P 1978
    13. Eslami, A., and Fellenius, B. H., Pile capacity by direct CPT
    and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories. Canadian
    Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 880-898, 1997.
    14. Eslami, A., and Fellenius, B. H. Soil Profile interpreted from
    CPTu Data, Year 2000 Geotechnics, Geotechnical Engineering
    Conference, Asian Institute of Technology, Bankok, Tailand,
    November 27-30, 2000.
    15. Robertson P. K. Soil classification by the cone penetration
    test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27: pp. 151-158. 1990.
    16. Jefferies M. G. and Davies M. P., Soil classification by the
    85
    cone penetration test Discussion. Canadian Geotechnical
    Journal, 28: pp. 173-176. 1991.
    17. Olson, R. S., and Farr, V., Site characterization using the cone
    penetration test. American Society of Civil Engineers,
    Proceedings of In-Situ 86, ASCE SPT6 Blacksburg, June 23-25,
    pp. 854-868. 1986
    18. Robertson, P. K. Campanella, R. G., Gillespie, D., and Grieg,
    J., Use of piezometer cone data. Proceeding of American Society
    of Civil Engineers, ASCE, In-Situ 86 Specialty Conference,
    Edited by S Clemence, Blacksburg, June 23-25, Geotechnical
    Special Publication GSP No. 6, pp. 1263-1280. 1986
    19. Robertson, P. K. and Campanella, R. G., Interpretation of cone
    penetrometer tests, Part I sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,
    Vol. 20, No. 4, pp 718-733. 1983

    QR CODE