印度尼西亞傳統房屋使用不同接頭組裝合成木柱實驗研究

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	林金雄 ANTHONY - SUGIHARTO WONODIHARDJO
論文名稱：	印度尼西亞傳統房屋使用不同接頭組裝合成木柱實驗研究 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON WOODEN COMPOSITE COLUMN FOR INDONESIA TRADITIONAL HOUSE WITH DIFFERENT JOINTS
指導教授：	施宣光 Shen-Guan Shih
口試委員:	蔡孟廷 Meng-Ting Tsai 林慶元 Ching-Yuan Lin
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	設計學院 - 建築系 Department of Architecture
論文出版年：	2017
畢業學年度：	105
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	165
中文關鍵詞：	印度尼西亞玫瑰木、壓縮試驗、剪切強度、合成木柱、印度尼西亞的傳統房屋
外文關鍵詞：	Java Palisandre, Indonesia Rosewood, Paraserianthes Falcataria, Compressive Test, Composite Wood Column, Indonesia Traditional house
相關次數：	點閱：263 下載：58
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

作為世界上最大的森林地區之一，印度尼西亞一直面臨木材產品的危機。很久以前，許多印度尼西亞的傳統房屋仍然使用木材作為結構材料組件。但是今天很難找到一個新的傳統房子使用木材作為材料，這是因為今天木材供應價格太貴而且很難找到。為了更有效地利用木材，本研究提出了一個新的合成木柱的實驗研究，以保存印度尼西亞的傳統木製房屋。
在這項研究中，所使用的樣本是來自印度尼西亞鋸木廠公司的2種木材（Java Palisandre & Paraserianthes falcataria）的廢物部分。這項研究的主要思想是組裝四個小塊的廢木材，以創建一個新的合成矩形木柱，可以作為印度尼西亞的傳統木製房屋的主要結構部分。實驗研究分為2個初步試驗，剪應強度壓縮試驗和撤回連結試驗。實驗的所有結果已被塑彈性原理方法來檢查和分析以確定其失效模式。
目前，有許多方法來預測木材接頭的屈服載荷。本研究將使用Johansen，Foschi和US 5％釘徑法以及鋼釘和自攻螺絲接頭來預測23個剪應試樣的屈服載荷。實驗程序和3方法的比較表明，結果是可靠的，但仍然需要更多的測試為了獲得更多的數據。
實驗結果表明，試樣上的大多數連接能正常運作以及一些材料因爲連接失敗而斷裂。由於缺乏材料，將進一步研究使用更多的試樣部分來測試另一組裝形狀的可能性和測試規模更大的柱的全壓縮試驗。

As one of the biggest forest area in the world, Indonesia has been facing the crisis of wood product. Long time ago many traditional houses in Indonesia were still used wood as the structure material component. However, today it is difficult to find a new traditional houses using wood as a material, this problem occurred because today wood supply was too expensive and difficult to find. In order to use wood more effectively, this research proposed an experimental study of creating a new composite wood column to conserve traditional wooden house in Indonesia.
In this research, the specimens that used were the waste part of two species of woods (Java Palisandre & Paraserianthes falcataria) from Indonesia sawmill company. The main idea for this research is assembling a four small pieces of waste wood to create a new composite rectangular column, which can be used as a structural column for the main structure part of Indonesia traditional wooden house. The experimental study divided into 2 preliminary test, shear strength compressive test and connection withdrawal test. All results from the tests were reviewed and analyze using the plastic method to determine the failure mode from the test.
Currently, there are many methods to predict yield load of timber joints. This study will use Johansen, Foschi and US 5% nail diameter method to predict the yield load of 23 shear test specimens with steel nail and self-tapping screw joint. The comparison between experimental program and the three method shows that the result is reliable but still need more testing to obtain more data.
The result shows most connection on the specimen were work properly and some material was broken with the connection failure. Due to lack of material, there will be a further investigation, which use more specimen’s part to test another assembling shape possibility and a full compression test on bigger column scale.

ABSTRACT...............................................................i
TABLE OF CONTENT.....................................................iii
LIST OF TABLE.........................................................vi
LIST OF FIGURES......................................................vii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................1
1	Research Background............................................1
2	Research Scope.................................................9
3	Research Limitation............................................9
4	Research Objectives...........................................11
5	Research Contribution.........................................11
6	Research Outline..............................................12
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW...........................................15
1	Wood as a structural material.................................15
2	Indonesia Traditional Wooden Houses Structure.................17
3	Composite wood................................................20
4	Wood column...................................................22
4.1	Type of column................................................24
4.2	Wood Column Buckling Effect...................................25
5	Euler Buckling Effect.........................................26
6	Yield Theory..................................................28
6.1	Johansen Yield Load Theory....................................29
6.2	Foschi Yield Load Theory......................................32
6.3	US 5% Nail Diameter offset yield load.........................34
7	Conclusion....................................................35
CHAPTER 3 MATERIAL AND EXPERIMENT METHODOLOGY.........................36
1	Material......................................................36
1.1	Silk Tree.....................................................38
1.2	Java Palisandre...............................................43
2	Connection....................................................45
2.1	Steel Nail Fastener...........................................48
2.2	Self-Tapping Screw Fastener...................................49
2.3	Fastener Comparison...........................................49
3	Experimental Specimen.........................................51
3.1	Composite Wood Column.........................................51
3.2	Experimental Program Specimen Shape...........................57
3.3	Experimental Program Specimens Size...........................58
4	Experimental program..........................................60
4.1	Withdrawal Resistance Test....................................60
4.2	Shear Connection Compressive test.............................66
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL RESULT AND METHOD COMPARISON...................74
1	Withdrawal Resistance Test....................................74
1.1	Withdrawal Resistance Test Result.............................74
1.2	Withdrawal Resistance Test Problem............................75
1.3	Withdrawal Structural Damage Observation......................77
1.4	Withdrawal Resistance Test failure mode.......................81
1.5	Withdrawal Resistance Test Result Comparison..................83
2	Shear Connection Compressive Test.............................85
2.1	Shear Connection Compressive Test Result......................85
2.2	Structural Damage Observation.................................87
2.3	Shear Connection Failure Mode.................................94
2.4	Shear Connection Compressive Test Yield Load Comparison.......98
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH.............................113
1	Conclusion...................................................113
2	Future research..............................................115
REFERENCES...........................................................116
APPENDIX.............................................................118
                                

[1]Anino, E. (1997). Commercial plantation establishment, management, and wood utilization of Paraserianthes falcataria by PICOP Resources, In: Zabala, N. (ed.) International workshop (131–139). Proceedings of a workshop held November 13–19, 1994, Bislig, Surigao del Sur, Philippines. Winrock International, Morrilton, Arkansas, USA.
[2]ASTM. (1999A). "Standard test methods for specificgravity of wood and wood-base material". D2395-93. West Conshohocken, PA.
[3]ASTM. (2009). "Standart test method for mechanical fastener in wood". D1761-88. West Conshohocken, PA.
[4]Brock GR. (1957). The Strength of nailed timber joints. Forest Product Research, Bulletin No. 41, HMSO. London.
[5]Dawsonet al.Barry,. (1994). The Traditional Architecture of Indonesia. Thames and Hudson Ltd. London. p.109-146.
[6]Forest Product Labolatory. (1965). Nail-wihdrawal resistance of American woods. FPL-093, Research Note. Madison, Wis:. U.S FPL.
[7]Foschi RO. (1974). Load-Slip characteristic of nails. Wood Sci 7(1):69-76.
http://declaration.forestlegality.org/category/country/philippines. (無日期).
[8]JohansenK. W. (1949). Theory of timber connection. Int. Assoc for bridge and structural Eng. (IABSE) Pub., 9:249-262.
[9]Kis-JovakImre, et al.Jowa. (1988). Banua Toraja, Amsterdam. p.74-112.
[10]LemmensR.H.M.J. (2008年Accessed 6 October 2016月). Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. [Internet] Record from Protabase. Louppe, D., Oteng-Amoako, A.A. & Brink, M. (Editors). 擷取自 http://declaration.forestlegality.org/category/country/philippines
[11]Martawijaya, A. Kartasujana, I., Mandang, Y.I.,. (1989). Atlas Kayu Indonesia Jilid II. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan. Bogor, Indonesia.
[12]Sa'at ES. (2001). Strength of mechanical timber joints. 於 MalayaUniversity, Graduation Exercise, Department of Civil Engineering. University Malaya.
[13]Said, Abdul A. (2004). Toraja: Simbolisme Unsur Visual Rumah Traditional (Toraja: The Symbolism of Tradional House Visual Elements), p.47-83.
[14]Smith I, & Whale LRJ. (1987). Characteristic properties of nailed and bolted joints under short-term lateral load, part 1. Research philosophy and test program. J I wood Sci 11, (2):53-59.
[15]Smith IPQuenneville. (1999). Predicting capacities of joints with laterally loaded nails. In: International council for research and innovation in building and construction; working commision W18-timber sctructures (CIB-W18), 32nd meeting,. Graz, Austria.
[16]Soerianegara I, Lemmens RHMJ (eds.). (1993). Plant Resources of South-East Asia. No. 5(1): Timber trees: major. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文