簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王志楷
Chih-Kai Wang
論文名稱: 敵意併購與合意併購併後報酬與影響因子探討
The Study of Post-Merger Return and the Factor that Affect Hostile & Friendly Takeover
指導教授: 謝劍平
Joseph C.P. Shieh
口試委員: 陳俊男
none
王明隆
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 59
中文關鍵詞: 敵意併購合意併購事件研究法
外文關鍵詞: Hostile takeover, Friendly takeover, Event study
相關次數: 點閱:1061下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文以 1995~2010 共78 件美國公開發行之公司之敵意併購與合意併購案
    為樣本,採用事件研究法以累積異常報酬率(CAR)對併購案的若干因子與併購
    完成後各年度經營指標進行t 檢定及複迴歸分析,探討併購完成後,主併公司
    後續之累積股價異常報酬率是否與併購案態度有關,再將樣本細分為敵意併購
    與合意併購分別對本研究所採用的解釋變數進行複迴歸分析,希望能找出影響
    敵意併購與合意併購後續股價異常報酬率的變數。
    t 檢定結果發現,總樣本的併購完成後平均累積異常報酬率為負,且具統計
    上的顯著性,若把樣本拆分為敵意併購與合意併購分別檢定,合意併購樣本的
    平均累積異常報酬在併購完成當期、併購完成後一年、併購完成後兩年都顯著
    為負,敵意併購在同段時期的平均累積異常報酬率亦為負,但不具統計上的顯
    著性。本研究對併購案各解釋變數的進行複迴歸分析發現:併購案態度與主併
    公司併購完成後之累積股價異常報酬率有正向顯著關係,跨產業併購則對累積
    股價異常報酬率有負向顯著關係。至於經營指標的各類會計指標:併購完成當
    季之銷管費用率具有負向顯著關係,敵意併購樣本併購一年後之資產周轉率與
    累積異常報酬率有正向顯著關係,敵意併購樣本併購兩年後之負債比率與資產
    報酬率成正向顯著,每股盈餘為負向顯著,但綜觀各年之結果無發現有變數具
    有持續性的統計顯著關係。


    This paper uses 78 US public company M&A cases from 1995 to 2010 as sample
    and using event study to examine whether there are any abnormal returns related to deal attitude. Furthermore, multiple regression model is used to find out which indicator may influence the cumulative abnormal return (CAR).
    After t-test, it is found that the average CAR of all 78 samples have negative significance. We separate these 78 samples into hostile takeover and friendly takeover and do t-test again. We find that friendly takeover cases have negative significance abnormal return in all period of our sample. Hostile takeover cases also have negative return but did not reach the significance level. This paper uses multiple regression model and it is found that (1) deal attitude has positive significant influence to CAR
    (2) cross industry M&A has negative significant influence to CAR
    (3) business operating ratios don’t have continuous significant impact to CAR.

    致謝................................................................ I 摘要............................................................... II ABSTRACT ....................................................... III 目錄............................................................... IV 圖目錄.............................................................. V 表目錄.............................................................. V 第壹章 緒論......................................................... 1 第一節 研究背景與動機........................................... 1 第二節 研究目的與貢獻........................................... 3 第三節 研究架構流程............................................. 4 第貳章 文獻探討..................................................... 5 第一節 併購的動機與理論......................................... 5 第二節 併購能否帶來績效改善.................................... 12 第三節 敵意併購與合意併購...................................... 13 第四節 敵意併購與合意併購後續績效表現.......................... 14 第參章 研究方法.................................................... 16 第一節 樣本資料來源與選取標準.................................. 16 第二節 併購後效果衡量與變數定義................................ 17 第三節 事件研究法.............................................. 22 第四節 複迴歸分析.............................................. 24 第肆章 實證結果與分析.............................................. 26 第一節 敘述統計................................................ 26 第二節 累積異常報酬率檢定...................................... 34 第三節 複迴歸模型檢定.......................................... 36 第伍章 結論與建議.................................................. 42 第一節 研究結論................................................ 42 第二節 研究限制與建議.......................................... 44 參考文獻........................................................... 46 附表............................................................... 49

    中文部分
    1. 王淑芬,2008,白色騎士,敵意併購與股東利益,國立交通大學財務金融所碩士論文。
    2. 伍忠賢,2013,企業併購:理論與實務四版,新陸書局
    3. 沈中華與李建然,2000,事件研究法財務與會計實證研究必備,華泰文化事業公司。
    4. 林芊芊,2008, 敵意併購目標公司經營效率之研究,國立政治大學會計所學位論文。
    5. 金玉瑩,2007,台灣金融機構敵意併購問題之研究,國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    6. 洪啟仁,2008,企業併購交易指南:策略、模式、評估與整合,安侯企業管理股份有限公司。
    7. 孫泓毅,2005,台灣敵意併購之效益分析,國立清華大學科技管理所碩士論文。
    8. 張淑玲,2004,併購動機, 整合機制與績效評估-以平衡計分卡為例,國立成功大學企業管理學系學位論文。
    9. 張福成,1999,企業併購之個案研究,國立臺灣大學商學研究所。
    10. 陳碩耘,2014,執行長為創辦人與否對購併宣告效果之影響-以美國紐約證交所上市公司為例,國立政治大學財務管理所碩士論文。
    11. 謝劍平,2010,現代投資銀行三版,智勝文化。
    英文部分
    1. Agrawal, A., J. F. Jaffe, and G.N. Mandelker. 1992. ” The post‐merger performance of acquiring firms: a re‐examination of an anomaly” Journal of Finance, September, Vol 47, NO.4,1605-1620.
    2. Angwin, D. 2007. ” Motive Archetypes in Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): The Implications of a Configurational Approach to Performance.” Advances in mergers and acquisitions, Vol.6, 77-105.
    3. Armour, J., J. B. Jacobs, and C. J. Milhaupt. 2011. “Evolution of Hostile Takeover Regimes in Developed and Emerging Markets: An Analytical Framework”
    Harvard International Law Journal, Winter, Vol.52, NO.1, 221-284.
    4. Bruner, R. F. 2002. ” Does M&A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker” Journal of Applied Finance, Spring, Vol.12,NO.1, 48-68.
    5. Celikyurt, U., M. Sevilir, and A. Shivdasani. 2010. “Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs” Journal of Financial Economics, June, Vol.96, Issue 3, 345-363.
    6. Con, R.L., A. Cosh, P. Guest and A. Hughes. 2005. ”The impact on UK acquirers of domestic, cross‐border, public and private acquisitions” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, June, Vol.32, Issue5-6, 815-870.
    7. Cosh, A. and P. Guest. 2001. The long-run performance of hostile takeovers: UK evidence.
    8. Dealogic 2014. Global M&A Review.
    9. Healy, P. M., K.G. Palepu, and R.S. Ruback. 1992. “Does corporate performance improve after mergers?” Journal of financial economics, April, Vol.31, Issue 2, 135-175.
    10. Kummer, C. and U. Steger. 2008. “Why merger and acquisition (M&A) waves
    reoccur: the vicious circle from pressure to failure.” Strategic Management Review, January, Vol.2, Issue 1, 44-63.
    11. Martynova, M. and L. Renneboog. 2008. “A century of corporate takeovers: What
    have we learned and where do we stand?” Journal of Banking & Finance,
    October, Vol.32, Issue 10, 2148-2177.
    12. McKinsey & Company. 2010. ”Perspectives on merger integration”
    13. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. “Characteristics of Hostile and Friendly Takeover Targets” NBER Working paper, June, NO.2295
    14. Raconteur. 2014. M&A 2015 OUTLOOK.
    15. Schwert, G. W. 2000. “Hostility in Takeovers: In the Eyes of the Beholder?”
    Journal of Finance, December, Vol.55, NO.6, 2599-2640.
    16. Teerikangas, S. and P. Very. 2006.” The Culture–Performance Relationship in M&A: From Yes/No to How” British Journal of Management, March, Vol.17,
    Issue S1, 31-48.
    17. Tichy, G. 2001. "What do we know about success and failure of mergers?"
    Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, December, Vol.1, Issue 4, 347-394.
    18. Trautwein, F. 1990. “Merger motives and merger prescriptions.” Strategic
    management journal , May, Vol.11, Issue 4, 283-295

    QR CODE