人類世指的是全球現代人類活動對地質和環境所帶來的深層改變，有望成為新的地質紀元。儘管尚未得到地質學正式承認，但廣泛的討論表明其具有跨學科性質，對未來產生深遠影響，並為各領域提供新的思考框架。本創作《浮生記號》以人類世為背景，旨在探討人類活動對地貌所帶來的深刻變化，特別聚焦於農業與礦業在土地上留下的文明軌跡、難以降解的人造物質形成的科技化石，以及隨著工業發展而普及的都市化現象，並由此發展與之對應的《脈動》、《渦流》和《餘響》三項系列創作子題，呈現人類對環境進行塑造和改變的過程。此外，也將語言哲學中對後現代的關懷引入，以現代理性觀點的語言指涉為起點，並延伸至文字在排版空間方面對想像力的影響。透過對於國內外漢字圖像詩的深入分析，深化自身對於文字形式與內涵之掌握，作為後續創作之依據。在視覺創作方面，本創作以非自然物件的皺褶與損壞痕跡為主要靈感，對其進行視覺上的線條抽取，並以鉛字打印作為偶然性的視覺實驗，在創作成果中作為特定文字的排佈依歸。以此展示人類活動對地貌產生的影響，同時呈現人們對於自然的現代性詮釋。

The Anthropocene refers to profound changes in the Earth's geology and environment caused by modern human activities, potentially marking a new geological epoch. Although not officially recognized by geology, extensive discussions suggest its interdisciplinary nature, with far-reaching implications for the future and providing new frameworks for various fields. This artistic creation, "Markings of Life," is set against the backdrop of the Anthropocene, aiming to explore the profound changes in the landscape brought about by human activities. It particularly focuses on the civilization traces left by agriculture and mining on the land, the technofossils formed by non-degradable artificial materials, and the urbanization phenomenon widespread with industrial development. Three sub-themes, "Pulsation," "Whirlpool," and "Resonance," are developed to depict the process of humans shaping and altering the environment. Additionally, the thesis incorporates concerns from linguistic philosophy regarding postmodernity, starting from the linguistic reference of modern rational perspectives and extending to the impact of typography on imagination within layout spaces. Through in-depth analysis of Chinese concrete poetry domestically and internationally, the research aims to deepen understanding of the mastery of textual forms and content as a basis for subsequent creations. In terms of visual creation, the project draws inspiration from the folds and damage marks of non-natural objects, extracting their outlines. It utilizes letterpress printing as a fortuitous experimental visual element, serving as the starting point for the layout of specific texts in the creative outcome. This creation showcases the impact of human activities on the landscape whilst interprets nature with modernity.

Autin, W. J., & Holbrook, J. M. (2012). Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture. GSA today, 22(7), 60-61.
Biermann, F., et al. (2016). Down to earth: contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 39, 341-350.
Brown, A. G., et al. (2017). The geomorphology of the Anthropocene: emergence, status and implications. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(1), 71-90.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2021). The ‘Anthropocene’(2000). Paul J. Crutzen and the anthropocene: A new epoch in earth’s history, 19-21.
Davis, H., & Turpin, E. (2015). Art & death: Lives between the fifth assessment & the sixth extinction. Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies, 3-30.
Elmqvist, T., et al. (2021). Urbanization in and for the Anthropocene. npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 6.
Emil Ruder (1967). Typography: A Manual of Design. Niggli.
Gibbard, P. L., & Walker, M. J. (2014). The term ‘Anthropocene’in the context of formal geological classification. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 395(1), 29-37.
Harden, C. P., et al. (2014). Understanding human–landscape interactions in the “Anthropocene”. Environmental management, 53, 4-13.
Hamilton, C. (2015). Getting the Anthropocene so wrong. The Anthropocene Review, 2(2), 102–107.
Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171-180.
Lebreton, L., et al. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1-15.
Maya Lin (2015). Maya Lin: Topologies. Rizzoli New York.
Media Collective, R. (2013). Three and a Half Conversations with an Eccentric Planet. Third Text, 27(1), 108-114.
Michael Juliano（2015年4月27日）。Check out these amazing, colorful aerial photos of LA。Time Out Group。西元2023年12月23日，取自：https://www.timeout.com/los-angeles/things-to-do/check-out-these-amazing-colorful-aerial-photos-of-la
Mirschel, W., et al. (2020). Modelling and simulation of agricultural landscapes. Landscape Modelling and Decision Support, 3-21.
Morton, T. (2018). Being ecological. Mit Press.
Raupach, M. R., & Canadell, J. G. (2010). Carbon and the Anthropocene. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 210-218.
Raven, J., et al. (2005). Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. The Royal Society.
Ruddiman, William F. (2013). The Anthropocene. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 41(1), 45–68. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-123944
Santana, C. (2019). Waiting for the Anthropocene. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Schuster, J. (2013). Between manufacturing and landscapes: Edward Burtynsky and the photography of ecology. Photography and Culture, 6(2), 193-212.
Shaw, M., & Trossell, W. (2014). Digital doppelgängers: future scanscapes. Architectural Design, 84(1), 20-29.
Steffen, W., et al. (2011). The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40, 739-761.
Steffen, W., et al. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252-8259.
Swindles, G. T., Roland, T. P., & Ruffell, A. (2023). The ‘Anthropocene’is most useful as an informal concept. Journal of Quaternary Science, 38(4), 453-454.
Timothy Morton (2019). Being Ecological. The MIT Press
Trischler, H. (2016). The Anthropocene: A challenge for the history of science, technology, and the environment. NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 24(3), 309-335.
Walter J. Ong. (1982). Orality and literacy : the technologizing of the word, New York : Methuen.
Wanner, H., Solomina, O., Grosjean, M., Ritz, S. P., & Jetel, M. (2011). Structure and origin of Holocene cold events. Quaternary Science Reviews, 30(21-22), 3109-3123.
Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J. A., Williams, M., Ellis, M. A., & Snelling, A. M. (2014). A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene?. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 395(1), 1-21.
Waters, C. N., et al. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351(6269), aad2622.
Zalasiewicz, J., et al. (2016). The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 13, 4-17.
Zalasiewicz*, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., & Crutzen, P. (2010). The new world of the Anthropocene. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(7), 2228–2231.
Zehle, S. (2008). Dispatches from the depletion zone: Edward Burtynsky and the documentary sublime. Media International Australia, 127(1), 109-115.
王慶節、陳嘉映（譯）（1990）。存在與時間（原作者：Martin Heidegger）。台北市：久大文化。
吳正芬（2017）。陳黎圖像詩符號美學探析。語文教育學報，3期 Pp. 119-160
吳明益（2007）。家離水邊那麼近。新北市：二魚文化。
孟東籬（1986）。素面相見。台北市：爾雅出版社。
紀金慶（2019）。偽理性。台北市：財經傳訊。
涌井隆（2015）。新国誠一の具体詩。言語文化論集。巻 36, 号 2, p. 127-138
陳欣白（2003）。對話與溝通。台北市：揚智文化。
陳若盈（譯）（2021）。地球絕景：從空中目睹人類世的曙光與環境保育的契機。台北市：城邦文化有限公司 尖端出版。
陳秋惠（2018）。circle, a graphic design zine（第13期）。台北市：方法原創有限公司。
陳美智、游承彥、林依瑩、蔡佳曈（譯）（2023）。人類世：凝視．消逝中的地表（原作者：Sophie Hackett等）。高雄市：高雄市立美術館。
陳雅汝（譯）（2013）。反轉地圖（原作者：Katharine Harmon、Gayle Clemans）。台北市：紅桌文化。
陳榮華（2017）。海德格《存有與時間》闡釋（三版）。國立臺灣大學出版中心。
陳黎（2003）。島嶼邊緣。台北市：九歌。
陳黎（2005）。苦惱與自由的平均率。台北市：九歌。
莊安祺（譯）（2015）。人類時代：我們所塑造的世界（原作者：Diane Ackerman）。台北市：時報文化。
許雅雯（譯）（2022）。人類世的文學：臺灣作家吳明益的生態批評研究（原作者：Gwennaël Gaffric）。臺北市：新經典圖文傳播有限公司。
黃心儀（2015）。臺灣圖象詩－讓文字越界。漢學研究通訊，34卷1期Pp. 17-27。
解昆樺（2017）。從圖像詩到視覺詩：中國暨義大利當代詩人視覺詩畫聯展（1984）、視覺詩十人展（1986）之理論與實踐文本。臺灣文學研究學報，(24)，297-341。
新国誠一（2019）。新国誠一詩集。株式会社思潮社。