簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡美鈴
Elizabeth Citra Dewi Rahardjo
論文名稱: THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON CORPORATE SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON CORPORATE SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
指導教授: 徐中琦
Jon-Chi Shyu
口試委員: 郭啟賢
Chii-Shyan Kuo
劉邦典
Pang-Tien Liu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 89
中文關鍵詞: Corporate Social ResponsibilitySustained Competitive AdvantageIndonesiaCSRSCA
外文關鍵詞: Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustained Competitive Advantage, Indonesia, CSR, SCA
相關次數: 點閱:309下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

Continuous pressure of the implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an inescapable priority for business leaders. But often the engagement of CSR does not give as much expected return for the companies, mostly because the management often place business against society, and the CSR programs that most companies engaged are executed in generic ways instead of aligning it with the company’s strategies. If the companies can engage their CSR activities that present an opportunity to create shared value both for the business and the society, CSR can be a tool to achieve competitive advantage. The sustainability of the competitive advantage nowadays is no longer based solely on financial outcomes, but rather associated with non-financial outcomes that are less-tangible and exemplify the company’s distinguished values, in which the concept of sustainability lies on the possibility of competitive duplication.
Using Carroll’s (1991) CSR concept which distinguished CSR activities into four inter-related components, this research examines the influence of CSR conducted on Indonesian company’s sustained competitive advantage (SCA) with resource-based view perspective, using process performance as the indicator of SCA. The result showed that CSR engagement has a partial significant influence towards company’s SCA.


Continuous pressure of the implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an inescapable priority for business leaders. But often the engagement of CSR does not give as much expected return for the companies, mostly because the management often place business against society, and the CSR programs that most companies engaged are executed in generic ways instead of aligning it with the company’s strategies. If the companies can engage their CSR activities that present an opportunity to create shared value both for the business and the society, CSR can be a tool to achieve competitive advantage. The sustainability of the competitive advantage nowadays is no longer based solely on financial outcomes, but rather associated with non-financial outcomes that are less-tangible and exemplify the company’s distinguished values, in which the concept of sustainability lies on the possibility of competitive duplication.
Using Carroll’s (1991) CSR concept which distinguished CSR activities into four inter-related components, this research examines the influence of CSR conducted on Indonesian company’s sustained competitive advantage (SCA) with resource-based view perspective, using process performance as the indicator of SCA. The result showed that CSR engagement has a partial significant influence towards company’s SCA.

TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER I 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Research Problem 6 1.3. Research Purpose 7 1.4. Research Contribution 7 1.4.1. Theoretical Contribution 7 1.4.2. Practical Contribution 7 CHAPTER II 8 2.1. Literature Review 8 2.1.1. Agency Theory 8 2.1.2. Stakeholder Theory 9 2.1.3. Corporate Social Responsibility 12 2.1.4. Resource Based View 20 2.1.5. Sustained Competitive Advantage 24 2.2. Theoretical Framework 29 2.2.1. Hypothesis Construct 29 2.2.2. Research Model 32 CHAPTER III 33 3.1. Research Approach and Design 33 3.2. Data Collection Method 33 3.3. Research Population and Sampling 33 3.3.1. Population 33 3.3.2. Sampling 34 3.4. Variable Definition 35 3.4.1. Operational Definition of Economic Responsibility 36 3.4.2. Operational Definition of Legal Responsibility 36 3.4.3. Operational Definition of Ethical Responsibility 37 3.4.4. Operational Definition of Philanthropic Responsibility 38 3.4.5. Operational Definition of Overall Corporate Social Responsibility Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.6. Operational Definition of Sustained Competitive Advantage 39 3.5. Survey Methodology 40 3.6. Questionnaire Design 41 3.7. Measurement Framework 48 3.8. Data Analysis 48 3.8.1. Descriptive Analysis 48 3.8.2. Statistical Analysis 48 3.9. Qualitative Analysis 50 CHAPTER IV 51 4.1. Survey Data Collection 51 4.2. Research Variable Description 55 4.2.1. Independent Variable Description – Economic CSR 55 4.2.2. Independent Variable Description – Legal CSR 56 4.2.3. Independent Variable Description – Ethical CSR 57 4.2.4. Independent Variable Description – Philanthropy CSR 58 4.2.5. Dependent Variable Description – SCA 59 4.3. Data Examination 60 4.3.1. Reliability Test 60 4.3.2. Normality Test 61 4.3.3. Multicollinearity Test 63 4.4. Hypothesis Testing Result 63 4.4.1. Hypothesis Testing Between Economic CSR and SCA 64 4.4.2. Hypothesis Testing Between Legal CSR and SCA 64 4.4.3. Hypothesis Testing Between Ethical CSR and SCA 64 4.4.4. Hypothesis Testing Between Philanthropy CSR and SCA 64 4.4.5. Hypothesis Testing Between Simultaneous CSR and SCA Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.5. Result Analysis 64 4.5.1. The Impact of Economic CSR on SCA 64 4.5.2. The Impact of Legal CSR on SCA 65 4.5.3. The Impact of Ethical CSR on SCA 66 4.5.4. The Impact of Philanthropy CSR on SCA 68 4.5.5. The Impact of Simultaneous CSR on SCA Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER V 72 5.1. Conclusion 72 5.2. Practical Recommendation 74 5.3. Academic Recommendation and Research Limitation 74 REFERENCES 76

Adenye, Y. B., & Ahmed, M. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, VII(1).
Ardimas, W., & Wardoyo. (2014, June). Influence of Financial Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Company's Value on Publicly Traded Banking Companies in Indonesia. Benefit Journal of Management and Business, XVIII(1), 57-66.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985, June). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, XXVIII(2), 446-463.
Bansal, P. (2005, March). Evolving Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development. Strategic Management Journal, XXVI(3), 197-218.
Barney, J. (1991, March). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, XVII(1), 99-120.
Bertens, K. (2000). Business Ethics. Kanisius.
Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997, May/June). Integrated Performance Measurement Systems: A Development Guide. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, XVII(6), 522-535.
Bititci, U. S., Garengo, P., Dorfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012, September). Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews , XIV(3), 305-327.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2003, December). How the Resource-Based and the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Corporate-Level Strategy. British Journal of Management, XIV(4), 289-303.
Branco, M. C., & Rodriguez, L. L. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, LXIX, 111-132.
Cao, D., Berkeley, N., & Finlay, D. (2014, March). Measuring Sustained Competitive Advantage from Resource-Based View: Survey of Chinese Clothing Industry. Journal of Sustainable Development, VII(2), 89-104.
Carroll, A. B. (1991, July 1). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, XXXIV(4), 39-48.
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2006). Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Thomson/South-Western.
Cavaco, S., & Crifo, P. (2014, June 11). CSR and Financial Performance: Complementarity Between Environmental, Social, and Business Behaviours. Journal of Applied Economics, XLVI(27), 3323-3338.
Cheung, Y., Chinn, M., & Fujii, E. (2010). China's Current Account and Exchange Rate .
Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Chloe, C. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate FInancial Performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, XXXV(3), 291-311.
Clemens, B., & Lynn, B. (2010). A Framework of Theoritical Lenses and Strategic Purposes to Describe Relationship among FIrm Environmental Strategy, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance. Management Research Review, XXXIII(4), 393-405.
Cordasco, P. (2012). Consumers Continue to Prioritize Social Responsibility Across Business Sectors, Despite Recession. Retrieved from http://www.burson-marsteller.com/newsroom/lists/Press Releases
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Dahlsrud, A. (2008, January/ February). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, XV(1), 1-13.
Dicken, P. (2011). Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. Guilford Publications.
Ermawati. (2014). Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Company's Financial Performance of Indonesian Manufacture Companies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange.
Ethics, C. C. (1999). Principles of Stakeholder Management. Clarkson Centre for Business Management, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
Falkenberg, J., & Brunsael, P. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Strategic Advantage or A Strategic Necessity? Journal of Business Ethics, XCIX(1), 9-16.
Freedman, R. J. (2015, November 11). ... From the Chairman. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, XXV(1).
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. H., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. Yale University Press.
Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & deColle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Galbreath, J. (2005, September 30). Which Resources Matter the Most to Firm Success? An Exploratory Study of Resource-Based Theory. Technovation, XXV(9), 979-987.
Gallego-Alvarez, I., Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2011, November 15). Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation: A Resource-Based Theory. Management Decision, XLIX(10), 1709-1727.
Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., & Bititci, U. S. (2005). Performance Measurement Systems in SMEs: A Review for A Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, VII(1), 25-47.
Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004, August). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics , LIII(1-2), 51-71.
Gudono. (2014). Organizational Theory (3rd ed.). Yogyakarta BPFE.
Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989, September - October). Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors. Strategic Management Journal, X(5), 399-411.
Hart, S., & Banbury, C. (1994, May). How Strategy-Making Processes Can Make A Difference. Strategic Management Journal, XV(4), 251-269.
Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T. (2002). The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, XLIV, 110-125.
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001, February). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, XXII(2), 125-139.
Husted, B. W., & Salazar, J. D. (2006, January 10). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance. Journal of Management Studies, XLIII(1), 75-91.
Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016, May). Looking Inside the Black Box: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, XXIV(3), 253-273.
Jensen, M. C. (2001, Fall). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Journal of Applied Corporate FInance , XIV(3), 8-21.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976, October). Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, III(4), 305-360.
Kadek, R. (2014). Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility towards Company's Financial Performance. Journal of Accountancy , II(1), 3.
Kemp, M. (2001, December). Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Quixotic Dream or Confident Expectation? Technology, Business, and Society, Programme Paper United Nations Research Institute for Social Development(6).
Labaree, R. V. (2016). Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Quantitative Methods. University of Southern California Libraries.
Li, W., & Zhang, R. (2010, November). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, XCVI(4), 631-645.
Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Johnston, W. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, XII(1), 1-7.
Lowell, B. L. (2007). The New Metrics of Corporate Performance: Profit Per Employee. The McKinsey Quarterly(1), 56-65. Retrieved from www.mckinseyquarterly.com
Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1991). Measure Up! Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement. Blackwell Business.
Madura, J. (2006). International Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
Maruffi, B. L., R., P., & Malindretos, J. V. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Competitive Advantage of Multinational Corporations: What is the Right Balance? The Journal of Global Business Issues, VII(2), 69-81.
Mathews, J. A. (2002, December). Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, XIX(4), 467-488.
Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003, June). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, XLV(1), 109-120.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006, January 10). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, XLIII(1), 1-18.
Mertens, K. M. (2013). Milton Friedman and Social Responsibility: An Ethical Defense of the Stockholder Theory.
Moskal, B. M., & Leydens, J. A. (2000, November). Scoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, VII(10).
Muijs, D. (2010). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. SAGE Publications.
Nalband, N. A., & Kelabi, S. A. (2014, September). Redesigning Carroll's CSR Pyramid Model. Journal of Advanced Management Science, II(3), 236-239.
Penrose, E. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. September: OUP Oxford.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006, December). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011, January-February). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review.
Powell, T. C. (2001, September). Competitive Advantage: Logical and Philosophical Considerations. Strategic Management Journal, XXII(9), 875-888.
Rangan, V. K., Chase, L., & Karim, S. (2015, January-February). The Truth About CSR. Harvard Business Review.
Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, XXV(1), 23-37. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.366
Razafindrambinina, D., & Sabran, A. (2014). The Impact of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility on Operating Performance: An Investigation Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Indonesia. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, VI(1), 68-78.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997, June). A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. The Academy of Management Journal, XL(3), 534-559.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998, August). Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and The Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal , XIX(8), 729-753.
Simionescu, L. N., & Gherghina, S. C. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: Empirical Evidence from A Panel of the Bucharest Stock Exchange Listed Companies . Management & Marketing, IX(4), 439-458.
Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility : Whether or How? California Management Review, XLV(4), 52-76.
Stefanska, M. (2014). Competitive Advantage Based on CSR in Supply Chains - Suppliers About Retailers Strategy. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, VII(4), 35-44.
Ullman, A. A. (1985). Data in Search of A Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms. Academy of Management Review, X(3), 540-557.
Velasquez, M. G. (2006). Business Ethics: Concepts & Cases. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M., & Arenas, D. (2009, April). Exploring the Nature of the Relationship Between CSR and Competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, LXXXVII(1), 57-69.
WIndsor, D. (2006, January). Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, XLIII(1), 93-114.
World Bank. (2010). Retrieved from web.worldbank.org

QR CODE