簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 紀慧貞
Huei-Jhen Ji
論文名稱: 以系統動力學探討設計專案管理問題之研究
A Study for System Dynamics Applied to the Issues of Design Project Management
指導教授: 李欣運
Hsin-Yun Lee
口試委員: 楊亦東
I-Yung Yang
曾浩璽
HAO-HIS TSENG
陳介豪
Jieh-Haur Chen
李欣運
Hsin-Yun Lee
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 系統動力學設計階段缺失設計專案管理
外文關鍵詞: system dynamics, design stage flaws, design project management
相關次數: 點閱:186下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在國內建築工程生命週期中設計階段為整體專案成敗關鍵,若發生設計錯誤將導致後續階段工程問題與糾紛的情形發生,故設計階段之管理有一定的重要性。在設計管理中設計單位的效益主要目標就是達到設計品質控制、設計成本控制和設計進度控制的三項要求,稱作設計專案管理。
    本研究藉由國內外學術資料,整理出四大常見造成設計錯誤之問題為(1)趕工疲勞(2)業主需求誤解(3)溝通與協調時間(4)整體設計能力,以此作為設計專案管理之影響因子。
    針對設計流程、設計生產量、四大設計問題,分別進行系統思考並繪製因果環路圖,探討相關變數的相互影響關係。利用系統動力學動態仿真之特性,將因果環路圖轉換建構設計專案管理模型,其模擬結果可以得知設計過程對設計效益的影響程度,並能從中發現設計缺失問題。
    期望未來能對設計單位管理者在進行設計專案管理上實質的幫助,並能提早發現問題,先行預防與改善,以降低設計單位效益之影響。


    In the life cycle of domestic construction projects, the design phase is the key to the success or failure of the overall project. If a design error occurs, it will lead to engineering problems and disputes in the subsequent phases. Therefore, the management of the design phase is of certain importance. In design management, the main goal of the benefit of the design unit is to meet the three requirements of design quality control, design cost control and design progress control, which is called design project management.
    Based on domestic and foreign academic data, this study sorted out the four most common design deficiencies that caused design errors as (1) Fatigue at rush work (2) misunderstanding of owner’s needs (3) communication and coordination time (4) overall design ability as a design The impact factor of project management.
    In view of the design process, design production volume and the four major design deficiencies, systematically think and draw causal loop diagrams to explore the mutual influence of related variables. Using the characteristics of system dynamics dynamic simulation, the causal loop diagram is converted to construct a design project management model. The simulation results can know the degree of influence of the design process on the design benefit, and can find the design deficiency problems from it.
    It is hoped that in the future, it will be able to provide substantial assistance to design unit managers in the management of design projects, and to discover problems early, prevent and improve them first, so as to reduce the impact of design units’ benefits.

    中文摘要·································································I 英文摘要·································································II 致謝·····································································III 第壹章 緒論······························································1 1.1 研究背景與動機·················································1 1.2 研究目的······················································2 1.3 研究限制······················································2 1.4 研究架構與流程·················································3 第貳章 文獻回顧···························································5 2.1 設計階段之流程·················································5 2.2 設計階段常見缺失···············································10 2.3 設計專案管理···················································14 2.3.1 設計管理·····················································14 2.3.2 專案管理·····················································15 2.3.3 設計專案管理內涵··············································17 2.4 系統動力學·····················································19 2.4.1 系統動力學之理論特性··········································19 2.4.2 系統動力學應用在工程設計與專案管理之研究························20 第參章 研究方法···························································23 3.1 系統動力學之常見軟體············································23 3.2 系統動力學之建模程序············································24 3.3 系統動力學之因果回饋與環路·······································25 3.4 系統動力學之動力流圖組成元件·····································28 3.5 系統動力學之動力流圖常見函數·····································30 第肆章 因果環路圖·························································37 4.1 設計流程因果環路圖··············································37 4.2 設計生產量因果環路圖············································41 4.3 四項缺失導致設計錯誤因果環路圖···································43 4.3.1 趕工疲勞·····················································44 4.3.2 業主需求誤解··················································46 4.3.3 溝通與協調時間················································48 4.3.4 整體設計能力··················································50 4.5 本章小結·······················································53 第伍章 動力流圖···························································54 5.1 設計流程動力流圖················································56 5.2 設計生產量動力流圖··············································63 5.3 四項缺失導致設計錯誤動力流圖·····································68 5.3.1 趕工疲勞·····················································69 5.3.2 業主需求誤解··················································73 5.3.3 溝通與協調時間················································75 5.3.4 整體設計能力··················································77 5.4 專案三目標動力流圖··············································79 5.5 本章小結·······················································85 第陸章 個案分析···························································86 6.1 個案概況·······················································86 6.2 個案模擬·······················································87 6.3 模擬結果與分析··················································90 第柒章 結論與建議···················································96 7.1 研究結論·······················································96 7.2 研究貢獻·······················································97 7.3 研究建議·······················································97 參考文獻···························································98

    [1] 詹紹華,2005,「公共工程規劃設計階段成本及進度管理問題之研究」,碩士論文,國立交通大學土木工程系所。
    [2] 倪春耀,2005,「公務機關代辦建築工程施工專案管理能力之研究-以內政部營建署(北二辦)為例」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士在職專班。
    [3] 謝佳玲,2009,「建築專案設計流程規劃之研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
    [4] 黃世孟,1989,「論用後評估與建築設計之規劃研究」,賀陳詞教授七秩壽慶論文集,詹氏書局,頁363-376。
    [5] 邱寶止,2012,「學校工程建築設計個案作業管理之案例研究」,碩士論文,朝陽科技大學營建工程系碩士班。
    [6] 陳怡萱,2002,「專案工程設計階段管理之研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
    [7] 黃俊銘,2004,「統包工程設計階段管理缺失及因應策略之探討」,碩士論文,中華大學營建管理研究所。
    [8] 劉福勳,2000,「規劃設計階段營建管理之合理作業」,營建管理季刊,42卷,頁17-22。
    [9] 魏沛銳,2005,「國內公共工程規劃設計階段時程延遲原因分析」,碩士論文,中華大學營建管理研究所。
    [10] 戴期甦、何純平,2000,「設計管理之模式與技術」,營建管理季刊,45卷,頁50-57。
    [11] 江永清,2008,「建築設計業管理應用管理科學之指派模式探討」,碩士論文,國立中正大學企業管理所。
    [12] 連維仁,2000,「設計管理」,營建管理季刊,44卷,頁5-9。
    [13] 何純平,2004,「公共建築工程專案設計管理量化模式應用之探討」,碩士論文,中華大學營建管理研究所。
    [14] 盧勇,2001,「政府投資項目工程發包的研究」,同濟大學出版社。
    [15] 林家煌,2003,「公共工程統包專案設計管理之研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所。
    [16] 張裕滿,2009,「公共工程規劃設計品質管理缺失分析與改善策略之研究」,碩士論文,中華大學營建管理研究所。
    [17] 葉連發,2001,「專案工程設計品質管理系統建構之研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
    [18] 屠益民、張良政,2010,「系統動力學:理論與應用」,智勝文化。
    [19] 簡義源,2008,「以系統動力學研究營建材料生產裝備妥善率之影響因素-以某營建公司為例」,碩士論文,開南大學物流與航運管理系。
    [20] 程文彬,2012,「以系統動態學建立工程專案跨國設計外包管理模式」,碩士論文,中國文化大學企業實務管理數位學習碩士在職專班。
    [21] 林宣佑,2018,「工程專案時程管理之系統動力學研究-以高雄輕軌候車站為例」,碩士論文,國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系研究所。
    [22] 陳毓錚,2010,「以系統動力學方法初探營建工程專案管理-以台電變電所為例」,碩士論文,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所。
    [23] 吳定芳,2002,「應用動態資料增強系統動力學模型模擬技術之探討」,碩士論文,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所。
    [24] 李旭,2008,「Vensim使用手冊」,復旦大學管理學院。
    [25] 陶在樸,2016,「系統動力學入門」,五南出版社。
    [26] 鄧明元,2005,「系統思考於工程案例分析之初探」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
    [27] 李斌,2014,「基於系統動力學的施工項目質量控制研究」,重慶交通大學。
    [28] 詹堯安,2003,「設計與施工介面問題之研究-以系統動力學檢視公路工程案例」,碩士論文,國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程所。
    [29] 何信坤,2004,「產品設計專案管理之溝通效益研究」,碩士論文,實踐大學工業產品設計學系碩士在職專班。
    [30] 羅靜淑,2013,「以系統思考探討營建工程設計與施工之介面問題」,碩士論文,國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所。
    [31] 張大千,2002,「統包採購制度對公共工程品質影響之研究」,碩士論文,國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程所。
    [32] Musa, S., 2016, “EFFECTS OF DESIGN ERRORS ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.” International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, vol. 7, pp. 1099-1114.
    [33] Rounce, G., 1998, “Quality, waste and cost considerations in architectural building design management.” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 16, pp. 123-127.
    [34] Cooper, R., Junginger, S., and Lockwood, T., 2009, “Design Thinking and Design Management: A Research and Practice Perspective.” Design Management Review, vol. 20, pp. 46-55.
    [35] Edwin, H. W. C. Chan., Albert, P. C. Chan., and Ann, T. W. Yu., 2005, “Design Management in Design and Build Projects: The New Role of the Contractor.” in Construction Research Congress 2005, pp. 1-11.
    [36] Jones, J. C., 1970, “Design Methods: Seeds of Human Future, Wiley.”
    [37] David, I. C. and Roland, G., 2006, “Global Project Management Handbook: Planning, Organizing, and Controlling International Projects.” Second Edition, 2nd el. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
    [38] Senge, P. M., 1990, “The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization.” Doubleday/Currency.
    [39] Park, M., S.-H. Ji, H.-S. Lee, and Kim, W., 2009, “Strategies for Design-Build in Korea Using System Dynamics Modeling.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 135, pp. 1125-1137.
    [40] Love, P. E. D., Mandal, P., Smith, J. and H. Li, 2000, “Modelling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction.” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18, pp. 567-574.
    [41] Chritamara, S., Ogunlana, S. O. and Bach, N. L., 2002, “System dynamics modeling of design and build construction projects.” Construction Innovation, vol. 2, pp. 269-295.
    [42] Han, S., Love, P. and Peña-Mora, F., 2013, “A system dynamics model for assessing the impacts of design errors in construction projects.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 57, pp. 2044-2053.
    [43] Ogunlana, S., Jason, L., and Khalid, S., 1998, “Desman: A dynamic model for managing civil engineering design projects.” Computers & Structures, vol. 67, pp. 401-419.
    [44] i. s. inc, 2021. https://www.iseesystems.com/about.aspx.
    [45] I. Ventana Systems, 2016. https://www.ventanasystems.com/.
    [46] Sterman, J., 2000, “Business Dynamics, System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World.” vol. 19.
    [47] Abraham, K. and Farber, H., 1987, “Job Duration, Seniority and Earnings.” American Economic Review, vol. 77, pp. 278-97.
    [48] Akula, B. and Cusick, J., 2008, “Impact of Overtime and Stress on Software Quality.”.
    [49] I. Circadian ZircLight, 2020. https://www.circadian.com/

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/08/02 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE