研究生: |
吳啟宏 Chi-Hung Wu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
文字/背景色彩組合之語意差別分析 An analysis of semantic differential for text/background color combination |
指導教授: |
謝光進
Kong-King Shieh |
口試委員: |
李永輝
Yung-hui Lee 紀佳芬 Chia-fen Chi |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業管理系 Department of Industrial Management |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 88 |
中文關鍵詞: | 情感 、文字色彩組合 、感性工程 、語意差別法 、因素分析 |
外文關鍵詞: | affect, text color combination |
相關次數: | 點閱:227 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
目前文字/背景色彩組合的研究,大多集中在認知視覺績效的探討。文字/背景色彩組合對情感的影響也是影響作業績效的因素之ㄧ。本研究應用感性工程(Kansei Engineering)的概念,主要探討文字介面的目標/背景色彩組合和情感語義間的關係。
在本研究中,使用語意差別法找出30組相對應之語意字彙,分別給30位受試者在300 lux及700 lux的環境照度下及1:3及1:7的亮度對比下進行文字/背景色彩組合1-10分的評分。在資料分析方面,先針對所搜集到的資料進行因素分析,經過因素轉軸及萃取後得到3個因素,分別為清晰性因素、活動性因素及力量性因素。在相關分析上,利用實驗中的最後ㄧ題,也就是對色彩組合整體喜好度,來分析此30組語意字彙與色彩組合整體喜好程度之相關性及語意字彙彼此間的關連性,結果發現,所有語意字彙中只有實際的/浪漫的沒有達顯著水準。在迴歸分析中,均顯示了清晰性因素與受試者對色彩組合整體喜好度有最大相關性。在變異數分析中,以照度、亮度對比及色彩組合為自變項,研究結果發現照度只對活動性因素有顯著差異;而在清晰性及活動性因素上,亮度對比則是1:7顯著優於1:3;在色彩組合的部份,則顯示出多樣化的結果,在清晰性因素、活動性因素及色彩組合整體喜好程度中,黑/青被評為最低分之色彩組合,在力量性因素及色彩組合整體喜好程度中,紫/紅則是同樣被被評分為最高之色彩組合。
Abstract
This study investigated the relationships between figure/ground color combinations and human affects. Many previous researches focus on the effect of VDT color combination on visual performances and visual fatigue. However, affect factor is an important factor influencing performance, too. In this study, 30 participants used the Method of Semantic Differential with 30 adjectives to rate 10 text /background color combinations under 2 ambient illuminations and 2 luminance contrast. Factor analysis of the data identified three factors (legibility, activity, potency) in the affective expression of color combination. Regression of the overall preference on the three factors showed that legibility was the most important factor influencing preference.
Analysis of variance of the factor scores on color combination, luminance contrast and illumination showed that color combination had statistically significant effect on the three factor scores. Black on cyan and blue on black were significantly lower on legibility and activity, however, they were better on potency. On the other hand, purple on red and purple on yellow had lower potency score, but they were better on legibility and activity. In sum, different color combinations were rated differently on the three factors. Luminance contrast significant influenced legibility and activity. Luminance contrast 1:7 had significantly better legibility and activity scores than luminance contrast 1:3. However, the effect of illumination was significant only on activity factor. The findings of this study can contribute to Human-computer interface design.
參考文獻
長町三生 (1999),感性工學—產品開發之人因消費者導向新技術,國立成功大學工業設計所,專題討論:感性工學報告,3-9。
黃崇彬、原田 昭 (1998),日本感性工學發展現況及其在遠隔控制介面設計上應用的可能性,1998中日設計教育研討會論文集。
Matsubara, Yukihiro, Mitsuo Nagamachi (1999),感性工學—複合式感性工學系統與設計輔助,國立成功大學工業設計所 專題討論:感性工學報告,13。
柯超茗 (1997),材料視覺與觸覺質感意象的研究,國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
許鳳火 (1985),產品設計之理念與方法,大同公司印刷中心,台北。
馬永川 (1998),產品意象語彙與造型呈現對應關係之研究,國立台灣交通大學碩士論文。
朱介英 (1998),色彩設計計畫,美工圖書社,41-100。
李陽世 (1984),色彩技術原理與應用,台北:永大,46-60。
林清山 (1992),心理與教育統計學,台北:東華,384-390。
許勝雄、彭游、吳水丕 譯 (1996),人因工程,台北:滄海。
謝光進、陳明德 (1997),螢幕文字/背景色彩組合與相關作業特性對視覺績效與視覺疲勞影響之研究,國立台灣科技大學工業管理系博士論文。
謝光進、柯亞先、張振卿 (2003),亮度對比、極性和色彩組合對VDT績效之影響,中華民國人因工程學會十周年慶暨研討會論文集。
彭昭英 (2001),SAS與統計分析,台北:儒林。
謝光進、柯亞先 (2005),螢幕特性與各別差異對VDT圖像設計之偏好與腦波(EEG)的影響,國立台灣科技大學工業管理系博士論文。
ANSI/HFS (1998) American National Standard for Human Factors Engineeinrg of visual display terminal workstations. Human Factors Society, Inc., Santa Monica, California, 100-198.
Brown, R. O. and Macleod, D. I. A (1997) Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors. Current Biology, 7(11), 844-849.
Bruce, M. and Foster, J.J. (1982) The visibility of colored characters on colored background on viewdata displays. Visible Land, 32, 382-390.
Lippert, T. M. (1986) Color-difference prediction of legibility performance for CRT raster imagery. SID Digest of Technical Papers, XVI, 86-89.
Mark Meerum Terwogt and Jan B. Hoeksma (1995) Colors and Emotions: Preferences and Combinations. The Journal of General Psychology, 5-17.
Matthews, M. L. and Mertins, K., (1988) Working with color CRTs: Pink eyes, yellow fever, and feeling blue. In: E. D. Megaw (Ed.) Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society’s 1988, Annal conference-London: Taylor & Francis, 228-233.
National Research Council, (1983) Video display, work and vision. National Academy Pres, Washington, DC.
Pastoor, S., (1990) Legibility and subjective preference for color combinations in text. Human Factors, 32(2), 157-171.
Sanders, M. S. and McCormick E. J., (1993) Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
Synder, H. L., (1988) Image quality. In: Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction, Elsevier science publishers, Amsterdam.
Turville, K. L., Psihogios, J. P., Uimer, T. R. and Mirka, G. A. (1998). The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15°and 40° recommendations. Applied Ergonomics, 29(4), 239-246.
Wickens, C.D., (1992) Engineeinrg Psychology and Human Performance, Harper Cillins: New York.
Xu, W. and Zhu, Z. (1990) The effects of ambient illumination and target luminnance on colour in a CRT display. Ergonomics, 33, 933-944.
Yuiko Sakuta and Jiro Gyoba (2006) Affevtive Impressions and Memorability of Color-Form Combinations. The Journal of General Psychology, 191-207.
參考網址:
http://hyperphysics.Phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/cie.html
http://www.ergolabs.Com/kansei_engineering.htm
http://www.psy.ntu.edu.tw/pm/method/FA.htm