簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊守對
Shou-tui Yang
論文名稱: 極早期火災預警系統購買意願之實證
An Empirical Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions of Very Early Smoke Detection System
指導教授: 盧希鵬
Hsi-Peng Lu
羅天一
Tain-yi Luor
口試委員: 陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 51
中文關鍵詞: 知覺風險風險管理購買意願損害防阻極早期火災預警系統
外文關鍵詞: Product properties, Loss prevention, Very Early Smoke Detector Apparatus
相關次數: 點閱:411下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

當全球經濟陷入衰退之後,企業全面性地大幅削減安全預算,卻可能因此無法防範景氣下滑而導致的隱藏性企業風險。因此安全主管必須以更少的資源,發揮更大的效益,愈來愈多的企業以購置極早期火災預警系統提昇其火災防護能力,落實企業風險管理降低損失發生的機會,達到企業永續經營的目標。本研究以問卷調查法,透過探討企業「知覺風險」在績效因素、時間因素及財務因素三個知覺風險構面上,相較於產品特色與供應商的特性等五個自變數,相對應於企業購置極早期火災預警系統之「購買意願」此應變數的相互影響關係程度,期能對極早期火災預警系統業者提供有效的行銷管理策略與經營管理方向。本研究結果發現如下:
1. 客戶在財務面的風險認知會正向的影響其購買火災預警系統的意願。
2. 客戶對火災預警系統供應商的特性認知會正向的影響其購買火災預警系統的意願。
3. 客戶在績效面的風險認知會正向的影響其購買火災預警系統的意願。
4. 客戶對火災預警系統的商品的特色認知會正向的影響其購買火災預警系統的意願。
5. 企業若曾因火災而承受重大損失,將會正向的影響其購買火災預警系統的意願。
消費者之購買意願關係著於企業的獲利程度,而企業的風險管理落實程度更影響著企業購買極早期火災預警系統的決策,如何讓企業在購買評估的過程中產生較高的知覺品質,提高產品在企業心中之價值,進而讓企業產生更高的購買意願,應是業者擬定行銷管理策略的重要議題,本研究在管理實務上的建議如下:
1. 重視銷售人員的專業技能訓練,確實瞭解客戶的需求,提供完善的安全防護系統規劃設計。
2. 提供完善的售後服務與技術諮詢
3. 配合產物保險公司舉辦安全管理系統相關知識與風險管理趨勢研討會,提供客戶損害防阻應用技術與火災預警知識推廣。


In the current global economic crisis many companies cut their budget for safety systems. As a result many companies increase their risks. The safety officers need to use their resources wisely so as to still get the best possible risk control. Many companies in this situation purchase VESDA(Very Early Smoke Detector Apparatus)to maximize protection against fire losses. This will safeguard your company’s long-term success. This research is based on a survey of corporate safety managers. This study intended to understand the Perceived Risk as it is influenced by the three parts: the Financial Risk, the Performance Risk and Time Risk. Two other factors studied was perception of Product Properties and Characteristics of the System Supplier. We have tried to determine the relative influence of each of these five variables on the Consumer’s Purchase Intention.
We studied this in the hope that we can give some useful advice regarding an effective strategy for marketing and for a successful operation of businesses involved in supplying safety systems.
The main research results are:
1. We found that the financial risk positively affect the purchase of a VESDA system
2. The characteristics of the supplier positively affect the purchase of a VESDA system
3. The performance risk positively affect the purchase of a VESDA system
4. Product properties positively affect the purchase of a VESDA system
5. If the customer has experienced substantial losses due to fire it positively affect the purchase of a VESDA system
The consumer’s profit picture can influence his purchasing decision. The customer’s attitude about risk management also influences his inclination to purchase a VESDA system. To influence a corporation during its survey of systems so that is develops a higher perception of the quality of the system it will assist the customer in making a purchase decision.
Recommendations for improved management practices are as follows:
1. Training of your sales representatives is very important. You need to develop a real understanding of the customer’s need so that you provide a very complete safety system design.
2. Provide very good after-sales service and technical support.
3. Cooperate with insurance companies on conferences exchanging ideas about risk management innovations and current trends in the field.

摘要 I Abstract III 誌謝 V 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 壹、 緒論 1 一、 研究動機 1 二、 研究目的 4 三、 研究對象與範圍 5 四、 研究流程 5 貳、 文獻回顧 8 一、 知覺風險(Perceived risk) 9 二、 極早期火災預警系統之定義、產品特性與功能 13 三、 企業購買行為與產品特色及供應商特性 17 參、 研究方法 21 一、 研究模型 21 二、 研究假設 21 三、 研究變數之操作性定義 22 四、 問卷設計 23 五、 抽樣設計 27 六、 問卷之信度與效度 28 肆、 研究結果 32 一、 樣本特徵分析 32 二、 相關係數 35 三、 實證假設檢定 37 伍、 結論與建議 41 陸、 參考文獻 44 附錄–問卷 48

中文部份
1. 王蓉莉,「消費者對組合產品的知覺評估–以產品知識、產品涉入為調節變數」,碩士論文,義守大學管理科學研究所,(2001)。
2. 王耀隆,「高科技廠房建築物防火安全評估與風險改善之研究」,碩士論文,雲林科技大學防災與環境工程所,(2008)。
3. 吳統雄,態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、反應、反省,民意學術專刊,夏季號,頁29,(1985)。
4. 紀人毫,「高科技廠房建築物火災預期損失之模擬與實例驗證」,行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,(2007)。
5. 許士軍,謝文雀,行銷管理-亞洲實例,華泰書局,(1998)。
6. 徐艾怡,「口碑效應對組織購買意願的影響-以多功能事務機品為例」,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學企業管研系研究所在職專班,(2007)。
7. 陳銘祥,「消費者類型與知覺風險對網際網路購物意願影響之研究」,碩士論文,銘傳大學資訊管理研究所,(2001)。
8. 博見科技網站, http://www.provisiontech.com.tw/Product/Product_03.html
9. 鄭富馨, 降低風險策略對消費者知覺風險和網路購物意願的影響,碩士論文,國防管理學院資源管理研究所,(2002)。
10. 賴紀汶,「品牌價值認知與顧客忠誠之整合模式分析-TOYOTA 品牌顧客之實證研究」,TOYOTA管理論文競賽,(2006)。
11. 顏登通,高科技廠務,初版,全華科技圖書,(2005)。
英文部份
1. ACSNI Human Factors Study Group. Third Report: Organising for Safety, Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Health and Safety Commission, (1993).
2. Bansal,H.S. and Voyer,P.A., “Word-of-Mouth Processes Within a Services Phurchasa Decision Context” ,Journal of Service Research, Vol.3, No.2,pp.166-177(2000).
3. Bauer, R. A., “Consumer behavior as risk taking”, in R. S. Hancock( Ed.), Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World. Chicago: America Marketing Association, pp.389-398(1960).
4. Bearden & Shimp, “The Use of Extrinsic Cues to Facilitat Product Adoption”, Journal of Marketing Research,Vol.19,pp.229-239(1982).
5. Chaudhuri, A. and Holbrook, M.B., “The Chain of Effect from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Loyalty”, Journal of Marketing,Vol.65, No.2, pp.81-93(2001).
6. Cox, D. F., “Risk handling in consumer behavior- an intensive study of two cases”, in Donald F. Cox(ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press, pp.34-81(1967).
7. Cronbach, L. J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika. Vol.16, pp.297-334(1951).
8. Cunningham, S. M., “The major dimension of perceived risk”, in Donald F. Cox(ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press, pp.82-108(1967).
9. Derbaix,C., “Perceived Risk and Risk Relievers:An Empirical Investigation” ,Journal of Economic Psychology,Vol.3,pp.52-38(1983)
10. FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheets, US: Factory Mutual Insurance Company, (2003).
11. Fournier, S., “Customers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.24, No.4, pp.343-73 (1998).
12. Guieford, J. P., “ Fundamental Statistics”, Psychology and Education (4th ed.). New York: McGram-Hill,(1965).
13. Havlena,W.J.,and Desarbo,W.S., “On the Meseasurement of Perceived Consumer Risk” ,Decision Sciences,Atlanta,Vol.22,No.4,pp.927-939(1991).
14. IAEA, “Safety Culture Series No.75-INSAG-4”, Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, (1991).
15. James McManus, “The World Market for Fire Detection Suppression Products”, IMS Research ,(2008).
16. Jocoby,J.and Kaplan,L.“The Components of Perceived Risk” ,In M.Venkatesan(Ed.),Proceedings,3rd Annual Conferenca,Chicago:Association for Consumer Reasearch,pp.382-393(1972).
17. Kaplan,L.B.,Szybillo,G.J.,and Jacoby,J., “Components of Perceived Risk in Product Purchase:A Cross-Vaildation” ,Journal of Applied Psychology,Vol.59,No.3,pp.287-291(1974).
18. Kerlinger, F.N., Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, (1986).
19. King,Maryon F and Siva K Balasubramanian, “The effects of expertise,and goal,and product type on adoption of preference formation strategy” ,Academy of Marketing Science Journal,Vol.22,pp.146-159(1994)
20. Kotler,Philip,Marketing Management:Analysis,Planning,Implentation and Control,10th Edition,Prentice-Hill Inc.,(2000).
21. Midgley, “Effects of information supply and demand on judgment accuracy: evidence from corporate managers”, The Accounting Review, Vol.58, pp.284-293(1983).
22. Mitra,Kaushik,Michele C.Reiss and Luuis M.Capella,“An Examination of Perceived Risk,Information Search and Behavioral Intentions in Search,Experience and Credence Services” , Journal of Services Marketing,Vol.13,No.3,pp.208-228(1999).
23. Mitchell,V.W.,and Greatorex,M. ,“Risk Perception and Reduction in the Purchase of Consumer Services”, The Service Industries Journal,Vol.13,No.4,pp.179-200(1993).
24. Mitchell,V.W.,and Greatorex,M. ,“Modeling Consumer Risk Perception Preferences from Percevied Loss Data” , Journal of Economic Psychology,Vol.15,pp.669-685(1994).
25. Mou and Chen, “Risk Management in Semiconductor Industry”, Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology Workshop, pp.197 - 200( 2004).
26. Oxford Metrica, Improving Risk Quality to Drive Value, US: Factory Mutual Insurance Company, (2003).
27. Kolter,P., “Marketing Management Analysis,Planning,Implementation and ontrol,”Prentice-Hall,NJ,pp.433-437,pp.718-733(1997).
28. Peter and Tarpey, “A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies”, Journal of Consumer Research , Vol.2, pp. 29-37(1975).
29. Roselius,Ted.,“Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods”, Journal of Marketing ,Vol.35 , pp.56-61(1971).
30. Richard M.Cyert,Hebert A.Simon,and Doland B.Trow,“Obervation of Business Decision” , Journal of Business,October,pp.237-285(1956).
31. Robinson,Fairs,Wind,“Industrial Buyer and Creative Markerting”,Allyn & Bacon,Boston,(1967).
32. Sheth, J. N.,“A Model of Industrial Buyer Behavior” ,Journal of Marketing,Vol.37,October,pp.50-56(1973)
33. Stone,R.N.,and Gronhaung,K., “Perceived Risk: Further Consideration for the Marketing Discipline” ,European Journal of Marketing,Vol.27,No.3,pp.39-50(1993).
34. Sweeney,J.C.,Soutar,G.N.,and Johnson,L.W., “The Role of Perceived Risk in the Quality-Value Relationship: A study in a Retail Environment “,Journal of Retailing,Vol.75,pp.77-105(1999).
35. Tan, “Straegies for Reducing Consumers’Risk Aversion in Internet Shopping”,Journal of Markerting,Vol.16,No.2,pp.168-180(1999).
36. Thakor,M V,Lea Prevel Katsanis, “A model of brand and country effects on quality dimension:Issues and implications” ,Journal of International Consumer Marketing,Vol.9,pp.79-100(1997).
37. Webster.Jr,Wind,“A General Model for Understanding Organizational Buying Behavior”, Journal of Marketing,Vol.36, April, pp.12-19(1972).

QR CODE