近幾年來資訊電腦工業的產業生態變化非常的大，其背後推手為低價電腦的快速成長，促使相關的產業之生產設備與產品之應用成本降低。因此，廠商若可以發揮設計時的整體規劃、有效運用模組化設計來增進設計時程與設計成熟度還有生產效率，則不論在設計、工程乃至於生產等階段獲得極大化的成本節省效益。 本研究透過文獻探討、個案研究與問卷調查法，希望達成之研究目的如下：
一、探討新產品開發的構面與內涵
二、探討產品趨勢相關議題
三、探討產品模組化設計、各驗證階段相關議題
四、藉由對個案公司筆記型電腦產品模組化之設計研究與探討，除了認識產品模組化設計流程以外，盼進一步提出客觀之模組化設計與組裝流程檢核表，提供消費性電子產品產業的設計部門進行產品模組化設計之參考。
五、透過問卷調查的方式，除了瞭解各驗證階段的實際作用以外，尚可進一步探究模組化設計所帶來之競爭優勢、以及其對消費者採購決策的影響。
研究結果顯示：
一、筆記型電腦具有生命週期短、體積小、高單價、組裝複雜度高、顧客送修等候期間忍受度低及因為屬於精密電子儀器故其運輸條件需求高等特性，而筆記型電腦製造商之營運挑戰則為降低存貨成本、呆料風險、關鍵零組件供需問題及未來需求之不確定性，因此，模組化設計確有其必要性。
二、由個案公司之實例驗證得知，模組化設計確可在產品利潤率上獲得大幅度的提升。
三、本研究揭示的EVT、DVT與PVT等階段各工作步驟；HW、SW、Reliability Evaluation for EVT、DVT，與PVT；乃至於模組化的效益，應可做為其他廠商進行模組化設計與規劃時之參考。
四、以標準化組裝規格建立的組裝界面，可以進一步延伸產品標準化與模組化的開發效能至設計階段，使同步工程應用於產品開發，更完整的具體實踐。
五、問卷調查結果亦顯示不論是從消費者使用便利、維修方面考量；抑或是從生產者維修效率、零件庫存、設計期程、成本降低、穩定度與成熟度，乃至於產品競爭力等，均認同模組化設計確有其正面的意義。

The information industry of the computer is very great in ecological change to write letters in recent years, their pushes hands for the growing up fast of the low price computer behind one's back, impel the application cost of production equipment and products of relevant industries to reduce. Therefore, manufacturer overall plan, use mould group when promoting designing with design maturity have production efficiency to design effectively when can give play to the design, save benefit no matter in design, project and even cost obtaining maximization at such stages as production,etc.. This research probes into, case study and questionnaire investigation method through documents, the research purpose to hope to reach is as follows:
First, probe into the literary composition surface and intension of new product development.
Second, probe into the relevant topics of the trend of the products.
Third, probe into the mould group of the products and design, each verify the relevant topics of stage.
Design research and discussion of fourth, note type computer products mould group to the case company, besides knowing the procedure of designing of mould group of the products, wish to propose further the objective mould group designs and assembles the procedure to examine the nuclear form, offer the consuming design department of an electronic product industry to carry on model's group reference designed of the products.
Fifth, way to pass questionnaire investigation, besides understanding that each verifies the actual function at stage, in line to probe into mould group competition advantage brought to design, and their purchase influence of decision to consumer further.
The result of study shows:
First, the note type computer has life cycle short, small, high unit price, assemble complexity high, customer is it build during waiting for standing degree and because accurate electron tube instrumenting to send off so their requirements for transportation demand high characteristic, material risk, the supply and demand question of the key spare part and uncertainty of the future demand of in order to reduce the stock cost, stay the note type operation challenge of computer manufacturers, so, the mould group really has its necessities to design.
Second, proved that learns by the instance of the case company, the mould group can really get improvement by a large margin to design on the profit rate of the products.
Third, such every job step of stage as EVT, DVT and PVT that this research announces,etc. HW, SW, Reliability Evaluation for EVT, DVT, and PVT; And even in group benefit of the mould, can make the reference while designing and planning the mould group for other manufacturers while answering.
Fourth, can extend products standardization and group development efficiency of the mould to design phase further by standardizing and assembling the equipment interface set up of the specification, make the synchronous project apply to product development, an more intact concrete practice.
Fifth, the questionnaire investigation result also shows no matter easy-to-use and maintaining the respect to consider from consumers; Maintain efficiency, part stock, design issues of Cheng, cost reduce, steady degree and maturity from producer, and even wait in the competitiveness of the products, admit model's group designs the meaning that really has his front.

【1】 吳思華（2000a）。《策略九說》。台北：臉譜出版社。
【2】 吳思華（2000b）。《知識世紀的產業創新：議題與對策》。科技發展政策報導SR8902。
【3】 林晉寬（1995），從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係，博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
【4】 許士軍(1989)，「管理學」，台北：東華。
【5】 湯明哲、李吉仁（1999），「外包與專業製造廠商－雙贏的策略」，遠見雜誌，12月號，頁172-4。
【6】 謝宏暉（2003）。〈由模組化生產建構體育頻道的數位平台〉，「中華傳播研究新視野研討會」。
【7】 Aaker, D. A. (1984), Strategic Market Management, 台北: 華泰書局.
【8】 Baldwin C. Y,. & Clark K. B. (1997). Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, Aug.-Sep, 84-93.
【9】 Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management, Vol.17 (1), pp.99-120.
【10】 Booz,Allen and Hamilton(1982),New Product Management for the 1980’s,NEW YORK: Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc.
【11】 Boynton, A. C. and W. A. Robert (1984), “An Assessment of Critical Success Factors.” Sloan Management Review, p.17.
【12】 Chiesa, V. (2001), R & D Strategy and Organisation: Management Technical Change in Dynamic Context. London: Imperial College Press.
【13】 Chun-Che Huang, Andrew Kusiak, 1998, “Modularity in Design of Products and Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Systems and Cybernetics, Vol. 28, pp. 66-77.
【14】 Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1993), Screening new products for potential winners, Long Range Planning, Vol. 266, pp.74-81.
【15】 De Fazio and D. E. Whitney, 1987, “Simplified Generation of All Mechanical Assembly Sequences” IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automations, Vol.3, No.6, pp. 640-658.
【16】 Donald V. Steward, 1981, System Analysis and Management：Structure, Strategy, and Design, Petrocelli Books, New York.
【17】 Grant, R. M. (1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation.” California Management Review, Vol. 33(3), pp.114-35.
【18】 Gruner and Homburg, "Does Customer Interaction Relationship Enhance New Product Success?" Journal of the Business Research," Vol.49, pp.1-14, 2000.
【19】 Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1990), “The Core Competence of Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68(3), pp .79-91.
【20】 Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1993), “Strategy : As Stretch and Leverage.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71(2), pp .77-86.
【21】 Henderson and Clark., “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing product technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35(1), pp.9-30, 1990
【22】 Johne, F. Axel and Patricia A. Snelson. “Success Factors in Product Innovation: A Selective Review of the Literature.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1988): 114-128.
【23】 K. Ulrich and K. Tung, 1991, “Fundamentals of Product Modularity”, Issues in Design/Manufacture Integration, A. Sharon, Ed., New York, ASME, 1991, pp. 73-79.
【24】 Kotler, P.(2003)Marketing Management 11th ed.. New Jersey; Prentice Hall.
【25】 Kuczmarski, T.D(1992), Managing New Product：The Power of Innovation 2nd ed,
【26】 Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox In Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.111-25.
【27】 Meyer, M., & Lehnerd, A. (1997) .The Power of Product Platforms. New York: The Free Press.
【28】 New Jersey：Prentice-Hall Inc.,pp.35.
【29】 Page, A.L.(1993), Assessing new product development practices and performance establishing crucial norms,Journal of Product Innovation Management,Vol.10,pp.273- 290.
【30】 Parry, M.E. and Song,X.M.(1994),Identifying new product success in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management,11, pp.15-30.36.
【31】 Peter O’Gray(1999). The Age of Modularity. Adams and Steele publishers.
【32】 Philip, Kotler(1999),Marketing Management, ISBN,10thed,
【33】 Ping Yi Chao and Tsung Te Chen, 2001, “Analysis of Assembly through Product Configuration”, Computer-Aided Design, 44, pp. 189-203.
【34】 Robert, J. Thomas(1993), New prduct development: management and forcasting for strategic success, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
【35】 Rochford, L. “Generating and Screening New Product Ideas.” Industrial Marketing Management 20, no.4 (1991): 287-296.
【36】 Rockart, J. F. (1979), “Chief Executive Define Their Own Data Needs." Cambridge: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 57, p.85.
【37】 Sanchez R. & Mahoney J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17 (Winter Special Issue), 63-76.
【38】 Sanchez R. (1999). Modular architectures in the marketing process. Journal of Marketing, Vol.63 (Special issue), 92-111.
【39】 Sanchez, R.（1996）. Quick Connection Technologies For Production Creation: Implication of Competence-based Competition in R. Sanchze and A. Heene (eds.) Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management, 299-322.
【40】 Santikarn, M. (1981), Technology Transfer-A Case Study, Singapore: Singapore University Press.
【41】 Schilling M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. The Academy of Management Review, Apr, 312-334.
【42】 Song, X.M. & Parry M.E., (1997), “The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes”, The Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), pp.65。
【43】 Song, X.M. and Parry, M.E.(1996), A cross-national comparative study of new product development process:Japan and the United States, Journal of Marketing,Vol.61,pp.1-18.
【44】 Strassman, W. P. (1968), Technological Change and Economic Development, The Manufacturing Experience of Mexico and Puerto Rico, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
【45】 Teece, D. J. and G. Pisano (1994), “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction Industrial and Corporate Change.” Vol. 3(3), pp.537-56.
【46】 Thompson, M. (1967), Organization in Action, N.Y. : McGraw-Hill.
【47】 Tidd, J.(2001), Innovation management in context : environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews.
【48】 Wei Ma, Yongmin Zhong, Shiu-Kit Yso, Tianxiang Zhou, 2004, “A Hierarchically Structured and Constraint-based Data Model for Intuitive and Precise Solid Modeling in a Virtual Reality Environment”, Computer-Aided Design, 36, pp. 903-928.
【49】 Yoon.E & Lilien, G.L.(1985),”New Industrial Product Performance: The Effect of Market Characteristics and Strategy”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol3, pp.134-144.