台灣過去靠著優異的代工能力，建立起「代工王國」的美名。隨著全球化的競爭，獲利能力不增反減的情況之下，代工廠商開始找尋利基市場以創造價值，提升企業競爭能力。如何透過產業轉型以因應迅速變遷的產業環境儼然成了當今重要的議題之一。
面對品牌的挑戰，轉換原有的思維模式，透過思維模式驅動管理模式進行轉換。然而在管理實務中，關係網絡的部署是較少被探討的，本研究以質化研究為研究方法，透過個案研究作為研究思路探索組織應如何藉由重整關係網絡以及部署商業生態系統以獲取更多商業機會。
本研究希冀透過全球第二強固型電腦品牌 - 神基科技，詳細分析個案公司針對組織內部與外部管理模式的調整。透過主導邏輯探討轉型前後之差異與其管理模式的轉換；並以商業生態系統觀點，觀察個案公司之合作夥伴如何相互運用各自的能力，共同探索未來機會；本研究延伸管理控制系統與跨界管理機制，建立「跨界管理控制系統」以觀察個案公司之重要關鍵夥伴合作模式，並且透過個案分析建立一套「組織轉型機制」，藉此提供企業轉型的參考依據。

With excellent OEM capability in industrial field, Taiwan has earned an outstanding reputation as “the nation of manufacturing” for decades. Under the increasingly intense global competition, profitability have declined year by year. Countless manufacturing companies found a niche market via reorienting themselves. Organizational change have gathered great importance over the past years.
As the transition from goods-dominant to service-dominant logic, the firm adapted to organizational changes by transforming their business procedures and policies, as well as other partners in the network of firm to create value for customers. In business ecosystem viewpoint, boundary spanning is an important factor contributing to business ecosystem deployment. If they cannot jointly develop strategies or share resources, how can firms be succeed in global competition? To find out solutions to the problems, we presented Boundary Management Control System. By depicting two across company boundaries firms to see how they obtain future growth opportunities.
Through the case study, we developed a theoretical framework to explain the organizational change process and provide? Toward a further understanding of management from internal and deployment ecosystem components aspect during organizational change.

中文部分
1. 陳明哲，2013，商業生態系統：超越產業疆界的競爭，哈佛商業評論，2013/03。
2. 陳向明，2002，社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
3. 蔡敦浩、劉育忠、王慧蘭，2011，敘說探究的第一堂課，鼎茂圖書。
4. 陳美霞、徐碧卿、許甘霖譯，2009，研究的藝術，巨流出版社。
5. 湯明哲，2002，主導邏輯也要改變，遠見雜誌，第192期，2002/06。
6. 顏和正，2012，「二線對二線」 敗部復活，天下雜誌250期，2012/07。
7. 莊淳雅，2002，研發要與顧客面對面，遠見雜誌第190期，2002/04。
8. 顏瓊玉，2014，二線台廠轉做品牌，踢走戴爾當老二，商業週刊第1405期，2014/10。
9. 陳良榕，2015，轉型大膽求穩，苗豐強的兩手策略，天下雜誌585期，2015/11。
10. 劉予斌，2006，黃明漢追求真理不鄉愿，理財周刊286期，2006/02。
11. 張煥勇，2003，企業家能力與企業成長關係研究，復旦大學，博士。
12. 蔡淳涵，2015，資訊科技與社會影響力之研究-以愛樂活為例，國立台灣科技大學，碩士。
13. 楊坤木，2012，商業生態資源模組化管理之研究，國立台灣科技大學，碩士。
14. 張云，2013，由商業生態系統觀點探討台灣雲端商業智慧之發展：以台灣睿智資訊股份有限公司為例，國立台灣科技大學，碩士。
英文部分
1. Kotter, J. (2012). How the most innovative companies capitalize on today's rapid-fire strategic challenges–and still make their numbers. Harvard Business Review, 90(11), 43-58.
2. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
3. Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485-501.
4. Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The blinders of dominant logic. Long Range Planning, 37(2), 171-179.
5. Donaldson, G., & Lorsch, J. W. (1983). Decision making at the top: The shaping of strategic direction. New York: basic books.
6. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
7. Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic management journal, 16(1), 5-14.
8. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
9. Merz, M. A., He, Y., & Vargo, S. L. (2009). The evolving brand logic: a service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 328-344.
10. Anthony, R. N., & Mass.). Graduate School of Business Administration Harvard University (Cambridge. (1965). Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis.
11. Simons, R. (1987). Accounting control systems and business strategy: an empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(4), 357-374.
12. Simons, R. (1992). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives (pp. 622-645). Springer US.
13. Simons, R. (1995). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard business review, 73(2), 80-88.
14. Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 9(1), 31-41.
15. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups.
16. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
17. Robbins, D. K., & Pearce, J. A. (1992). Turnaround: Retrenchment and recovery. Strategic management journal, 13(4), 287-309.
18. Gerdin, J. (2005). Management accounting system design in manufacturing departments: an empirical investigation using a multiple contingencies approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(2), 99-126.
19. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, organizations and society, 28(2), 127-168.
20. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition. Crown Business.
21. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-83.
22. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68-81.
23. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
24. Ernst, C., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2010). Boundary spanning leadership: Six practices for solving problems, driving innovation, and transforming organizations. McGraw Hill Professional.
25. Ghemawat, P. (2007), Managing Differences: The Central Challenge, Harvard Business Review, March 2007
26. Du, W.Y, Pan, S.L. (2013), Boundary spanning by design: Toward aligning boundary-spanning capacity and strategy in IT outsourcing. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 60.1 (2013): 59-76.
27. Hedrick RP., Mac Connell E., de Kinkelin P. (1993), Proliferative kidney disease of salmonid fish. nnual Review of Fish Diseases Volume 3, 1993, Pages 277–290
28. Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage.
29. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
30. Pan, S. L., & Tan, B. (2011). Demystifying case research: A structured–pragmatic–situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Information and Organization, 21(3), 161-176.
31. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (No. 4). Sage.
32. Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1974). Organization and management: A systems approach. McGraw-Hill.
網站部分
1. 神基科技官方網站，(2015年12月瀏覽)，http://tw.getac.com/index.html
2. 文筆天天網，黃明漢要為神基創造奇蹟，2009年6月15日，(2015年9月瀏覽)，http://tw.ttnet.net/trade-shows/news-detail-p25glq3vka3a.html
3. Getac 神基科技 | 強固型電腦品牌領航家 - 2015 企業影片，2015年8月31日，(2015年10月瀏覽)，https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EvKidDb6f8