簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林欣頻
Xin-Pin Lin
論文名稱: 擦亮雇主品牌:以大數據分析企業留才與招才的關鍵要素
To Polish Employer Brand-Key Factors of Enterprise Retention and Recruitment under Big Data Analysis
指導教授: 葉穎蓉
Ying-Jung Yeh
林孟彥
Tom M.Y. Lin
口試委員: 葉穎蓉
Ying-Jung, Yeh
林孟彥
Tom M.Y. Lin
謝亦泰
Yi-Tai Seih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: Glassdoor雇主品牌線上評論文字探勘大數據分析
外文關鍵詞: Glassdoor, Employer Brand, Online Review, Text Mining, Big Data Analysis
相關次數: 點閱:423下載:14
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 網際網路時代下,企業日益仰賴社群網站進行招募,此外企業的網路口碑決定了雇主品牌的優劣,進而影響其招募與留任人才。近年來,職場評論網Glassdoor的出現,成為企業在招募上的新選擇,員工可在Glassdoor上對企業評論與評分,以影響企業的雇主品牌與網路口碑。

    本研究以Glassdoor為研究樣本,蒐集37,000多則線上評論,並使用大數據分析軟體Python為研究分析工具,進行網路爬蟲與文字探勘。使用詞頻分析,TF-IDF關鍵字分析與隱含狄利克雷分布 (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) ,對最佳與最差企業的優缺點四個文本作主題模型與關聯性分群,研究結果得出七大類員工工作在意要素的主題模型,包含(1)工作生活平衡、(2)組織文化認同、(3)職涯發展機會、(4)薪酬福利、(5)上層管理、(6)社會心理價值、(7)顧客關係。透過本研究,期望能幫助企業做人力資源政策上的調整,以提升雇主品牌來加強未來留任與招募人才的效能。


    In the era of the Internet, enterprises are increasingly relying on different types of social networking sites for recruitment. In addition, the online word-of-mouth of the enterprise determines the pros and cons of the employer brand, which becomes the key factors to affect the enterprise to recruit or retain the talent. In recent years, the emergence of Glassdoor has become a new online employment website for enterprises and employees. Through Glassdoor, employees can leave online reviews and score for their enterprises, which in turn affects the employer brand and online word-of-mouth of the enterprise.

    This study used the big data analysis tool Python as the research analysis tool to extract more than 37,000 employee’s online reviews for textual analysis from Glassdoor. Using words frequency analysis, TF-IDF keywords analysis, and Latent Dirichlet Allocation to conclude topic models and relevance grouping from four texts of the best and the worst enterprises’ pros and cons reviews. The result revealed 7 key employee work-concerned factors topic: (1) work-life balance, (2) organizational culture identity, (3) career development opportunity, (4) compensation and benefits, (5) upper management, (6) social and psychological value, (7) customer relationship. Through this study, it can help enterprises to adjust their human resource strategy, which in turn can improve their employer brand in order to enhance enterprises’ future performance on talent recruitment retention.

    摘要 I Abstract II 謝誌 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 V 表目錄 V 壹、 緒論 1 貳、 文獻回顧 2 一、 雇主品牌吸引力 2 二、 員工工作在意要素 3 三、 網路口碑對雇主品牌與員工工作在意要素之影響 5 參、 研究方法 6 一、 研究對象 6 二、 研究程序 7 三、 研究分析 7 肆、 研究結果 11 一、 高詞頻與文字雲分析結果 11 二、 TF-IDF關鍵字分析結果 14 三、 LDA 主題模型分析結果 16 伍、 結論與建議 17 一、 結論 17 二、 貢獻 17 三、 研究限制與建議 18 參考文獻 18 一、 中文文獻 18 二、 英文文獻 19 附錄一 Glassdoor 爬蟲之程式碼 22 附錄二 最佳與最差企業評論文字處理與詞頻分析 25 附錄三 百大詞頻文字雲 26 附錄四 最佳與最差企業優缺點評論之TF-IDF分析 27 附錄五 LDA主題模型 31 附錄六 最佳與最差企業名單與評論數 34 附錄七 最佳企業優點主題分群 35 附錄八 最佳企業缺點主題分群 35 附錄九 最差企業優點主題分群 36 附錄十 最差企業缺點主題分群 36 圖目錄 圖 1 Glassdoor職場評論網評論截圖說明 6 圖 2 研究流程圖 7 圖 3 LDA主題分群與文本包含字詞之不同顏色區分之範例 10 圖 4 LDA主題模型結構圖 11 圖 5 最佳企業優點前百大高詞頻 12 圖 6 最佳企業缺點前百大高詞頻 12 圖 7 最差企業優點前百大高詞頻 12 圖 8 最差企業缺點前百大高詞頻 12 圖 9 最佳與最差企業共同優缺點差異分析圖 13 表目錄 表 1 員工工作在意要素之相關文獻整理 4 表 2 員工工作在意要素六大主題分類與操作性定義 4 表 3 最佳與最差企業優缺點之前十大高詞頻 13 表 4 最佳與最差企業前十大詞頻優缺點之共同點 14 表 5 最佳與最差企業優點與缺點十大關鍵字 15 表 6 前十大高詞頻與TFIDF關鍵字之七大主題分布 16

    一、 中文文獻
    王冲冲與曾建中,2018。基于雇主品牌視角下的企業招聘研究,現代經濟信息,(17)30。
    汪志堅與吳宜環,2013。情緒發洩、報復與利他:服務失誤後之線上負面口碑,臺大管理論叢,24卷1期,173-205。
    林文政,2004。從內部行銷談人力資源管理,Career 就業情報 ,334卷,24-25。
    侯佩妤、陳俊智與包曉天,2017。電子口碑訊息和訂價:以臺灣連鎖經營酒店為例,商略學報,9卷2期,103-118。
    陸洛、林惠彥與楊士倫,2015。經濟誘因之外-雇主品牌吸引力與員工工作後果之關聯,商略學報,7卷2期,113-128。
    黃俊堯與柳秉佑,2016。消費者線上口碑與評論研究:國內外相關文獻回顧與討論,臺大管理論叢,26卷3期,215-256。
    蔣建武、宋軍梅、劉心怡與鄭倩茵,2018。普適與權變觀視角下 “2017 美國最佳雇主 100 強” 人力資源管理實踐的聚類研究,管理學報,18卷5期,678。

    二、 英文文獻
    Aizawa, A., 2003. An information-theoretic perspective of tf–idf measures, Information Processing and Management, 39(1), 45-65.
    Ambler, T., and Barrow, S., 1996. The employer brand, Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185-206.
    Backhaus, K. B., 2004. An exploration of corporate recruitment descriptions on Monster. com. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 41(2), 115-136.
    Berthon, P., Ewing, M., and Hah, L. L., 2005. Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding, International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151-172.
    Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I., 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan), 993-1022.
    Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., and Bauin, S., 1983. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis, Information. International Social Science Council, 22(2), 191-235.
    Cantallops, A. S., and Salvi, F., 2014. New consumer behavior: A review of research on eWOM and hotels, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 41-51.
    Cheng, X., Fu, S., Sun, J., Bilgihan, A., and Okumus, F., 2019. An investigation on online reviews in sharing economy driven hospitality platforms: A viewpoint of trust, Tourism Management, 71, 366-377.
    Dabirian, A., Kietzmann, J., and Diba, H., 2017. A great place to work!? Understanding crowdsourced employer branding, Business Horizons, 60(2), 197-205.
    Davis, A., and Khazanchi, D., 2008. An empirical study of online word of mouth as a predictor for multi‐product category e‐commerce sales, Electronic Markets, 18(2), 130-141.
    Demoulin, N. T., and Coussement, K., 2018. Acceptance of text-mining systems: The signaling role of information quality, Information and Management.
    Edwards, M. R., 2009. An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory, Personnel review, 39(1), 5-23.
    Filieri, R., and McLeay, F., 2014. E-WOM and accommodation: An analysis of the factors that influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews, Journal of Travel Research, 53(1), 44-57.
    Goh, K. Y., Heng, C. S., and Lin, Z., 2013. Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content, Information Systems Research, 24(1), 88-107.
    Hales, J., Moon Jr, J. R., and Swenson, L. A., 2018. A new era of voluntary disclosure? Empirical evidence on how employee postings on social media relate to future corporate disclosures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68, 88-108.
    Hu, N., Liu, L., and Zhang, J. J., 2008. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects, Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201-214.
    Könsgen, R., Schaarschmidt, M., Ivens, S., and Munzel, A., 2018. Finding Meaning in Contradiction on Employee Review Sites—Effects of Discrepant Online Reviews on Job Application Intentions, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43, 165-177.
    Kusumasondjaja, S., Shanka, T., and Marchegiani, C., 2012. Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: The roles of reviewer’s identity and review valence, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18(3), 185-195.
    Lee, J., and Kang, J., 2017. A Study on Job Satisfaction Factors in Retention and Turnover Groups using Dominance Analysis and LDA Topic Modeling with Employee Reviews on Glassdoor. com. Proceedings of the 2017 ICIS International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, Korea, December 10-13
    Liu, G. Y., Hu, J. M., and Wang, H. L., 2011. A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203-217.
    Luo, N., Zhou, Y., and Shon, J., 2016. Employee satisfaction and corporate performance: Mining employee reviews on glassdoor. com. Proceedings of the 2016 ICIS International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, December 11-14
    Martin, G., Beaumont, P., Doig, R., and Pate, J., 2005. Branding: A New Performance Discourse for HR? European Management Journal, 23(1), 76-88.
    Maxwell, R., and Knox, S., 2009. Motivating employees to" live the brand": a comparative case study of employer brand attractiveness within the firm, Journal of Marketing Management, 25(9-10), 893-907.
    Mudambi, S. M., and Schuff, D., 2010. What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200.
    Purnawirawan, N., De Pelsmacker, P., and Dens, N., 2012. Balance and sequence in online reviews: How perceived usefulness affects attitudes and intentions, Journal of interactive marketing, 26(4), 244-255.
    Ramos, J., 2003. Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries, Proceedings of the First Instructional Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 242, p. 133-142.
    Rampl, L. V., 2014. How to become an employer of choice: transforming employer brand associations into employer first-choice brands, Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13-14), 1486-1504.
    Rose, J., and Lennerholt, C., 2017. Low cost text mining as a strategy for qualitative researchers, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 15(1), 2-16.
    Sivertzen, A. M., Nilsen, E. R., and Olafsen, A. H., 2013. Employer branding: employer attractiveness and the use of social media, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22(7), 473-483.
    Small, H., 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
    Wu, H. C., Luk, R. W. P., Wong, K. F., and Kwok, K. L., 2008. Interpreting tf-idf term weights as making relevance decisions, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 26(3), 13.
    Yang, C. C., Jou, Y. T., and Cheng, L. Y., 2011. Using integrated quality assessment for hotel service quality, Quality and Quantity, 45(2), 349-364.
    Zenger, T. R., 1994. Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size, Management Science, 40(6), 708-729.

    QR CODE