簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王智緯
Chih-wei Wang
論文名稱: 腰椎動靜態組合式內固定器的生物力學研究
Biomechanical study about rigid and semi-rigid design for lumbar fixator
指導教授: 林上智
Shang-chih Lin
口試委員: 陳世豪
Shih-hao Chen
許維君
Wei-jyun Syu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 應用科技學院 - 醫學工程研究所
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 183
中文關鍵詞: 腰椎有限元素分析後方固定器動態固定器
外文關鍵詞: lumbar, pedicle screw fixator
相關次數: 點閱:157下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

目前臨床上利用穿椎弓根靜態固定器治療腰椎退化已被廣泛接受,但是此手術方式常會引起手術區域鄰近節的加速退化問題,許多文獻報告亦證明出固定區域的運動學以及力學的限制,是此類手術區域鄰近節加速退化的主要原因。雖然近年來已設計出許多強調動態效果;或者是可以與傳統靜態進行搭配的固定器,但是其使用方式及效果在臨床上仍然不明確,並且被廣泛討論。本研究利用電腦斷層掃瞄(CT)掃瞄出成年人L1至S1脊椎並建立長節有限元素腰椎模型。並且為了更真實模擬出手術情形,建立了三種不同的退化等級,並利用三種不同型態之動靜態混和式後方固定器給予治療,希望由分析結果了解不同植入物之生物力學情形,並且建立出後方固定器剛性與不同退化等級的平衡區間。
由研究結果可以發現關節螺絲頭型態後方固定器之動態螺絲並無明顯的旋轉,並且在四種運動情形下皆可觀察到明顯的手術鄰近節補償問題,本研究認為主要是因為固定器骨螺絲植入方向與腰椎運動方向不同所造成。關節連接桿型態後方固定器在不同退化等級也發現手術鄰近節有明顯的退化加速問題,其主要原因為軟性墊片材質剛性較強,並且最大軸向位移量受到限制,然而本研究認為由於此種設計具有良好的椎間盤高度維持能力,並且提供些微的動態效果,因此使用於動態骨融合手術為較好的選擇。由研究結果可以發現饒性連接桿固定器在四種運動情形下腰椎運動能力較植入另外兩種固定器佳,然而固定器方姓仍舊過大。因此本研究建立一平衡區間,並且發現隨著退化等級提升,植入物所需的剛性則越強。


Lumbar fusion with a rigid fixator has been the widely accepted treatment of degenerative disc disease. However, the previous studies report that the junctional problem is the common complications at the adjacent levels. However, there is still no extensively study to investigate the kinematic and mechanical behavior of fixed and transition levels.This study aims to evaluate stress distribution, facet contact force and motion pattern of instrumented lumbar with the rigid (titanium), and 3 diffenent type of dynamic fixators (joint, hinge and spacer type). The CT-based lumbar from L1 vertebra to L5/S1 disc is developed. The behavior of seven ligaments and five muscles are modeled, and the geometric and mechanical properties of lumbar tissues and fixator components are cited from the literature. The kinematic and mechanical compensation from the fixed to transition levels are predicted in this study. The results show that both hinge type and joint type fixator have adjacent segment disease (ASD). And the higher rigidity of fixator is used, the severer stress and motion is compensated. This is correlated with the literature findings. Compared with the rigid fixation, the use of dynamic fixator can reduce the stress (motion) compensation at the transition levels. The stiffness-related problem is more significantly reduced by the dynamic fixator. This indicates the flexible design of cord and spacer can effectively suppress the junction problem. For the semi-rigid or dynamic fixator, the fixator-assisted constraints at the L3/L4 level can reduce the stress (motion) compensation at the bridged level. However, the stress and motion at the cephalic (L2/L3) level is highly affected than the caudal (L5/S1) level by the hybrid fixator.

摘要 I ABSTRACT II 致謝 III 目錄 IV 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景及目的 1 1.2 腰椎的解剖、病理及生物力學 2 2.3.1.肌肉與韌帶 4 1.2.2.前方椎體 6 1.2.3.後方元件 8 1.2.4.椎間盤 11 1.2.5.椎間盤退化 13 1.3 腰椎動靜態椎弓足固定器介紹 15 1.3.1.高強度連接桿固定器 20 1.3.2.具饒性連接桿固定器 20 1.3.3.具關節連接桿固定器 21 1.3.4.具關節螺絲頭固定器 23 1.3.5.動靜態混和式固定器 24 第二章 文獻回顧 28 2.1 腰椎椎間盤退化研究 28 2.2 固定區域鄰近節問題 33 2.3 動態固定器臨床報告 36 2.4 動態固定器體外測試 42 2.5 腰椎有限元素法分析 48 第三章 材料方法 55 3.1 健康腰椎有限元素模型建立 55 3.1.1幾何模型建立 56 3.1.2材料參數設定 60 3.1.3腰椎組織介面接觸行為 60 3.1.4網格參數設定 62 3.1.5肌肉與韌帶系統 63 3.1.6運動形式設定 65 3.1.7運動分析結果與驗證 66 3.2 退化腰椎有限元素模型建立 67 3.2.1椎間盤退化等級建立 67 3.2.2腰椎退化位置建構 68 3.3 後方椎弓足植入物模型建立 70 3.3.1靜態固定器 70 3.3.2具饒性連接桿形式 72 3.3.3具關節連接桿形式 75 3.3.4具關節螺絲頭形式 77 3.4 鄰近區域之力學與運動學轉移 79 3.4.1椎間盤運動角度運算方式 79 3.4.2手術固定區域之鄰近節問題 80 3.4.3動態固定器的平衡剛性概念 81 第四章 結果 84 4.1. 健康有限元素腰椎模型驗證 84 4.2. 腰椎不同退化等級模擬結果 85 4.3. 單節靜態固定器之腰椎生物力學分析 93 4.4. 動靜態混合固定器之腰椎生物力學分析 100 4.4.1不同型態固定植入相同退化程度椎 101 4.4.2不同退化等級搭配饒姓連接桿固定器 109 4.4.3不同退化等級搭配關節連接桿固定器 116 4.4.4不同退化等級搭配關節螺絲頭固定器 123 4.5. 動態固定器之剛性平衡區間分析與建立 131 4.5.1具饒性連接桿固定器平衡區間探討 131 4.5.2具關節連接桿固定器平衡區間探討 144 第五章 討論 156 5.1 有限元素模型之基本假設與誤差來源 157 5.1.1幾何與材質之假設與限制 157 5.1.2腰椎肌肉群之假設與限制 157 5.1.3負載條件的探討 158 5.1.4退化椎間盤之假設與限制 158 5.1.5椎弓足固定器之假設與限制 159 5.1.6驗證之討論 159 5.2 手術鄰進節退化問題結果與討論 160 5.2.1退化模型討論 161 5.2.2單節靜態固定器生物力學討論 162 5.2.3動靜態混用固定器之模擬結果討論 163 5.2.4植入物剛性區間概念討論 169 5.3 研究結果之臨床意義 171 第六章 結論 173

1. Carola R, Harley JP, Noback CR: Human anatomy and physiology; 1992.
2. Healthhype [http://www.healthhype.com/]
3. chang Yt: Low Back Pain with With Whole-Body Vibration and Manual Materials Handling. Taipei Medical University; 2008.
4. 張俊詳: 肌肉骨骼系統解頗學:構造與功能; 2006.
5. Jemmett RS, MacDonald DA, Agur AMR: Anatomical relationships between selected segmental muscles of the lumbar spine in the context of multi-planar segmental motion: a preliminary investigation. Manual Therapy 2004, 9(4):203-210.
6. P.Schnuerer A, Gallego PAJ, Manuel MDC: Anatomy of the Spine & Related Structures.
7. Chen CS: Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spinal fusion. National Yang-Ming University; 2001.
8. Teng JM: Finite Element Analysis in Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence. National Yang-Ming University; 2004.
9. prohealthsys [http://www. Prohealthsys.com]
10. AB J, AE T, RS S: Orthopaedic Basic Science: Biology and Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System; 2000.
11. Stokes IAF: Mechanical function of facet joints in the lumbar spine. Clinical Biomechanics 1988, 3(2):101-105.
12. Yang KH, King AI: Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine 1984, 9(6):557-565.
13. Cyron BM, Hutton WC, Troup JD: Spondylolytic fractures. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 1976, 58-B(4):462-466.
14. 洪一智: Finite Element Analysis of the Lumbar
Interspinous Process Distractor. 國立中央大學; 2008.
15. Zhong ZC: Biomechanical Evaluation and Design of the Interbody Fusion
Cage in Lumbar Spine National Yang-Ming University; 2004.
16. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Clements JH, Wilder DG, MacPherson B, Ashikaga T: Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1983, 65(2):213-218.
17. spineuniverse [http://www.spineuniverse.com]
18. Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N: Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 2002, 27(2):125-134.
19. Kjaer P, Korsholm L, Bendix T, Sorensen JS, Leboeuf-Yde C: Modic changes and their associations with clinical findings. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2006, 15(9):1312-1319.
20. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, Tanaka N, Jeon CH, Andersson GB, Haughton VM: The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000, 25(23):3036-3044.
21. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC: Alterations in the mechanical behavior of the human lumbar nucleus pulposus with degeneration and aging. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 1997, 15(2):318-322.
22. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Kramer M, Hartwig E: Height of lumbar discs measured from radiographs compared with degeneration and height classified from MR images. European radiology 2001, 11(2):263-269.
23. Ruberte LM, Natarajan RN, Andersson GB: Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments--a finite element model study. Journal of biomechanics 2009, 42(3):341-348.
24. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF: Instability of the lumbar spine. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1982(165):110-123.
25. Kettler A, Rohlmann F, Ring C, Mack C, Wilke HJ: Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2011, 20(4):578-584.
26. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Costanza MC, Rosen JC, Goggin JE, Wilder DG: Epidemiologic studies of low-back pain. Spine 1980, 5(5):419-423.
27. spine-health [http://www.spine-health.com]
28. Chen CS, Chen WJ, Cheng CK, Jao SH, Chueh SC, Wang CC: Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation. Medical engineering & physics 2005, 27(6):487-496.
29. Graf H: Lumbar instability: Surgical treatment without fusion. Rachis 1992, 412:123-37.
30. Zimmer [http://www.zimmer.com]
31. Barrey CY, Ponnappan RK, Song J, Vaccaro AR: Biomechanical Evaluation of Pedicle Screw-Based Dynamic Stabilization Devices for the Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review. SAS Journal 2008, 2(4):159-170.
32. Barrey CY: Dynamic instrumentation for fusion with Isobar TTL™: biomechanical and clinical aspects. ArgoSpine News & Journal 2010, 22(2):62-66.
33. Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR: Posterior Pedicle Fixation-based Dynamic Stabilization Devices for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009, 22(5):376-383 310.1097/BSD.1090b1013e31817c36489.
34. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ: The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. The Orthopedic clinics of North America 1991, 22(2):181-187.
35. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N: The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1995, 20(17):1878-1883.
36. McNally DS, Shackleford IM, Goodship AE, Mulholland RC: In vivo stress measurement can predict pain on discography. Spine 1996, 21(22):2580-2587.
37. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Lamminen A, Viikari-Juntura E: Lumbar disc degeneration in relation to occupation. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 1998, 24(5):358-366.
38. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A: Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2000, 25(4):487-492.
39. Kelsey JL, Githens PB, O'Conner T, Weil U, Calogero JA, Holford TR, White AA, 3rd, Walter SD, Ostfeld AM, Southwick WO: Acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. An epidemiologic study with special reference to driving automobiles and cigarette smoking. Spine 1984, 9(6):608-613.
40. Heliovaara M: Occupation and risk of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. Journal of chronic diseases 1987, 40(3):259-264.
41. Mundt DJ, Kelsey JL, Golden AL, Pastides H, Berg AT, Sklar J, Hosea T, Panjabi MM: An epidemiologic study of non-occupational lifting as a risk factor for herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. The Northeast Collaborative Group on Low Back Pain. Spine 1993, 18(5):595-602.
42. Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, Fisher LD, Manninen H, Gill K: 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine 1995, 20(24):2601-2612.
43. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K: Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2005, 14(1):27-35.
44. Roberts S, Menage J, Eisenstein SM: The cartilage end-plate and intervertebral disc in scoliosis: calcification and other sequelae. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 1993, 11(5):747-757.
45. Roberts S, Urban JP, Evans H, Eisenstein SM: Transport properties of the human cartilage endplate in relation to its composition and calcification. Spine 1996, 21(4):415-420.
46. Macnab I: The traction spur. An indicator of segmental instability. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1971, 53(4):663-670.
47. Panagiotacopulos ND, Pope MH, Krag MH, Block R: Water content in human intervertebral discs. Part I. Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1987, 12(9):912-917.
48. Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Crisco JJ, Yamamoto I, Vasavada A: Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 1994, 19(12):1371-1380.
49. Oxland TR, Lund T, Jost B, Cripton P, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Nolte LP: The relative importance of vertebral bone density and disc degeneration in spinal flexibility and interbody implant performance. An in vitro study. Spine 1996, 21(22):2558-2569.
50. Krismer M, Haid C, Behensky H, Kapfinger P, Landauer F, Rachbauer F: Motion in lumbar functional spine units during side bending and axial rotation moments depending on the degree of degeneration. Spine 2000, 25(16):2020-2027.
51. Tanaka N, An HS, Lim TH, Fujiwara A, Jeon CH, Haughton VM: The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society 2001, 1(1):47-56.
52. Natarajan RN, Williams JR, Andersson GB: Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 2006, 88 Suppl 2:36-40.
53. Goto K, Tajima N, Chosa E, Totoribe K, Kuroki H, Arizumi Y, Arai T: Mechanical analysis of the lumbar vertebrae in a three-dimensional finite element method model in which intradiscal pressure in the nucleus pulposus was used to establish the model. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2002, 7(2):243-246.
54. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Schmidt H, Wilke HJ, Bergmann G: Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. Journal of biomechanics 2006, 39(13):2484-2490.
55. Waris E, Eskelin M, Hermunen H, Kiviluoto O, Paajanen H: Disc degeneration in low back pain: a 17-year follow-up study using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2007, 32(6):681-684.
56. Lee CK: Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988, 13(3):375-377.
57. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL: Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 1996, 21(8):970-981.
58. Kuslich SD, Danielson G, Dowdle JD, Sherman J, Fredrickson B, Yuan H, Griffith SL: Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage. Spine 2000, 25(20):2656-2662.
59. Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, Wong CY: Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2002, 122(1):39-43.
60. Auerbach JD, Balderston RA: Lumbar Instability Adjacent to a Previous Fusion. Seminars in Spine Surgery 2005, 17(4):267-276.
61. Wiltse LL, Radecki SE, Biel HM, DiMartino PP, Oas RA, Farjalla G, Ravessoud FA, Wohletz C: Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. Journal of spinal disorders 1999, 12(1):27-33.
62. Park JY, Chin DK, Cho YE: Accelerated L5-S1 Segment Degeneration after Spinal Fusion on and above L4-5 : Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Results. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2009, 45(2):81-84.
63. Cho KS, Kang SG, Yoo DS, Huh PW, Kim DS, Lee SB: Risk factors and surgical treatment for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spine fusion. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2009, 46(5):425-430.
64. Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT: Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 2002, 84(2):289-294.
65. Lee CK, Langrana NA: Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 1984, 9(6):574-581.
66. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC: Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2003, 28(20):S110-117.
67. Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, Griffith SL: Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 1995, 20(5):526-531.
68. Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G, Weber U: Internal spinal fixator stiffness has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs. Spine 1999, 24(12):1192-1195; discussion 1195-1196.
69. Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL, Lo WH: Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Medical engineering & physics 2001, 23(7):483-491.
70. Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL: A biomechanical comparison of posterolateral fusion and posterior fusion in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002, 15(1):53-63.
71. Chen CS, Feng CK, Cheng CK, Tzeng MJ, Liu CL, Chen WJ: Biomechanical analysis of the disc adjacent to posterolateral fusion with laminectomy in lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18(1):58-65.
72. JJ Y, R B, PC M, An HS: Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine. 3rd ed; 2008.
73. Champain S, Mazel C, Mitulescu A, Skalli W: Quantitative analysis in outcome assessment of instrumented lumbosacral arthrodesis. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2007, 16(8):1241-1249.
74. Hudson WRS, Gee JE, Billys JB, Castellvi AE: Hybrid dynamic stabilization with posterior spinal fusion in the lumbar spine. SAS Journal 2011, 5(2):36-43.
75. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Aydin AL, Ozer AF: Clinical outcomes of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with lumbar decompression and the Cosmic “semi-rigid” posterior system. SAS Journal 2010, 4(4):99-106.
76. Stoffel M, Behr M, Reinke A, Stuer C, Ringel F, Meyer B: Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic-system: a prospective observation. Acta neurochirurgica 2010, 152(5):835-843.
77. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, Hsu WK, Dawson EG: Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 2004, 86-A(7):1497-1503.
78. Freudiger S, Dubois G, Lorrain M: Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 1999, 119(3-4):127-132.
79. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O: The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2002, 11 Suppl 2:S170-178.
80. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF: Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 2005, 30(3):324-331.
81. Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, Tohtz SW, Perka C: The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine 2005, 30(5):E109-114.
82. Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B: Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2006, 31(4):442-449.
83. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Hughes J, Smith F, Wardlaw D: The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 2007, 32(6):685-690.
84. Barrey CY: Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine. ArgoSpine News & Journal 2009, 21(2):78-84.
85. Skalli W, Champain S, Mosnier T: Spine Biomechanics in Lumbar and Lumbo-Sacral Fusion Alternatives. Elsevier Masson EDS 2007:8-18.
86. Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR: Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009, 22(5):376-383.
87. Duncan RL, Turner CH: Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcified tissue international 1995, 57(5):344-358.
88. Cheng BC, Bellotte JB, Yu A, Swidarski K, Whiting DM: Historical overview and rationale for dynamic fusion. ArgoSpine News & Journal 2010, 22(2):53-56.
89. Sangiorgio SN, Sheikh H, Borkowski SL, Khoo L, Warren CR, Ebramzadeh E: Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Spine 2011, 36(19):E1251-1258.
90. Schmoelz W, Onder U, Martin A, von Strempel A: Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2009, 18(10):1478-1485.
91. Bozkus H, Senoglu M, Baek S, Sawa AG, Ozer AF, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR: Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 2010, 12(2):183-189.
92. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, Dipl I, Claes L, Wilke HJ: Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003, 16(4):418-423.
93. Strube P, Tohtz S, Hoff E, Gross C, Perka C, Putzier M: Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2010, 19(12):2171-2180.
94. Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Oxland TR: Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. European Spine Journal 2006, 15(6):913-922.
95. Niosi CA, Wilson DC, Zhu Q, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Oxland TR: The effect of dynamic posterior stabilization on facet joint contact forces: an in vitro investigation. Spine 2008, 33(1):19-26.
96. Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC: Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion. Spine 2007, 32(23):2551-2557.
97. Moumene M, Harms J, Geisler F, Vaccaro A: Biomechanical Effect of PEEK Rod vs. Metallic Rod in Spinal Fusion Constructs. 2010, 31:577-579.
98. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Anasetti F, Ciavarro C, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M: Rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices: a biomechanical comparison. Medical engineering & physics 2011, 33(4):490-496.
99. Castellvi AE, Huang H, Vestgaarden T, Saigal S, Clabeaux DH, Pienkowski D: Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis. SAS Journal 2007, 1(2):74-81.
100. Goel VK, Konz RJ, Chang HT, Grosland NM, Grobler LJ, Chesmel KD: Hinged-Dynamic Posterior Device Permits Greater Loads on the Graft and Similar Stability as Compared with Its Equivalent Rigid Device: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Assessment. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 2001, 13(1):17-20.
101. Zander T, Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Bergmann G: Effect of a posterior dynamic implant adjacent to a rigid spinal fixator. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006, 21(8):767-774.
102. Rohlmann A, Nabil Boustani H, Bergmann G, Zander T: Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis. Journal of biomechanics 2010, 43(15):2963-2969.
103. Moumene M, Harms J: Is Posterior Dynamic Stabilization an Option to Avoid Adjacent Segment Decompensation? 2010:207-211.
104. Liu CL, Zhong ZC, Shih SL, Hung C, Lee YE, Chen CS: Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010, 23(6):410-417.
105. Liu CL, Zhong ZC, Hsu HW, Shih SL, Wang ST, Hung C, Chen CS: Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2011, 20(11):1850-1858.
106. Zhang QH, Teo EC: Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Medical engineering & physics 2008, 30(10):1246-1256.
107. 實威國際: Solidworks Simulation原廠教育手冊; 2011.
108. Shirazi-Adl A, El-Rich M, Pop D, Parnianpour M: Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads!Xapplication of kinematics-based algorithm. European Spine Journal 2005, 14(4):381-392.
109. Gudavalli MR, Triano JJ: An analytical model of lumbar motion segment in flexion. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 1999, 22(4):201-208.
110. Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T: Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 1989, 14(11):1256-1260.
111. Natarajan RN, Williams JR, Andersson GBJ: Recent advances in analytical modeling of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2004, 29(23):2733-2741.
112. Natarajan RN, Williams JR, Andersson GBJ: Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration. Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 2006, 88:36-40.
113. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Anderson SE, Alini M, Ito K: Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. European Spine Journal 2005, 14(1):27-35.
114. Ohta H, Matsumoto Y, Morishita Y, Sakai T, Huang G, Kida H, Takemitsu Y: Surgical results of dynamic nonfusion stabilization with the Segmental Spinal Correction System for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases with instability: Minimum 2-year follow-up. SAS Journal 2011, 5(3):69-74.
115. Kuo CS, Hu HT, Lin RM, Huang KY, Lin PC, Zhong ZC, Hseih ML: Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine on facet joint force and intradiscal pressure--a finite element study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2010, 11:151.

QR CODE