提供未來生活的願景，是設計師重要的工作。設計師藉著對過去及現在的了解與觀察，提出對未來的看法。透過跨領域設計團隊合作，概念具備了多方專業的支持，對未來的預想將更有可能落實。利用情境故事法，可以有效以使用者為中心進行構想，發展出更貼近使用者的設計。為了有效地傳達現今許多新興科技，並節省設計概念在技術落實所需的成本與時間，視覺化的影片提供了很好的解決方案。
創作者以描述M2M技術為主，首先創作出「Have You Ever Noticed that Everything is Chatting Quietly」前導影片，讓設計人員快速了解該技術，提供設計發想。接著透過技術與設計跨領域合作，創作「Apps4Home- Kids’ Edition」，描述M2M技術應用於家庭中孩童的生活。最後獨立創作「Serious & Naughty」，描述未來的智慧物件，具有自己的個性，根據自我意志，提供使用者意見。
創作後歸納以下三點，作為後續創作者進行相關創作的參考：(1)發想未來生活的情境概念，應從宏觀層面與微觀層面，整體規劃預想的未來世界。(2)除了與技術團隊跨領域合作外，也應與電影、影像專業人員請益合作，可以讓劇本故事更具吸引力，並使得拍攝製作流程更為順利。(3)透過設計語言並視覺化詮釋新興技術，該影片能夠激發設計師進行概念發想，也能使觀者預先體驗未來生活，藉以互動回饋，作為設計團隊往後進行設計之參考。

It is important for designers to envisage future life. Designers can provide their viewpoints for the future through the understanding and observation of the past and the now. Interdisciplinary design teamwork can provide multiple professional supports for concepts and the vision of the future is more likely to be implemented. Scenario storytelling helps concepts to be user-centered generated effectively and designs closer to users can be developed. In order to effectively portray many latest technologies and save the cost and time required to practice the technology for design concepts, visualized films provide a good solution.
Firstly, the designer made an introductory film titled “Have You Ever Noticed that Everything is Chatting Quietly” to portray the M2M technology. It could help designers to quickly familiarize the technology for concept generation. A second film titled “Apps4Home- Kids’ Edition” was made by interdisciplinary collaboration between engineers and designers. It portrayed the application of M2M technology in domestic kids’ life. The last film titled “Serious & Naughty” was made to portray future intelligent objects with characters that could provide suggestions for users by their own wills.
Subsequently, the following suggestions were made for future designers as references of relevant studies. (1) Concept generation for future life scenarios should be macroscopic and microscopic to envisage holistically the future world. (2) Designers could collaborate with engineers and also filming and imaging professionals for interdisciplinary teamwork to make the screenplay story more attractive and the filmmaking process more smoothly. (3) A film based on design language and visualized interpretation of new technologies could be used to stimulate designers for concept generation and to provide viewers with future life experiences. The result could provide interactive feedbacks to the design team for subsequent design references.

Alexiou, K. & Zamenopoulos, T. (2008). Design as social process: A complex systems perspective. Futures, 40, 586-595.
Amer, W., Ansari, U., & Ghafoor, A. (2009). Industrial automation using embedded systems and machine-to-machine, man-to-machine (M2M) connectivity for improved overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). In W. A. Gruver, L. O. Hall, D. Yeung, & M. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 4450-4454). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Arnall, T. & Martinussen, E. S. (2010). Depth of field: Discursive design research through film. FORMakademisk, 3(1), 100-122.
Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bonanni, L. & Ishii, H. (2009). Stop-motion prototyping for tangible interfaces. In N. Villar & S. Izadi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 315-316). New York: ACM.
Bonsiepe, G. (2007). The uneasy relationship between design and design research. In R. Michel (Ed.), Design research now: Essays and selected projects (pp.25-39). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.
Bordwell, D. & Thompson, K. (2007). Film art: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Campbell, R. L. (1992). Will the real scenario please stand up? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(2), 6-8.
Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Design Studies, 13(1), 43-60.
Cha, I., Shah, Y., & Schmidt, A. U. (2009). Trust in M2M communication. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 4(3), 69-75.
Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee involvement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Denton, H. G. (1997). Multidisciplinary team-based project work: Planning factors. Design Studies, 18(2), 155-170.
Design Council (2007). Eleven lessons: Managing design in eleven global companies. London: Design Council.
Eames, C., Eames, R., Demetrios, E., Demetrios, L. E., & Mills, S. (2000). The films of Charles & Ray Eames (Vol. 4, DVD). Chatsworth, CA: Image Entertainment.
Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory. London: Heinemann.
Engelbart, D. (1968). 1968 Demo. Retrieved May 16, 2014, from http://sloan.stanford.edu/ MouseSite/1968Demo.html
Forsythe, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gates, B. (1995). The road ahead (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
Gomoll, K., (1990). Some techniques for observing users. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human computer interface design (pp. 85-90). Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
Halskov, K. & Nielsen, R. (2006). Virtual video prototyping. Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2), 199-233.
Intel Corporation (2012). Simplifying the internet of things: Intel intelligent systems framework. Santa Clara, CA: Intel Corporation.
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2005). ITU Internet reports 2005: The Internet of things, executive summary. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
Jason, D. (2000). Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members. Journal of Management, 26(2), 259-279.
Katz, S. (1991). Film directing shot by shot: Visualizing from concept to screen. Studio City, CA: M. Wiese.
Kidwell, R. E., Mossholder, K. W., & Bennett, N. (1997). Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23(6), 775-793.
Kim, H. & Han, Y. (2005). A proportional fair scheduling for multicarrier transmission systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 9(3), 210-212.
Kirby, D. (2010). The Future is Now: Diegetic prototypes and the role of popular films in generating real-world technological development. Social Studies of Science, 40(1), 41-70.
Manovich, L. (2007). After Effects, or velvet revolution. Artefact, 1(2), 67-75.
McClean, S. (2008). Digital storytelling: The narrative power of visual effects in film. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nardi, B. A. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14.
Nigel, C. & Anita, C. C. (1995). Observation of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies, 16(2), 143-170.
Niyato, D., Lu, X., & Wang, P. (2011). Machine-to-machine communications for home energy management system in smart grid. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 53-59.
Nordby, K. (2010). Conceptual designing and technology: Short-range RFID as design material. International Journal of Design, 4(1), 29-44.
Pan, J. I. (1999). A scenario driven approach to requirements engineering. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Jungli, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Parker, G. M. (1996). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Paulus, P. B. (1989). Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237-262.
Ricquebourg, V., Menga, D., Durand, D., Marhic, B., Delahoche, L., & Loge, C. (2006). The smart home concept: Our immediate future. In Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on E-Learning in Industrial Electronics (pp. 23-24). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Steiff, J. (2005). The complete idiot’s guide to independent filmmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Alpha Books.
Steward, D. D. & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 619-628.
Vallgarda, A. & Redstrom, J. (2007). Computational composites. In M. B. Rosson & D. Gilmore (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 513-522). New York: ACM.
Verplank, B., Fulton, J., Black, A., & Moggridge, B. (1993). Observation and invention: Use of scenarios in interaction design. Tutorial notes for InterCHI’93, Amsterdam.
Whitehead, S. (2004). Adopting wireless machine-to-machine technology. Computing and Control Engineering Journal, 15(5), 40-46.
Ylirisku, S. & Buur, J. (2007). Designing with video. London: Springer.
Zeisel, J. (1991). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behavior research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Y., Yu, R., Xie, S., Yao, W., Xiao, Y., & Guizani, M. (2011). Home M2M networks: Architectures, standards, and QoS improvement. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 44-52.
林婷（2010）。GS1 MobileCom在零售業的加值應用。GS1 TW夏季刊，5-11。
邱茂林（1996）。分散式環境下之建築設計合作、溝通與管理。建築學報，17，45-59。
洪偉肯（2012）。創新策略：矛盾語意及跨領域合作。未出版之博士論文，國立臺灣科技大學工商業設計系博士班，臺北市。
張志勇、翁仲銘、石貴平、廖文華（2013）。物聯網概論。臺北市：碁峰資訊。
單承剛、何明泉（2001）。設計經理人與跨領域設計團隊之傳達研究。設計學報，8（1），1-16。
黃麗芬（2001）。情境故事法應用於產品創新設計育教學之探討。未出版碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學創新設計研究所，臺北市。
楊義銘（2002）。情境故事法與電腦中介溝通應用於協同創新設計企劃之探討。未出版碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學創新設計研究所，臺北市。
蘇照彬（1994）。Scenario在人機互動中之理論與應用：以互動電視節目表的發展與評估為例。未出版碩士論文，國立交通大學傳播研究所，新竹市。