本研究應用教學評鑑理論、教學目標結合模糊理論(Fuzzy Theory)與層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process；AHP)，建構出一套教學績效線上評估系統。藉由運用模糊理論與層級分析法等概念，以提高評估結果的可接受度與合理性。
本研究為確認所開發的雛型系統之實用性，最後藉由個案實證的方式來驗證本系統之效益，並透過個案訪談得到以下結論：(1)本系統有助於簡化評估的過程，進而提高績效評估的效率；(2)本系統的評估結果確實能作為教師改善教學參考之依據；(3)讓學生能夠更清楚瞭解自我的學習狀況。
透過系統實施與驗證後，歸納出本研究的研究貢獻有下列三點：(1)教學績效流程設計，確實提高了非結構化問題之客觀性與評估結果之合理性；(2)評估結果能作為教師教學改善之參考；(3)讓學生能夠反思學習過程與收獲。
本研究根據結論給予教育界的建議：(1)在中小學教育中，教學目標的達成與否在教學中是很重要的指標，但是在大學教育裡，由於教學自主，這一部份很少提及，可以從如何引發教師重視這一部份為目標；(2)現行的教學評鑑，多以評鑑教師為主，並不能瞭解學生到底獲得了多少，本研究可以是一個參考性的改善指標。而對未來研究者的建議有三點：(1)教學績效評估系統與教學改善建議之整合；(2)整合其他教學評鑑的方式，將其他的教學評鑑的方式加入本系統，就能讓本系統更加完善；(3)尋找更適切的教學目標層次、權重評估模式，因為教學目標的層次有所受限，如果能有更加完善且詳細的分類，相信可以讓評估結果更加準確。

Based on the Fuzzy Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study applies to the instructional evaluation, to construct an on-line instructional evaluated system to improve the results of rationality.

Confirm the practicability of prototype system, via case study, gets three conclusions: (1) simplify the process to improve the efficiency of evaluation; (2) favor teachers to improve the teaching performance; (3) enable students to understand self-study state more clearly even more.

After implementing the prototype system, there are three points in the contribution of this research: (1) for the evaluated processes, improves the objectivity and rationality that users assess the questionnaire; (2) for teachers, to enhance the teaching performance; (3) for students, finds out about the situation of self-study.

Suggestion given to the education circle: (1)to national compulsory education, it is a very important indicator to reach the teaching goal, however, to university education, because of teaching melts independently, but mention few; (2)current evaluative system is to rely mainly on teacher, and it can’t find out about the study situation of learners’. This research can be regarded as a way to strength the completeness of the system.

Propose the direction of future research: (1)strengthen the functions of decision support of our prototype system further, in order to help the teacher to draft the suitable teaching goal; (2) consider relevant evaluative methods to add-in our prototype system to strength it’s functionality；(3) deepen the assessment level of the teaching goal and collect more indicators used to evaluate the studying performance, it would improve the accuracy of instructional evaluation.

中文部份
1. 朱敬先，教育心理學—教學取向。台北：五南，2000。
2. 吳肇銘等，影響「教學評鑑」結果之因素探討----以中原大學商學院為例，1995。
3. 吳智宇，學習性組織成效評量系統建構之研究，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2005。
4. 林立宜，運用模糊層級分析法（FAHP）建立護理之家服務品質指標，雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
5. 林怡珊，知識分享影響因素評估系統之研究，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2003。
6. 林幸璇，社區大學教師成人教學評鑑指標建構與應用之研究，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文，2005。
7. 李允中、王小璠、蘇木春，模糊理論及其應用，臺北：全華出版，2003。
8. 季延平、郭鴻志，系統分析與設計，台北：華泰文化事業有限公司，1995。
9. 周祝瑛，淺談「大學教學評鑑」，研習資訊，第20卷，第三期，2003。
10. 徐美惠、高薰芳，重視教師評鑑落實「教評會」功能。台灣教育，544 期，11-19，1996。
11. 秦夢群，教育行政：實務部分。台北：五南，1997。
12. 莊順斌，「模糊積分應用於電子化企業績效評估之研究」，大葉大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
13. 梁定澎。資訊管理研究方法總論，資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊，第四卷，第一期，第1~6頁，1997。
14. 郭仁宗，知識管理績效評估系統建構之研究，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2003。
15. 郭生玉，心理與教育測驗，台北：精華書局，1985
16. 陳銘煌，關鍵知識盤點系統建置之研究，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2005。
17. 陳亭羽、曾國雄，模糊測度應用於多屬性決策時之資訊需求量簡化研究，管理學報，第十七卷，第三期，第483-514頁，2000。
18. 陳振東、莊順斌，電子化企業績效評估模式構建之研究，管理與系統期刊，第10卷，第1期，第41-58頁，2003。
19. 陳郁文、胡夢蕾、林威宏，應用模糊積分層級分析法於台灣國際觀光旅館服務品質之研究：μ 測度與λ 測度之比較，第一屆台灣作業研究學會學術研討會暨2004 年科技與管理學術研討會，第700-718頁，2004。
20. 陳珮軒，大學學生評鑑教師教學之研究－以長庚大學管理學院為例，長庚大學管理學研究所企業管理組碩士論文，2000。
21. 陳偉泓，臺北市資訊科技融入教學評鑑準則發展之研究，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士論文，2004。
22. 陳玉琨，教育評鑑學。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2004。
23. 黃光雄，教育評鑑的模式。台北：師大書苑，1989。
24. 黃光雄編譯，Robert J. Kibler等四位學者合著，教學目標與評鑑(Objectives for Instruction and Evaluation/Robert J. Kibler, Donald J. Cegala, Larry L. Barker, David T. Miles 1974) ，1987。
25. 葉重新，台灣地區九所大學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」期望之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，1987。
26. 蔡進雄，從評鑑的意涵論「學生評鑑教師教學」，深耕，第一期，2006。
27. 張惠貞，淡江大學教師教學評鑑之實證與研究。淡江大學統計學系碩士論文，1998。
28. 張霄亭，教學原理。台北：空大，1997。
29. 張施言，Fuzzy入門人類思維的新境界模糊理論，全欣資訊圖書股份有限公司，第93-102頁，1995。
30. 楊榮祥，生物科學習成就評量資料。師大科學教育中心編：學習成就評量資料，95-114頁，1981。
31. 歐陽教、張德銳，教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊，第一卷，第二期，90-100頁，1993。
32. 謝文全，教育行政-理論與實務。台北：文景，1989。
33. 謝臥龍，國中教師最重要的優良教學特質之德懷研究。高雄：國民中學教學策略國際學術研討會資料，1991。
34. 鄧振源、曾國雄，「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」，中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第六期，第13707-13724頁，1989。
35. 鄧振源、曾國雄，「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)」，中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第七期，第13767-13870頁，1989。

英文部份
1. Abrami, P. & Mizener, D. , "Student / Instructor Attitude Similarity, Student Ratings and Course Performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), pp.693-702(1985).
2. Asai K. , "Fuzzy System for Management", Ohmsha, pp.49-54(1995).
3. Austin, T. & Cage, B., "Personality Influences on Student and Cooperating Teacher Attitudes Toward Teaching", Paper Presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Meeting(1980).
4. Barber, L. W. , Self- assessment. In J. Millnan & L. Darling- Hammond (Ed.). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teacher, 216-228. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publicationns, Inc(1990).
5. Bloom, B. S. (ed.), "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Classification of Educational Goals", Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David Mckey (1969).
6. Bollington, R., Hopkins, D., & West, M.. An introduction to teacher appraisal：A professional development approach. London: Cassell. Beach, B., & Reinhartz, J.（1989）. Supervision：Focus on instruction. New York： Harper & Row(1990).
7. Cashin, W.E. , "Student Ratings of Teaching：Recommendations for Use". IdeaPaper No.22, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas States Univ., Manhattan(1990).
8. Chen, S. J.& Hwang, C. L., "Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications", Springer-Verlag (1992).
9. Chen, Y. W. & Tzeng, G. H., "Using fuzzy integral for evaluation subjectively perceived travel costs in a traffic assignment model", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, pp. 653-664(2001).
10. Eisenhardt, K., "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 532-550,(1989).
11. Giles, A., Martin, S., Bryce, D., & Hendry, G. , Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives". Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 681-685(2004).
12. Greene, J. E., "School personnel administration". Radnor, Pennsylvania：Chilton Book Company (1971).
13. Harrow, A. J., A Taxonomy of Psychomotor Domain-A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York: David Mckey(1972).
14. Ishii, K. & Sugeno, M., "A model human evaluation process using fuzzy measure", International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 22, pp. 19-38 (1985).
15. Iwanicki, E. F., Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J. Millman & Darling-Hammond, L.（Eds.）, The new handbook of teacher evaluation： Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers（pp. 158-174）.Newbury Park, California：Sage Publications(1990).
16. Iwanicki, E. F., The role of evaluation in supervision as a process of inquiry. Draft of a manuscript prepared for the handbook of research on school supervision, unpublished(1996).
17. John C, O., "Teaching Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future". New direction for teaching and learning. 83, 13-18. Jossey- Bass, a Wiley company(2000).
18. Klir, G. J.& Yuan, B., "Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic–Theory and Application", Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey(1995).
19. Krathwohl, D.R. & Bloom, B. S. & Masia, B. B., "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Classification of Educational Goals". Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David Mckey(1969).
20. Lancaster, C., Ross, G. & Smith, I., "Survey of Practices Evaluating Teaching in U.S. Medical Schools, 1978 and 1986", Journal of Medical Education, 63, 912-914(1988).
21. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G. L. & Zytkow, J.M., "Scientific discovery: computational exploration of the creative processes", Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (1987).
22. Lee, C., Liu, L. C.& Tzeng, G. H. . "Hierarchical fuzzy integral evaluation approach for vocational education performance: case of junior colleges in Taiwan", International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 476-485(2000).
23. Liang, G. S. . "Theory and Methodology: Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal & anti-deal concepts", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.112, pp.682-691(1999).
24. McGreal, T. L.. Successful teacher evaluation. Alexandria, Virginia： Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development(1983).
25. Onisawa, T., Sugeno, M., Nishiwaki, Y., Kawai, H. & Harima, Y.. "Fuzzy measure analysis of public attitude towards the use of nuclear energy", Fuzzy Sets and System, Vol.20, pp. 259-289(1986).
26. Saaty T. L.. The Analysis Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., (1980).
27. Seldin, Peter, and Associates. Self-Evaluation: What works? What doesn’t? In Peter Seldin et al. (Eds.), Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching: a practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions (pp. 97-115). Boston, MA: Anker(1999).
28. Shieh, V.. "Using Delphi Technique to Determine the Most ImportantCharacteristics of Effective Teaching at Junior High School Level in Taiwan". Doctor Dissertation, University of Cincinnati(1990).
29. Simon C. K. Shiu, Yan Li, Feng Zhang. "A Fuzzy Integral Based Query Dispatching Model in Collaborative Case-Based Reasoning". Appl. Intell. 21(3): 301-310 (2004)
30. Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, L. R., Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. M.. "Educational evaluation and decision-making". Itasca, IL：Peacock(1974).
31. Sugeno, M., "Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications", Dr. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974).
32. Sugeno, M. & Terano, T., "A model of learning based on fuzzy information. " Kybernetes, Vol.6, pp. 157-166, (1977).
33. Theall, M. & Franklin, J., Student Ratings in the Context Evaluation Systems. In M. Theall and J. Franklin（eds.）, Student Ratings of Instruction：Issues for Improving Practice, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no.43. San Francisco：Jossey-Bass(1991).
34. Tenbrink, T. D.. Evaluation：A practical guide for teachers. New York： McGraw-Hill(1974).
35. Tollefson, N., Chen, J.S. & Kleinsasser, A., "The Relationship of Students’ Attitude About Effective Teaching to Students’ Ratings of Effective Teaching". Educational and Psychological Measurement, 529-536(1989).
36. Zadeh, L. A., "Fuzzy Sets", Information and Control, Vol.8, pp. 338-353, (1965).
37. Zadeh, L. A., "The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning I", Information Science, Vol.8, pp. 199-251 (1975) .
38. Zadeh, L. A., "The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning II", Information Science, Vol.8, pp.301-357(1975).
39. Zadeh, L. A., "The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning III", Information Science, Vol.9, pp. 43-80(1975).
40. Zimmerman, H. J., Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, 4th ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001).