簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 左佩穎
Pei-Ying Zuo
論文名稱: 整合多重表徵鷹架與心智工具的遠距同步遊戲化數學教學活動的設計與評估
Design and evaluation of remote synchronousgamifiedmathematics teaching activities that integrate multi-representational scaffolding and mind tool
指導教授: 侯惠澤
huei-tse hou
口試委員: 湯梓辰
朱志明
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 應用科技學院 - 應用科技研究所
Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 遠距教學心智工具遊戲化學習鷹架理論學習動機心流狀態
外文關鍵詞: distance teaching, mind tool, gamification of learning, scaffolding, learning motivation, flow state
相關次數: 點閱:716下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

講述式的數學教學活動與因疫情緊急的遠距教學的實施,對學生的學習動機及學習成效帶來許多限制。運用遊戲化學習輔助數學教學可以引起學習者的學習動機且降低學習焦慮,提高學習者對於數學學習的投入程度,達到心流。而導入多重表徵鷹架結合遊戲化,可望幫助學習者進行更高層次的思考以及問題解決能力,並降低學習焦慮,進而提高學習成效。
本研究探討三種教學活動(講述式教學活動、心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動與心智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動)對學生數學學習的影響。本研究運用所開發的線上遊戲「幾何建築師」結合線上心智工具與多表徵鷹架進行遊戲化教學,在教學活動中提供一故事情境,循序漸進地引導學生完成學習活動。心智工具中提供學習者多重表徵鷹架,再透過遊戲化的機制(例如:即時檢核積分、積分排行榜)來協助學生對數學立體圖形展開圖的概念有更多的瞭解,且加深其所學知識之印象。本研究之研究對象為50位台灣北部某高職學生,以不等組前後測設計探討三種教學活動下學習者的學習成效、學習動機、心流狀態、活動焦慮以及活動情緒。研究結果顯示,在學習成效上,心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動組學生的學習成效顯著的退步。在學習動機方面,心智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動組在實驗前後的學習動機有顯著上升,而講述式教學活動組的學習動機則是顯著下降。三組組間比較發現心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動組與心智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動組的學習動機顯著高於講述式教學活動組。心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動與心智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動兩組的心流狀態與其子維度及正向情緒方面皆高於中位數,活動焦慮接近中位數,而負面情緒方面則低於中位數。
另外,本研究也初步分析學習成效、心流狀態、學習動機、焦慮與活動情緒各維度間彼此的關聯,並提出相關的研究與教學實務的建議。


Due to the outbreak ofan epidemic, the lecture-based learning and distance learning of mathematics caused many restrictions on students' learning motivationand performance. Thegamification formathematics teaching can motivatestudents, reduce theiranxiety, increasetheirengagementin mathematics learning, and finally achieveflow. The learning activities, that combined multi-representational scaffold-based gamification, is expected to help studentsengage inhigher-level thinking and problem-solving skills, and reduce theirlearning anxiety, thereby improvinglearning effectiveness.
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of three learning activities(lecture-based teaching activity, mind tool with scaffolding teaching activity, and mind tool with scaffold-basedgamification teaching activity) onmathematics learning.In the study, wedeveloped an online game "Geometric Architect"and integrated an online mind tooland multi-representational scaffold-basedgamification teaching.We provideda story situation and gradually guidedstudents to complete the learning activities.The mind tool with multi-representationalscaffold-based gamification mechanism (such as real-time ratingandranking) helped students to understandthethreedimensionsof drawingdiagrams.The participants of this study were fiftyvocationalhigh schoolstudentsfromnorthern Taiwan.A pre-test and post-test research design were used to explore the students’learning effectiveness, learning motivation, flow state,activity anxiety, and activity emotions under the three teaching activities.The results showed that the learning effectiveness of students in the group of mind tool with scaffolding has significantly degraded.In terms of learning motivation, the students in thegroup of mind tool with scaffold–basedgamification teachingsignificantly improved their learning motivation after the experiment. On the other hand, the students in the lecture-based group significantlydecreased their learning motivation.The comparisonbetweenthe three groupsrevealed that the learning motivations of themind tool with scaffolding group and mind tool with scaffold–basedgamificationgroupwere significantly higher than that of the lecture-based group.The flow state, sub-dimensions, and positive emotions of students in themind tool with scaffolding group and mind tool with scaffold–basedgamificationgroup are higher than the median.Their activity anxietiesare close to the median, and their negative emotions are lower than the median.
Furthermore, thisstudy also preliminarily analyzed the correlation among learning effectiveness, flow state, learning motivation, activity anxiety, and activity emotion.According to the results, we providedsome suggestions and implications for future research.

目錄 摘要..................................................................................................................................... I Abstract .............................................................................................................................II 目錄.................................................................................................................................. IV 圖次............................................................................................................................... VIII 表次.................................................................................................................................. IX 第一章 緒論.....................................................................................................................1 第一節研究背景與動機.............................................................................................1 第二節研究目的與研究問題.....................................................................................4 第貳章 文獻探討.............................................................................................................6 第一節數學課堂教學常見的限制.............................................................................6 第二節遠距教學的現況與限制.................................................................................8 第三節遊戲化促進學習...........................................................................................10 第四節鷹架理論.......................................................................................................12 一、 鷹架理論...............................................................................................12 二、 鷹架理論應用於學習案例...................................................................12 第五節心智工具.......................................................................................................15 第六節 小結...........................................................................................................17 第参章 研究方法...........................................................................................................18 第一節 研究設計...................................................................................................18 第二節 研究對象...................................................................................................22 第三節 研究工具...................................................................................................22 一、教學內容與流程 .......................................................................................22 二、鷹架導向心智工具 ...................................................................................24 三、參與實驗同意書、基本資料問卷與遊戲經驗問卷 ...............................32 VI 四、學習成效評量(前後測).............................................................................32 五、ARCS 動機量表(前後測).........................................................................32 六、動機三階段量表 .......................................................................................33 七、心流問卷 ...................................................................................................33 八、活動焦慮量表 ...........................................................................................34 九、活動情緒量表 ...........................................................................................35 十、遊戲活動心得 ...........................................................................................36 第四節 實驗流程...................................................................................................38 第五節 資料蒐集與分析.......................................................................................38 第肆章 研究結果...........................................................................................................40 第一節 學習成效分析...........................................................................................40 一、組內學習成效前後測差異分析 ...............................................................40 二、組間學習成效分析 ...................................................................................41 第二節 ARCS 活動動機........................................................................................41 一、ARCS 動機組內前後測分析....................................................................41 二、ARCS 動機組間差異分析........................................................................43 第三節 學習動機前、中、後三階段分析...........................................................44 一、組內學習動機三階段分析 .......................................................................44 二、學習動機三階段組間分析 .......................................................................45 第四節 心流分析...................................................................................................46 第五節 活動焦慮分析...........................................................................................48 第六節 活動情緒分析...........................................................................................48 第七節 遊戲活動心得問卷分析...........................................................................49 第伍章 討論...................................................................................................................53 第一節 受試者在「講述式教學活動」、「心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動」與「心 VII 智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動」三組之學習成效表現與差異........53 第二節 受試者在「講述式教學活動」、「心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動」與「心 智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動」三組之 ARCS 動機表現與差異...55 第三節 受試者在「講述式教學活動」、「心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動」與「心 智工具搭配鷹架遊戲化教學活動」三組之動機三階段表現與差異....57 第四節 受試者在「心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動」與「心智工具搭配鷹架遊戲 化教學活動」兩組之心流、活動焦慮、活動情緒表現與差異............58 第五節 受試者在「心智工具搭配鷹架教學活動」與「心智工具搭配鷹架遊戲 化教學活動」兩組之教學活動心得........................................................60 第陸章 結論與建議.......................................................................................................62 第一節結論...............................................................................................................62 第二節建議...............................................................................................................64 一、教學實務方面 ...........................................................................................64 二、未來研究生的建議 ...................................................................................64 三、系統設計建議 ...........................................................................................65 參考文獻...........................................................................................................................66 附錄一:參與遊戲同意書...............................................................................................79 附錄二:學習成效評量...................................................................................................80 附錄三:ARCS 學習動機問卷.......................................................................................85 附錄四:動機三階段問卷...............................................................................................92 附錄五:心流問卷...........................................................................................................93 附錄六:活動焦慮問卷...................................................................................................94 附錄七:活動情緒問卷...................................................................................................95 附錄八:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 1 填答分析彙整表(實驗組 1) .................................96 附錄九:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 1 填答分析彙整表(實驗組 2) .................................96 VIII 附錄十:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 2 填答分析彙整表(實驗組 1) .................................96 附錄十一:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 2 填答分析彙整表(實驗組 2) .............................97 附錄十二:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 3 編碼表(實驗組 1) .............................................97 附錄十三:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 3 編碼表(實驗組 2) .............................................98 附錄十四:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 4 編碼表(實驗組 1) .............................................99 附錄十五:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 4 編碼表(實驗組 2) .............................................99 附錄十六:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 5 編碼表(實驗組 1) .............................................99 附錄十七:【遊戲心得問卷】問題 5 編碼表(實驗組 2) .............................................99

姚紅陽.(2020). 談建構主義理論在初中數學教學中的應用. 才智.
吳劍英. (2018). 小學數學教學採用遊戲化教學法的實踐思考. 數學大世界 (下
旬).
雷立偉. (2020). 遠距教學與 e 化工具並非解決教育難題的萬靈丹. 臺灣教育評
論月刊, 9(6), 58-60.
楊秀珍. (2016). 教師採用同步網路教學之困難與解決方案. 中山大學資訊管理學
系研究所學位論文, 1-107.
馮宇. (2015). 遊戲化教學在小學數學教學中的應用. 科教文匯, (16), 101-102.
羅方吟, &陳政煥. (2021). COVID-19 疫情下同步與非同步資訊科技輔助的大學
遠距英語文教學. 當代教育研究季刊, 29(1), 69-71.
陳孟秦, 鄭雅婷, &陳采伶. (2020). 鷹架作用對幼兒利社會行為之助益. 臺灣教育
評論月刊, 9(10), 145-149.
張基成, &林冠佑. (2016). 從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習-學習成效, 心流體
驗與認知負荷. 科學教育學刊, 24(3), 221-248.
楊斯定. (2019). 鷹架數位遊戲式學習對不同認知風格學習者學習情緒, 認知負
荷與學習成效之影響研究. 臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系學
位論文, 1-220.
李彩鳳. (2018). 鷹架策略與提示策略對不同先備知識國中生程式設計課程學習
成效與動機之探討. 臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所學位論文, 1-124.
Abate, A. F., Cascone, L., Nappi, M., Narducci, F., & Passero, I. (2021). Attention
monitoring for synchronous distance learning. Future Generation Computer
Systems.
Adam, N. L., Alzahri, F. B., Soh, S. C., Bakar, N. A., & Kamal, N. A. M. (2017,
November). Self-regulated learning and online learning: a systematic review.
In International Visual Informatics Conference (pp. 143-154). Springer, Cham.
67
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic:
Students' Perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51.
Aghaei, A. R., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The Necessity of Math Education in Primary
School.
Anderson, P. E., Nash, T., & McCauley, R. (2015, June). Facilitating programming
success in data science courses through gamified scaffolding and learn2mine.
In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in
Computer Science Education (pp. 99-104).
Aparicio, Y. (2015). Tools of the Mind: A Path to Build Knowledge and Construct
Language through Play. Revista Letral, (15), 88-100.
Arianto, F. (2016). Implementation Mindtools in Problem Solving. Jurnal
TEKPEN, 1(1).
Arnsten, (2009).Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and
function.Nat Rev Neurosci. 10(6), 410-22
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory,
math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
130, 224–237.
Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect
test performance?. Computers & Education, 83, 57-63.
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning
outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in
educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of
Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115.
68
Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2017). Studying student
differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study. Computers in Human
Behavior, 71, 550-585.
Barlovits, S., Jablonski, S., Milicic, G., & Ludwig, M. (2021, July). Distance
Learning in Mathematics Education: Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning
with MathCityMap@ home. In Proceedings of EDULEARN21 Conference (Vol.
5, p. 6th).
Beilock, S. L., & Willingham, D. T. (2014). Math Anxiety: Can Teachers Help
Students Reduce It? Ask the Cognitive Scientist. American educator, 38(2), 28.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2018). Tools of the mind: A Vygotskian early childhood
curriculum. In International handbook of early childhood education (pp.
1095-1111). Springer, Dordrecht.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2019). Tools of the mind: the Vygotskian-based early
childhood program. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(3),
223-237.
Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive lea
rning environments, 24(6), 1162-1175.
Cakir, B. E. (2012). Geleneksel ogretim yontemleri ile dramatizasyon yonteminin
ilkogretim 2. sinif matematik dersinde, ogrencilerin akademik basari ve
kavramların kalicilik duzeylerine etkisinin karsilastirilmasi (Yayimlanmamis
Yuksek Lisans Tezi). Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu,
Izmir, Turkey.
Chen, C. H., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based
learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human
Behavior, 55, 1201-1212.
Chen, Y. C. (2017). Empirical study on the effect of digital game-based instruction on
69
students’ learning motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3177-3187.
Chen, Y. C., & Hou, H. T*.(2020) Development and Evaluation of a Computer
Supported Collaborative Learning Tool for Teaching Activities Using
Educational Board Games, paper presented at the International Conference on
Computers in Education (ICCE2020), 23-27 November 2020 (online)
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship:
Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick
(Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert
Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cruse, A. R. (2012). Using hands-on learning activities in high school mathematics
classes to impact student success (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Dagoc, D., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Effects of metacognitive scaffolding on the
mathematics performance of grade 6 pupils in a cooperative learning
environment. International Journal of English and Education, 7(4), 378-391.
de Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V. H., Reis, H. M., & Isotani, S. (2014). A Systematic
Mapping on Gamification Applied to Education. SAC'14 (pp. 217-222). ACM
Diamond, A., Lee, C., Senften, P., Lam, A., & Abbott, D. (2019). Randomized
control trial of Tools of the Mind: Marked benefits to kindergarten children and
their teachers. PloS one, 14(9), e0222447.
Diana, N., Suhendra, S., & Yohannes, Y. (2020, October). Teachers’ Difficulties in
Implementing Distance Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic. In 2020 12th
International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp.
105-109).
Dietrich, N., Kentheswaran, K., Ahmadi, A., Teychené, J., Bessière, Y., Alfenore,
70
S., ... & Hébrard, G. (2020). Attempts, successes, and failures of distance
learning in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9),
2448-2457.
Ding, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in
gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 120, 213-226.
Fatonia, N. A., Nurkhayatic, E., Nurdiawatid, E., Fidziahe, G. P., Adhag, S., Irawanh,
A. P., ... & Azizik, E. (2020). University students online learning system during
Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Reviews
in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576.
Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L.
(2017). The math anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52-58.
Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L.
(2017). The math anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52-58.
Fouze, A. Q., & Amit, M. (2017). Development of mathematical thinking through
integration of ethnomathematic folklore game in math instruction. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 617-630.
Gelles, L. A., Lord, S. M., Hoople, G. D., Chen, D. A., & Mejia, J. A. (2020).
Compassionate flexibility and self-discipline: Student adaptation to emergency
remote teaching in an integrated engineering energy course during
COVID-19. Education Sciences, 10(11), 304.
Glover, I. (2013, June). Play as you learn: gamification as a technique for motivating
learners. In Edmedia+ innovate learning (pp. 1999-2008). Association for the
Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
71
Gonida, E. N., & Lemos, M. S. (2019). Motivation in education at a time of global
change: Theory, research, and implications for practice. Emerald Publishing
Limited.
Grossman, J., Lin, Z., Sheng, H., Wei, J. T. Z., Williams, J. J., & Goel, S. (2019).
MathBot: Transforming online resources for learning math into conversational
interactions. AAAI 2019 Story-Enabled Intelligence.
Guven, B. & Ozcelik, C. (2017). Ilkokul matematik dersine yonelik gerceklestirilen
lisansustu egitim tez calismalarina iliskin bir inceleme. Egitimde Kuram ve
Uygulama, 13(4), 693–714.
Guven, B. & Ozcelik, C. (2017). Ilkokul matematik dersine yonelik gerceklestirilen
lisansustu egitim tez calismalarina iliskin bir inceleme. Egitimde Kuram ve
Uygulama, 13(4), 693–714.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature
Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Hawaii International Conference
on System Science (pp. 3025-3034). IEEE.
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the
classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison,
satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & education, 80,
152-161.
Hou, H. T., & Keng, S. H. (2021). A Dual-Scaffolding Framework Integrating
Peer-Scaffolding and Cognitive-Scaffolding for an Augmented Reality-Based
Educational Board Game: An Analysis of Learners’ Collective Flow State and
Collaborative Learning Behavioral Patterns. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 59(3), 547-573.
Hsieh, Y. C. (2017). A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners
72
and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 30(1-2), 115-132.
Huang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2015, November). Do points, badges and leaderboard
increase learning and activity: A quasi-experiment on the effects of
gamification. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on
Computers in Education (pp. 275-280).
Hyrynsalmi, S., Smed, J., & Kimppa, K. (2017, May). The Dark Side of
Gamification: How We Should Stop Worrying and Study also the Negative
Impacts of Bringing Game Design Elements to Everywhere. In GamiFIN (pp.
96-104).
Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H. J. (2018). Examining competitive, collaborative and
adaptive gamification in young learners' math learning. Computers &
education, 125, 444-457.
Johnson, J. P., & Mighten, A. (2005). A comparison of teaching strategies: lecture
notes combined with structured group discussion versus lecture only. Journal of
Nursing Education, 44(7), 319-322.
Jonassen, D. H. (1995, Spring). Computers as Cognitive Tools:Learning with
Technology,Not from Technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,
6(2), 40-73.
Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2020). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge
representations for learning. In Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: No
more walls (pp. 165-196). Routledge.
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. I. (2021). Gamification in
science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education
Sciences, 11(1), 22.
73
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated
STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 1-11.
Kiili, K., Lindstedt, A., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Exploring characteristics of students'
emotions, flow and motivation in a math game competition. In GamiFIN (pp.
20-29).
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A
review of gamification research. International Journal of Information
Management, 45, 191-210.
Kruszewska, A., Nazaruk, S., & Szewczyk, K. (2020). Polish teachers of early
education in the face of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic–the
difficulties experienced and suggestions for the future. Education 3-13, 1-12.
Kusmaryono, I., Gufron, A. M., & Rusdiantoro, A. (2020). Effectiveness of
Scaffolding Strategies in Learning Against Decrease in Mathematics Anxiety
Level. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13-22.
Li, C. T., Lee, M. H., Lien, Y. H., Huang, Y. J., Wang, C. P., & Hou, H. T. (2019,
July). A Real Escape Gamification Teaching Activity Integrated with Situated
Learning and Multi-dimensional Scaffolding for Elementary School Social
Studies Course. In 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied
Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 1051-1052). IEEE.
Li, J., van der Spek, E., Hu, J., & Feijs, L. (2017, October). SEE ME ROAR:
self-determination enhanced engagement for math education relying on
augmented reality. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium
on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 345-351).
Liang, C. P., & She, H. C. (2021). Investigate the effectiveness of single and multiple
representational scaffolds on mathematics problem solving: evidence from eye
74
movements. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16.
Liles, K. R., Bryant, D. A. G., & Beer, J. M. (2017, March). How can social robots
motivate students to practice math?. In Proceedings of the Companion of the
2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp.
353-354).
Lukowski, S. L., DiTrapani, J., Jeon, M., Wang, Z., Schenker, V.
J., Doran, M. M., . . . Petrill, S. A. (2016). Multidimensionality
in the measurement of math-specific anxiety and its relationship with
mathematical performance. Learning and
Individual Differences. Advance online publication.
doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.007Multidimensionality in the measurement of
math-specific anxiety and its relationship with mathematical
performance. Learning and individual differences, 70, 228-235.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online
and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers
College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
Mitchell, K. M., Harrigan, T., Stefansson, T., & Setlack, H. (2017). Exploring
self-efficacy and anxiety in first-year nursing students enrolled in a
discipline-specific scholarly writing course. Quality Advancement in Nursing
Education-Avancées en formation infirmière, 3(1), 4.
Nesbitt, K. T., & Farran, D. C. (2021). Effects of prekindergarten curricula: tools of
the mind as a case study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 86(1), 7-119.
Oliveira, W., Toda, A., Toledo, P., Shi, L., Vassileva, J., Bittencourt, I. I., & Isotani,
S. (2020). Does Tailoring Gamified Educational Systems Matter? The Impact
75
on Students' Flow Experience.
Orhan, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2020). TEACHERS’PERCEPTIONS AND TEACHING
EXPERIENCES ON DISTANCE EDUCATION THROUGH
SYNCHRONOUS VIDEO CONFERENCING DURING COVID-19
PANDEMIC. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 7(1), 8-44.
Outhwaite, L. A., Gulliford, A. & Pitchford, N. J. (2017). Closing the gap: efficacy of
a tablet intervention to support the development of early mathematical skills in
UK primary school children. Computers & Education, 108, 43–58.
Raymond, E. (2000). Cognitive Characteristics. Learners with Mild Disabilities (pp.
169-201). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, A Pearson Education
Company
Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying gamification: the effect of
rewards and incentives on motivation. In Gamification in education and
business (pp. 21-46). Springer, Cham.
Rodrigues, L. F., Oliveira, A., & Rodrigues, H. (2019). Main gamification concepts: a
systematic mapping study. Heliyon, 5(7), e01993.
Russell, D. (2015). Mindtools: what does it mean to be literate in the age of
Google?. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 30(3), 5-6.
Safapour, E., Kermanshachi, S., & Taneja, P. (2019). A review of nontraditional
teaching methods: Flipped classroom, gamification, case study, self-learning,
and social media. Education Sciences, 9(4), 273.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis.
Sansone, C., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & MacNamara, A. (2012). Regulating
interest when learning online: Potential motivation and performance trade-offs.
The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 141-149.
76
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and
social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.
Solomon, T., Plamondon, A., O’Hara, A., Finch, H., Goco, G., Chaban, P., ... &
Tannock, R. (2018). A cluster randomized-controlled trial of the impact of the
Tools of the Mind curriculum on self-regulation in Canadian
preschoolers. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2366.
Stoyanova, M., Tuparova, D., & Samardzhiev, K. (2017, September). Impact of
motivation, gamification and learning style on students’ interest in Maths
classes–A Study in 11 high school grade. In International conference on
interactive collaborative learning (pp. 133-142). Springer, Cham.
Su, C. H. (2016). The effects of students' motivation, cognitive load and learning
anxiety in gamification software engineering education: a structural equation
modeling study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(16), 10013-10036.
Sutiarso, S., Coesamin, C., & Nurhanurawati, N. (2018). THE EFFECT OF
VARIOUS MEDIA SCAFFOLDING ON INCREASING UNDERSTANDING
OF STUDENTS’GEOMETRY CONCEPTS. Journal on Mathematics
Education, 9(1), 95-102.
Tarasova, O. V., & Savvina, O. A. (2019). Information technologies in math
education: pro et contra. people, 15(35), 18.
Teemueangsa, S., & Jedaman, P. (2021, March). Developing science learning
activities using online gamification. In Journal of Physics: Conference
Series (Vol. 1835, No. 1, p. 012079). IOP Publishing.
Toda, A. M., Valle, P. H., & Isotani, S. (2017, March). The dark side of gamification:
An overview of negative effects of gamification in education. In Researcher
77
links workshop: higher education for all (pp. 143-156). Springer, Cham.
Wachyunni, S. (2015). Scaffolding and co-operative learning: Effects on reading
comprehension and vocabulary knowledge in English as a foreign language.
Wang, Z., Lukowski, S. L., Hart, S. A., Lyons, I. M., Thompson, L. A., Kovas, Y., ...
& Petrill, S. A. (2015). Is math anxiety always bad for math learning? The role
of math motivation. Psychological science, 26(12), 1863-1876.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem
solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Wossala, J., & Lavrinčík, J. CHANGES IN MATH EDUCATION AT MORAVIAN
BUSINESS COLLEGE OLOMOUC DURING THE COVID
CRISIS. International Days of Science, 75.
Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Individual differences in an English learning
achievement system: Gaming flow experience, gender differences and learning
motivation. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 351-366.
Yilmaz Ince, E., Kabul, A., & Diler, İ. (2020). Distance education in higher education
in the COVİD-19 pandemic process: A case of Isparta Applied Sciences
University. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4),
345-351.
Yung, O. C., Junaini, S. N., Kamal, A., & Ibharim, L. F. (2020). Slash 100%:
Gamification of mathematics with hybrid QR-based card game. Indones. J.
Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci, 20, 1453-1459.
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of
gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical
evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326.
Zimmerling, E., Höllig, C. E., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). Exploring the
78
influence of common game elements on ideation output and motivation. Journal
of Business Research, 94, 302-312

QR CODE