研究生: |
韓明娟 Ming-Chuan Han |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
自我概念對個人資源與服務表現關係之調節作用 How Self-Concepts Moderate the Relationships between Personal Resources and Service Behaviors |
指導教授: |
邱淑芬
Su-Fen Chiu |
口試委員: |
鄭仁偉
Jen-Wei Cheng 葉穎蓉 Ying-Jung Yeh 吳宗祐 Tsung-Yu Wu 黃品全 Pin-Chyuan Hwang 黃敦群 none |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理系 Department of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 73 |
中文關鍵詞: | 特定焦點積極行為 、角色寬度自我效能 、顧客情感承諾 、自我概念 、顧客服務表現 |
外文關鍵詞: | proactivebehavior |
相關次數: | 點閱:417 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究從人員在服務工作中的意願及能力之角度,以二個研究分別探討自我概念對個人資源與服務表現關係之調節作用。研究一從對顧客、群體、個人三個面向的動機心態,探討群體層面自我概念對顧客情感承諾(意願)與行為表現(利他組織公民行為、顧客服務)之間關係的調節作用。更進一步探討個人、群體層面自我概念與顧客承諾之間的三維交互作用,以檢視個人層面自我概念對以上群體層面自我概念調節作用的影響。從284位旅館服務人員之有效樣本中發現,群體層面自我概念能強化顧客情感承諾對利他組織公民行為、顧客服務之正向作用。此外,個人層面自我概念又能更進一步影響上述群體層面自我概念的調節效果。個人層面自我概念的調節分析發現,相較於低個人層面自我概念,在高個人層面自我概念的條件下,群體層面自我概念增強顧客情感承諾與利他組織公民行為之間正向關係的調節作用將較為明顯。研究二則是探討自我概念分別對角色寬度自我效能(能力)與對組織、對人際(主管及同事),以及對自我三種特定焦點積極行為關係之調節作用。從259位航空公司地勤人員之有效樣本中發現,群體層面自我概念能強化角色寬度自我效能對組織積極行為的正向作用;關係層面自我概念能強化角色寬度自我效能對主管積極行為的正向作用;最後,個人層面自我概念能強化角色寬度自我效能對自我積極行為的正向作用。此二研究結果不僅顯示,以自我概念解釋個人行為動機的適用性,也提供了進一步的管理及實務意涵。
Based on the theoretical grounding of self-concept, this thesis examined the moderating role of different level of self-concepts through two studies. The first study examined the intersection of employees’ self-concept with their affective commitment to customers. Specifically, it elucidated the moderating effects of collective self-concept on affective commitment to customer and the three-way interaction coupled with individual self-concept. Results obtained from the sample of 284 employees at hotels showed that collective self-concept had additive moderating effects on the positive relationships between commitment and customer service as well as altruism to colleagues. In addition, the results also showed that the individual self-concept could determine the moderating role of collective self-concept. Specifically, with the increase of individual level self-concept, the collective self-concept would moderate the influence of commitment on altruism more obviously. The second study aims to identify the interactive effect of role breadth self-efficacy (RBSE) and the three levels of self-concept (collective, relational, and individual) in predicting of different foci of proactive behaviors. Results from 259 matched responses from an airline company in Taiwan showed that RBSE had a positive effect on (1) pro-organizational proactive behavior among those with higher collective self-concept, (2) pro-supervisor proactive behavior among those with higher relational self-concept, and (3) pro-self proactive behavior among those with higher individual self-concept. The findings provide insights into the moderating role of different levels of self-concept on RBSE-proactive behavior process in terms of specific targets or beneficiaries. Further implications for organizational research and practice are discussed.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bell, S. J., & Menguc, B. (2002). The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior service quality. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 131-146.
Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Pro‐self, prosocial, and pro‐organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475-498.
Bettencourt, L. A., Gwinner, K. P., & Meuter, M. L. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 29-41.
Bindl, U. K., Parker, S. K., Totterdell, P., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 134-150.
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445-464.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98.
Bolino, M. C., Harvey, J., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 126-139.
Brebels, L., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijke, M. (2014). Using self-definition to predict the influence of procedural justice on organizational-, interpersonal-, and job/task-oriented citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 40(3), 731-763.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this “We”? : Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.
Chen, G., & Klimoski, R. J. (2003). The impact of expectations on newcomer performance in teams as mediated by work characteristics, social exchanges, and empowerment. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 591-607.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analvsis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19(4), 915-922.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nauta, A. (2009). Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 913-926.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Donavan, D. T., Brown, T. J., & Mowen, J. C. (2004). Internal benefits of service-worker customer orientation: Job satisfaction, commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 128-146.
Epitropaki, O. (2013). A multi‐level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated–mediated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 65-86.
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 737-750.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 133-187). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Luke, M., O'Mara, E. M., Iuzzini, J., Jackson, L. E., . . . Wu, Q.-P. (2012). A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 997-1013.
Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Vevea, J. L., & Iuzzini, J. (2002). The" I," the" we," and the" when": A meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 574-591.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Groth, M., Paul, M., & Gremler, D. D. (2006). Are all smiles created equal? How emotional contagion and emotional labor affect service relationships. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 58-73.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
Holley, D. M. (1999). Self-interest and beyond. St. Paul,MN: Paragon House.
Johnson, R. E., & Chang, C.-H. (2006). “I” is to continuance as “We” is to affective: the relevance of the self-concept for organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 549-570.
Johnson, R. E., & Chang, C.-H. (2008). Relationships between organizational commitment and its antecedents: Employee self‐concept matters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(2), 513-541.
Johnson, R. E., Chang, C.-H., & Yang, L. Q. (2010). Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. The Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 226-245.
Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. (2006). When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 175-201.
Kampmeier, C., & Simon, B. (2001). Individuality and group formation: The role of independence and differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 448-462.
Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 602-609.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2 ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416.
Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224-253.
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665-683.
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007.
Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299-326.
Morin, A. J. S., Vandenberghe, C., Boudrias, J. S., Madore, I., Morizot, J., & Tremblay, M. (2011). Affective commitment and citizenship behaviors across multiple foci. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(8), 716-738.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.
Rank, J., Carsten, J. M., Unger, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (2007). Proactive customer service performance: Relationships with individual, task, and leadership variables. Human Performance, 20(4), 363-390.
Raub, S., & Liao, H. (2012). Doing the right thing without being told: Joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 651-667.
Redman, T., & Snape, E. (2005). Unpacking Commitment: Multiple Loyalties and Employee Behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 301-328.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
Sonnentag, S., & Spychala, A. (2012). Job control and job stressors as predictors of proactive work behavior: Is role breadth self-efficacy the link? Human Performance, 25(5), 412-431.
Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 580-598.
Tajfel, H. E. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1-34.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 207-226.
Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., Michon, R., Chebat, J.-C., Tremblay, M., & Fils, J.-F. (2007). An Examination of the Role of Perceived Support and Employee Commitment in Employee-Customer Encounters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1177-1187.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 505-516.
Wieseke, J., Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & Van Dick, R. (2007). Organizational identification as a determinant of customer orientation in service organizations. Marketing Letters, 18(4), 265-278.
Yang, H. D., Sanders, K., & Bumatay, C. P. (2012). Linking perceptions of training with organizational commitment: The moderating role of self-construals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(1), 125-149.