簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱紀鳳
JI-FONG CIOU
論文名稱: 團隊成員交換關係與員工建言之關連性研究--角色定義之中介效果
The Study of Relationship between Team-Member Exchange and Employee Voice Behavior -- The Mediating effect of Role Definition.
指導教授: 鄭仁偉
Jen-wei Cheng
口試委員: 葉穎蓉
none
邱淑芬
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 73
中文關鍵詞: 團隊成員交換關係、角色定義、員工建言行為
外文關鍵詞: role definition, and employee voice.
相關次數: 點閱:252下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 由於現今企業內部經營發展皆以人為本,許多企業紛以開放式溝通環境與管理模式,讓公司的方向與員工的意見得以充分交流。因此,我們可以瞭解,企業非常重視員工建言行為的表現。
     
    對於企業來說,組織要能有效運作,除了要求員工能將契約內的工作完成外,員工是否能自動自發地去執行一些非正式且未包含於正式工作中的任務,亦是影響組織績效的另一項因素。然而,員工建言行為屬於非工作契約上的角色外行為之一。

    因此,本研究提出團隊成員交換關係、角色定義與員工建言行為等變數,進行深入的探討。並以角色定義作為中介變項,探討團隊成員交換關係是否會透過角色定義引發員工建言行為。

    本研究透過紙本及電子問卷的方式,收集351份樣本來進行分析,結果發現團隊成員交換關係與員工建言行為均呈現顯著的正向關係,且角色定義確實在團隊成員交換關係與員工建言行為間扮演著部份中介的角色。最後,本研究利用分析結果,提出管理上的建議,供各界做為參考。


    Because of enterprises development within the business nowadays focus on People-oriented, most of them use the ”open” way to manage people and pay attention for employee’s voice, Therefore, we can figure out that voice behavior is great importance.

    In order to make the organization well-functioned, the employers should not only request their employees to do the required jobs, but also see whether they do works which are in excess of the formal requirements voluntarily. However, employee voice behavior is one of the extra-role behavior which not indicate in work contract.

    Therefore, this research uses “team-member exchange”, “role definition”, and “employee voice” as variables and role definition as mediates to discuss whether team-member exchange will lead to employee voice through role definition.

    The present study analyzes 351 samples recruited form paper and Electronic questionnaire. The results show that the team-member exchange and employee voice have significant and positive influences. Moreover, role definition plays a role as mediation between team-member exchange and employee voice. Based on research finding, this investigation provides some managerial suggestions and hopes these suggestions will be useful for the enterprises.

    Key words: Team-member exchange, role definition, and employee voice.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 圖目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 團隊成員交換關係 5 第二節 角色定義 9 第三節 員工建言 16 第四節 團隊成員交換關係、角色定義與員工建言之關係 23 第三章 研究方法 28 第一節 研究架構與假說 28 第二節 研究對象和研究程序 30 第三節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 32 第四節 資料分析方法 37 第四章 實證研究結果 39 第一節 樣本敘述性統計 39 第二節 信效度分析 44 第三節 研究變項平均數、標準差及相關係數分析 49 第四節 研究假設驗證 50 第五章 結論與建議 55 第一節 研究結論 55 第二節 學術與管理意涵 57 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 61 參考文獻 63 附錄:問卷 71

    一、中文文獻

    1. 林佳怡(民93),新進人員與直屬主管及資深同事價值觀契合度對新進人員組織承諾之影響-並檢驗「與主管交換關係」及「與同事交換關係」之干擾效果,國立政治大學企業管理研究所。
    2. 林佳潓(民94),知覺組織支持與組織公民行為:角色定義幅度之中介效果,私立中原大學心理學研究所。
    3. 林宜蓁(民97),人力資源管理滿意度與員工建言之關聯性研究-心理安全感的中介效果,台灣科技大學企業管理系。
    4. 林傳洋(民96),關係認定取向與主管領導行為對建言的影響,高雄醫學大學心理學研究所。 
    5. 陳建安(民97),員工工作鑲嵌、組織承諾與失業憂慮對意見表達之影響,國立東華大學企業管理學系。
    6. 黃麗穎(民94) ,團隊成員交換關係、信任與知識分享關係之研究,私立中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。
    7. 趙榮村(民95),團隊成員交換關係與社會賦閒之研究-以集體效能為干擾變項,私立中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。
    8. 鄭清揚(民93),組織公平、工作滿意與職場偏差行為關係之研究,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。
    9. 劉鴻漢(民93),組織公平、團隊成員交換關係與社會賦閒之關聯性研究,私立中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。
    10. 蔡孟真(民92),角色定義幅度與組織公民行為:前置要素之探討,私立中原大學心理學研究所。
    11. 盧婉君(民93),組織公民行為的角色定義對其與互動公正間關係之影響探討-以中華電信為例,國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班經營管理組。 
    12. 藍庭國(民95),團隊多元性、成員交換關係及角色定義幅度對團隊品質之影響,私立靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班。 

    二、英文文獻

    1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. NY: Holt Rimehart and Winston.
    2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
    3. Avery, D. R. 2003. Personality as a predictor of the value of voice. Journal of Psychology, 137(5), 435-446.
    4. Babbie, E. (1992). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    5. Bachrach, D. G., & Jex, S. M. (2000). Organizational citizenship and mood: an experimental test of perceived job breadth. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 641-663.
    6. Banton, M. P. (1965). Roles: An introduction to the study of social relations. London: Tavistock.
    7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    8. Blakely, G. L., Srivastava, A., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The Effects of Nationality, Work Role Centrality, and Work Locus of Control on Role Definitions of OCB. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(1), 103-117.
    9. Chiaburu, D. S., & Byrne, A. Z. (2009). Predicting OCB role definitions: exchanges with the organization and psychological attachment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 201-214.
    10. Choi, J. N. (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 467-484.
    11. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
    12. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
    13. Dunegan, K. J., Tierney, P., & Duchon, D. (1992). Toward an understanding of nnovative climate: Explaining variance in perceptions by divisional affiliation work group interactions, and employee-manager exchanges. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39, 227-236.
    14. Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). The meanings and purpose of employee voice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 1149-1170.
    15. Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.
    16. Farrell, A. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596-607.
    17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
    18. Freeman, R., & Medoff, J. (1984). What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.
    19. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153-170.
    20. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organization: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers. Kent, OH: Comparative Administration Research Institute, Kent State University.
    21. Gran, G. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1201-1245. Chicago: Rand Mcnally.
    22. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W. C., (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: USA.
    23. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate date analysis international edition. N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
    24. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
    25. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 12(2), 597-606.
    26. Hodson, R. (2008). The ethnographic contribution to understanding co-worker relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1), 169-192.
    27. Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: an examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
    28. Kamdar, D., McAllister, D. J., & Turban, D. B. (2006). ‘‘All in a day’s work’’: How follower individual differences and justice perceptions predict OCB role definitions and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 841–855.
    29. Kamdar, D., & VanDyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286-1298.
    30. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146.
    31. Lam, S. S.K., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (1999). Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspective of supervisors and subordinates across four international sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 594-601.
    32. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 325–336.
    33. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 407-416.
    34. Love, M. S., & Forret, M. (2008). Exchange Relationships at Work: An Examination of the Relationship between Team-Member Exchange and Supervisor Reports of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(4), 342.
    35. Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567.
    36. Naus, F., van Iterson, A., & Roe, R. (2007). Organizational cynicism: Extending the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect model of employees' responses to adverse conditions in the workplace. Human Relations, 60(5), 683-718.
    37. Nunnally, J. (1994). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    38. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    39. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.
    40. Ortiz, B. P., Heberlein, T. A., & Linz, D. (1982). Satisfaction, commitment, and knowledge of customers on a mandatory participation time-of-day electricity pricing experiment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 106-115.
    41. Parker, L. E. (1993). When to fix it and when to leave: Relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent, and exit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 949-959.
    42. Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1997). ‘‘That’s not my job’’: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 899–929.
    43. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
    44. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization: 27-48. Hillsdale. NJ:Erlbaum.
    45. Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job status satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
    46. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.
    47. Seers, A. (1989). Team-Member Exchange Quality: A new construct for Role-making Research. Organizational behavior and Human decision Processes, 43, 118-135.
    48. Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman J. F. (1995). Team-Member Exchange under Team and Traditional Management. Group & Organization Management, 20(1), 18-38.
    49. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.
    50. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Sociological methodology 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    51. Susan, M. M., Sandy, J. W., Robert, C. L., & Berrin E. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
    52. Tse, H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195-211.
    53. Van Dyne, L. G., J and Dienesch, R (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
    54. Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215–330.
    55. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behavior: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.
    56. Van Dyne, L. Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
    57. Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In-Role Perceptions Buffer the Negative Impact of Low LMX on Helping and Enhance the Positive Impact of High LMX on Voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195–1207.
    58. Walumbwa F. O., & Schaubroeck. J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of applied psychology, 94(5), 1275-1286.
    59. Withey, M., & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 521-539.
    60. Zhou, J., George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2015/06/17 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE