簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱敏鑑
Ming-Jen Chiou
論文名稱: 數位學習網站滿意度情境因素及影響因素之研究
The Predictors of E-learning System Satisfaction:A Contingency Approach
指導教授: 盧希鵬
Hsi-Peng Lu
口試委員: 陳鴻基
Houn-Gee Chen
陳靜枝
Ching-Chin Chern
楊亨利
Heng-Li Yang
陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 76
中文關鍵詞: 數位學習數位學習網站滿意度情境因素滿意度因素
外文關鍵詞: e-learning system satisfaction, contingency factor, ANOVA, SEM
相關次數: 點閱:354下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

隨著數位學習網站被廣泛地應用於企業的教育訓練及大專院校的教學課程中,探索數位學習網站滿意度之影響因素成為目前許多研究的重要課題。本研究嘗試從情境因素之角度來探討數位學習網站滿意度相關的影響因素。為了探索情境因素扮演的角色,本研究從過去文獻中分析整理出了相關情境因素及四個數位學習網站滿意度預測因子,並以實證研究來調查情境因素對這些預測因子與滿意度間關係的影響。在實證研究中,共有來自北台灣一所大學於一個學期中十個不同線上課程的五百二十二位大學生參與問卷調查,問卷中收集了學生對於研究模型中的四個預測因子品質的知覺、數位學習網站的滿意度及學生個人學習型態的調查。經過 ANOVA及SEM 統計分析後發現,不同性別及部別(日夜間部)的學生對於預測因子品質的知覺及數位學習網站的滿意度有顯著差異;本研究同時發現兩個情境因素(部別及學習型態)對於這些預測因子與滿意度間的關係有顯著的干擾效果。本研究建議了有效提升數位學習網站的滿意度,需將重要的情境因素納入考量。研究結果在管理上的意涵及未來研究的方向也在論文中被詳細的提出討論。


An e-learning system has been extensively used for training programs in corporations and for teaching courses in universities, and therefore finding predictors of e-learning system satisfaction has become an important issue in current e-learning studies. By reviewing previous e-learning studies, this dissertation located four dominant predictors of e-learning system satisfaction and various contingent variables based on contingency theory. This dissertation investigated the impact of these contingent variables on the relationship between four predictors and students’ satisfaction with e-learning. Five hundred and twenty-two university students from ten intact classes engaging in online instruction were asked to answer questionnaires about their learning styles, perceptions of the quality of the proposed predictors, and satisfaction with e-learning systems. The results of ANOVA and SEM analyses showed that two contingent variables, gender and job status, significantly influenced the perceptions of predictors and students’ satisfaction with the e-learning system. This dissertation also found a statistically significant moderating effect of two contingent variables, student job status and learning styles, on the relationship between predictors and e-learning system satisfaction. The results suggest that a serious consideration of contingent variables is crucial for improving e-learning system satisfaction. The implications of these results for the management of e-learning systems are discussed and future research directions are recommended.

中文摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III Table of Contents IV List of Tables VI List of Figures VII Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background and motivation 1 1.2 Research questions and purposes 2 1.3 Organization of the dissertation 4 Chapter 2. Literature Review 4 2.1 Information system satisfaction and success model 5 2.2 E-learning system satisfaction 6 2.3 Contingency theory and related IS research 12 2.4 Possible contingent variables 14 Chapter 3. Proposed model and research hypotheses 17 Chapter 4. Research method 20 4.1 Sample 20 4.2 Instrument development 24 Chapter 5. Data analysis and results 27 5.1 Analysis of measurement validity 27 5.2 Model estimation and hypotheses testing 32 Chapter 6. Discussion 41 6.1 Overall fit of the research model 41 6.2 The significant differences among various contingent groups 42 6.3 The managerial implication 45 Chapter 7. Conclusion 47 7.1 The contribution of this study 47 7.2 Future research direction 49 7.3 Limitation of this study 49 References 51 Appendix 57 Appendix A. Questionnaire of this study (English version) 57 Appendix B. Questionnaire of this study (Chinese version) 58 Appendix C. KLSI Version 3.1 use agreement 60 Appendix D. KLSI Version 3.1 Approval Letter 62 Autobiographical sketch and publications 63 Autobiographical Sketch 63 Publications 64

References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2003 and 2004: 27. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marking Science 16, 74-94.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Chin, K. L. (1999). A study into students' perceptions of Web-based learning environment [WWW document]. URL: http://www.herdsa.org.au/branches/vic/Cornerstones/pdf/Chin.PDF
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C. & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers & Education 45, 399-416.
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1988). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 294-334.
DeLone, W. D. & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3, 60-95.
DeLone, W. D. & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19, 9-30.
Doll, W. J. & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. . MIS Quarterly 12, 259-274.
Federico, P. A. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior 16, 359-379.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Garland, D. & Martin, B. N. (2005). Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed? Journal of Interactive Online Learning 4, 67-81.
Gallagher, S. (2004). Online Distance Education Market Update: A Nascent Market Begins to Mature. In S. Gallagher (Ed.): 13. Boston, MA: Eduventures.
Harris, R. N., Dwyer, W. O. & Leeming, F. C. (2003). Are learning styles relevant in web-based instruction? Journal of Educational Computing Research 29, 13-28.
James, G. W. (2001). Take the ID road to success. Training and development, 16-17.
Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2007). Effective practice with e-Learning: a good practice guide in designing for learning [WWW document]. URL http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepractice.pdf
Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kahle, L. R. (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation of life in America. New York: Praeger.
Kim, K.-J. & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says… Educause Quarterly 29, 22-30.
Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBear.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (1992). Learning style inventory: Version 2a. Boston: Experience Based Learning systems, Inc.
Kolb, D. A. (1999). Learning style inventory: Version 3. Boston: Hay/McBer Training Resources Group.
Kolb, D. A. (2005). The learning style inventory: Version 3.1. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct.
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). "Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations" Administrative Science Quarterly 12, 1-30.
Lee, Y. K. (2007). Understanding e-learning consumers: The moderating effects of gender and learner diversity. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 11, 223-230.
Lee, Y. K., Tseng, S. P., Liu, F. J. & Liu, S. C. (2007). Antecedents of learner satisfaction toward e-learning. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 11, 161-168.
Liegle, J. O. & Janicki, T. N. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 885-898.
Lu, J., Yu, C. S. & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information & Management 40, 497-507.
Masiello, I., Ramberg, R. & Lonka, K. P. O. (2005). Attitudes to the application of a Web-based learning system in a microbiology course. Computers & Education 45, 171-185
McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods 7, 64-82.
McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T. & Wetherbe, J. C. (1994). The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors. MIS Quarterly 18, 427-451.
McMahon, J. T. (1972). The contingency theory: logic and method revisited. Personnel Psychology, 697-710.
Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J. A. & the ID2 Research Group at Utah State University (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology 36, 5-7.
Netemeyer, R., Bentler, P., Bagozzi, R., Cudeck, R., Cote, J., Lehmann, D., McDonald, R., Heath, T., Irwin, J. & Ambler, T. (2001). Structural equations modeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology 10, 83-100.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ong, C. S. & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 816-829.
Shaw, G. & Marlow, N. (1999). The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perception on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers & Education 33, 223-234.
Tait, P., & Vessey I. (1988). The effect of user involvement on system success: A contingency approach. MIS Quarterly 12, 91-108
Vroom, V. H. & Yetton P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, Penn.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L. & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 207-217.
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management 41, 75-86.
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial Organisation: Theory and Practice. London: Oxford University Press.
Yang, H. (1993). Confucius (K'ung Tzu). Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education XXIII, 211-219.
Yanosky, R. (2004). Higher-Education E-Learning Grows Up. Gartner Group.
Zastrocky, M., Yanosky, R. & Harris, M. (2004) E-Learning in Higher Education: A Quiet Revolution. Gartner Group.
Zhang, D. and Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 207-218.

QR CODE