在觀光產業盛行的社會下，具有豐富故事的歷史街區備受重視，歷史街區的修復再利用，已成為執政者重要施政項目。現今經歷史風貌特定專用區計畫修復過後的老街街區，由於建築風格上的相似，加上老街上商業活動缺乏特色，使各地老街呈現同質化的現象，漸失風華。為了解決此問題，老街的場所營造也逐漸變成歷史街區修復過程中的重要議題。本研究的核心，即是嘗試著理解場所特徵與老街獨特性的關聯。
本文主旨在於研究台灣老街的場所營造方式。研究對象老街為：迪化街、三峽老街、深坑老街、宜蘭傳藝中心。探討老街在經過歷史風貌特定專用區計畫後，三個老街所形成的場所結構之間的差異性。藉由實地觀察場所理論於老街上的應用，理論架構主要根據Kevin Lynch的都市意象理論與Christopher Alexander的模式語言，來探討老街場所營造方式與結構組成。除了場所理論應用之外，實地觀察包括老街空間使用者行為與店家店面型態的紀錄。另外問卷調查研究中指出三種老街使用者對於場所建立方式的差異性，與老街店家店面的型態，也就是老街使用者在老街空間的使用深度相互影響。
最後將問卷調查結果與老街場所理論實地觀察比對分析中，發現老街場所的模糊區域範圍具備可塑性的特質。並指出意象元素自明性之間的衝突與模式語言的顯隱性，皆影響老街整體場所感的建立。因此此二場所理論中，應建立破壞整體老街場所感的負向空間營造列表。另外老街同質性的現象下，其場所結構本身具有異質性的特質。本研究提出場所理論應用於老街田野調查的分析框架，整理出老街個體及整體兩種空間尺度下的特性及之間的關聯性，並釐清老街使用者之間對於場所感認知的差異性及其建構方式。

With the prevalence of tourism, more people have come to appreciate the significance of historic districts, which have abundant stories. The preservation and renovation of historic districts have become the significant government projects. After the execution of the “Specific Purpose District of Historic Landscape”, the similarity of the architectural types and the monotony of the old streets activities generate the phenomenon of homogenization among the old streets which makes them become withered. To solve these problems, the issue of “place-making” plays an important role in the process of preservation and renovation. Attempting to understand the relations between the place identities and the uniqueness of the old street are the two core values of this research.
This particular research focuses on the methods of place-making in Taiwan’s old streets. The research subjects of the old streets are Dihua, Sanxia, ShengKeng Old Streets, and Yilan Folk Art Center. This research examines on the differences in place-making among three old streets under the “Specific Purpose District of Historic Landscape” plan and the artificial and tourist old street in Yilan. This investigation explores the method and configuration of place-making through field observations of old streets and referencing theories by Kevin Lynch in The Image of the City and Christopher Alexander in A Pattern Language. Apart from these place-making theories, human behavior and documentations of shop front typologies have been included in the field observations. Additionally, questionnaires and surveys results indicate that different old street configurations, users and types of shop fronts resulted in a diverse usage of space.
The comparisons among the results of the questionnaire surveys and field observations demonstrates that the areas with obscure sense of place in old streets milieu have the identity of plasticity. Simultaneously, the conflicts among the identities of the image elements, and the dominance and recessiveness in pattern languages, both influence the way of making the overall sense of place in old street. Due to this occurrence, it is essential to establish negative lists of place-making elements that hinder place-making in the old street for the two main applied theories in this specific research. Furthermore, under the phenomenon of the homogenization in old streets, the configuration of the place reveals the heterogeneity. The research contributes in the establishment of an analytic framework for applying place theories into the field survey of old streets, and have produced two main results. One is the identities and correlation of the old streets within individual and integral scales. The other is the differences of the way to identify and construct the sense of place among the old streets users. In conclusion, this thesis contributes a significant point of view in approaching the preservation and bringing to light the renovation issues of the old streets in Taiwan.

1.夏鑄九(1983)。《台灣傳統長形連棟式店舖住宅之研究》。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題報告: NSC 72-0410-E002-05
2.夏鑄九(1989)。《迪化街特定專用區現況調查及發展可行性研究》。台北市: 台北市政府工務局都市計畫處
3.趙冰譯(1994)。《建築的永恆之道》(初版)。台北市: 六合出版社 (Christopher Alexander, 1977)
4.王聽度、周序鴻譯(1994)。《建築模式語言 – 城鎮．建築．構造》(初版)。台北市: 六合出版社 (Christopher Alexander, 1977)
5.施植明譯(1997)。《場所精神 – 邁向建築現象學》(初版二刷)。台北市: 田園城市文化事業有限公司 (Christian Noberg-Schulz, 1979)
6.潘桂成譯(1998)。《經驗透視中的空間和地方》(初版)。台北市: 國立編譯館 (Yi-Fu Tuan, 1977)
7.徐苔玲、王志弘譯(2006)。《地方 : 記憶、想像與認同》(初版)。台北市: 群學出版有限公司 (Tim Cresswell,2004)
8.莊永明(2012)。《台北老街》。台北市: 時報文化
9.胡家璇譯(2014)。《城市的意象》 (初版)。台北市：遠流出版公司。(Kevin Lynch，1960)
10.黃沼元(2015)。《台灣老街歷史漫步: 台灣的記憶，台灣的歷史》(初版)。心北市: 遠足文化
11.Lynch, K. “The image of the city. Cambridge”, MA: M.I.T. Press.1960. Print.
12.Jacobs, Jane. "The Curse of Border Vacuums." The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House, 1961. Print.
13.Alexander, Christopher, Sara Ishikawa, and Murray Silverstein. “A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction”. New York: Oxford UP, 1977. Print.
14.Alexander, Christopher. “The timeless way of building”. New York: Oxford UP, 1979. Print.
15.Massey. D. “A Global Sense of Place” In “Space, Place and Gender”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. Print.
16.Tuan, Y., & Hoelscher, S. D. “Space and place: The perspective of experience” (25th ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001. Print.
17.Allan B. Jacobs. “Great Streets”. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1995. Print.
18.Marc Auge. “Non-places – introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity”. London, Verso Pres, 1995. Print.
19.廖春生(1989)。《台北之都市轉化 – 以清代三市街 (艋舺、大稻埕、城內) 為例》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文，台北市。
20.吳聖中(2005)。《全球化趨勢下台灣都市商業街道自明性之研究》。國立成功大學都市計劃學系研究所碩士論文，台南市。
21.許瓊丹(2009)。《老街文化之再發展課題研究 – 以三峽老街為例》。國立台北大學民俗藝術研究所碩士論文，新北市。
22.潘夙容(2011)。《三角湧歷史街保存修復與再發展課題探討》。國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文，台北市。
23.胡鈞豪(2013)。《老街保存、活化與再造之營造過程開發者、管理者及使用者參與機制探討-以深坑老街為例》。華梵大學建築研究所碩士論文，新北市。
24.蘇映塵(2014)。《風貌式老街再造的技術政治:以三峽和深坑老街為例》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文，台北市。
25.Brown, Warner. (1932) “Spatial Integration in a Human Maze”. University of California Publications in Psychology, Vol. V , No. 5, pp.123-134
26.Hans Blumenfeld. (1932) “Scale in Civic Design”. Town Planning review, Vol. 24 , No. 1, April 1953, pp.35-46
27.Francois Dufaux. (2000)“A new world from two old ones: the evolution of Montreal’s tenements, 1850-1892.” Urban Morphology Vol. 4 No.1 pp.9-19.
28.Edensor, T., & Kothari, U. (2004). “Sweetening colonialism: a Mauritian themed resort.” In M. Lasansky & B. McLaren (eds.) Architecture and tourism: perception performance and place, pp.189-205. Oxford: Berg.
29.Shuhana Shamsuddin, Norsidah Ujang. (2008) “Making places: The role of attachment in creating the sense of place for traditional streets in Malaysia.” Habitat International. Vol. 32, pp.399-409.
30.Norsidah Ujang.(2012) “Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 49, pp.156-167.
31.Chi-Wen Liu. (2012)“Challenges of Tourism upon the Local Community: Behavior settings in an old street in Tamsui, Taiwan.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 49, pp.305-318.