在人生裡學習過程是個基礎。透過學習，可形成一個人的品格和素質。優良的和正確的學習過程是實現學習的目標的必要條件。當學生對目前的學習過程感到滿意時，學習的目標就能夠達到。學習過程可包括方法，模型和學習的策略。整個行業裡有技術性的發展。技術的發展可使得共同對設計學習的興趣變得越來越高，但事實上，許多的學生在學習電腦於解決問題和邏輯思維方面的能力較差，這是學習程式語言的基礎。這個問題可能是由於不正確的學習過程，使用方法或模型或學習策略是錯誤的。因此，它需要一種能夠滿足學生學習編程語言的滿意度的學習方法。本研究希望通過學習程式語言中的概念圖來審視學生的滿意度。
參與者透過Google表單來選擇註冊社交的媒體。要求參與者填寫意見，直到研究結束。有49人註冊，但只有35人被證明有效。作者使用Pearson相關分析和回歸分析來分析數據。結果得到在概念圖中的可靠性因素是對學生滿意度影響最大。有形因素對學生滿意度的影響最小。同時，實用性和可靠性影響學生對滿意度有很大的因素。另外，公信力、同情和保證為其次。整體而言，所有的因素都對學生的滿意度產生積極的影響。由此可得到結論為學生對使用概念圖在學習編程語言中感到滿意。

關鍵詞：學生滿意度，概念圖，學習編程語言，學生使用概念圖的滿意度，學習程式語言中的概念圖。

The learning process is fundamental in our life. Through learning, it will form the character and quality of a person. An excellent and correct learning process is a must in achieving the learning objectives. Learning goals can be met well when students are satisfied with the current learning process. The learning process can include methods, models, and learning strategies. Technological developments that have spread throughout the industry. Development of technology makes the community interest in learning programming language becomes higher, but in fact, many students who learn about computers have less ability in problem-solving and logical thinking which is the basis of learning programming languages. This problem may occur due to the improper learning process, the use of methods or models or learning strategies are wrong. Therefore, it takes a learning method that can meet the student’s satisfaction in learning the programming language. This study wants to examine student’s satisfaction using the concept map in learning programming languages.

Participants were chosen by distributing the registration form through some social media using Google form. Participants are requested to fill the willingness to follow the research until the study ends. Forty-nine people were registering, but only 35 were declared valid. The author uses Pearson-correlation and regression analysis in analyzing the data. The results obtained that the reliability factor in the concept map is the factor that has the highest influence on student satisfaction. While the tangible element is the lowest influence on student satisfaction. Meanwhile, Usability and information quality are factors that have a high impact on student satisfaction after reliability. Furthermore, followed by credibility, empathy, and assurance. Overall, all factors have a positive effect on student satisfaction. It can be concluded that students are satisfied with the use of the concept map in learning programming languages.
Keyword: Student Satisfaction, Concept Map, Learning programming language, Student Satisfaction using Concept Map, Concept Map in Learning programming language.

REFERENCES
Ajaja, O. P. (2011). Concept Mapping As a Study Skill: Effects on Students Achievement in Biology. Education & Science, 49-57.
Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring. Information & Management, 467–476.
Al-Arimi, A. M.-K. (2014). Distance Learning. Social and Behaviour Science, 82-88.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barnes, S., & Vidgen, R. (2000). WebQual: an exploration of website quality. ECIS 2000 Proceedings, 74.
Barron, A. B., Hebets, E. A., Cleland, T. A., Fitzpatrick, C. L., Hauber, M. E., & Jeffrey. (2015). Embracing multiple definitions of learning. Trends in Neurosciences, 405-407.
Batdi, V. (2015). A Meta-analysis Study of Mind Mapping Techniques and Traditional Learning Methods. Anthropologist, 62-68.
Beaumont, D. J. (2012). Service Quality in Higher Education: The Student's viewpoint. Manchester: University of manchester.
Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2010). Knowledge Management : Systems and Processes. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1992). Prescription for service quality. American Organizational Dynamics, 5-15.
Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketin, 30(1), 8-32.
Chiou, C.-C., & Huang, H.-S. (2012). Effects of multidimensional concept maps on fourth grader's learning in web-based computer course. Computers & Education, 863-873.
Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology,, 246-263.
Daley, B. J. (2004). Using Concept Maps with Adults Student in Higher Education. Proc. of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping (pp. 183-190). Pamplona: Conference on Concept Mapping.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann.
Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. F. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Journal of Information System, 65-86.
Devedzic, V. (2006). Introduction to Web-Based Education. In V. Devedzic, Semantic Web and Education (pp. 1-28). USA: Springer.
Ekin, B., Sagir, Ş. U., & Saltan, F. (2016, 02 01). The Comparison on Evaluation of Concept Map and Structured Grid with Multiple-Choice Test. Retrieved from EBSCO Host: http://connection.ebscohost.com
Freeman, L. A., & Jessup, L. M. (2004). The power and benefits of concept mapping: measuring use, usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction. International Journal of Science Education, 151-169.
Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance . International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 29-35.
Gecer, A. (2013). Lecturer-Student Communication in Blended Learning Environments. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practic, 362-367.
Ghanbari, A., Paryad, E., & Ehsani, M. (2010). The Effectiveness of Conceptual Map Teaching Method on Short and Long Term Learning in Nursing Students . Journal of Medical Education Development Center , 113-119.
Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R., & Glaser-Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 105-123.
Guilford, J. P. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Hasan, H. F., Ilias, A., Rahman, R. A., & Razak, M. Z. (2009). Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions. International Business Research, 1, 163-175.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Method of Meta Analysis : Correcting error and bias in research findings. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Joseph, M., & Joseph, B. (1997). Service quality in education: a student perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), 15-21.
Kaddoura, M., VanDyke, O., & Shea-Foisy, K. (2016). Impact of concept mapping on the development of clinical judgment skills in nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 101-107.
Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The Effects of Teaching Programming via Scratch on Problem Solving Skills: A Discussion from Learners’ Perspective. Informatics in Education, 33-50.
Kontic, L. (2014). Measuring Service Quality in Higher Education. Management, Knowledge and Learning, 645-654.
Koo, C., Wati, Y., Wati, Y., & Lim, M. K. (2011). Website Quality, Expectation, Confirmation, and End User Satisfaction: The Knowledge-Intensive Website of the Korean National Cancer Information Center. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), 81.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing Management . New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
Kumar, M., & Rizwaan, M. (2013). Impact of Teaching through Concept mapping on Achievement in Social Studies’ Components. International Indexed & Refereed Research Journal, 54-57.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of social issues, 34-46.
Loewenthal, K. M. (2001). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. London: Psychology Press.
Malik, M. E., & Danish, R. Q. (2010). The Impact of Service Quality on Students’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutes of Punjab. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 1-11.
Marcos, A. G., Elias, F. A., Nalda, F. N., & Mere, J. O. (2016). Student evaluation of a virtual experience for project management learning : an empirical study for learning improvement. Computers & Education, 102, 172-187.
Martin, J., & Oxman, S. (1988). Building Expert System a Tutorial. New Jersey: Prentince Hall.
Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Harlow: Longman.
Mccrory, R. S. (2010). Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and student. Education Communication and Information, 241-280.
Merritt, D. (1989). Building Expert Systems in Prolog. Munich: Springer-Verlag.
Michigan Department of Education. (2006). MICHIGAN MERIT CURRICULUM GUIDELINES. MICHIGAN: Michigan Department of Education.
Minsky, M. (1974). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. Winston, The Psychology of Computer Vision. Cambridge: McGraw-Hill.
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies (liphs) leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 548-571.
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/pdf/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
Papadopoulos, Y., & Tegos, S. (2012). Using Microworlds to Introduce Programming to Novices. 16th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, 180-185.
Parasuraman, A. P., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implication for Future Research (SERVQUAL). Journal of Marketing, 41-45.
Parasuraman, A. P., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple- Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 12-40.
Santoso, B. S., Anwar, M. F., & Hermawati, S. (2015). Analysis Website Quality using WEBQUALdan Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) in KASKUS website. National Conference on Information Technology and Technical Engineering (CITEE). Yogyakarta: CITEE.
Sharma, S. (2012). Effect of Concept Mapping Strategy on the Learning outcome in Relation to Intelligence and study habits. International Multidisciplinary e-Journal, 44-52.
Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in Distance Learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 337-365.
Singh, P., & Anand, R. (2013, November 3). Service Quality Measurement in Education Sector. Retrieved from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2438403
Stevenson, M. P., Hartmeyer, R., & Bentsen, P. (2017). Systematically reviewing the potential of concept mapping technologies to promote self-regulated learning in primary and secondary science education. Educational Research Review, 1-16.
Suarez, J. G. (2000). Theree expert in quality management. Arlington: Total Quality Leadership Office.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujono, & Santoso, H. B. (2017, march). E-Learning Quality Analysis Of Use Of Web Conference In The Improvement. International Journal of Science and Technology (IJSTE), 8-14.
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., & Finger, G. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education , 1183-1202.
Taie, E. S. (2014). Concept Mapping as an Innovative Teaching Strategy to Enhance Cognitive Learning in Nursing Administration Course. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research , 11-25.
The effect of using the concept-mapping technique and traditional methods on the achievement, retention and attitudes of students: a meta-analytic study. (2015). Journal of Educational Technology, 143-156.
Tjiptono, F., & Chandra, G. (2005). Service, quality, and satisfaction. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 1272–1283.
Uka, A. (2014). Student Satisfaction as an Indicator of Quality in Higher Education. Journal of Educational and Instructional studies, 6-10.
Uriarte, F. A. (2008). Introduction to Knowledge Management. Jakarta: ASEAN Foundation.
Youssef, H., & Mansour, M. (2012). The Effect of Concept Mapping on Students' Learning Achievements and Interests in Taif University. Life Science Journal, 9.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Service Quality: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations,. New York: Free Press.
Zwaal, W., & Otting, H. (2012). The Impact of Concept Mapping on the Process of Problem-based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 104-128.