簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃千芳
Chien-fang Huang
論文名稱: 影響教師專業虛擬社群知識分享因素之探究
A study of the influential factors of knowledge sharing in teachers' virtual professional community
指導教授: 陳秀玲
Hsiu-ling Chen
口試委員: 徐式寬
none
蔡孟蓉
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 教師專業虛擬社群知識分享科技接受模式自我效能知識分享動
外文關鍵詞: teachers' virtual professional community
相關次數: 點閱:893下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以科技接受模式為基礎,並加入影響網路知識分享的因素-自我效能、知識分享動機和社群關係,藉此了解影響教師專業虛擬社群知識分享的因素。本研究以思摩特網教師成員為研究母群,採用網路問卷調查法,於2010年3月27日至4月28日間,獲得有效樣本336份。問卷調查結果以描述性統計、信度分析、探索性因素分析、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、卡方檢定、皮爾森積差相關分析和多元迴歸分析等方法進行分析。
    教師成員背景變項在各構面的差異性:性別方面,男性教師的自我效能、知識分享動機、社群關係、網路知識分享行為較女性教師高;不同教學年資在科技接受認知信念和社群關係方面具有差異;任教學校和教師類別在各構面則無差異性。
    教師成員的科技接受認知信念、自我效能、知識分享動機、社群關係對網路知識分享意願具有顯著影響;自我效能、知識分享動機和社群關係對網路知識分享行為具有顯著影響;網路知識分享意願對網路知識分享行為具有顯著影響;網路知識分享意願對科技接受認知信念、自我效能、知識分享動機、社群關係與網路知識分享行為之關係有中介效果。
    最後,藉由本研究之發現與結論,期能提供教育和學校單位之主管機關及未來研究者參考,以促進教師專業虛擬社群之發展。


    This research attempted to examine the influential factors of knowledge sharing in teacher’ virtual professional community. Based on the theory of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a model involving self-efficacy, knowledge sharing motivation and community relationship was developed. The research utilized the online survey questionnaire and sampled 336 members from SCTNet. The data were analysed by exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression analysis.
    The results showed that there were significant differences in gender and teaching experience. Male teachers’ self-efficacy, knowledge sharing motivation, community relationship and knowledge sharing behavior were better than female teachers’. There were significant teaching experience differences in technology acceptance and community relationship.
    Furthermore, the study found that technology acceptance, self-efficacy, knowledge sharing motivation and community relationship significantly affected knowledge sharing intention. Self-efficacy, knowledge sharing motivation and community relationship significantly affected knowledge sharing behavior. Knowledge sharing intention significantly affected knowledge sharing behavior. In addition, knowledge sharing intention was a mediating factor between technology acceptance, self-efficacy, knowledge sharing motivation, community relationship and knowledge sharing behavior.
    The results of this study would be beneficial to understand the influential factors of knowledge sharing in teachers’ virtual professional community and provide suggestions for educational administrations, schools and future researchers.

    中文摘要....................................................I 英文摘要...................................................II 目錄......................................................III 圖目錄......................................................V 表目錄.....................................................VI 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機.....................................1 第二節 研究目的...........................................4 第三節 研究問題...........................................5 第四節 名詞釋義...........................................6 第五節 研究範圍與限制.....................................9 第六節 研究重要性........................................10 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 科技接受模式......................................11 第二節 知識分享..........................................16 第三節 虛擬社群..........................................22 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構..........................................25 第二節 研究假設..........................................26 第三節 研究對象與調查方法................................28 第四節 研究工具..........................................30 第五節 資料分析方法......................................39 第四章 資料分析 第一節 樣本分析..........................................42 第二節 信度與效度分析....................................49 第三節 填答樣本現況分析..................................55 第四節 背景變項之差異檢定................................60 第五節 迴歸分析..........................................73 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 討論與結論........................................84 第二節 建議..............................................91 參考文獻...................................................93 附錄 附錄1 正式問卷.........................................103

    中文部分
    王順民、賴俊帆(2007)。數位學習、網路社群與個人適應-兼論e-learning的人文思
    索。2009年12月21日,取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/2701
    呂惠甄(2002)。影響教育人員知識分享因素之探究:以思摩特網路社群為例。國立中正
    大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
    吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北:五南圖書。
    邱皓政(2007)。量化研究法(二)統計原理與分析技術。台北:雙葉書廊。
    高義展(2001)。國民小學教師知識管理、學習型態、專業成長與專業表現關係之研究。
    國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    教育部(2008)。資訊教育執行績效說明。台北:教育部。
    陳瑩芝(2008)。以TAM擴充模式探討台北市國民小學教師網路融入教學行為。國立台灣科
    技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士學位論文,未出版,台北市。
    張金鐘(2002)。以科技接受模式探討教師與學生採用數位化教材的態度。國立中山大學
    資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    張基成(1998)。教師專業成長網路學習社群之規劃及其預期效應與挑戰。教學科技與媒
    體,40,31-42。
    黃欣儀(2001)。影響中小學教師網路進修使用程度相關因素之研究。國立中山大學資訊
    管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    黃勢民(2003)。國民小學教師知識分享及其影響因素之研究。國立台北師範學院教育政
    策與管理研究所,未出版,台北市。
    饒見維(1999)。九年一貫課程與教師專業發展之配套實施策略。2010年1月9日,取自
    http://educ.nchu.edu.tw/xoops/html/modules/xoopsfaq/index.php?cat_id
    =5

    西文部分
    Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). The antecedents and consequents of user
    perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems,
    22,15-29.
    Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In
    J.Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior
    (pp. 11-39). Berlin, NY: Springer-Verlag.
    Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitudes structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 252).
    Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting
    social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Andrews, D., Preece, J., & Turoff, M. (2002). A conceptual framework for
    demographic groups resistant to on-line community interaction.
    International Journal of Electronic commerce, 6(3), 9–24.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral
    change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1986). A social foundations of thought and action: A social
    cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moor, J. A., Cunningham, D. J., & The ILF
    Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The
    struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational
    Technology, Research and Development, 49, 71–96.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable
    distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
    statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
    51, 1173-1182.
    Blau, P. M., (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley
    and Sons.
    Bock, G.W., & Kim, Y.G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory
    study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources
    Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
    Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral
    intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic
    motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS
    Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
    Carroll, J. M., Choo, C. W., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kerr, S. T.,
    MacLean, A., et al. (2003). Knowledge management support for teachers.
    Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(4), 42–64.
    Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Dunlap, D., & Isenhour, P. (2005). Frameworks
    for sharing teaching practices. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (3),
    162-175.
    Chen, I. Y. L., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk. (2009). Examining the factors
    influencing participants' knowledge sharing behavior in virtual learning
    communities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 134-148.
    Cheung, W., & Huang, W. (2005). Proposing a framework to assess internet usage
    in university education: An empirical investigation from a student’s
    perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 237–253.
    Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge
    sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and
    social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888.
    Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen,
    J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of
    volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 74 (6), 1516-1530.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd
    ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
    Dalgarno, N., & Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics
    teachers' induction in professional communities and providing innovative
    forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and
    communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1051-1065.
    Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations
    manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user
    acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
    Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of
    computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management
    Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
    Deci, E.L. (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
    Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence
    model of consumer participation in network- and small-groupbased virtual
    communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–
    263.
    Fernback, J. (1999). There is a there: Notes toward a definition of cyber-
    community.In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues
    and methods for examine the net (pp. 203–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Publications.
    Fu, J. R., Farn, C. K., & Chao, W. P. (2006). Acceptance of electronic tax
    filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management, 43(1),
    109-126.
    Gao, Y. (2005). Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) to educational
    hypermedia: A field study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and
    Hypermedia, 14(3), 237-247.
    Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice. IBM
    global services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 842–862.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995).
    Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
    NJ.
    Harwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in
    information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.
    Hendriks, P. H. J. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on
    motivation for knowledge sharing. knowledge and process management, 6(2),
    91-100.
    Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007). Empirical study of motivators and barriers of
    teacher online knowledge sharing. Education Tech Research Dev, 55, 573-
    595.
    Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a
    virtual classroom. Communications of ACM, 40(9), 44–49.
    Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2009). Exploring the behavioral
    patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers
    with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 101-108.
    Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of
    technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation.
    Information & Management, 45, 65-74.
    Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing
    behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-
    efficacy, and outcome expectations. International journal of Human-
    Computer Studies, 65, 153-169.
    Hu, P. J. H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology
    acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information &
    Management 41, 227-241.
    Inbaria, M., Shayo, C., & Olfman, L. (1999). On becoming virtual: The driving
    forces and arrangements. Proceddings of SIGCPR, 99, New Orleans LA USA,
    pp. 27-41.
    Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and
    the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363–
    379.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-
    36.
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to
    electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS
    Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
    Katzy, B. R., & Ma, X. (2002). Virtual professional communities - definitions
    and typology. Paper presented at the The 8th International Conference on
    Concurrent Enterprising, Rome.
    Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2008). Organizational behavior. (8th ed.). New
    York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Lam, J.C.Y. & Lee, M.K.O. (2006). Digital inclusiveness: Longitudinal study of
    internet adoption by older adults. Journal of Management Information
    Systems, 22(4), 177-206.
    Lee, C. K., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002). Factors impacting knowledge sharing.
    Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 1(1), 49-56.
    Lee, F. S., Vogel, D., & Limayem, M. (2003). Virtual community informatics: A
    review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and
    Application, 5(1), 47–61.
    Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and
    organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination.
    Journal of Management Information Systems, 20 (1), 179-228.
    Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information
    technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model.
    Information and Management, 40, 191-204.
    Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998) The role of tacit knowledge in group
    innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
    Lin, F. R., Lin, S. C., & Huang, T. P. (2008). Knowledge sharing and creation
    in a teachers' professional virtual community. Computers & Education 50,
    742-756.
    Lin, M. J. J., Hung, S. W., & Chen, C. J. (2009). Fostering the determinants
    of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in
    Human Behavior, 25, 929-939.
    Louis, S., Marks, H., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in
    restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-
    798.
    Ma, W. W. k., Anderssonw, R., & Streithw, K. O. (2005). Examining user
    acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers.
    Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 387-395.
    Mahdizadeh, H., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2008). Determining factors of the
    use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Computers &
    Education, 51, 142-154.
    Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
    Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the Technology
    acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information System
    Research, 2(3), 173-191.
    Mcllroy, D., Bunting, B., Tierney, K., & Gordon, M. (2001). The relation of
    gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxiety and
    cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 21–33.
    Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web
    context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and
    the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2),
    242-266.
    Pavlou, P.A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and Predicting Electronic
    Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS
    Quarterly, 30 (1), 115-143.
    Rheingold, H. (1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic
    Frontier. HaperPerennial, New York.
    Ridings, C., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of
    trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11
    (3–4), 271-295.
    Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development,
    technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before
    the horse? The Information Society, 19, 203-220.
    Schwoerer, C.E., May, D.R., Hollensbe, E.C., & Mencl, J. (2005). General and
    specific self-efficacy in the context of a training intervention to
    enhance performance Expectancy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16
    (1), 111-129.
    Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of
    course websites. Computers & Education, 40, 343-360.
    Senge P. (1997). Sharing knowledge: the leader’s role is key to a learning
    culture. Executive Excellence, 4(11), 17–18.
    Sing, C. C., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and
    participation patterns in online community. Educational Technology &
    Society, 9(1), 250-261.
    Tampoe, M. (1993). Motivation knowledge worker—the challenge for the 1990s
    in the Myers. Long Range Planning, 26(3), 49-55.
    Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian
    perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1634-1642.
    Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-
    service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302-312.
    Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers'
    computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance
    model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24, 128-143.
    Todman, J. (2000). Gender differences in computer anxiety among university
    entrants since 1992. Computers and Education, 34, 27–35.
    Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public
    school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Yoo, W. S., Suh, K. S., & Lee, M. B. (2002). Exploring factors enhancing
    member participation in virtual communities. Journal of Global Information
    Management ,10(3) 55–71.
    Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-
    learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-
    243.
    Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating
    control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance
    model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
    Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the
    technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management
    Science, 46(2), 186-204.
    Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate
    and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of
    Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.
    Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital
    and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS
    Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
    Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating communities of
    Practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School
    Press.
    Wijnhoven, F. (1998) Knowledge logistics in business contexts: Analyzing and
    diagnosing knowledge sharing by logistics concepts. Knowledge and Process
    Management, 5, 143-157.
    Zhang, Y. & Hiltz, S.R. ( 2003) Factors that influence online relationship
    development in a knowledge sharing community, Proceedings of the Ninth
    American Conference on Information Systems.

    QR CODE