本研究旨在探討當前高職教師網路自我效能、網路因應策略與網路融入教學行為之關係，比較教師個人背景因素與教師使用網路經驗在三變項差異情形；分析網路自我效能、網路因應策略與網路融入教學行為間之關連性。本研究採用問卷調查法，研究工具包括「網路自我效能量表」、「網路因應策略量表」、「教師網路融入教學行為量表」；研究樣本為482名的台灣高職教師，其中女教師268名，男教師214名。研究結果發現，網路自我效能之「網路一般自我效能」、「網路溝通自我效能」與網路融入教學行為呈現正相關且具有預測能力；教師網路自我效能與教師網路因應策略之「尋求協助策略」、「問題解決策略」、「改變欲暫時擱置策略」呈正相關；教師網路自我效能與因應策略之「逃避策略」呈負相關且皆具有預測能力；教師網路教師網路因應策略對網路融入教學行為具有顯著相關與預測能力；本研究進一步發現，網路自我效能與網路因應策略聯合預測網路融入教學行為時，網路自我效能透過網路因應策略之中介，影響教師網路融入教學之行為。藉本研究之結果與發現，期能提供相關研究與教育單位之參考，以促進網路科技融入教學之實行。

Recent Internet developments have led to the rise of an unprecedented number of research projects conducted in the field of technology education. The purpose of the study was to investigate vocational high school teachers’ Internet self-efficacy, Internet coping strategies and Internet integration into instruction behavior in Taiwan. The participants of the study were 482 vocational high school teachers in Taiwan, including 268 female and 214 male teachers. The present research adopted ”Internet Self-Efficacy Scale”, ”Internet Coping Strategy Scale” and ” Internet integration into instruction behavior Scale” for data collection. Regarding the findings of the current study, the Internet general self-efficacy and Internet communicative self-efficacy both positively correlated with Internet integration into instruction behavior and the Internet self-efficacy is the predictor of Internet integration into instruction behavior; the Internet self-efficacy positively correlated with problem solving, supports seeking, and self-adjustment strategies and negatively correlated with avoidance strategy and the Internet self-efficacy is the predictor of the Internet coping strategies; the sudy further establishs a new model that shows the Internet coping strategies completely mediates the Internet self-efficacy and Internet integration into instruction behavior. The results of the present study will enrich our understanding of the relationship among Internet self-efficacy, Internet Coping Strategies and their Internet integration into instruction behavior of vocational high school teachers in Taiwan.

參考文獻
王日宏（2008，4月15日）。探討高中生網路自我效能因素及相關研究。
網路社會學通訊，70。2008年8月26日取自http//www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/
e-j.htm
王全世（2000）。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育，80，頁23-30。
尹玫君（2000）。國小老師的教育信念與網路融入教學間關係之研究。行政院國科會科資中心。（報告編號：NSC89-2413-H024-031），2008年8月26日取自https://nscnt12.nsc.gov.tw/prquery/WPR21010.asp?KIND=1&Query_Type=OLD
毛國楠（1995）。國中教師的樂觀信念、自我效能、對壓力認知評估、因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係。教育心裡學報，28，177-179。
毛慶禎（2004）。國民中小學的資訊教育。2008年9月10日取自
http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/works/info4school.htm
朱安玲（2006）。未來學園 創意盎然。教師天地，144，頁39-44。
張雅芳、朱鎮宇、徐加玲（2007）。國小教師資訊科技融入教學現況之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，44（4），413-434。
交通部統計處（2005）。民眾使用網際網路狀況調查摘要分析。台北：行政院交通部。
交通部統計處（2007）。民眾使用網際網路狀況調查報告。台北：交通部。
沈雯（2002）。國小教師電腦自我效能與電腦焦慮之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，屏東。
李光武、李子奇(2002)。國中科學領域教師職業壓力、處理方式以及心理困擾之關係研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。(計畫編號：NSC91-2511-S-154-001)
李開復（2006）。做21世界的人才。聯經出版事業股份有限公司，台北。
宋鴻燕（2004）。大學生「網路自我效能感」與學習動機特質：以「文化與心理健康」通識課程為例。通識教育季刊，11（4），23-44。
吳振賢（2001）。教師網路融入教學態度、網路融入教學行為及其相關因素之研究。 國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，台北。
林伯伶、陳美紀、陳文義（2006）。影響教師實施資訊科技融入學科教學之行為意願研究。TANET2006台灣網際網路研討會，花蓮。
林佳蓉（2006）。以HPT模式及認知動機因素探討台灣資訊種子小學科技融入教學之現況與相關因素研究。國立臺北教育大學學報，19（1）， 117- 148。
何榮桂（2002）。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展- 兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育，87，22-48。
吳清山、林天祐（2008）。教育e辭典。台北市：高等教育。
邱皓政（2008a）。結構方程模式。台北市：雙葉書廊。
邱皓政（2008b）。量化研究與統計分析。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
高申春（2001）。人性輝煌之路：班杜拉的社會學習理論。台北市：貓頭鷹出版社。

徐新逸、吳佩謹(2002)。資訊融入教學的現代意義與具體作為。教學科技與媒體，63，63-73。

郭生玉（1997）。心理與教育研究法。臺北：精華。

黃世奇（2008）。資訊科技融入教學策略分享。2008年9月2日取自http://www.yocps.kh.edu.tw/inet-team/learing/

黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程模式理論與應用（第四版）。台北：五南。

陳秀玲、陳瑩芝（2008）。以TAM擴充模式探討臺北市國民小學教師網路科技融入教學行為之初探性研究。2008數位科技與創新管理研討會，台北縣。
陳秀玲、簡林伶、陳怡璇（2008）。高中職教師網路教學之初探。2008技職教育永續發展研討會，台北市。
教育部（2008）。2008年5月15日，四年三十億國中小訊教育設備更新。取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0011/8年施政成果簡報-資教組970318.pdf

教育部統計處（2007）。2008年11月22日，高職職業學校概況，取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/index.aspx
教育部電算中心（2008）。2008年5月15日，台灣資訊教育推動理念、策略與現況，取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0011/台灣資訊教育推動理念、策略與現況(97)網頁版.pdf
教育評鑑與發展研究中心（2004）。九十三學年度大專教師問卷調查實施程序。2008年9月2日取自http://www.cher.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/analyze.php
許惠評（2006）。高中職餐飲管理科女性教師生涯自我效能、生涯阻礙及因應策略相關之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文，台北。
曾淑芬（2007）。各國網路整備度比較。2008年5月11日，取自http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/
資策會(無日期)。美國學校上網率達99%，我國為100% 。2008年5月11日，取自http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=2769
歐淑年（2007）。儲備教師生涯自我效能、生涯阻礙與因應策略關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，台北。
劉世雄（2001）。教師運用資訊科技融入教學決定歷程之個案研究。臺北師院課程與教學碩士論文，台北。
劉渼（2003）。網路融入國語文教學創新模式。TANET 台灣網際網路研討會
論文集2003。2008年9月10日，取自http://web.cc.ntnu.edu.tw/~t21033。

數位台灣計畫辦公室（2007）。我國寬頻上網用戶數已達609.3萬。2008年5月11日，取自http://www.etaiwan.nat.gov.tw/content/application/etaiwan/generala/guest-cnt-browse.php?cnt_id=1748

韓長澤、劉遠楨、陳淑純 (2002)。台北市中小學實施資訊科技融入教學之推行成效。國民教育。42 (6)，46-56。

謝靜慧（2000）。國民中小學教師之電腦焦慮、電腦自我效能、電腦因應策略與電腦素養之相關研究。國立中山大學教育硏究所碩士論文，台北。

蕭文龍（2007）。多變量分析最佳入門實用書。碁峰，台北。

蘇彙珺（1997）。社會支持、自我效能與國中學生壓力因應歷程中認知評估及因應策略的相關硏究。台灣師範大學教育心理輔導硏究所碩士論文，台北。

Ajzen, I. (1992). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and Human Design Process, 50, 179-211.

Andrea, P. F., & Punya, M. (2008). Why do Some Teachers Trust Digital Technologies and Others Don't?. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 3749-3751).

Bandura, A. (1977a). Social learning theory. Place, State: Prentice Hall Inc.
Bandura, A. (1977b). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). The self and mechanisms of agency. In J. Suls(Ed), psychological perspectives on the self, 1, 3-39. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. & Cervone, C., (1983). Self-evaluative and self efficacy mechanisms governing the motivation effects of goal system. Journal of personality and siciak psychology, 45, 1017-1028.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
Bandura, A. (1994a). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopia of human behavior (Vol. 4).New York: Academic press.
Bandura, A. (1994b). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. zillman (Eds.) Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associations..
Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. (pp. 178).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and company.
Bandura, A. (1996) Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning, Child Development, 67(3),1206–22.
Bandura, A., Reese, L., & Adams, N. E. (1982b). Micro-analysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 5-21.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977b).Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.35(3), 125-139.

Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344–358.

Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729–735.
Bates, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post-secondary education and training. Paris, France: UNESCO: International Institute for educational planning. 22-23
Bentler, P. M.,(1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software
Bernadette, P., & Nicole, J. (2006). Differences in motivation, coping style, and self-efficacy among incarcerated male and female drug users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30. p113-120.
Bitter, G. B., & Legacy, M. L. (2008). Using technology in the classroom. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 223-234.
Business Week (2008). The InfoTech 100. Retrieved September 10, 2008, http://bwnt.businessweek.com/interactive_reports/it100_2008/?chan=magazine+channel_special+report
Cervone, D. (1985). Randomization test to determine significance levels for microanalytic congruences between self-efficacy and behavior. Cognitive therapy and research, 9, 357-365.
Chen, Y. - L. (2008). Modeling the determinants of internet use, Computer & Education, 51(2), 545-558.
Chiou, W. B., & Wan, C. S. (2007). The dynamic change of self-efficacy in information searching on the Internet: Influence of valence of experience and prior self-efficacy. Journal of Psychology, 141(6), 589-603.
Chou, C. (2003). Incidences and correlates of Internet anxiety of high school teachers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behaviors, 19(6), 731-749.
Claudine, M., & Terry, C. (1998). The effects of coping style and self-efficay on health status and health care costs. Anxiety, stress, and coping, 11, pp. 311-325.
Collins, J. L. (1982). Self-efficacy and ability in achievement behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, NY.
Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 145–158.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Churchill, G. A., (1979). A Paradigm for Developing better Measures of Marketing Construct, Journal of Marking Research, 16, 64-73.

Doyle, E., Stamouli, I., & Huggard, M. (2005). Computer Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Computer Experience: An investigation throughout a Computer Science degree
.35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.

Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety,
attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, (2002) 521–535.
Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved August, 25, 2008. Available from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
Fan, T. S., ＆ Li, Y. C. (2005). Gender issues and computers: college computer science education in Taiwan. Computer ＆ Education, 44(3): 285-300.
Gillespie, H. (2006). Unlocking learning and teaching with ICT. London: David Fulton Publishers. P.5
Gist, M. (1987). Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 2, 472-486.

Gist, M. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology. 42, 787-805.
Hsu, M. H. & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369-381.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1993) Fit indeses in covariance structural equation modeling. Unpublished Manuscript
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. B. (1999) “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), PP.1-55
Internet use by teachers: conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. (1999).Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_413.asp?referrer=report
Internet World Stats. (2008). Retrieved september 11, 2008, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
ISTE（2008）.Nets for teachers. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForTeachers/2000Standards/NETS_for_Teachers_2000.htm
Jerusalem, M. & Mittag, W. (1995). Self-efficacy in stressful life transitions. IIn Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M., (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology. Upper Saddle River: New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc.
Joo, Y.J., Bong M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Internet Self-Efficacy in Web-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
Jorde-Bloom, P., & Ford, M. (1988). Factors influencing early childhood administrators' decisions regarding the adoption of computer technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4 (1), 31-47.
Jreskog, K. G. & Srbom, D., (1981), LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago:National Educational Resources.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer publishing company.
Lazarus, R. S., & Lazarus, R. S. N (1994) Passion and reason: making sense of our emotions. Oxford University Press, UK
Lee, M.-H., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2008). Exploring teachers’ self-efficacy toward the web pedagogical content knowledge in Taiwan. Paper resented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New York City.
Leonard, C. C. S. (1998). Souse of stress and coping strategies in basic grade occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther, 61, 257-262.
Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist Internet-based learning environments: A study of pre-school teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 226-237.
Lin, L. J. (2005). Teachers’ perceived importance and manageability on the factors in technology. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005(pp.2187-2192). Norfork, VA: AACE.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M., “Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.” Psychological Method, 1, PP.61-77
Mansourian, Y. (2008). Coping strategies in web searching, electronic library and information systems, 42(1), 28 – 39.
Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y. and Johnson, R. D. (1998), The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research, Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582.
McIlroy, D., Sadler, C. & Boojawon, N. (2007). Computer phobia and computer self-efficacy: their association with undergraduates’ use of university computer facilities. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 1285-1299.
Miller, C, Cronan T. (1998). The effects of coping style and self-efficacy on health status and health care costs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 11, 311–325.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108(6), 1017-1054.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, NY.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L.R., V. Aline, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C.D.(1989). “Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for Structural equation models.” Psychological Bulletin, 105, pp. 430-445.
Mulkeen, A., (2006). ICT in Schools: What is of Educational Value? In Hin, L. T. W. & Subramaniam R.(Eds.), Handbook of research on Literacy in technology at the K-12 Level(pp.83). Hershey, PA: Idea group reference.
Belden, N & Russonello, J. (1996). Teachers favor internet use in classrooms. Reading Today, 14(4).
Ng, Y. C. (2006). Levels of computer self-efficacy, computer use and earning in China. Economics Letters, 90, 427-432.
National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Stats in Brief: Teacher use of computers and the internet in public schools. Retrieved Dectember 10, 2008, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000090.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics (2008). Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of curriculum studies, 19(4), 317-328.

O’Malley, M., & Kelleher, T. (2002). Papayas and pedagogy: geographically dispersed teams and Internet self-efficacy. Public Relations Review, 28(2), 175–184.
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computer & Education, 50(3), 1084-1091.
Raven, M. W. (2004). A Framwork for understanding Teaching With the Internet, American Educational Research Journal, 41, 447-488.
Pea, R. (2000).The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning. In Becker H. J. (Ed), Internet Use by Teacher, 80-111. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc..
Peng, H., Tsai, C. –C., & Wu, Y.-T. (2006). University students’ Self-efficacyand their attitudes toward the Internet: the role of students; perceptions of the Internet. Educational Studies, 32, 73–86.
Public schools and instructional rooms with internet access, by selected school characteristics: Selected years, 1994 through 2005 (2008). Retrieved August 21, 2008, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/internet-use/
Reksten, L. E. (2000). Using technology to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks. CA: Corwin Press. 99-110
Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated learning to use computer in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402-424.

Rozell, E. J., & Gardner, W. L., III (1999). Computer-related success and failure: a longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 1-10.

Saleh, H. K. (2008). Computer self-efficacy of university faculty in Levanon. Education Tech Research Dev, 56, 229-240.
Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating studentcentered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schunk, D.H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48–58.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In Ames, C. & Ames, R. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education. 3, 13-44. San Diego: Academic Press.
Shikai, N., Uji M., Chen, Z., Hiramura, H., Tanaka, N., Shono, M., Kitamura T. (2007). The Role of Coping Styles and Self-efficacy in the Development of Dysphoric Mood among Nursing Students. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 241-248.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Sugar, W. (2002). Applying human-centered design to technology integration: Three alternative technology perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(1), 12-17.
Taylor, S. (1998). “Coping strategies”. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from macses.ucsf.edu/Reasearch/psychosococail/notebook/coping.html
Teaching , learning, and computing: 1998 national survey report # 1 (1999). Internet use by teachers: conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Retrieved August 21, 2008, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/internet-use
Tsai, M. -J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.
Tsai, M. (2004). Developing The Internet Self-Efficacy Scale (ISES). In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 4406-4408). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Torkzadeh, G., & van Dyke, T.P. (2001), Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology. 20(4), 275-280.
Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479-494.
Torkzadeh, G., Chang J.-C. J., & Demirhan D. (2006). A contingency model of computer and Internet self-efficacy. Information & Management. 43(4), 541-550.
U. S. department of Education (1997). President Clinton's Call to Action for American Education in the 21st Century Retrieved December 22, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/updates/PresEDPlan/index.html
Yang, H. J., & Liou, Y. C. (2007). Impact of Language Anxiety and Self-Efficacy on Accessing Internet Sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 226-233.
Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2008). Study of high school English teachers' behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1085-1103.
Whitty, M. T., & McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between
Loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1435–1446.
Wilfong, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs.Comput Human Behavior, 22(6), 1001-1011.
World Economic Forum(2008). Global Information Technology Report 2007-2008. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gitr/2008/Rankings.pdf
Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2003), University Students’ Internet Attitudes and Internet
Self-Efficacy: A Study at Three Universities in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(4), 441-450.