簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊育維
Yu-Wei Yang
論文名稱: 車載網路中對路邊裝置或特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之機制設計
Design of Emergency Message Forwarding Mechanisms towards a Roadside Unit or a Specific Area in VANETs.
指導教授: 馮輝文
Huei-Wen Ferng
口試委員: 鄭傑
Jay Cheng
張宏慶
Hung-Chin Jang
林嘉慶
Jia-Chin Lin
范欽雄
Qin-Xiong Fan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電資學院 - 資訊工程系
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 62
中文關鍵詞: 車載網路廣播風暴緊急訊息路邊裝置
外文關鍵詞: VANET, Broadcast Storm Problem, Emergency Message, Road Side Unit
相關次數: 點閱:458下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在車載網路中,當事故發生時,車輛藉由緊急訊息傳遞可以避免二次事故的
    發生,以提升用路安全。但傳統廣播方式會導致廣播風暴的發生,使得整體網路
    效能不佳,故本碩士論文致力於降低封包的轉傳數量。我們的設計提出了一個新
    的方向,當緊急事件發生時,把緊急訊息傳給距離最近的路邊裝置,藉此連接到
    後端網路來採取應對措施,同時也設計特定區域車輛通知的廣播設計,當車輛收
    到緊急訊息時,該點先判斷是否位在合適的廣播區域,若位於合適的區域,車輛
    再進一步透過鄰居列表資訊計算出一個等待廣播時間,節點條件越好等待廣播時
    間越短,當等待廣播時間一到時,該節點可進行封包廣播;若其他還在等待廣播
    的節點收到此封包時,則停止動作,藉此達到抑制的目的。最後,透過模擬結果
    顯示,我們提出的機制相較於其他機制能有效降低封包轉傳次數,以避免廣播風
    暴的發生,減少網路資源的消耗。


    In a vehicular ad hoc network (VANET), the vehicle can avoid the occurrence of secondary
    accidents through the emergency message forwarding when an accident occurs to
    enhance the safety on roads. However, the traditional unlimited broadcast will cause the
    so-called broadcast storm, making the overall network performance poor. Therefore, we
    aim at lowering the number of packets to be transmitted by proposing a new direction in
    our design. When an emergency occurs, the emergency message will be forwarded to the
    nearest roadside unit (RSU) connected to the backhaul network to take countermeasures.
    In addition, the emergency message forwarding mechanism can be extended to reach a
    specific area. When the vehicle receives an emergency message and it is located in an
    appropriate area, it starts to calculate the waiting time through the list of neighbors. The
    better the condition is, the shorter the waiting time is. When the time is up, it broadcasts
    the packet. If the other nodes still waiting for broadcasting receives the packet, it ceases
    the transmission of the packet to mitigate the broadcast storm. Finally, we show the superiority
    of our design over some related mechanisms in the literature in terms of amount
    of packets transmitted via simulations. This definitely show the ability of broadcast storm
    supression and saving of network resources exhibited by our proposed mechanisms.

    論文指導教授推薦書. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 考試委員審定書. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii 中文摘要. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii 英文摘要. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv 目錄. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 表目錄. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii 圖目錄. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 第一章、緒論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 車載網路簡介. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 研究背景. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 研究動機. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4 本碩士論文之安排. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 第二章、相關文獻回顧. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1 洪泛路由協定(MFlood) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 車載網路中廣播風暴的緩減技術. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3 重新廣播邊界演算法(RBBA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.4 有效定向廣播協定(EDB) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.5 速度自適性機率式洪氾機制(SAPF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.6 車載網路中之資料傳播協定(DRIVE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 第三章、對路邊裝置或特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之機制設計. . . . . . . . 15 3.1 資料蒐集方式. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.1.1 目的地資料蒐集. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.1.2 鄰居資料蒐集. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.2 緊急訊息推播機制之參數設定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.2.1 車輛位置與距離計算. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.2.2 有效鄰居數量統計. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3 對特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之機制設計. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.3.1 基於車輛距離與車輛角度劃分優先權. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.3.2 等待廣播時間計算. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.4 對路邊裝置進行緊急訊息推播之機制設計. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.4.1 判斷車輛是否位在合適轉傳範圍. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.4.2 基於位置距離劃分優先權. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.4.3 等待廣播時間計算. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 第四章、數值結果與討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.1 模擬環境與參數設定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.2 模擬結果與討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 4.2.1 理想場景下對特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之效能表現. . . . 33 4.2.2 理想場景下對路邊裝置進行緊急訊息推播之效能表現. . . . 37 4.2.3 仿真實場景下對特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之效能表現. . . 42 4.2.4 仿真實場景下對路邊裝置進行緊急訊息推播之效能表現. . . 44 4.2.5 不同速度下於理想場景對特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之效能 表現. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.2.6 不同速度下於理想場景對路邊裝置進行緊急訊息推播之效能 表現. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.2.7 不同速度下於仿真實場景對特定區域進行緊急訊息推播之效 能表現. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.2.8 不同速度下於仿真實場景對路邊裝置進行緊急訊息推播之效 能表現. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 第五章、結論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 參考文獻. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 誌謝. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

    [1] H. Hartenstein and L. P. Laberteaux, “A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 164–171, Jun. 2008.
    [2] L. Junhai, Y. Danxia, X. Liu, and F. Mingyu, “A survey of multicast routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 78–91, Jan. 2009.
    [3] J. Cheng, J. Cheng, M. Zhou, F. Liu, S. Gao, and C. Liu, “Routing in internet of vehicles: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16,no. 5, pp. 2339–2352, Oct. 2015.
    [4] A. Awang, K. Husain, N. Kamel, and S. Aïssa, “Routing in vehicular ad-hoc networks:A survey on single- and cross-layer design techniques, and perspectives,”IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 9497–9517, 2017.
    [5] P. Salvo, F. Cuomo, A. Baiocchi, and A. Bragagnini, “Road side unit coverage extension for data dissemination in VANETs,” in Proc. 9th Annual Conference on Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), pp. 47–50, Jan. 2012.
    [6] C. Suthaputchakun and Z. Sun, “Routing protocol in intervehicle communication systems: A survey,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 150–156,Dec. 2011.
    [7] Y. Lin, P. Wang, and M. Ma, “Intelligent transportation system(ITS): Concept, challenge and opportunity,” in Proc. IEEE 3rd International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), pp. 167–172, May 2017.
    [8] D. Jiang and L. Delgrossi, “IEEE 802.11p: Towards an International Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 2036–2040, May 2008.
    [9] S. Bitam, A. Mellouk, and S. Zeadally, “Bio-inspired routing algorithms survey for vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 843–867, 2015.
    [10] S. Chakkaphong and S. Zhili, “Routing protocol in intervehicle communication systems: A survey,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 12, 2011.[11] V. Vijayalakshmi, M. Sathya, S. Saranya, and C. Selvaroopini, “Survey on various
    mechanisms for secure and efficient VANET communication,” in Proc. IEEE Information Communication and Embedded Systems (ICICES), pp. 1–5, 2014.
    [12] R. S. Hande and A. Muddana, “Comprehensive survey on clustering-based efficient data dissemination algorithms for VANET,” in Proc. International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES),
    pp. 629–632, Oct. 2016.
    [13] F. Li and Y. Wang, “Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 12–22, Jun. 2007.
    [14] P. Bijan and I. Mohammed, “Survey over vanet routing protocols for vehicle to vehicle communication,” IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSRJCE), pp. 2278–0661, 2012.
    [15] I. D. Chakeres and E. M. Belding-Royer, “AODV routing protocol implementation design,” in Proc. 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, pp. 698–703, Mar. 2004.
    [16] K. Brad and K. H. Tsung, “GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks,” in Proc. The 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 243–254, 2000.
    [17] C. Cooper, D. Franklin, M. Ros, F. Safaei, and M. Abolhasan, “A comparative survey of VANET clustering techniques,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 657–681, 2017.
    [18] R. A. Santos, R. M. Edwards, A. E. Edwards, and D. Belis, “A novel cluster-based location routing algorithm for inter-vehicular communication,” in Proc. IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 2, pp. 1032–1036 Vol.2, Sep. 2004.
    [19] R. Tavakoli and M. Nabi, “TIGeR: A traffic-aware intersection-based geographical routing protocol for urban VANETs,” in Proc. IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–5, Jun. 2013.
    [20] O. Tonguz, N. Wisitpongphan, F. Bait, P. Mudaliget, and V. Sadekart, “Broadcasting in VANET,” in Proc. Mobile Networking for Vehicular Environments, pp. 7–12, May 2007.
    [21] Y. Bi, H. Shan, X. S. Shen, N. Wang, and H. Zhao, “A multi-hop broadcast protocol for emergency message dissemination in urban vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 736–750, Mar.
    2016.
    [22] L. Wu, L. Nie, J. Fan, Y. He, Q. Liu, and D. Wu, “An efficient multi-hop broadcast protocol for emergency messages dissemination in VANETs,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 614–623, 2017.
    [23] H. Runcai, Z. Yiwen, and C. Qiying, “Simulation and analysis of MFlood protocol in wireless network,” in Proc. IEEE Computer Science and Computational Technology. (ISCSCT) International Symposium on, pp. 658–662, 2008.
    [24] W. Nawaporn, T. Ozan, P. Jayendra, M. Priyantha, B. Fan, and S. Varsha, “Broadcast storm mitigation techniques in vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun.,vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 84–94, 2007.
    [25] K. Dongkyun, T. C. Keong, and M. Pietro, “A bounding algorithm for the broadcast storm problem in mobile ad hoc networks,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking. (WCNC ), vol. 2, pp. 1131–1136, 2003.
    [26] L. Da, H. Hongyu, L. Xu, L. Minglu, and T. Feilong, “A distance-based directional broadcast protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc network,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications,
    Networking and Mobile Computing. (WiCom), pp. 1520–1523, 2007.
    [27] Y. Mylonas, M. Lestas, A. Pitsillides, P. Ioannou, and V. Papadopoulou, “Speed adaptive probabilistic flooding for vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1973–1990, May 2015.
    [28] L. Aparecido, B. Azzedine, M. Guilherme, P. R. Werner, and L. Antonio, “DRIVE: An efficient and robust data dissemination protocol for highway and urban vehicular ad hoc networks,” Computer Networks, pp. 381–394, 2014.
    [29] “VanetMobiSim: Generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs,”vanet.eurecom.fr/, 2006.
    [30] K. F. Kristianto, M. Z. Hai, and L. K. Chan, “Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for VANET,” in Wireless communications and networking conference(WCNC), pp. 2506–2511, 2007.
    [31] “SUMO: Simulation of urban mobility,” http://sumo.sourceforge.net/, 2001.
    [32] “The network simulator - ns-2,” www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/, 2010.

    QR CODE