台北車站地區為台北市交通系統之重要樞紐，台北市政府民國70年代，著手研究規劃地下街之可行性，至民國90年後隨台北市鐵路地下化以及各捷運路網之開通營運，正式進入地下化時代，至今共整合六處地下街聯網絡於該地區。地下街於解決地面層人車衝突之問題，具有實質意義。然而使用者卻因難以辨認環境方位故於地下街活動時常發生迷路及尋路之問題所衍生。標示系統為最有效能幫助使用者到達目的地之工具，其中以具有連續性、序列性之「引導性指標」尤為重要，於此，本研究透過對於引導性指標現況之調查及相關彙整分析，嘗試發掘引導性指標所產生尋路上問題之癥結以及易發生尋路問題之路徑及節點，提出符合理論之建議設置方式，並建立現況調查資料，以提供後續研究參考基礎。

本研究範圍包含六處地下街路徑，其中，除中山地下街僅止於部份外，其於包括台北地下街、台北車站地下一層、台北新世界購物中心、站前地下街以及捷運台北車站（南側及北側出入口）等五處都以全區為範圍。本研究透過引導性指標設置方式、資訊內容、指標形式與類型的調查與分析得知，現況中引導性指標所造成尋路上之最主要問題為，引導資訊缺乏連續性，包括其位置、形式、顏色、距離及文字內容等，皆缺乏至「同一目的地」之一致性，其中多處提供相同資訊之兩點指標間距大於30公尺以上，其路徑中亦途經其他「決策點」時，將造成使用者於此決策點處產生尋路困擾。其次如地面層出入口處、地下街至地面層路徑出入口等決策點與各路徑中「決策點前」之引導資訊缺乏，以及指標設置之位置易產生使用者於引導上之誤解外，多處引導資訊並未以「最具時效性」為原則，增加了使用者到達目的地之距離以及途經決策點數，使用者必須增加決策次數，亦增加其決策錯誤之機率，進而衍生出尋路問題的產生。

從上述研究分析可知，整合引導性指標資訊的一致性，並妥善規劃合理的設置地點，是研究區域內指標調整的首要工作。而後續對使用者實際使用行為的檢証，則是對應本研究個案所發掘之問題，而得以於相關空間平面設計理論之探討，降低使用者於建築物中產生尋路問題之機率，以提升更符合使用需求之空間品質的重要工作。

The Taipei Railway Station area is the important key position of the Taipei transportation system. In the 1980's intermediate stages beginning, the Taipei government begins to study feasibility of the plan underground street. Taipei railroad as well as each Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) System after 2001’s along with the Taipei railroad underground to open and operate, officially enters the underground time, until now there are about six underground streets relations way system thus form. The underground street solves ground level problem of the person vehicle conflict, for its substantive significance. However the user occurs in the underground street present situation becomes lost and seeks question of the road frequently, the indication system also for most efficiently helps the user to arrive tool of the destination, take has the continuity, sequence it "the directional sign" really as importantly, but in underground street present situation multitudinously provided the guidance waymark still to be unable for the number smoothly to guide the user to arrive the destination, to this, this research penetration regarding the directional sign analysis and so on present situation investigation of and correlation research, understood the directional sign produced seeks on the road the question as well as to be easy to occur seeks way of and the pitch point the road question, proposed conformed to suggestion establishment way the theory, And collects the entire present situation investigation material, provides the following research reference foundation.

This research contains underground street way about six places, research scope besides the Zhongshan underground street for the part, it to includes the Taipei underground street, the Taipei station basement 1 level, the Taipei new world shopping center, the front of station underground street as well as the MRT Taipei station (south side and north side access) and so on five entire areas is the discussion scope, in view of provides to guidance information present situation MRT system position for this research content, and by understood each guidance way finding sign form and type present situation perform to show.

In present situation the directional sign make seeks on the road the question, like the guidance information deficient continuity, including its position, the form, the color, the distance and the writing content and so on, all lacks to "the identical destination" the uniformity, are many place provides second the targets spatial same information to be longer than above 30 meters, when in its way also way other "decision-making point", will make the user place to produce to this decision-making seeks the road puzzle. Then like ground level entrance, the underground street to ground level decision-making point and so on way access "before decision-making point" the guidance information lack with various ways in, as well as position of the target establishment is easy to produce the user in the guidance outside the misunderstanding, many place guidance’s information by no means take "most has the effectiveness for a period of time" as a principle, increased the user to arrive distance of as well as the way decision-making points the destination, the user must increase the decision-making number of times, also increased probability of the its decision-making mistake, then the promotion sought the road question to have the probability.

The conformity above and so on present situation has the question, proposed the suggestion improvement way, and raises draws up the correlation following research, expected the affiliation mentions the question by this research document, backward discussion to the correlation spatial layout design theory, promotes to conform to space of quality the use demand.

中文參考文獻

1. 中華民國建築學會，1988，《捷運系統優先路線車站地下街工程規劃準則及營運維護
管理制度》。
2. 王仁弘，2003，《地下街尋路行為與空間概念建構之研究》，中原大學建築學系研究所碩士論文。
3. 台北市政府捷運工程局，1991，《標誌系統-台北捷運標誌系統設計項目及內容》，台
北市政府捷運工程局頒布。
4. 李佩芬，1988，《台灣地下街開發及營運管理之研究—以台北車站及中華路計劃中之
地下街為例》，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
5. 林顯榕，1995，《台北市地下街的空間區位與消費者行為》，地理研究第42 期。
6. 侯曉玲，2001，《圖書館讀者尋路行為之研究─以臺北市立圖書館總館為例》，國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。
7. 胡嘉昕，2001，《捷運台北車站空間環境與標示系統使用後評估之研究－以使用者尋路的觀點探討》，國立台北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文。
8. 陳歷渝，1988，《地下街實質環境管理維護制度之研究》，淡江大學建築(工程)研究所碩士論文。
9. 陳格理，1999，《圖書館尋路工作之理念與設計》，中國圖書館學會會報第62 期。
10.張惟韶，2005，《大學圖書館標示系統規劃設計完整性之研究》，東海大學建築學系研究所碩士論文。
11.黃柏鈴，1980，《地下街研究—台灣發展之可行性》，國立成功大學工程技術研究所設計技術學程建築設計組碩士論文。
12.黃信豪，2003，《捷運車站尋路設計評估架構建立之研究》，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系研究所碩士論文。
13.蔡文彩，1989，《日本之地下商店街及其防災政策》，國立台灣師範大學地理研究報告。
14.劉純如，2001，《博物館館舍資訊服務系統之使用性研究--以國立自然科學博物館為例》，東海大學建築學系研究所碩士論文。
15.薛月琴、曾瑞嫺，2000，《捷運系統標誌設計與管理》，捷運技術23期，p,325-342。

中文書目
1.Christopher Alexander，1977，《建築模式語言》，（王聽度、周序鴻 譯），六合出版社印行。
2.Lynch Kevin，1981，《都市意像》，（宋伯欽 譯），臺隆書店印行。
3.黃柏鈴，1987，《隱藏的世界－地下街》，詹氏書局印行。
4.王錦堂、關華山 審編，1999，《環境設計與行為因素》，台隆書店出版印行。
5.徐磊青、楊公俠 編著，2005，《環境心理學：環境、知覺和行為》，五南圖書出版公
司印行。
8.陳格理，2007，《圖書館的尋路與標示》，文華圖書館管理資訊股份有限公司。

英文參考文獻
1.G.Best,1970,Direction-finding in Large Buildings,Architectural Psychology,RIBA Publication
2.G.Eaton,Wayfinding in a Library:Book searches andRoute Uncertanty,RQ 30:4(Summer1992),p.525
3.M. O’Neill,Effects of Signage and Floor plan Configuration on Wayfinding Accuracy,Environment and Behavior 23:5(Sept.1991),p.556
4.Passini R.,1984,Spatial Representations, A Wayfinding Perspective,p.153-164
5.Paul Arthur & Romedi Passini,1992,WAYFINDING-People,Signs and Architecture,
McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited,p.V
6.P.Arthur and R.Passini, Wayfinding, People, Sign andArchitecture (New York:McGraw-Hill,1992),p.3
7.P.Ingwerson,1982,Research Procedures in the Library:Analyzedfrom the Cognitive Point of View,Journal of Documentation,p.168
8.Marie Wallace,2000,The story of Storyboarding-Part 3 Wayfinding
9.Sharon MacMinner,2000,Wayfing:Human Perception & Orientation;in the Built
Environment