多年前，政府積極的推動「兩兆雙星」下，TFT-LCD 面板產業已成為眾多產業中，屬於明日之星的產業，眾多企業主紛紛投入大量資金於製程、原料、面板的製作。如今，卻因為供過於求，使面板價格下跌，利潤不若以往。故，「高效率的製造」、「生產最佳化」成為各面板公司的當務之急。
本研究以層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP) ，經過專家訪談及文獻探討評估出要素後，歸納出選擇生產工廠時，應考量到的五個構面，分別為：成本、品質、交期、技術能力及營運管理，以及其下一階的14個準則。再針對專家進行訪談與問卷調查、彙整專家意見，找出選擇生產工廠的評估策略，其中權重排行前五大的準則依序為：急單應變彈性、設備能力、短時間開發新產品能力、獲利能力、相互間協調。並以其中一間工廠為例，找出改善體質的五個關鍵因素：急單應變彈性、獲利能力、相互間協調、迅速調整產能能力、較短的交貨時間，並提出改善建議。

Many years ago, Taiwan Government developed prospects of the “Two Trillion, Twin Stars” Industries. TFT-LCD panel industry has become a rising star in many industries. A mass of enterprisers invest much money in this field include process, raw material and manufacture. Now, because of oversupply, panel prices fall and the profit is not the past. Therefore, “High efficient manufacturing” and “Production optimization” become the top priorities of all panel companies.
After assessing the factors through experts interview and documents study, by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), this research is concluded that choosing TFT-LCD manufacturing factory should consider five facets: Cost, Quality, Delivery, Technical Skills and Operation Management. And it is also sorted out it’s 14 criteria in the next layer. Then conducting interviews and surveys to the experts, find the evaluation strategy for choosing manufacturing factory. Among them, the weight of five former ranking criteria in order is Urgent Orders Resilience, Equipment Capability, Short-term Aability to Develop New Products, Profitability and Reciprocal Arrangement. In case of one factory, find the five key factors to improve its status: Urgent Orders Resilience, Profitability, Reciprocal Arrangement, Ability to Quickly Adjust Production Capacity and Shorter Delivery Time, and then propose improvement actions.

一、中文參考文獻
1. IHS官方網站(https://technology.ihs.com/)。
2. 友達光電官方網站(http://www.auo.com/)。
3. 林冠州，TFT-LCD面板廠商對供應商選擇之研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2004。
4. 洪育萍，應用層級分析法於合板加工業協力供應商評選-以某印刷廠為例，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系EMBA碩士在職專班碩士論文，2014。
5. 洪筱筑，綠色供應商評選模式之建構─以TFT-LCD 廠為例，中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文，2007。
6. 徐淑靜，以層級分析法探討大尺寸電視TFT-LCD面板供應商評選之關鍵因素，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系EMBA碩士在職專班碩士論文，2011。
7. 翁振義、周瑛琦等合著，張保隆總審訂，決策分析方法與應用，華泰文化，2006。
8. 張政偉，應用AHP建立合作廠商評選模式之研究–以手機產業A公司為例，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系EMBA碩士在職專班碩士論文，2009。
9. 張紹勳，模糊多準則評估法與統計，五南圖書，2012。
10. 張銥洳，應用層級分析法於寬頻網路設備產業之供應商遴選模型-以N公司為例，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系EMBA碩士在職專班碩士論文，2014。
11. 梁明哲，運用灰色理論於TFT-LCD 廠商之供應商評選之研究，國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班碩士論文，2010 。
12. 陳鐸，運用層級分析法決定某玻璃加工公司改善活動之優先順序，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系EMBA碩士在職專班碩士論文，2015。
13. 群創光電官方網站(http://www.innolux.com) 。
14. 葉信賢，應用資料包絡法評估TFT-LCD量產品之生產績效-以台灣某TFT-LCD廠為例，國立交通大學管理學院(工業工程與管理學程)碩士論文，2011。
15. 鄧振源、曾國雄，分析層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(上)，中國統計學報第二十七卷第六期，pp. 1-20，1989。
16. 鄧振源、曾國雄，分析層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(下)，中國統計學報第二十七卷第七期，pp. 5-22，1989。

二、英文參考文獻
1. Ansari, A. and Modarress, B., “JIT purchasing as a quality and productivity centre”, International Journal of Production Research 26(1),pp. 19-26(1980).
2. Burton, T., “JIT/repective sourcing performance:Tying the knot with your suppliers”, Production and Inventory Management Journal 29(4),pp. 38-42(1988).
3. Carter, J. R. and Ferrin, B. G., “The Impact of Transportation Costs on Supply chain Management”,Journal Of Business Logistics,16(1),pp. 189-212 (1995).
4. Dickson, Gary W., “An analysis of Vender selection systems and decisions”,Journal of Purchasing 2(4),pp. 563-588(1966).
5. Dickson, Gary W., “An analysis of Vender selection systems and decisions”,Journal of Purchasing 2(1),pp. 5-17(1966).
6. Donaldson, B., “Supplier selection criteria on the service dimension”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 1(5),pp. 209-217(1994).
7. Fang-Mei Tseng, Yu-jing Chiu, and Ja-shen Chen, “Measaring business performance in the high-tech manufacturing industry: A case study of Taiwan’s large-sized TFT-LCD panel companies”, Omega, 37,686-697 (2009).
8. Lehmann, D. R. and John O’Shaughnessy, “Decision criteria used in buying different categories of products”,Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 18(1),pp. 9-14(1982).
9. Lehmann, D. R. and John O’Shaughnessy, “Difference in Attribute Importance for Diffe- rent Industrial Products”,Journal of Markeing 38(1),pp. 36-42(1974).
10. Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J. , Handfield,E. B. and Ragatz, G. L., “ Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances: The Buying Company Perspective” , Decision Sciences, 29(3), pp. 553-577(1998).
11. Omkarprasad, S. V. and Sushil, K., “Analytic hierarchy process:An overview of applications”, European Journal of Operational Research 169,pp. 1-29(2006).
12. Rohit, V. and Madeleine, E. P., “An analysis of the supplier selection process”, Omega International Journal Management Sci 26(6),pp. 739-750(1998).
13. Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, Luis G., The Logic of Priorities, Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff (1982).
14. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York:McGraw-Hill (1980).
15. Saaty, T. L., “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structure”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3),pp. 234-281(1977).
16. Saaty, T. L., Decision Making For Leader:The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisoin in a Complex World , RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2001).
17. Sipahi, S., Timor, M., “ The analytic hierarchy process and analy tic network process: an overview of applications ” , Management Decision 48 (5), pp. 775-808 (2010).
18. Stevenson, W.J.,Production Operations Management,Sixth Edition, Ch.3 (1999).
19. Choi, T.Y. and Janet, L. H., An exploitation of supplier selection practices across the suppy chain, Journal of Operations Management 14, pp. 333-343(1996).
20. Wilson, E. J., “The relative importance of supplier selection creteria: A review and update”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 30(3), pp. 35-41(1994).