簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方思宜
Szu-Yi Fang
論文名稱: 以產品品質因素探討台灣年長者對智慧家庭之使用與接受度
The Use and Acceptance of Smart Home by Elderly Taiwanese Users: An Examination of Technology Acceptance Model with Product Quality Factors
指導教授: 鄭仁偉
Jen-Wei Cheng
呂志豪
Shih-Hao Lu
口試委員: 張飛黃
葉穎蓉
Ying-Jung Yeh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 73
中文關鍵詞: 高齡化產品品質網頁設計安全與隱私顧客服務科技接受模式
外文關鍵詞: Aging, Product Quality, Website Design, Security /Privacy, Customer Service, Technology Acceptance Model
相關次數: 點閱:469下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 根據2017世界人口展望數據顯示,到2050年,60歲以上人口數量將漲兩倍多,由於高齡化的趨勢,使得人力不足,年長者利用科技產品去輔助生活已成未來的趨勢,也因促使越來越多產業致力於開發智慧家庭類型產品,企業應該要更積極去探討當老年人在使用智慧家庭產品時注重的部分是甚麼,並且加以利用在產品設計上,搶食銀髮族消費市場這塊大餅。

    然而,過去僅有少數研究著眼於探究年長者對於智慧家庭使用意願,及較少深入分析產品品質是否影響年長者對產品的知覺有用與知覺易用程度。

    本研究主要以台灣北區之民眾作為研究對象,透過社群網路方式蒐集樣本。本研究採用科技接受模型(TAM),並參考 (Wolfinbarger & Gilly, 2003)所提出的產品品質構面,利用SPSS 20.0 與Lisrel 8.7分析探討不同的產品品質變項,包含網頁設計、安全與隱私及顧客服務,對年長者使用智慧家庭的知覺有用、知覺易用及使用意圖間的關係是否存在顯著差異,並進一步針對網頁設計、安全與隱私及顧客服務,提出產品開發之實務建議。

    本研究證實,網頁設計、安全與隱私及顧客服務都能顯著的影響年長者在使用智慧家庭上的意圖。因此建議智慧家庭業者應提升產品品質,以增加使用者正向的行為意向,並根據本研究之結果,提供建議給後續研究參考使用。


    According to data from World Population Prospects (2017), the number of elders, those age 60 years and above are expected to more than double by 2050. Aging leads to a labor shortage. Therefore, elder use technology products to assist life will become a trend in the near future. This drives more and more industries to develop smart home product. To grab the silver consumer market pie, businesses should be more active in discussing what elders are concerning about when using smart home products.

    This study focused on the people in Taipei, an urban area of Taiwan, as the research object and collected samples through social networking. This study adopts TAM as basic framework and referred to the product quality construct which proposed by Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2003). In the basic analysis, SPSS 20.0 statistical software is used to carry out descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, and Lisrel 8.7 is used for validity analysis and Structural Equation Model (SEM).

    It can be concluded in this research that website design, security/privacy, and customer service of smart home product have an impact on the perceive usefulness, perceive ease of use and behavioral intention of elders. Therefore, it is recommended that companies, which produce smart home product, should improve product quality in order to increase the user's positive behavioral intentions. Based on the results of this study, I provide some suggestion for future study.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii 致謝 iii TABLE OF CONTEN iv LIST OF FIGURE vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Motivation 3 1.3 Research Purposes 5 1.4 Research Scope and Flowchart 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Smart Home 7 2.2 Technology Acceptance Model 8 2.1.1 Theory of Reasoned Action 9 2.1.2 Theory of Planned Behavior 10 2.1.3 Technology Acceptance Model 12 2.1.4 Technology Acceptance Model 2 13 2.1.5 Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 15 2.3 Product Quality 16 2.4 Hypothesis Development 18 Chapter 3 Research Methodology 20 3.1 Research Model 20 3.2 Research Hypothesis 21 3.3 Operational Definition 22 3.3.1 Technology Acceptance Model 22 3.3.2 Product Quality 23 3.4 Questionnaire Design 23 3.4.1 Perceived Usefulness 24 3.4.2 Perceived Ease of Use 25 3.4.3 Behavioral Intention 25 3.4.4 Security/Privacy 26 3.4.5 Website Design 26 3.4.6 Customer Service 27 3.4.7 Demographic Survey 27 3.5 Sampling Design 27 3.5.1 Sampling Procedure 28 3.5.2 Data Collection 28 3.6 Data Analysis Method 28 Chapter 4 Research Result 29 4.1 Data Analysis and Results 29 4.2 Descriptive Statistics 31 4.3 Reliability Analysis 35 4.4 Validity Analysis 36 4.4.1 Convergent Validity 37 4.4.2 Discriminant Validity 39 4.5 Linear Structural Relation 39 4.5.1 Evaluation of Overall Goodness-of-Fit of Model 39 4.6 Path Analysis 41 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 45 5.1 Research Conclusion 45 5.2 Theoretical and Managerial Implication 46 5.2.1 Theoretical Implication 46 5.2.2 Managerial Implication 46 5.3 Research limitations and Recommendations for Future Research 47 APPENDIX1: QUESTIONNAIRE 49 APPENDIX2: Description video 52 APPENDIX3: Instructions 53 REFRERNCE 54

    Ahn, T., Ruy, S., & Han, I. (2004). The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3, pp. 405 – 420.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 2, pp. 179-211.
    Ajzen, l. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.
    Ajzen, l., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Al-Gahtani, S. (2011). Modeling the electronic transactions acceptance using an extended technology acceptance model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9, pp. 47 - 77.
    Babakus, E., Beinstock, C., & Van, S. J. (2006). Linking perceived quality and customer satisfaction to store traffic and revenue growth. Decis Sci, 35(4), pp. 713–737.
    Bagozzi, R. (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 562-584.
    Baier, D., & Stüber, E. (2010). Acceptance of recommendations to buy in online retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(3), pp. 173 - 180.
    Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? a new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 21-32.
    Barkhi, R., Belanger, F., & Hicks, J. (2008). A model of the determinants of purchasing from virtual stores. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(3), pp. 177-196.
    Beach, L., & Mitchell, T. (1987). Image Theory: Principles, Goals And Plans In Decision Making. Acta Psychologica, 66, pp. 201-220.
    Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Qua Vadis, TAM? ournal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), pp. 206 – 210.
    Boakye, K., Prybutok, V., & Ryan, S. (2012). The intention of continued web-enabled phone service usage: a quality perspective. Oper Manage Res, 5(1), pp. 14–24.
    Bortoleto, A., Hurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2012). Model development for household waste prevention behaviour. Waste Manag, 32, pp. 2195-2207.
    Box, J. (1984). Proceedings of the XIth International Research Seminar in Marketing. Aix-en-Provence, France.
    Braun, M. (2013). Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav, 29(3), pp. 673-680.
    Brown, S., Venkatesh, V., Kuruzovich, J., & Massey, A. (2008). Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, pp. 52-66.
    Calantone, R., Griffith, D., & Yalcinkaya, G. (2006). An Empirical Examination of a Technology Adoption Model for the Context of China. Journal of International Marketing, 4, pp. 1-27.
    Cerni, M., & Penhaker, M. (2008). Circadian rhythm monitoring in homecare systems (13 ed.). Singapore: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering.
    Chen, K., & Chan, A. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), pp. 635-652.
    Chin, W., Johnson, N., & Schwarz, A. (2008). A Fast Form Approach to Measuring Technology Acceptance and Other Constructs. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), pp. 687-703.
    Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 189-211.
    Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 189-211.
    Conner, M., & Armitage, C. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), pp. 1429-1464.
    Conner, M., Kirk, S., Cade, J., & Barrett, J. (2001). Why do women use dietary supplements? The use of the theory of planned behavior to explore beliefs about their use. Social Science and Medicine, pp. 621-633.
    Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., & Thornton, K. e. (2010). Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review, 36(1), pp. 90-92.
    Czaja, S., Beach, S., Charness, N., & Schulz, R. (2013). Older adults and the adoption of healthcare technology: Opportunities and challenges. New York: Springer.
    Davies, J., Foxall, G., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the Intention–Behaviour Mythology a integrated model of recycling. Mark. Theory, 2, pp. 29-113.
    Davis, F. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982-1003.
    Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 38(5), pp. 982-1003.
    Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), pp. 1111-1132.
    DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent. Inf Syst Res, 3(3), pp. 60–95.
    Demiris, G., & Hensel, B. (2008). Technologies for an aging society: A systematic review of "smart home" applications. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 33-40.
    Demographic statistics – population aged 15 and over by gender and education level. (n.d.). Retrieved from Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=5018
    Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics. Inf Syst Res, 13(3), pp. 316–333.
    Dishaw, M., & Strong, D. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task technology fit constructs. Inf. Manag, 36, pp. 9-21.
    Estimation of population in Taiwan from 2010 to 2060. Available. (n.d.). Retrieved from Council for Economic Planning and Development: http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000455
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, reading. Addison-Wesley Publishing Compan.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, V. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 39-50.
    Garvin, D. (1984). What does product quality really mean? Sloan Management Review, pp. 25-43.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), pp. 51-90.
    Genth, M. (1981). Qualität und Automobile—Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des deutschen Automobilmarktes 1974–1977 (Quality and Cars: An Investigation for the German Car Market from 1974–1977). Frankfurt: FRG.
    Golant, S. (2008). Commentary: Irrational exuberance for the aging in place of vulnerable low-income older homeowners. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 20(4), pp. 379-397.
    Golant, S. M. (2017). A theoretical model to explain the smart technology adoption behaviors of elder consumers (Elderadopt). Journal of Aging Studies, 42, pp. 56-73.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
    ilKim, K., Gollamudi, S. S., & Steinhubl, S. (2017). Digital technology to enable aging in place. Experimental Gerontology, 88, pp. 25-31.
    Jones, B., & Hubona, G. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), pp. 706-717.
    Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
    Juran, J. (1974). Basic Concepts. New York : Random House.
    Kotler, P. (1984). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Lee, Y., Kozar, K., & Larsen, K. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, pp. 752-780.
    Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, pp. 191-204.
    Liu, L., Stroulia, E., Nikolaidis, I., Cruz, A., & Rincon, A. (2016). Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 91, pp. 44-59.
    Lucas, H. j., & Swanson, E. R. (2007). Implementation, Innovation, and Related Themes Over The Years In Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), pp. 206 – 210.
    Luora, T., Lu, H., Yu, H., & Lu, Y. (2015). Exploring the critical quality attributes and models of smart homes. Maturitas, 82(4), pp. 377-386.
    Marie, C., Eric, C., Daniel, E., & Jean, F. (n.d.).
    Marie, C., Eric, C., Daniel, E., & Jean, F. (2009). Smart homes — Current features and future perspectives. Maturitas, 64(2).
    McKechnie, S., Winklhofer, H., & Ennew, C. (2006). Applying the technology acceptance model to the online retailing of financial services. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(4/5), pp. 388 – 410.
    Min, L., Wenbin, G., C., W., H., Y., W., Y., & Z., Y. (2018). Smart Home:Architecture, Technologies and Systems. Procedia Computer Science, 131, pp. 393-400.
    Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp. 192-222.
    O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, pp. 81 - 94.
    Orlov, L. (2016). Technology for aging in place. Market overview.
    Perea y Monsuwé, T., Dellaert, B., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(1), pp. 102 - 121.
    R.King, W., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), pp. 740-755.
    Robert, P. (2015). The Connected Home: What Consumers Want. Retrieved from security info watch : www.securityinfowatch.com/article/12067774/smart-home-customer-wants
    Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon/ Random House.
    Schenkman BN & Jonsson FU. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behav Inf Technol 19(5), pp. 367–377.
    Schoenberg, N. E., & Coward, R. T. (1997). Attitudes about entering a nursing home: Comparisons of older rural and urban African-American women. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(1), pp. 27-47.
    Sheppard, B., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), pp. 325-343.
    Snoj, B., Korda, A., & Mumel, D. (2004). The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(2/3), pp. 156-167.
    Stone, R. I., & Harahan, M. F. (2010). Improving The Long-Term Care workforce serving older Adults. Health Affair, 29(1), pp. 109-15.
    Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2004). A Methodological Analysis of User Technology Acceptance. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
    Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 64(2), pp. 53-78.
    Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), pp. 144-176.
    Ten-year long-term project in Taiwan. (2007). Retrieved from Taiwan Executive Yuan: https://english.ey.gov.tw/News_Hot_Topic.aspx?n=FE8C5966F81D8273&sms=BBB420E471DAF6C0
    Teo, T., & Schaik, v. P. (2012). Understanding the intention to use technology by preservice teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 28(3), pp. 178-188.
    The coming of a “super-aged society”: how Taiwan, the fastest ageing population, is responding. (2017). Retrieved from Social enterprise insights: http://en.seinsights.asia/2017/06/12/the-coming-of-a-super-aged-society-how-taiwan-the-fastest-ageing-population-is-responding/
    Theokary, C., & Ren, Z. (2011). An empirical study of the relations between hospital volume. teachin.
    Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), pp. 125-143.
    Tonglet, M., Phillips, P., & Bates, M. (2004). Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl, 42, pp. 27-48.
    Tractinsky, N., Katz, A., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interact Comput, 13(2), pp. 127-145.
    Van den Putte, B. (1991). 20 Years of the theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A meta-analysis. University of Amsterdam,.
    Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46, , pp. 186-204.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & DavisF.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, pp. 425-478.
    Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Carnegie Institute of Technology.
    Wang, H., & Tsay, S. (2012). Elderly and long-term care trends and policy in Taiwan: Challenges and opportunities for health care professionals. 28(9), pp. 465-469.
    Wimmer, F. (1975). The Quality Judgment of Consumers: Theoretical Underpinnings and Empirical Results. Frankfurt,: FRG.
    Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), pp. 183-198.
    Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). ETailQ: Dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), pp. 183-198.
    Yang, C., Hsu, Y.-C., & Tan, S. (2010). Predicting the Determinants of Users’ Intentions for Using YouTube to Share Video: Moderating Gender Effects, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 13(2), pp. 141 – 152.
    Yusif, S., Soar, J., & Baig, A. H. (2016). Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 94, pp. 112–116.
    吳統雄. (1990). 電話調查:理論與方法,第二版. 台灣: 聯經出版社.
    郭外天. (2016). 臺灣的照護人力跑到哪去了?高折損率+低留任率=缺乏照護人力. 原水文化. 擷取自 http://www.ilong-termcare.com/Article/Detail/221
    郭外天. (2016). 臺灣的照護人力跑到哪去了?高折損率+低留任率=缺乏照護人力. 原水文化.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/12/25 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE