簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 莊雲心
Suci - Utomo
論文名稱: 當建議導致延遲: 延遲選擇之動態
When Recommendations Cause Delay: The Dynamics of Choice Deferral
指導教授: 葉明義
Ming-Yih Yeh
口試委員: 吳克振
Cou-Chen Wu
張琬喻
Woan-Yuh Jang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 34
中文關鍵詞: 建議配適專業知識熟悉度涉入延遲選擇
外文關鍵詞: recommendation fit, expertise, familiarity, involvement, choice deferral
相關次數: 點閱:178下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討在消費者不同的特點下,建議效果對延遲選擇的影響。以傳統的角度來看,提供建議可以幫助消費者選擇過程中更流暢,但研究結果顯示這個情況並非總是如此。當消費者具有較高的專業知識時,他們對於不符合偏好的建議相較於符合的建議,更可能會有延遲選擇的傾向;而具有較低專業知識的消費者則沒有顯示出顯著的差異。消費者在不同的涉入情境下,顯示出相同的結果。當建議不符合高涉入消費者的偏好時,他們更可能延遲購買;對於低涉入的消費者,建議符合或不符合他們的偏好都沒有顯著的差異。本研究結果指出專業知識以及涉入程度會干擾建議效果的影響,而消費者對於產品的熟悉度則不會干擾建議效果對延遲選擇的影響。


    This research examines how the effect of recommendation fit on choice deferral might differ under the moderation of consumers’ characteristics. Traditional views suggest that providing recommendations should help consumers in the choice process; however, the results show that this is not always the case. When the recommendations given do not match with consumers’ prior preference, consumers with high expertise are more likely to delay their purchase compared to when they are given recommendations that fit to their preferences, whereas low-expertise consumers do not show any significant difference in delaying their purchase regardless the recommendation fit. The direction is the same under the moderation effect of consumer involvement. Highly involved consumers show higher preference for no-choice option when they are given unfit recommendation, while for consumers with low involvement, the likelihood for choice deferral incidence is the same regardless the recommendation fit. While results show that expertise and involvement moderate the recommendation effect, the recommendation effect on choice deferral cannot be observed under the moderation effect of familiarity.

    ABSTRACT i 摘要 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vi INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 Recommendations and Preference for No-Choice Option 3 Consumer Knowledge 5 STUDY 1: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE 8 Method 8 Results 9 Discussion 14 STUDY 2: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT 15 Consumer Involvement 15 Method 17 Results 17 Discussion 19 REFERENCES 24 APPENDIX 26 Appendix 1 26 Appendix 2 26

    Alba, Joseph W. and J. Wesley Hutchinson (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 411-54.
    Amir, On and Jonathan Levav (2008). “Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preference Learned in Context,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (April), 145-58.
    Brucks, Merrie (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (1), 1-16.
    Chang, Chiu-Chi Angela and Monika Kukar-Kinney (2011), “The Effects of Shopping Aid Usage on Consumer Purchase Decision and Decision Satisfaction,” Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23 (June), 745-54.
    Dhar, Ravi (1997), “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (September), 215-31.
    Fitzsimons, Gavan J. and Donald R. Lehmann (2004), “Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses,” Marketing Science, 23 (1), 82-94.
    Gershoff, Andrew D., Susan M. Broniarczyk, and Patricia M. West (2001), “Recommendation or Evaluation? Task Sensitivity in Information Source Selection,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (December), 418-38.
    Goodman, Joseph K., Susan M. Broniarczyk, Jill G. Griffin, and Leigh McAllister (2013), “Help or Hinder? When Recommendation Signage Expands Consideration Sets and Heightens Decision Difficulty,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (February), 165-74.
    Greenleaf, Eric A. and Donald R. Lehmann (1995), “Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (September), 186-99.
    Hawkins, Del I. and David L. Mothersbaugh (2010), Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    Laurent, G. and Jean-Noel Kapferer (1985), “Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (February), 41-53.
    Liang, Ying-Ping (2012), “The Relationship between Consumer Product Involvement, Product Knowledge and Impulsive Buying Behavior,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57 (October), 325-30.
    Maheswaran, Durairaj and Brian Sternthal (1990), “The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation, and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (June), 66-73.
    Peter, J. Paul and Jerry C. Olson (2010), Consumer Behavior & Marketing Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    Shugan, Steven M. (1980), “The Cost of Thinking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (2), 99-111.
    Tversky, Amos and Eldar Shafir (1992), “Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision,” Psychological Science, 6 (November), 358-61.
    Urbany, J.E., P.R. Dickson, and W.L. Wilkie (1989), “Buyer Uncertainty and Information Search,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (September), 208-15.
    Wilson, William R. and Robert A. Peterson (1989), “Some Limits on the Potency of Word-of-Mouth Information,” Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 23-9.

    QR CODE