研究生: |
王偉文 Benedictus - Rahardjo |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
運用FMECA方法提升印尼油品公司安全性 FMECA Approach to Improve Safety in an Indonesian Cooking Oil Company |
指導教授: |
江行全
Bernard C. Jiang |
口試委員: |
紀佳芬
Chia-Fen Chi 張季明 Chi-Ming Chang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業管理系 Department of Industrial Management |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 57 |
中文關鍵詞: | FailureModeEffectsandCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA) 、CriticalityPriorityNumber(CPN) 、severityandoccurrenceclassification 、coconutoilandpalmoil |
外文關鍵詞: | Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (F, Criticality Priority Number (CPN), severity and occurrence classification, coconut oil and palm oil |
相關次數: | 點閱:231 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
This study attempts to apply Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to improve the safety of production system, especially on the production process of an oil company in Indonesia. Since food processing is a worldwide issue and the self management of a food company is more important than relying on government regulations, so the purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the criticality of potential failure mode on the production process, then take corrective actions to minimize the probability of making the same failure mode and re-analyze its criticality. This corrective actions are compared with the before improvement condition by testing the significance of the difference between before and after improvement using two sample t-test. Final result that had been measured is Criticality Priority Number (CPN), which refers to severity category and probability of making the same failure mode. Recommended actions that proposed on the part of FMECA give less CPN significantly compare with before improvement, with increment by 48.33% and 38.46%, respectively on coconut oil and palm oil case studies.
This study attempts to apply Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to improve the safety of production system, especially on the production process of an oil company in Indonesia. Since food processing is a worldwide issue and the self management of a food company is more important than relying on government regulations, so the purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the criticality of potential failure mode on the production process, then take corrective actions to minimize the probability of making the same failure mode and re-analyze its criticality. This corrective actions are compared with the before improvement condition by testing the significance of the difference between before and after improvement using two sample t-test. Final result that had been measured is Criticality Priority Number (CPN), which refers to severity category and probability of making the same failure mode. Recommended actions that proposed on the part of FMECA give less CPN significantly compare with before improvement, with increment by 48.33% and 38.46%, respectively on coconut oil and palm oil case studies.
Alion System Reliability Center. (1983). US Military Standard, MIL-STD-1629A: Procedures for performing a failure mode, effect and criticality analysis. USA: Department of Defense.
Anon. (1996). Qualitatssicherung durch herkunftsnachweis. International Z. Lebensm, 47, 55-58.
Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M., & Massini, R. (2006). FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control, 17(2), 137-145.
Bowles, J. B. (2004). An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. Journal of Institute of Environmental Sciences & Technology, 47(1), 51-56.
Bowles, J. B. & Pelaez, C. E. (1995a). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50(2), 203-213.
Braglia, M. (2000). MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(9), 1017-1033.
Chandler, G., Denson, W., Rossi M., & Wanner, R. (1991). Failure mode/mechanism distributions. Rome, NY: Reliability Analysis Center.
Chung, L. (2013, November 05). Concerns Over Food Safety Build In Taiwan After Scandals. Retrieved from South China Morning Post website: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1348274/
Clay, J. W. (2004). World agriculture and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
European Standard. (1995). [EN ISO 8402:1995, Point 3.16], European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
Ford. (1988). Potential failure mode and effects analysis in design (Design FMECA) and for manufacturing and assembly process (Process FMECA) instruction manual. Detroit, MI: Internal Report.
Lim, T. K. (2010). “Palm+stearin” Medicinal and non-medicinal edible plants. Dordrecht: Springer.
Malik, A., Masood, F., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Food processing: Strategies for quality assessment, a broad perspective. New York: Springer.
Manandhar, N. P. (2002). Plants and people of Nepal. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
Moe, T. (1998). Perspectives on traceability in food manufacture. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 9(5), 211-214.
Muralidharan, K. (2015). Six sigma for organizational excellence: A statistical approach. New Delhi, India: Springer (pp. 241).
Pirelli. (1988). FMEA-FMECA: Analisi delle modalita degli effetti e delle criticita dei guasti. Milan: Internal Report.
Ramesh, B., Dwiggins, D., De Vries, G., & Edwards, M. (1995). Towards requirements traceability models. Proceedings of International Symposium and Workshop on Systems Engineering of Computer Based Systems, IEEE, 229-232.
The China Post News Staff. (2013, October 25). Food Scares Jeopardize Health and Taiwan’s Image. Retrieved from The China Post website: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/editorial/taiwan-issues/2013/10/25/391961/
Yage, X. (2013, October 26). New Food Scandals Lead Consumers To Wonder About “What They Can Eat”. Retrieved from Asia News website: http://www.asianews.it/news-en/
Zanussi. (1989). FMEA: Guida all’analisi del guasto. Italy: Internal Report.