本研究以大學生之生涯發展「探索」、「瞭解」、「計畫」、「準備」四個階段與Holland人境適配論等相關文獻作為系統建置之基礎，協助學生進行職涯探索活動，並從系統資料中瞭解自我和職業的關聯，期望學生透過系統的協助，能找到自我發展的方向。
本研究實施目標對象以國立台灣科技大學學生為主，透過大學生之生涯發展階段理論，在學生入學時，可以「探索」自己的職業興趣，以RIASEC職業興趣量表為基礎與職業和系所做關聯，來「瞭解」自己的職業適配度與系所適配度。也提供學院與系所的培育目標、職業的工作環境、職業技能修課推薦與升學修課推薦，讓學生在就學中提早做好學習「計畫」。另外，學生在畢業後面臨求職「準備」階段，而開始準備找企業，期望能找到一間好公司，所以我們從PTT求職版蒐集文章的資料，從這些文章中的資料運用文字探勘之技術，自動摘要該企業的相關評論，也運用情緒分析、語意分析的技術整理出這些公司的推薦指數與正負面評論資訊，提供給同學參考，希望透過系統化的流程，幫助大學生做好生涯規劃。
最後，以台科大學生作為系統驗證之對象，依據資料分析的結果歸納出三項研究貢獻：(1)透過資訊系統運算快速的特性引導學生做職涯決策，也能有效減少耗費人力、時間上的成本。並且可以建立學生與教師、輔導人員之間的橋樑，經由系統分析的資料，教師與輔導人員能夠快速掌握學生職涯興趣的狀況，對症下藥。(2)透過統計資料的分析，台科大學生的職業六大類型也符合Holland理論。(3)提供教師、輔導人員改善之方法並透過學校的輔導資源，給予同學協助，降低學生選錯科系的比例。

In this study, we use four stages of college student’s career development ("Exploring", "Learning", "Planning", and “Preparing”) and Holland’s person-environment congruence as well as other related literature as a basis to build the system. To assist students in career exploration activities, and to understand the relationship between Selfhood and Career. The students are expected finding the direction of self-development through the help of the system.
In this study, the implementation of the target object is the students of National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST). According to the theory of college student’s career development, when students start their school life, they can “explore” their personalities by using the system, as well as using RIASEC Career Interest Inventory to “learn” the relationships between school departments and future career. The system also provide school department’s learning targets, possible career working environment, recommendations of taking courses to meet career skills and further education. The students can “plan” their future plan as early as possible. In addition, students will face the job hunting at the “prepare” stage after graduation. They will looking for company’s information. However, it’s hard to tell which one is the “good” company. Therefore, we collect these information from the community of PTT and use the skills of Text mining. Students can use these information to find good job.
Finally, we take NTUST students as our system validation objects. Base on the results of the study, the research contributions are shown as follow: (1) Through the characteristic of quick calculation of the system, can lead students to do their career planning decisions with less waiting time. Also, the system can effectively reduce the cost of labor intensive. Furthermore, the system can be the bridge between students, teachers and counselors. Especially teachers and counselors can use the information from the system to quickly grasp the situation of students’ career interest. (2) According to the analysis result of this study, NTUST students’ six types of career fits Holland’s theory. (3) Provide teachers and counselors the students’ career interest information together with school’s counseling resources, can reduce the ratio of students choose the wrong department.

中文參考文獻
1.王思峰、劉兆明(2012)。學涯與職涯分類系統之串接：建立大學學系學類之關係描述子。輔導與諮商學報，第34卷第1期。頁1-29。
2.王嘉陵(2011)。臺灣高等教育課程地圖繪製之反思。教育研究與發展期刊，第7卷第2期，頁55-77。
3.向素君(2010)。生涯與就業輔導系統建置之個案研究。輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
4.吳芝儀(2000)。生涯輔導與諮商。臺北：濤石文化。
5.巫啟台(2003)。文件之關聯資訊萃取及其概念圖自動建構。國立成功大學資訊工程學系博士論文。
6.李坤崇(2009)。大學課程地圖理念、繪製與類型。教育研究月刊，187，86-116。
7.李勝隆、黃同圳(1990)。人力資源發展。臺北：師大書院。
8.周談輝(2003)。生涯規劃。台北：全華出版社。
9.陳泉榮譯(1990)。松本順、岩崎隆治原著。第二次起跑，九種重新發展自我的方法。台北：遠流出版社。
10.林一真，路君約，簡茂發，盧欽銘(1988)。職業探索量表修訂報告。測驗年刊，35，65-76。
11.林孟瑜(2012)。職涯探索輔導系統建置之研究。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
12.林幸台(1987)。生計輔導的理論與實施。臺北：五南出版社。
13.林幸台(1990)。從生涯規劃談經社變遷中就業服務工作的走向。就業與訓練雙月刊，第8卷第6期。頁8-11。
14.林幸台、金樹人、張小鳳、陳清平（1996）。生涯興趣量表指導手冊。台北：測驗出版社。
15.林清文(2000)。大學生生涯發展與規劃手冊。臺北：心理出版社。
16.邱美華、董華欣(1997)。生涯發展與輔導。臺北：心理出版社。
17.金樹人(1986)。何倫類型論之因素結構分析。教育心理學報，第19期，頁219-253。
18.金樹人(1987)。生涯發展與輔導。臺北：天馬出版社。
19.青輔會(2006)。在正式教育中提升就業力：大專畢業生就業力之調查報告。行政院青年輔導委員會。
20.青輔會(2009)。青輔會大專畢業生就業力調查。行政院青年輔導委員會。
21.胡冬吟(2002)。國民中學校長生涯規劃之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
22.張哲偉(2011)。大學學習生涯歷程管理系統建置研究。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
23.張添洲(1994)。生涯發展與規劃。臺北：五南出版社。
24.張添洲(2007)。學習規劃與生涯發展。臺北：五南出版社。
25.張德聰(1995)。輔導員原理與實務。臺北：國立空中大學。
26.張耀人(2004)。職業適性傾向與工作績效之關聯性做研究-以壽險行銷人員為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
27.教育部UCAN計畫辦公室(2012)。大專校院就業職能平台UCAN職業興趣探索使用手冊。
28.梁定澎(1997)。資訊管理研究方法總論。中華民國資訊管理學報。
29.陳維君(2013)。網路意見分析與意見調查比較之研究─以公共議題為例。淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
30.黃培文（2004）。工作適性的組織、群體及職務層次對工作滿意、工作績效與工作轉換意圖的同時效果-以台灣旅館業餐飲部員工為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
31.楊惠淳(2011)。以主客觀分析與相互資訊檢索探討情感分析之準確度-以電影評論為例。國立臺北科技大學資訊與運籌管理研究所碩士論文。
32.楊朝祥(1989)。生計輔導一終生的輔導歷程。行政院青年輔導委員會。
33.葛樹人(1996)。心理測驗學。臺北：桂冠出版社。
34.廖慧媛、鄭燕琴、尤瑞彰(1998)。臺灣地區從業員工之工作適性與工作投入相關性研究。中山管理評論，第6卷第3期，頁797-825。
35.蔡培村(1998)。終生學習與教師生涯發展。台灣教育，565，14-26。
36.藍茜茹(2011)。生活與生涯規劃。臺北：都華文化。
37.羅大涵(1991)。生涯訓練的落實與推展。就業與訓練雙月刊，第9卷第1期，頁3-11。
38.羅文基、朱湘吉、陳如山(1991)。生涯規劃與發展。臺北：國立空中大學。
 
網頁參考文獻
1.O*NET-SOC. (2010). O*NET Resource Center. Website:
http://www.onetcenter.org/supplemental.html#supp .
2.施嘉峻、彭鼎鈞(2010)。利用文字探勘分析大眾觀感。取至：http://mag.chinatimes.com/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=3159&page=1。
3.財團法人大學考試入學中心(2013)。學類代碼表。網址：http://www.ceec.edu.tw/intqry/學類代碼表.pdf。
4.財團法人大學考試入學中心(2003)。漫步在大學。網址：
http://1058763.wit.com.tw/。
5.國立屏東科技大學教務處(2009)。課程學習地圖與職涯進路地圖。取至：http://aa.npust.edu.tw/16.htm。
6.國立彰化師範大學(2012)。華人生涯網。取至：
http://careering.heart.net.tw/。
7.劉孟奇(2008)。大鵬網專欄文章，職涯規劃DIY。取至：http://youngeagle.kkp.nsysu.edu.tw/files/15-1174-25862,c4051-1.php
8.教育部(2011)。UCAN大專院校就業職能平台。取至：https://ucan.moe.edu.tw/index.asp。
9.蔣興儀(2010)。何謂「生涯探索」。國立清華大學通識教育中心。取至：
http://www.college.nthu.edu.tw/files/15-1090-28993,c2259-1.php。

英文參考文獻
1.Beach,D. S. (1980). The Management of People at Work. New York：Macmillan Publicshing Co., Inc. 2.
2.Bretz,R. D.,&Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.
3.Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
4.Cole, N. A., & Hanson, G. R. (1971). An analysis of the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1, 1-9.
5.Edwards, K. J., & Whitney, D. R. (1972). Structural analysis of Holland career typesusing factor and configural analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 136- 145.
6.English, F. W. (1980). Curriculum mapping. Educational Leadership, 37(7), 558-559.
7.Greenhaus, J. H. & Callanan, G. A. (1994). Career Management. Orlando. FL:Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
8.Gysbers, N. C., & Moore, E. J. (1981). Improving guidance programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.Hall, D. T. (1976). Career in organizations, Pacific Palisades. CA:Goodear.
10.Hall, D. T. (1986). An Overview of Career Development Theory and Practice, Development Quarterly, 42, 28-37.
11.Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1996). The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of Management, 22, 527–547.
12.Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
13.Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work envirments (2nd ). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
14.Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Control theory and the perception of work environments: The effects of focus of attention on affective and behavioral reactions to work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 43, 406–430.
15.Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum & assessment K-12. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.Kaplan M.＆Saccuzzo P.（1997）,Psychological Testing, Phoenix Color Corporation, Inc.
17.Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
18.Langley, P., Simin, H.A. Bradshaw, G. and Zykow, J. (1987). Scientific Discovery: Computational Exploration of the creative Processes. Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press.
19.Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E.B., Levinson, M. H. & Mckee, B. (1978) . The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.
20.Lunneborg, C. E., & Lunneborg, P. W. (1975). Factor structure of the vocational interest models of Roe and Holland. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 313-326.
21.McDaniel, C. (1978). The practice of career guidance and counseling. Inform, Vol.7, No.1, pp.1-8.
22.Nafziger, D. H. & Helms, S. T. (1974). Cluster analysis of interest inventory scales as tests of Holland’s occupational Classification. Journal of Applies Psychology, 59,344-353.
23.Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., Dye, D. M. (2001). Understanding work using the Occupational Information Network(O*NET): Implicationa for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451-492.
24.Rachman, D. J., Amernic, J. M., & Aranya, N. (1981). A factor- analysis of the construct validity of Holland’s Self-Directed Search test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41,425-437.
25.Salton Salton, G. (1986). Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems. Communications of the ACM, 29, 648-656.
26.Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organization needs reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.Super, D.E. (1957). Vocational development :a framework for research. N.Y.: Teacher College Columbia University.
28.Super, D. E. (1976). Career education and the meaning of work, Monographs on career education, Washington, DC: The Office of Career Education, U.S. Office of Education.
29.Super, D. E. (1984).Career and life development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Associates career choice and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.Swain, R. (1984). Easing the Transition: A Career Planning Course for College Students. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62(9), 529 -532.
31.Wallen, N. E. & Fraenkel, J. R. (2001). Educational research: A guide to the process. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.Zunker, V.G. (1990). Career Counseling Applied Concepts of Life Planning. California：Wadsworth.