驗收抽樣計畫（Acceptance Sampling Plan）是一項在品質管理和品質保證領域中非常典型且實用的工具。它可以透過買賣雙方所制定的品質條件下，制定出保障雙方皆能承受之風險下的貨批判斷決策。然而因科技的發達，生產技術與品質不斷提升，使貨批的良率越來越高，因此傳統型的計數型驗收抽樣計畫，在合理的抽樣樣本數下已經無法有效的判別貨批實際的品質情況而容易造成誤判及損失。但近年來，許多學者將製程能力指標（Process Capability Indices, PCIs）應用在驗收抽樣計畫上。而透過製程能力指標發展出計量型驗收抽樣計畫，不僅能有效解決過去傳統型驗收抽樣計畫的問題，透過精確的抽樣分配，可提供較佳的準確度與可信度。本研究目的為結合單邊製程能力指標發展一計量型快速轉換（Variables Quick Switching Sampling, VQSS）抽樣系統，是利用兩種抽樣計畫所結合的一套系統，分別為正常檢驗（Normal inspection）與嚴格檢驗（Tightened inspection），其精神為在正常檢驗拒絕貨批，則下次便轉換為嚴格檢驗，利用這樣快速轉換的機制，將可有效地兼顧買賣雙方保障及節省抽樣成本。而本研究特別針對具單邊規格界限之產品品質特性下，透過單邊製程能力指標來設計此快速轉換抽樣系統，本研究亦會與不同策略的抽樣計畫進行比較分析。最後，為了便於使用，針對在不同風險水準及常見的品質要求下，將檢驗所需抽樣樣本數和臨界值整理成表格，並提供逐步操作程序。最後輔以實例做為分析與說明，以供日後參考使用。

Acceptance sampling plan is a typical and practical tool in quality management and assurance field. It can make a decision on product acceptance and provide the protection to both the buyer and the vender. However, traditional attributes acceptance sampling plans can’t work with a reasonably size of sample size if the required quality level is extremely high. For remedy for this, many researchers developed variables acceptance sampling plans by considering several process capability indices (PCIs) recently. The aim of this study is to develop a variables quick switching sampling （VQSS） system based on one-sided capability indices for process with unilateral specification limits. VQSS is one of the two-plan systems involving normal and tightened inspections. The VQSS system will begin with normal inspection and will switch to tightened inspection when the quality of a product has deteriorated under normal inspection. In this thesis, the operating characteristic function of the developed VQSS is derived based on the exact sampling distribution of the estimated one-sided capability indices. A comparison study is also conducted to compare the proposed VQSS system and the existing sampling plans. For practical use, the operating procedure and tables of the plan parameters under different levels of risks and quality requirements are provided. Finally, an application example is presented for illustration and discussion

一、 中文部分
1.蘇朝墩 (2010)，「品質管理」，前程文化事業有限公司。
二、 英文部分
1. Aslam, M., Azam, M. and Jun, C.H. (2013). Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41(2), 1-7.
2. Balamurali, S. and Jun, C. H. (2007). Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operation Research, 180(3), 1221-1230.
3. Balamurali, S. and Jun, C. H. (2009). Designing of a variables two-plan system by minimizing the average sample number. Journal of Applied Statistics, 36(10), 1159-1172.
4. Balamurali, S. and Usha, M. (2012). Variables quick switching system with double specification limits, International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 19(2), 125008-1-17.
5. Balamurali, S., Park, H., Jun, C. H., Kim, K. J. and Lee, J. (2005). Designing of Variables Repetitive Group Sampling Plan Involving Minimum Average sample number. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 34, 799-809.
6. Chou, Y. M and Owen D. B. (1989). On the distributions of the estimated process capability indices, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 18(12), 4549-4560.
7. Dodge, H. F. (1967). A dual system of acceptance sampling, Technical Report No. 16, The Statistics Center, Rutgers- The State University, New Brunswick, NJ.
8. Govindaraju, K. and Ganesalingam, S. (1998). Zero acceptance number quick switching system for compliance sampling. Journal of Applied Statistics, 25(3), 399-407.
9. Jennett, W. J. and Welch, B. L. (1939). The control of proportion defective asjudged by a single quality characteristic varying on a continuous scale. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 6(1), 80-88.
10. Juran, J. M. (1974). Quality Control Handbook, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New Work, USA.
11. Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 41-52.
12. Lieberman, G. J. and Resnikoff, G. J. (1955). Sampling plans for inspection by
13. Liu, S.W. and Wu, C.W. (2013). Design and construction of a variables repetitive group sampling plan for unilateral specification limit. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 43(8), 1866-1878.
14. Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to Statistics Quality Control (6th Edition).Wiley, New York.
15. Pearn, W. L. and Chen, K. S. (2002). One-sided capability indices and : decision making with sample information. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(3), 221-245.
16. Pearn, W. L. and Wu, C. W. (2004). Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives. Omega – The International Journal of Management Science, 34(1), 90-101.
17. Sherman, R. E. (1965). Design and evaluation of repetitive group sampling plan.
Technometrics, 7, 11-21
variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 475-516.