簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江函謙
Han-Chien Chiang
論文名稱: 股價報酬指數、基差與期貨、選擇權大額交易人未平倉契約之動態關係
The Relationship between Stock Index Return, Spread, Futures and Options Open Interest
指導教授: 陳俊男
Chun-Nan Chen
口試委員: 謝劍平
Joseph C.P. Shieh
陳嬿如
none
林軒竹
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 71
中文關鍵詞: 未平倉契約VAR
外文關鍵詞: VAR, open interest
相關次數: 點閱:375下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣為淺碟型市場,許多文獻證實機構投資人有影響市場的行為,為了解決一般投資人資訊缺乏,本研究以台灣股價指數為主,透過向量自我迴歸模型(VAR)、Granger因果關係檢定、衝擊反應函數及變異數分解,來探討基差、期貨大額交易人未平倉部位與選擇權大額交易人未平倉部位與台股報酬率的領先落後關係,由於期貨與選擇權的大額交易人未平倉部位的統計量有八種不同方法,本研究透過定義與模型配適度來選取最適當之代理變數,研究期間自2007年1月至2012年12月,共1366筆資料,其研究結果如下:
    一、 基差對台股報酬率有領先關係,基差領先兩期,t-2期基差對台股當期報酬率有正向影響。
    二、 選擇權的賣權大額交易人未平倉部位對台股報酬率有領先關係,但買權的大額交易人未平倉部位對台股報酬率則無顯著領先關係,選擇權的賣權大額交易人未平倉部位領先兩期,t-2期選擇權的賣權大額交易人未平倉部位對台股當期報酬率有負向影響。
    三、 期貨大額交易人未平倉部位對台股報酬率有互相領先關係,期貨大額交易人未平倉部位在VAR模型下落後兩期的係數為負且顯著,t-2期期貨大額交易人未平倉部位對台股當期報酬率有負向影響。
    根據以上結論,本研究嘗試建立交易策略模型來進行跟隨交易,當檢定機構投資人的變數出現買進訊號時,跟隨進場做多和做空,可以得到顯著大於50%的勝率,證明跟隨策略是能有效觀察出機構投資人的買賣時點。但在是否可以獲得超額報酬部分則無法顯著拒絕等於0之假設,可能推測為變數判斷僅用簡單的二分法判斷會產生誤差,即使將交易條件改以中位數做判斷,也無法顯著拒絕虛無假設。


    Due to the small size of market in Taiwan, literature confirmed that institutional investments affect the market. In this study, a VAR model and granger causality tests, impulse response function and variance decomposition are used to solve the problems that general investors are lack of information. The variables used are stock index return, spread, and open interest of futures and options. Eight different definitions are used to calculate the open interest. This study will find out which definition method is the best to fit the model. The data period covers from January 2007 to December 2012 with 1366 data in total. Results are listed below:
    1. Spread has two periods earlier than index Return, and it has positive correlation with return.
    2. Open interest of put options has two periods earlier than index return, but that of call options does not. Open interest of put options has negative correlation with index return.
    3. Open interest of futures and index return has bilateral Granger causality. The coefficient of open interest of futures in the VAR model is negative. Open interest of futures has negative correlation with index return.
    Based on the above findings, this study attempts to establish a trading strategy to follow the smart money from institutional investment. When the buying signal is shown, stock index is bought. The winning ratio of the strategy is found to be significantly greater than 50%. But the null hypothesis that there is excess return can't be rejected, even if many different trading strategies are used.

    目錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景及動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 論文架構 6 第四節 研究流程與步驟 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 公開資訊對股價影響之相關研究 8 第二節 基差變化之相關文獻探討 11 第三節 期貨大額交易人未沖銷部位之相關研究 13 第四節 選擇權大額交易人未沖銷部位之相關文獻 16 第五節 計量方法相關文獻 18 第六節 文獻探討小結 19 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 資料來源與處理 21 第二節 定態時間序列及單根檢定 27 第三節 向量自我迴歸模型 29 第四節 交易策略模型設計 35 第四章 實證結果分析 37 第一節 單根檢定及基本統計量分析 37 第二節 VAR模型之實證結果 42 第三節 衝擊反應分析 47 第四節 預測誤差變異數分解 49 第五節 敏感性分析 52 第六節 交易策略模擬分析 54 第五章 結論與建議 59 第一節 研究結論 59 第二節 研究限制與建議 60 參考文獻 68 圖目錄 圖2.1 台指期&台指選擇權交易結構 17 圖4.1 VAR模型平穩性檢定 40 圖4.2 VAR(2)衝擊反應合成圖 43 表目錄 表 3.1 變數定義表 26 表 4.1 本研究使用之主要變數敘述統計量 39 表 4.2 變數相關分析(簡) 40 表 4.3 單根檢定結果 (無單根代表時間序列為定態) 41 表 4.4 最適落後期評價 43 表 4.5 GRANGER CAUSALITY TESTS 46 表 4.6 台股報酬率之變異數分解 50 表 4.7 基差之變異數分解 50 表 4.8 期貨前五大特定交易人近月份淨多單率之變異數分解 51 表 4.9 選擇權前五大特定交易人近月份賣權淨空單率之變異數分解 51 表 4.10 多頭交易符號檢定勝率是否顯著大於50% 54 表 4.11 多頭交易當沖時符號檢定勝率是否顯著大於50% 55 表 4.12 多空交易符號檢定勝率是否顯著大於50% 56 表 4.13 多空交易Z檢定超額報酬是否顯著大於0 56 表 4.14 樣本外模擬分析結果 58

    國外文獻
    Anthony, J. H., 1988. The Interrlation of Stock and Options Market Trading-Volume Date, The Journal of Finance 43, 949-964.
    Anina, L., and S. Figlewski, 1993. The informational content of implied volatility,Review of Financial Studies 6, 659-681.
    Aksu,C., E. Gunay(1995), “ An Empirical Analysis of the Causal Relationship Between Short Interest and Stock Prices,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 22, p.733-749.
    Beckers, S., 1981. Standard deviations implind in option prices as predictors of futureStock price variability, Journal of Banking & Finance 5, 363-381.
    Bolerslev, Tim (1986). "Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity."
    Journal of Econometrics 31:307-27 Barber, B., and M. Bhattacharya, 1987. Price Changes of Related Securities: The Case of Call Options and Stocks, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22,1-15.
    Bessembinder, H., and P. J. Seguin, 1993. Price Volatility, Trading Volume, and Market Depth: Evidence from Futures Markets, Journal of Financial andQuantitative Analysis 28, 21-39.
    Blume, Lawrence & Easley, David & Halpern, Joseph Y., 2009. "Constructive Decision Theory," Economics Series 246, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    Brook, C. 2002 Introductory Econometrics for Fainance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Bhuyan, R., and D. Williams., 2005. Information, Equity Open Interests and Short-Term Movements of the Underlying Stock Price: An Empirical Examination., Derivatives Use, Trading & Regulation 10(2005) pp. 349-360.
    Bhuyan, 2005. Trading on the information content of open interest: Evidence from the US equity options market, Derivvatives Use, Trading Requlation 11, 16-36.
    Barber, Brad M., Yi-Tsung Lee, Yu-Jane Liu, and Terrance Odean, 2006, Just how much do investor lose from trade?, Working paper.
    Chiras, D. P., and S. Manaster, 1978.The information content of option prices and a test Of market efficiency, Journal of Financial Economics 6,213-234.
    Christensen, B. J., and N. R. Prabhala, 1998. The relation between implied and realized Volatility, Journal of Financial Economics 50, 125-150.
    Clark. P. K., 1973. A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices, Econometrica 41, 135-155.
    Cornell, B., and K. R. French,1983. The pricing of stock index futures, Journal of Futures Markets 3,1-14.
    Chordia, T. and B. Swaminathan, 2000, “Trading Volume and Cross-Autocorrelations in Stock Returns,” The Journal of Finance, pp.913-935
    Ciner, Cetin, 2002, “The Stock Price-Volume Linkage on the Toronto Stock Exchange:Before and After Automation”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,19, iss.4, pp.335.
    Epps, T. & Epps, M. 1976. The stochastic dependence of stochastic price changes and transaction volume: Implications for the mixture of distribution hypothesis, Econometrica, 44, 305-321.
    Engle, Robert (1982). "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation." Econometrica 50:987-1007.
    Easley, D., M. O′Hara, and P. S. Srinivas, 1998. Option Volume and Stock Prices:
    Evidence on Where Informed Traders Trade, The Journal of Finance 53, 431-465.
    Evans, M. D. D., and R. K. Lyons, 1999. Order Flow and Exchange Rate Dynamics, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 7317.
    Evans, M. D. D., and R. K. Lyons, 2001. Portfolio Balance, Price Impact, and Secret Intervention, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No 8356.
    Ender, W. 2004 Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
    Fama, E., 1965, The behavior of stock market price, The Journal of Business, 38, pp.34-105
    Figlewski, s., 1984. Hedging Performance and Basis Risk in Stock Index Futures, The Journal of Finance 39, 657-669.
    Fleming, J., 1988. The qualiyy of market volatility forecasts implied by S&P 100 index option price, Journal of Empirical Finance 5, 317-345.
    Foster, A. J., 1995. Volume-volatility relationships for crude oil futures markets, Journal Of Futures Markets 15, 929-951.
    Gulen, H., an S. Mayhew, 2000. Stock index futures trading and volatility in International equity markets, Journal of Futures Markets 20, 661-685.
    Gong-meng Chen, 2001. The Dynamic Relation Between Stock Returns, Trading Volume, and Volatility, The Financial Review 38, 153-174.
    Gopinath, S. and C. Krishnamurti, 2001, Number of Transactions and Volatility: An Empirical Study Using High-frequency Data from Nasdaq Stocks, The Journal of Financial Research, 24, 205-218.
    Grinblatt, Mark and Matti Keloharju. 2004. “Tax-Loss Trading and Wash Sales.”Journal of Financial Economics 71:1, 51-76.
    Harris, L. 1986, cross-security tests of the mixture of distribution hypothesis, Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 22, pp. 127-141.
    Hasbrouck, J., and G. Sofianos, 1993. The Trades of Market Makers: An Empirical Analysis of NYSE Specialists, The Journal of Finance 48, 1565-1593.
    Hagelin, H., 2000. Index option market activity and cash market volatility under different Market conditions: an empirical study from Sweden, Applied Financial Economics 10, 597-613.
    Hsu, H., Wang, J., 2004. Price expectation and the pricing of stock index futures. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 23, 167-184.
    Jorion, P., 1995. Predicting Volatility in the Foreign Exchange Market, The Journal of Finance 50, 507-528.
    Jayaraman, N., M. B. Frye, and S. Sabherwal, 2001. Informed Trading around Merger Announcements: An Empirical Test Using Transaction Volume and Open Interest In Options Market, Financial Review 36, 45-74.
    Karpoff, J. M., 1986. A Theory of Trading Volume, The Journal of Finance 41, 1069-1087.
    Kothari, S.P. and Shanken, J. 1997. Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market returns : a time series analysis, Journal of Financial Economics,44, pp.169-203.
    Kim, M., G. R. Kim, and M. Kim, 2004. Stock market volatility and trading activities in the KOSPI 200 derivatives markets, pplied Economics Letters 11, 49-53.
    Lakonishok, J. and S. Smidt. 1989. Are Seasonal Anomalies Real? A Ninety-Year Perspective. Review of Financial Studies, 1: 403-425.
    Lamoureux, C. G. and W. D. Lastrapes 1990a, persistence in variance, structure change, and the Garch model, The Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 8, pp.225-234
    Lakonishok Josef, A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny., 1992. The impact of institutional trading on stock prices, Journal of Financial Economics 32, 23-43.
    Lyons, R. K., 1996. Tests of microstructural hypotheses in the foreign exchange market, Journal of Financial Economics 39, 321-351.
    Mandelbrot, B. 1963, “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices,” Journal of Business, 36, 294-419.
    Manaster, S., and R. J. Rendleman, Jr., 1982. Option Prices as Predictors of Equilibrium Stock Prices, The Journal of Finance 37, 1043-1057.
    MacKinlay, A., and K. Ramaswamy, 1988. Index-futures arbitrage and the behavior of Stock index futures prices, Review of Financial Studies 1, 137-158.
    Mcinish, Thomas H., and Robert A.wood,1995, Hidden limit orders on the NYSE, Journal of Portfolio Management, 19-26.
    M., Y.-T. Lee, Y.-J. Liu, and T. Odeam,2009. Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?, Review of Financial Studies 22, 609-632.
    Osborne, M. F. M., 1959, “Brownian Motion in the Stock Market ,” Operation Research, Vol. 7, pp.145-173.
    Odean, T., 1998. Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are above Average, The Journal of Finance 53, 1887-1934.
    Pan, J., and A. M. Poteshman,2006. The Information in Option Volume for Future Stock Prices, Review of Financial Studies 19, 871-908.
    Rogalski, R. J. 1978, “The Dependence of Prices and Volume”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 60, pp. 268-274.
    Rastogi, P. a., 2010. Informational Role of Options Open Interests and Volume in Forecasting Future Prices: A Study on Indian Market, The IUP JourNal of Financial Economics. VIII(2010), 49-61.
    Srivastava, S. 2003. Informational Content of Trading Volume and Open Interest –An Empirical Study of Stock Option Market in India, SSRN eLibrary.
    Tauchen, G. and Pitts, M. 1983. The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on Speculative Markets. Econometrica, 51(2):485–505.
    Terrance Odean.1998. Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average, Journal of Finance, Vol. LIII, No. 6, December 1998, 1887-1934.
    Westerfield, J. M. 1977, “An examination of foreign exchange risk under fixed and floating rate regimes,” Journal of International Economics, 7, 181-20.
    Ying, F.Y. 1996. Earnings Management and Stock Performance of Reverse Leveraged Bayouts, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis(SSCI), Vol.41,407-438
    Yao, 1998. Market Making in the Interbank Foreign Exchange Market, New York University Salomon Center Working Paper #S-98-3.
    國內文獻
    朱世欽 (2010) 機構投資人在台灣股市與期市之交易訊息內涵與應用,國立成功大學財務金融所碩士在職專班論文。
    林美珍、馬麗菁(2002)投資機構交易資訊與市場報酬之互動關係,證券市場發展季刊,14:3,113-143
    林昭賢 (2005) 期貨交易者與期貨價格行為關係的三個議題探討,國立成功大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    林群堯 (2011) 股價報酬指數、波動性指數與選擇權未平倉量的動態關係:以台灣指數型選擇權為例,國立成功大學財務金融所碩士論文。
    林端玲 (2012) 指數期貨報酬、基差與未平倉量即委託單資訊之關聯性研究:以臺指期為例,國立成功大學財務金融所碩士在職專班論文。
    陳東明 (1991) 台灣股票市場價量關係之實證研究」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    陳文賢 (2001) 日內委買委賣比例對台灣加權股價指數報酬率影響,二十一世紀全球投資策略研討會,頁603-621。
    陳俊宏 (2005) 台股指數成交筆數與委買委賣張數對指數報酬率影響之實證研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
    許溪南、黃文芳 (1997) 台灣股市價量線性與非線性關係之研究,管理學報,14卷,2期,頁177-195。
    許溪南、王健聰 (1999) SIMEX摩根台股指數期貨之定價、套利與預測,成大學報,第34卷,109-142頁。
    莊金月 (2006) 期貨前十大交易額未平倉口數與台股漲跌趨勢關係之探討,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
    黃敏鈞 (2005) 指數選擇權指標與股票市場價格發現之研究,國立東海大學管理碩士學程在職進修專班。
    郭玟秀 (2006) 不同類交易人的衍生性金融商品交易活動對標的資產的資訊效果,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    張麟 (2008) 台灣期貨前十大交易人淨部位與台股指數行情之模擬研究,佛光大學經濟學系碩士論文。
    楊奕農 (2009) 「時間序列分析 經濟與財務上之應用」,雙葉書廊有限公司。
    趙廷楷 (2002) 現貨指數報酬、基差走勢、未平倉合約數與外資交易行為之動態關聯探討,高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    謝百庭 (2008) 大額交易人未平倉部位與期貨指數報酬、波動率關係探討,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2018/01/22 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2033/01/22 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE