簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李宗文
Theerapong - Binali
論文名稱: 泰國及越南大學網站學校宣傳的語文使用及技巧之比較
Comparisons of Language Texts and Techniques Used in Websites for University Promotions in Thailand and Vietnam
指導教授: 陳淑嬌
Su-chiao Chen
口試委員: 慧君鄧
Huei-chun Teng
斐文鄭
Fei-wen Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 應用外語系
Department of Applied Foreign Languages
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 104
外文關鍵詞: University’s promotional texts, marketized education, persuasive techniques
相關次數: 點閱:313下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

  • Since business perspectives have dominated the world-wide educational marketplace in recent years, most institutions have thus been marketized and driven to widely advertise themselves. In the region of Southeast Asia, there has been a high level of competition among the universities of its member countries. Thus, university texts were used as a salient device for those higher institutions to promote themselves. For this reason, this study attempts to analyze the promotional texts produced by higher institutions in this region, specifically in Thailand and Vietnam, in terms of generic structure, frequently used key words and persuasive techniques. The texts were taken from the vision and mission statements of 10 Thai universities and 10 Vietnamese universities’ websites in English version. Only prestigious universities of each country were selected in this study. Results have shown that the selected universities tend to promote their prestige, excellence in academic training and research as well as the social values of their settings. Besides, discourses used to present these issues were embellished by the following persuasive techniques: loaded words, praise, association, alliteration and assonance, connotation and metaphor. As the language use for university’s promotional text is considered a kind of language in advertising, promoting the institution’s academic potential can be the best way to persuade the public and those who plan to further study. However, in the context of the universities in Thailand and Vietnam, expressing support for cultures, identities or traditions of the country or of each regional setting is another important concept of their discourse community.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................x LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................................xi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Background ...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Study and Research Questions ..........................................................................5 1.3 Significance of the Study...........................................................................................................5 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Move Analysis...........................................................................................................................7 2.1.1 Studies of Move Analysis in University’s Texts........................................................9 2.2 Higher Education and Globalization........................................................................................16 2.2.1 Marketization of Educational Discourse…................................................................16 2.2.2 Significant Concepts for University’s Promotional Discourse.................................18 2.2.3 Impacts of Marketized Education on University’s Promotional Text.......................20 2.2.4 Higher Education and Institutional Websites...........................................................23 2.3 Persuasive Language and Higher Education Discourse...........................................................23 2.3.1 Persuasive Techniques..............................................................................................25 2.4 Concluding Remark of the Literature Review.........................................................................27 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY 3.1 The Selection of Prestigious Universities ...............................................................................28 3.1.1 University Profile......................................................................................................33 3.2 Data Collection........................................................................................................................30 3.3 Data Analysis and Analytical Tools........................................................................................32 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Sociocultural Background of Higher Institutions in Thailand and Vietnam...........................36 4.2 Move Analysis of the Universities Texts.................................................................................39 4.2.1 Generic Structure of Vision Statement.....................................................................39 4.2.2 Generic Structure of Mission Statement...................................................................43 4.2.3 Summary of Move Analysis.....................................................................................49 4.3 Words Frequency and University Texts..................................................................................49 4.3.1 Key words Indicating Marketized Discourse in Education......................................50 4.3.1.1 University’s Competence in Academic Training and Research................51 4.3.1.2 University’s Prestige..................................................................................53 4.3.1.3 University’s Role in Producing Human Resources...................................55 4.3.2 Key words Indicating Social Structure.....................................................................56 4.3.2.2 Role of Sociocultural Perspectives on a University’s Mission Statements………………………………………………...56 4.3.2.2 Role of Sociocultural Perspectives on a University’s Mission Statements………………………………………………...57 4.3.3 Summary of Words Frequency and University Texts...............................................60 4.4 Persuasive Techniques and University’s Texts........................................................................61 4.4.1 Extensive Use of Loaded Words...............................................................................62 4.4.2 Praise as a Persuasive Pattern...................................................................................63 4.4.3 Existence of Association...........................................................................................64 4.4.4 Presence of Alliteration and Assonance...................................................................65 4.4.5 Employment of Connotation.....................................................................................66 4.4.6 Use of Metaphor.......................................................................................................67 4.4.7 Summary of Persuasive Techniques and University texts........................................68 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION 5.1 Summary of the Findings and Implications.............................................................................69 5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research...................................................................72 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................74 APPENDICES..............................................................................................................................83

    Anctil, E. J. (2008). Selling higher education: Marketing and advertising. Higher Education Report, 34, 1–121.
    Afful, J. B. A. (2009). Rhetorical analysis of introductions in an undergraduate English studies course. English for Specific Purposes World, 5(26), 0-28.
    Allen, W., Bonous-Hammarth, M., & Teranishi, R. T. (2005). Institutional change and the transformative potential of the university. In C. Camp-Yeakey (Ed.), Advances in education in diverse communities: research, policy and praxis. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.
    Askehave, I. (2007). The impact on marketization on higher education genres: The international students prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723-742.
    Bautista, M. L. S. & Gonsalez, A. B. (2006). Southeast Asian Englishes. In B. B. Kachu, Y. Kachru, & C. L. Nelson (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 130-144). Malden, MA; Oxford; Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Baxter, A. (2011). Higher education mission and vision in Rwanda: A comparative and critical discourse analysis. Reconsidering Development Journal, 2(2). 1-26.
    Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/ culture/ power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Benjamin, S. (2003). Educational “Success” and the Standards Agenda: Hierarchical discourses in action. In G. Walford (Ed.), Investigating Educational Policy through Ethnography (Studies in Educational Ethnography, Volume 8) (pp.17-45). Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.
    Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
    Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.
    Bhatia, V. K. (2005). Generic patterns in promotional discourse. In H. Halmari, &
T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (pp. 213-
225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Bunzel, D. (2007). Universities sell their brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16(2), 152-153.
    Burbules, N. C. & Torres, C. A. (2000). Globalization and education: An introduction. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp.1-26). London: Routledge.
    Caiazzo, L. (2009). The hybridization of academic discourse: The ‘About us’ section of British and Indian university websites. Abstract retrieved 19 March, 2015 from http://www.genresonthemove2009.unina.it/abstracts/Caiazzo% 20Luisa.pdf
    Cheng, F. W. (2015). Genre and language analysis. Retrieved April 10, 2015 from the workshop on corpus-based ESP research held by Northern Taiwan Teaching and Learning Resources Center, Taipei.
    Collins, F. L. & Chong, H. K. (2012). Constructing a “Global University Centred in Asia”: Globalizing strategies and experiences at the National University of Singapore. In D.E. Neubauer & K. Kuroda (Eds.), Mobility and Migration in Asian Pacific (pp. 157-174). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Connor, U. & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47–62.
    Connor, U. & Traversa, A. (2013). The role of intercultural rhetoric in ESP education. In X. Deng & R. Seow (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth CELC Symposium for English Language Teachers (pp.19-24). Singapore: Centre for English Language Communication, National University of Singapore.
    Crocco, O. S. & Bunyawirat, N. (2014). English in ASEAN: Key effects. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 22(2). 22-27.
    Dainton. M, & Zelley, E. D. (2005). Chapter 5 Explaining theories of persuasion. Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction. pp. 103-131.
    Dayrell, C., Candido Jr, A., Lima, G., Machado Jr, D., Copestake, A., Feltrim, V. D., … Aluisio, S. (2012, May). Rhetorical move detection in English abstracts: Multi-label sentence classifiers and their annotated corpora. Paper presented at LREC 2012, pp.1604-1609. Istanbul, Turkey.
    Ding, H. L. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 368-392.
    Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ecklund, P. (2009), “Introduction to Excel 2007 Data tables and Data Table Exercises,” Available at http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~pecklund/ExcelReview/Excel%202007%20Data
    %20Table %20Notes.pdf.
    EP-Nuffic. (2015a). Education system Thailand - The Thai education system described and
    compared with the Dutch system. Den Haag: EP-Nuffic: Internationalising Education.
    EP-Nuffic. (2015b). Education system Vietnam - The Vietnam education system described and
    compared with the Dutch system. Den Haag: EP-Nuffic: Internationalising Education.
    Erkkilä, T. (2014). Global university rankings, transnational policy discourse and higher education in Europe. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 91-101.
    Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
    Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133-168.
    Fairclough, N. (2007). Global capitalism and change in higher education. Proceedings of the BAAL Annual Conference 2007, pp.131-140. London: Scitsiugnil Press.
    Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
    Fangsa, N. (2010). Rhetorical moves of PhD dissertation abstracts in educational administration. SDU Research Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 150-163.
    Goldman, C. (2009). Vietnamese Cultural Profile: An Initiative of QLD Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care. West End: Diversicare.
    Gray, B. J., Fam, K. S., & Llanes, V. A. (2003). Branding universities in Asian markets. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(2), 108-120.
    Guembe, P. G. (2014). Higher education as a marketable product: A critical discourse analysis of universities’ persuasive strategies to recruit students (Unpublished bachelor thesis). University of Llieda.
    Han, Z. (2014). The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities, Discourse & Communication, 8(1), 85-103.
    Hershock, P. D. (2012). Mobility, markets, and equity in higher education: match or mismatch? In D.E. Neubauer & K. Kuroda (Eds.), Mobility and Migration in Asian Pacific (pp. 21-37). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hoang, T. V. Y. & Rojas-Lizana, I. (2015). Promotional discourse in the websites of two Australian universities: A discourse analytic approach. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1-19.
    Hossler, D., Smith, J. L., & Vesper, N. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Huang, S. J. & Chang, Y. L. (2015). A move analysis of the "About Us" page on university engineering websites. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Language Learning 2015, pp. 1-18. Kobe, Japan: IAFOR.
    Huggard, R. Keaney, L. & Breuer, I. (2006). Insight outcomes English year 12. Mentone, Vitoria: Insight Publications Ltd.
    Hussein, B. A. S. (2012). The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis today. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 642-646.
    Hyland, K. (1997). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Jounal of Pramatics, 30, 437-455.
    Joseph, M., Mullen, E. W., & Spake, D. (2012). University branding: Understanding students’ choice of an educational institution. Journal of Brand Management, 20(1), 1-12.
    Kalemaj, S. (2014). Argumentation in contemporary persuasive discourse. European Scientific Journal, 10(11), 77-87.
    Kehm, B. M. (2014). Global university rankings: Impacts and unintended side effects. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 102-112.
    Kenechukwu, S. A., Asemah, E. S., Edegoh, L. O. N. (2013). Behind advertising: The language of persuasion. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(4), 951-959.
    Kheovichai, B. (2014). Marketized university discourse: A synchronic and diachronic comparison of the discursive constructions of employer organizations in academic and business job advertisements. Discourse & Communication, 8(4), 371-390.
    Kirkpatrick, A. (2012). English in ASEAN: Implications for regional multilingualism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 331-344.
    Intellectual Property Awareness Foundation. (2014). Teaching resources: A guide to understand persuasive language. Retrieved March 27, 2015 from http:// www.ipawareness.com.au/LiteratureRetrieve.aspx?ID=167349
    Labrador, B., Ramon, N., Alaiz-Moreton, H., & Sanjurjo-Gonzalez, H. (2014). Rhetorical structure and persuasive language in the subgenre of online advertisements. English for Specific Purposes, 34, 38-47.
    Lam, Y. Y. (2010). Impact of globalization on higher education: An empirical study of education policy & planning of design education in Hong Kong. International Education Studies, 3(4), 73-85.
    Loaded language. (n.d.). In YourDictionary’s online dictionary. Retrieved November 12 2015,
    from http://examples.yourdictionary.com/loaded-language-examples.html
    Maalej, Z. 1996. Persuasion in the discourse of billboard Tunisa. In Payne, R.M. (ed.), Language
    in Tunisa (pp.11-21). Tuniss: Bourguiba Institue of Modern Languages
    Mahadi, T. S. T., & Jafari, S. M. (2012). Language and culture. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(17), 230-235.
    Marginson, M. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45-59.
    McCollum, K. (1999). Colleges revamp web pages with professional help. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(45), A25–A26.
    Moody, A. (2012). English in Southeast Asian pop culture. In E. L. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Varieties of English around the World (VEAW) Series (pp.307–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Mayr, A. (2008). Langugae and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London; New York: Continuum.
    Nall, S. P., & Nall, T.M. (2009). Language and culture: Their relationships and linguistic impact. Retrieved January 26, 2015 from http://ir.lib.au.edu.tw/ bitstream/987654321/2619/1/CH10-conf.2009_su03_01.pdf
    Nguyen, Q. K. & Nguyen, Q. C. (2008). Education in Vietnam: Development History, Challenges, and Solutions. In B. Fredriksen & J. P. Tan (Eds.), An African exploration of the East Asian education experience (pp.109-154). Washington DC: he World Bank.
    Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
    O’ Donnell, M. (2008). UAM Corpus Tool 2.0. [Computer Software]. Madrid.
    Osman, H. (2006). An investigation of socio-cognitive strategies in university brochure. ESP Malaysia, 12, 39-51.
    Osman, H. (2008). Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: A genre perspective. Discourse & Communication, 2(1), 57-77.
    Saarinen, T. (2008). Persuasive presuppositions in OECD and EU higher education policy documents. Discourse Studies, 10(3), 341-359.
    Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. & Montazeran, H. (2012). The book review genre: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 6(1), 1-30.
    Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools (version 5). [Computer Software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
    Simpson, P. & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and Power: A resource book for student. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
    Suryani, I., Kamaruddin, H., Hashima, N., Yaacob, A., Rashid, S. A., & Desa, H. (2013). Rhetorical structures in academic research writing by non-native writers. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 29-38.
    Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Tarry, E. F. (2008). Thai students and their reasons for choosing to study in United Kingdom
    universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bath.
    Temesi, J. (2011). On the international ranking and classification of research universities. In Z. Szalai (Ed.), Higher Education in Hungary and the World Tendencies and Potentialities (pp. 42-55). Budapest: Mathias Convinus Collegiun.
    Thinh, D. H. & Phuong, H. T. M. (2012). Governance reform in higher education of Vietnam. Retrieved October 25, 2015 from http://www.globalasia.org/V4N3_Fall_2009/Hoang_Anh_
    Tuan.html?w=v4n3+fall+2009
    Upton, T. A. & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585-605.
    Vallely, T. J. & Wikinson, B. (2008). Vietnamese higher education: Crisis and response. (Vol. Memorandum, Higher Education Task Force). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School; Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation
    Van Dijk, T. A. (1981). Discourse studies and education. Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-26.
    Walford, G. (2003). Introduction: Investigating education policy. In G. Walford (Ed.) Investigating Educational Policy through Ethnography (pp.1-15), Amsterdam: Elservier.
    Walton, D. & Macagno, F. (2008). The argumentative structure of persuasive definitions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(5). 525-549.
    Wiezbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    Whitty, G. & Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 20, 93-107.
    Xiong, T. (2012). Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts, Discourse & Society, 23(3), 318-337.
    Yang, W. H. (2012). Analyzing and teaching keywords in hotel brochure context. Language for Special Purposes, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and cognition, 3(1), 32-50.
    Yang, W. H. (2013). ‘Why Choose Us?’ Texts in university websites: A genre analysis. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 5(1), 45-80.
    Zarei, G. R. & Darani, P. A. (2013). A comparative study of the rhetorical moves in spam emails:
    A cross-linguistic investigation between English and Persian Spammers. English for Specific Purposes World, 40(14), 1-13. Retrieved March 4, 2015 from http://www.esp-
    world.info/Articles_40/Darani.pdf

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2019/02/05 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2036/02/05 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2031/02/05 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE