簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王冠崴
Kuan-wei Wang
論文名稱: 台灣智慧型手機效能評估:模糊多準則(FANP)之應用
Performance Evaluation for Smartphones in Taiwan:The Application of Fuzzy Multiple Criteria (FANP)
指導教授: 張順教
Shun-chiao Chang
口試委員: 賴法才
Fav-tsoin Lai
廖文志
Wen-chih Liao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 137
中文關鍵詞: 智慧型手機模糊集理論混合模糊模式營運模式決策實驗室分析法BOCR模式多準則決策方法敏感度分析
外文關鍵詞: smartphone, Fuzzy set theory, hybrid Fuzzy model, business model, DEMATEL, BOCR model, MCDM methods, sensitivity analysis
相關次數: 點閱:339下載:23
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用混合式模糊多準則決策法來評估台灣的智慧型手機。本研究的架構涵概了BOCR四個主準則(Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks) (Saaty, 1996)以及二十六個質化與量化的次準則(qualitative and quantitative sub-criteria)。質化與量化次準則的挑選,是經由相關的文獻和專家群的討論而來。更進一步地,本研究利用決策實驗室分析法(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL)與模糊網路層級分析法(Fuzzy Analytic Network Process, FANP),來獲得主構面彼此之間的因果關係並計算各評估指標的權重值。此外,透過ANP的敏感度分析(sensitivity analysis)來確認方案的排名是否因指標的權重變化而影響。最後,透過先前取得的權重,我們得以使用折衷排序法(VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, VIKOR)來排序方案,找出台灣最佳的智慧型手機。研究結果顯示以下資訊。就主構面而言,重要性按照順序為利益、成本、機會,以及風險。就次構面而言,前五名的指標為營收成長、產品成本、研發成本、行銷與銷售以及獲利能力。就ANP的敏感度分析來看,假如成本的權重提高到83.4%,Huawei Ascend P系列將會擊敗LG L系列,由第六名晉升成第五名;假如機會的權重提高到51.5%,HTC One系列將會擊敗Samsung Galaxy系列,由第三名晉升為第二名; 假如機會的權重提高到74.5%,Sony Xperia系列將會擊敗Samsung Galaxy系列,由第四名晉升為第三名。就方案的排名來說,按照順序為Apple iPhone 5系列、Samsung Galaxy系列、HTC One Series、Sony Xperia Series、LG L Series,以及Huawei Ascend P系列。最後,我們希望這個評估模式可以作為參考依據,有效的提升公司績效,促進產業的發展。


    This study adopts hybrid Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach to evaluate smartphones in Taiwan. The research structure is inclusive of BOCR (Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks) (Saaty, 1996) criteria and twenty-six sub-criteria. The selection of sub-criteria is through much literature and discussions of related experts, inclusive of qualitative and quantitative indicators. Furthermore, this study utilizes the DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) and the FANP (Fuzzy Analytic Network Process) to obtain causalities among the BOCR criteria and calculate weights of evaluation indicators. In addition, through the sensitivity analyses, we can confirm whether the ranking of alternatives change as weights are adjusted. Eventually, by previous obtained weights, we can use the VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) to rank alternatives and pick up the best smartphone in Taiwan. The result demonstrates the following information. In terms of criteria, the importance is Benefits, Costs, Opportunities, and Risks in ranking order. In terms of sub-criteria, the Top Five indicators are Revenue growth, Product costs, RD costs, Marketing and sales, and Profitability. In terms of sensitivity analysis of ANP, if the weight of Costs is up to 83.4%, the Huawei Ascend P Series will defeat the LG L Series as the fifth place; if the weight of Opportunities is up to 51.5%, the HTC One Series will defeat the Samsung Galaxy Series as the second place; if the weight of Opportunities is up to 74.5%, the Sony Xperia Series will defeat the Samsung Galaxy Series as the third place. In terms of alternatives, the ranking of branded smartphones is Apple iPhone 5 Series, Samsung Galaxy Series, HTC One Series, Sony Xperia Series, LG L Series, Huawei Ascend P Series in order. At last, we hope this evaluation model can be a reference to elevate performance of firms and to promote the development of industry.

    中文摘要 Abstract Contents List of Tables List of Figures Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1.2 Research problems and objectives 1.3 Research framework Chapter 2 Smartphone-related Industry Chapter 3 Methodology 3.1 The BOCR model 3.2 The DEMATEL method 3.3 Fuzzy set theory and Fuzzy numbers 3.4 Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods 3.4.1 The FAHP method 3.4.2 The FANP method 3.4.3 The VIKOR method Chapter 4 Construct an Evaluation Model for Smartphones Chapter 5 Empirical Results 5.1 Analysis of the DEMATEL method 5.2 Analysis of the FANP method 5.3 Sensitivity analysis 5.4 Analysis of the VIKOR Chapter 6 Conclusions, Suggestions, and Limitations References Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C

    References
    Amiri, M., Zandieh, M., Soltani, R., and Vahdani, B. (2009). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(10), 12314-12322.
    Ayağ, Z., and Özdemir, R. G. (2009). A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(1), 368-379.
    Ayağ, Z., and Özdemir, R. G. (2012). Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), 630-636.
    Birgelen, M. V., Ruyter, K. D., Jong, A. D., and Wetzels, M. (2002). Customer evaluations of after-sales service contact modes: An empirical analysis of national culture’s consequences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(1), 43-64.
    Büyüközkan, G., and Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
    Cebeci, U. (2009). Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8900-8909.
    Chan, F. T. S., and Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using Fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417-431.
    Chan, S. L., Ip, W. H., and Cho, V. (2010). A model for predicting customer value from perspectives of product attractiveness and marketing strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1207-1215.
    Chang, B., Chang, C. W., and Wu, C. H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850-1858.
    Chang, S. C. (2011), High-tech industry and Strategic Analysis.
    Chang, S. C. (2012), Exploring the e-book Business Model Selection for Taiwan’s e-book Firms: The Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Chang, S. C., and Tsai, P. H. (2013). A hybrid financial performance evaluation model for wealth management banks following the global financial crisis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. In Press
    Chen, C. T. (2001). A Fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center.
    Chen, F. H., Hsu, T. S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 908-932.
    Chen, H. H., Lee, A. H. I., and Kang, H. Y. (2010a). A model for strategic selection of feeder management systems: A case study. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 32(5), 421-427.
    Chen, H. S., Wang, P. W., Chen, C. M., and Lee, H. T. (2010b). An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(2), 278-287.
    Chen, M. F., Tzeng, G. H., and Tang, T. I. (2005). Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of expatriate assignments. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4(2), 277-296.
    Cheng, C. C., Chen, C. T., Hsu, F. S., and Hu, H. Y. (2012). Enhancing service quality improvement strategies of fine-dining restaurants: New insights from integrating a two-phase decision-making model of IPGA and DEMATEL analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1155-1166.
    Chou, W. C., and Cheng, Y. P. (2012). A hybrid fuzz MCDM approach for evaluating website quality of professional accounting firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2783-2793.
    Chou, Y. C., Sun, C. C., and Yen, H. Y. (2012). Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), 64-71.
    Chou, Y., Lee, C., and Chung, J. (2004). Understanding M-commerce payment systems through the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1423-1430.
    Cook, W. D., and Hababou, M. (2001). Sales performance measurement in bank branches. Omega, 29(4), 299-307.
    Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Wei, K. K., and Zhang, J. (2010). Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study of mobile instant messages in China. International Journal of Information Management, 30(4), 289-300.
    Dey, S., Kumar, A., Ray, A., and Pradhan, B. B. (2012). Supplier selection: Integrated theory using DEMATEL and quality function deployment methodology. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2111-2116.
    Dytczak, M., and Ginda, G. (2009). Identification of building repair policy choice criteria role. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(2), 213-228.
    Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., and Vahdani, B. (2012). A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4197-4217.
    Ergu, Daji., and Peng, Yi (2013). A framework for SaaS software packages evaluation and selection with virtual team and BOCR of analytic network process. Journal of Supercomputing,67(1),219-238
    Eroğmuş, Ş., Kapanoglu, M., and Koç, E. (2005). Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(4), 391-399.
    Flint, D. J., Blocker, C. P., and Boutin Jr., P. J. (2011). Customer value anticipation, customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical examination. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 219-230.
    Fontela, E., and Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report, Switzerland, Geneva, Battelle Geneva Research Center.
    Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E. K., and Haji Moini, S. H. (2012). A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: Case study of construction company. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), 164-188.
    Fu, H. P., Chu, K. K., Chao, P., Lee, H. H., and Liao, Y. C. (2011). Using Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR for benchmarking analysis in the hotel industry. Service Industries Journal, 31(14), 2373-2389.
    Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118(1), 65–73.
    Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating with Those Bearing Collective Responsibility, DEMATEL Report No. 1. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
    Gaiardelli, P., Saccani, N., and Songini, L. (2007). Performance measurement of the after-sales service network-Evidence from the automotive industry. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 698-708.
    Ghassemi, S. A., and Danesh, S. (2013). A hybrid Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for desalination process selection. Desalination, 313, 44-50.
    Gray, J. V., Roth, A. V., and Leiblein, M. J. (2011). Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7), 737-752.
    Heo, E., Kim, J., and Cho, S. (2012). Selecting hydrogen production methods using Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with opportunities, costs, and risks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(23), 17655-17662.
    Jadhav, A. S., and Sonar, R. M. (2009). Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), 555-563.
    Jadhav, A. S., and Sonar, R. M. (2011). Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(8), 1394-1407.
    Jassbi, J., Mohamadnejad, F., and Nasrollahzadeh, H. (2011). A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5967-5973.
    Jung, U., and Seo, D. W. (2010). An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependences between research objective and evaluation criteria. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 335-342.
    Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., and Dogan, Y. (2003). Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences, 157, 135-153.
    Korhonen, P., and Voutilaninen, R. (2006). Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1285-1299.
    Lee, A. H. I., Chang, H. J., and Lin, C. Y. (2009). An evaluation model of buyer-supplier relationships in high-tech industry-The case of an electronic components manufacturer in Taiwan. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(4), 1417-1430.
    Lee, A. H. I., Chen, H. H., and Kang, H. Y. (2011b). A model to analyze strategic products for photovoltaic silicon thin-film solar cell power industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(2), 1271-1283.
    Lee, A.H.I. (2009). A Fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2),2879–2893
    Lee, C. Y., Lee, H. Y., Seol, H. N., and Park, Y. T. (2011c). Evaluation of new service concepts using rough set theory and group analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3404-3412.
    Lee, H., Kim, C., and Park, Y. (2010). Evaluation and management of new service concepts: An ANP-based portfolio approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(4), 535-543.
    Lee, J. W., and Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27(4), 367-382.
    Lee, Y., and Kozar, K. A. (2006). Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1383-1401.
    Li, Y., and Liao, X. (2007). Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance. Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2043-2059.
    Liang, C., and Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 810-820.
    Lin, C. L., Chen, C. W., and Tzeng, G. H. (2010b). Planning the development strategy for the mobile communication package based on consumers’ choice preferences. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4749-4760.
    Lin, H. Y., Hsu, P. Y., and Sheen, G. J. (2007). A Fuzzy-based decision-making procedure for data warehouse system selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 939-953.
    Lin, Y. T., Yang, Y. H., Kang, J. S., and Yu, H. C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6262-6268.
    Liou, J. J. H., and Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Comments on “multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview”. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(4), 672-695.
    Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., Tsai, C. Y., and Hsu, C. C. (2011). A hybrid ANP model in Fuzzy environments for strategic alliance partner selection in the airline industry. Applied Soft Computing, 11(4), 3515-3524.
    Liu, H. T., and Tsai, Y. L. (2012). A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Safety Science, 50(4), 1067-1078.
    Liu, J. W., Cheng, C. H., Chen, Y. H., and Chen, T. L. (2010). OWA rough set model for forecasting the revenues growth rate of the electronic industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 610-617.
    Macharis, C., Springael, J., Brucker, K. D., and Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: Strengthening Promethee with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317.
    Markarian, G. Pozza, L., and Prencipe, A. (2008). Capitalization of R&D costs and earnings management: Evidence from Italian listed companies. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 246-267.
    Menor, L. M., Tatikonda, M. V., and Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135-157.
    Moon, J., Chadee, D., and Tikoo, S. (2008). Culture, product type, and price influences on consumer purchase intention to buy personalized products online. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 31-39.
    Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
    Ramanathan, R. (2010). The moderating roles of risk and efficiency on the relationship between logistics performance and customer loyalty in e-commerce. Transportation Research Part E, 46(6), 950-962.
    Saaty ,T.L.(1971) “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.40, pp. 9-10.
    Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill Publications.
    Saaty, T. L., and Özdemir, M. (2003). Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37(9), 1063-1075.
    Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., and Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.
    Sevkli, M., Oztekin, A., Uysal, O., Torlak, G., Turkyilmaz, A., and Delen D. (2012). Development of a Fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 14-24.
    Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., and Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277-282.
    Shiue, Y. C., and Lin, C. Y. (2012). Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy and Buildings, 54, 266-277.
    Sipahi, S., and Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: An overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808.
    Tsai, P. H., and Chang, S. C. (2013). Comparing the Apple iPad and non-Apple camp tablet PCs: A multicriteria decision analysis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(SI), S256-S284
    Tung, S. L., and Tang, S. L. (1998). A comparison of the Saaty’s AHP and modified AHP for right and left eigenvector inconsistency. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 123-128.
    Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., and Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
    Voss, C., Johnston, R., Silvestro, R., Fitzgerald, L., and Brignall, T. (1992). Measurement of innovation and design performance in services. Design Management Journal, 3(1), 40-46.
    Wang, C. H., Lu, I. Y., and Chen, C. B. (2010). Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with non-additive Fuzzy integral for evaluating high technology firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 413-426.
    Wang, Y. L., and Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5600-5615.
    Wijnmalen, D. J. D. (2007). Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 892-905.
    Wu, C. R., Lin, C. T., and Tsai, P. H. (2009). Analysing alternatives in financial services for wealth management banks: The analytic network process and the balanced scorecard. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 20(3), 303-321.
    Wu, C. R., Lin, C. T., and Tsai, P. H. (2010). Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 971-979.
    Wu, H. Y., Lin, Y. K., and Chang, C. H. (2011). Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 37-50.
    Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828-835.
    Wu, W. W. (2012). Segmenting critical factors for successful knowledge management implementation using Fuzzy DEMATEL method. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), 527-535.
    Yang, H. W., and Chang, K. F. (2012). Combining means-end chain and fuzzy ANP to explore customers’ decision process in selecting bundies. International Journal of Information Management, 32(4), 381-395.
    Yüksel, İ., and Dağdeviren, M. (2010). Using the Fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1270-1278.
    Yurdakul, M., and Tansel İç, Y. (2004). AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 88(3), 269-289.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Parts 1-3. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199-249, 301-357; 9(1), 43-80.
    Zavadaskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamosaitiene, J., and Marina, V. (2008). Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 462-477.
    Zavadskas, E. K., and Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397-427.

    QR CODE