從全球航空事故的資料來看，飛行員實為飛航安全的核心。因此，對飛航人員之「飛行決策」的研究與了解，是提升飛航安全不能忽視的課題。
本研究採「關鍵事例法」，以實際飛行訓練課目為研究之主題，淬取出每個飛行訓練課目中與「飛行決策」相關之因素，作為精進「飛行訓練」之參考。並運用飛行決策訓練模式，探討加強飛行訓練之方法。
經研究分析後，本論文蒐集歸納一般飛行過程中飛行員易犯疏失的潛在因素，發現飛行員普遍認為應具備足夠的飛行決策能力，才能確保飛安。飛行決策項目經量化分析結果，找出依賴正確決策的迫切程度。各決策能力經權重分析結果，可知經驗在飛行訓練中為須最重視之訓練項目。最後本論文建構加強訓練模式，未來更可套用其他各種飛行決策模式，來推導飛行訓練，藉以強化飛行員因應各種狀況，降低人為因素所導致之飛安事件。

Statistics by the global aviation accident, the pilot is the key factor of the flight safety. Therefore, the study of “aeronautical decision making” (ADM) is a serious topic that promotes the flight safety.
This research adopts the “critical incident technique” (CIT) and takes the actual training course as the sample. The ADM factors are extracted from the training course to be the references of the flight train. Then make use of the ADM training mode and develop to enhance the flight training methods.
After analyzing, this thesis collects the latent factors of failures that the pilot makes in flight process and finds that the pilots think of the ADM as the guarantee of flight safety. Through the quantization analysis, the urgent degrees of correct ADM items are found out. The results of the weighting analysis in ADM item, it finds that the experience is the most important item in the flight train. Finally stage, this thesis constructs to strengthen the training mode to deduce to the training. In the future, the ADM items can be used in other ADM training modes to strengthen the pilot’s responsibility and reduce the artificial factors to cause the aviation accident.

[1] Jensen, R. and Hunter, D., General aviation aeronautical decision-making, Washington, D.C. ,2002.
[2] Zakay, D., “The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress,” Svenson, O. and Maule, A. J. (editor), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making, pp. 59-72, New York: Plenum, 1993.
[3] Buch, G. and Diehl, A., “An investigation of the effectiveness of pilot judgment training,” Human factors, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 557-564, 1984.
[4] O'Hare, D., “The artful decision maker: a framework model for aeronautical decision making,” The international journey of aviation psychology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175-192, 1992.
[5] Klein, G. A. and Woods, D. D., “Conclusions: decision making in action,” G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, and C. E. Zsambok (editor), Decision making in action: models and methods, pp. 404-411, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1993.
[6] Jensen, R. S., “The boundaries of aviation psychology, human factors, aeronautical decision making, situation awareness, and crew resource management,” The international journal of aviation psychology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 259-268, 1997.
[7] Kaempf, G. L. and Orasanu, J., “Current and future applications of naturalistic decision making,” Zsambok, C. E. and Klein, G. (editor), Naturalistic decision making, pp. 81-90, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
[8] O'Hare, D., “Aeronautical decision making: metaphors, models, and methods,” Tsang, P. S. and Vidulich, M. A. (Editor), Principles and practice of aviation psychology: human factors in transportation, pp. 201-237, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
[9] Diehl, A., “The effectiveness of training programs for preventing aircrew error,” Sixth international symposium on aviation psychology, pp. 640-655, the Ohio state university, 1991.
[10] Lee, T. H. and Lee, Y. H., “An investigation of stability limit while holding a load,” Ergonomics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 446-454, 2003.
[11] Lee, Y. H. and Lee, T. H., “Muscle responses while holding an unstable load,” Clinical biomechanics, vol. 17, pp. 250-256, 2002.
[12] Lee, Y. H. and Kamg, S. M., “Effect of belt tension and breath-held on trunk muscle EMG”, SPINE, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 282-290, 2002.
[13] Lee, Y.H. and Kuo, C.L., “Factor structure of trunk performance data for healthy subjects,” Clinical biomechanics, vol. 15, pp. 221-227, 2000.
[14] McCormick, E. J. and Sanders, M. S., Human factors in engineering and design (5th ed.), Japan: McGraw-Hill, 1983.
[15] Hawkins, F. H., Human factors in flight, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1987.
[16] Reason, J., Managing the risks of organizational accidents, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1997.
[17] Dekker, S. “The re-invention of human error,” Human factors and aerospace safety, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 247-266, 2001.
[18] Reason, J., Human error, New York: Cambridge University, 1990.
[19] Orasanu, J. and Connolly, T., “The reinvention of decision making,” Klein,G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E. (editor), Decision making in action: models and methods, pp. 3-20, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1993.
[20] Prince, C. and Salas, E., “Situation assessment for routine flight and decision making,” International journal of cognitive ergonomics, vol. 1 no. 4, pp. 315-324, 1997.
[21] Orasanu, J., Davison, J., and Fischer, U., “The role of risk in aviation decision making: How pilots perceive and manage flight risks,” Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 45th annual meeting, pp. 58-62, Santa Monica, USA: Human factors and ergonomics society, 2001.
[22] Jensen, R. S., Pilot judgment and crew resource management, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1995.
[23] Prince, C. and Salas, E., “Team situation awareness, errors, and crew resource management: research integration for training guidance,” Endsley, M. R. and Garland, D. J. (editor), Situation awareness analysis and measurement, pp. 325-345, London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
[24] Waag, W. L. and Bell, H. H., “Situation assessment and decision making in skilled fighter pilots,” Zsambok, C. E. and Klein, G. (editor), Naturalistic decision making, pp. 247-256, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
[25] Stokes, A. F., Kemper, K., and Kite, K., “Aeronautical decision making, cue recognition, and expertise under time pressure,” Zsambok, C. E. and Klein, G. (editor), Naturalistic decision making, pp. 183-196, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbuam, 1997.
[26] Drillings, M. and Serfaty, D., “Naturalistic decision making in command and control,” Zsambok, C. E. and Klein, G. (editor), Naturalistic decision making, pp. 71-80, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
[27] Diehl, A. “Human performance/system safety issues in aircraft accident investigation and prevention,” Fifth international symposium on aviation psychology, pp. 838-847, The Ohio State University, 1989.
[28] Helmreich, R. L. and Merritt, A. C., Culture at work in aviation and medicine: national, organizational and professional influences, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1998.
[29] Hammond, K. R. “Naturalistic decision making from a brunswikian viewpoint: its past, present, future,” Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E. (editor), Decision making in action: models and methods, pp. 205-227, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1993.
[30] Rasmussen, J. “Skills, rule, and knowledge; signals, sign, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models,” The IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 257-266, 1983.
[31] Rasmussen, J., “Deciding and doing: decision making in natural contexts,” Orasanu,G. A. J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E. (editor), Decision making in action: models and methods, pp. 158-171, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1993.
[32] Murray, S. R., “Deliberate decision making by aircraft pilots: A simple reminder to avoid decision making under panic,” International journal of aviation studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 83-100, 1997.
[33] Wiggins, M. W. and Stevens, C., Aviation social science: research methods in practice, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999.
[34] Seamster, T. L., Redding, R. E., and Kaempf, G. L., Applied cognitive task analysis in aviation, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1997.
[35] Robson, C., Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers, Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, 1993.