簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱明柔
Ming-Jou Chiu
論文名稱: 建構金融預警模型-以CAMELS與CARSEL為基礎
Constructing Financial Distress Model- Based on CAMELS and CARSEL Ratings
指導教授: 張琬喻
Woan-Yuh Jang
口試委員: 李美杏
Mei-Hsing Lee
繆維中
Wei-Chung Miao
張琬喻
Woan-Yuh Jang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 72
中文關鍵詞: 財務困境預警模型CAMELSCARSEL法令遵循制度重大裁罰案件洗錢防制資訊安全國內系統性重要銀行(D-S Bs)
外文關鍵詞: Financial Distress Model, CAMELS, CARSEL, Regulation Compliance, Key Audit Matters, Money Laundering Prevention, Information Security, Domestic Systemic Important Banks
相關次數: 點閱:307下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 銀行對國家經濟發展舉足輕重,完善的金融制度是穩定國家經濟的基礎,如果能提前預測銀行財務困境的發生,便可以減少事件發生所造成的衝擊。此外,因為全球銀行業務多元化發展,對各國銀行而言,建立完善且有效的金融預警制度是必要且立即的。
    為此,本研究以計量方法建構本國銀行財務困境預警模型,即銀行財務困境為應變數(Y),並以美國CAMELS信用評級指標及台灣央行所創立之CARSEL信用評級指標為主要分析基礎,兩組信用評級指標共涵蓋八大面向,分別為C、A、M、E、L、S、R及SS。本研究將這些面向與國際金融政策、主管機關金融改革、金融相關法規標準等做連結,挑選出合適的量化指標作為本研究之自變數(X)。同時為考慮研究變數全面性,本研究亦將質化指標進行量化研究,例如,法令遵循制度上,以重大裁罰案件之裁罰金額、件數進行量化分析;針對金融科技近年熱門議題,如洗錢防制與資訊安全等,也納入研究變數中。此外,也因應國內系統性重要銀行(D-S Bs)之監理政策,將其加入虛擬變數中。
    為考量時間序列與研究變數變動的關係,本研究利用panel data進行樣本資料蒐集,以提升實證結果的價值性;統計方法上,則以固定效果模型進行計量分析,並合理且客觀解讀以CAMELS與CARSEL信用評級指標所建構的財務困境模型對本國銀行財務困境的解釋力;最後,本研究建構一套比上述兩模型更具解釋力之新模型,並對銀行管理當局提出建議,及時糾正與改善我國銀行危機狀況。


    Commercial banks play a pivotal role in its economy. While banking operating activities diversification can potentially cause distress, the financial distress model might help banks to avoid this situation.
    This study aims to develop a financial distress model which makes a better prediction of banking distress, as well as better identifying the predictors of financial distress for Taiwanese commercial banks. Basing on CAMELS and CARSEL ratings in total of eight aspects, namely Capital adequacy (C) , Asset quality (A), Management (M), Earnings (E), Liquidity (L), Sensitivity to market risk(S), Regulations compliance (R)、Strategies and Stability (SS), this study selects appropriate parameters as the independent variables(X).
    This study not only follows international financial rules and national policies enhancing the explanation, but also tries to transform more qualitative indicators into quantitative indicators being more comprehensive. For example, in Regulation compliance, major penalties about money laundering prevention and information security could be variables in the research. In addition, this study adds variable in response to the supervision policy of the domestic systemic important banks (D-S Bs).
    In the end, to construct high significance levels and good explanatory power in the model, this study uses several statistical methods such as descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, variance inflation faction, and multiple regression analysis. In the contribution, based on financial ratios containing all other banks’ value and results in this study, it is useful to bankers and regulators to identify banking problems in Taiwan.

    目錄 摘要 iii ABSTRACTiv 致謝 v 目錄 vi 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 CAMEL&CAMELS信用評級指標 5 第二節 CARSEL信用評級指標 7 第三章 研究方法與實證模型 11 第一節 研究架構 11 第二節 研究變數及定義 13 第三節 資料蒐集 24 第四節 統計方法 27 第五節 實證模型 32 第四章 實證結果與分析 33 第一節 敘述性統計 33 第二節 共線性分析 36 第三節 多元迴歸分析 42 第四節 實證結果 52 第五章 結論、貢獻與建議 54 第一節 研究目的之成效 54 第二節 研究貢獻 55 第三節 研究限制 56 第四節 後續之研究建議 57 參考文獻 59 中文文獻 59 英文文獻 60

    中文文獻
    余紀瑩(2019),金管會裁罰案件對金控公司股票報酬率的影響,國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系碩士論文。
    李光傲(2006),台灣金控公司績效因子之實證,國立中興大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    李榮謙(2001),貨幣銀行學,智勝文化出版。
    李蓮婷(2010), CAMELS與經營績效之關聯性-以台灣銀行業為例,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
    林維義(2000),金融預警制度之建立對強化金融監理與存保機制功能之探討,存款保險季刊,13(3),1-81。
    梁榮輝、徐中琦、廖振盛(2007),台灣外商銀行財務經營績效與影響因素之實證研究,華人經濟研究,5(2),49-70。
    許振明(2009),建置國際金融海嘯後預警機制之研究,台灣金融研訓院。
    陳美菊(2009),全球金融危機之成因、影響及因應,經濟研究。
    蔡曜如(2010),全球金融危機專輯-金融危機對金融體系與總體經濟之影響,中央銀行。

    英文文獻
    Asquith P., R. Gertner, and D. Sharfstein, (1994). Anatomy of Financial Distress: An Explanation of Junk Bond Issuers, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 625-658.
    Baral K.J., (2005). Health Check-up of Commercial Banks in the Framework of CAMEL: A Case Study of Joint Venture Banks in Nepal, The Journal of Nepalese Business Studies, 2(1), 41-55.
    Barth J.R., G.J Caprio, and R. Levine, (2004). Bank Regulation and Supervision: What Works Best?, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(2), 205-248.
    Berger A.N., and C. Bouwman, (2009). Bank Liquidity Creation, The Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779-3837.
    Bouvatier V., and L. Lepetit, (2012). Effects of loan loss provisions on growth in bank lending : Some international comparisons. Économie internationale, 4(4), 91-116.
    Boyd J.H., C. Chang, and B. Smith, (1998). Moral Hazard Under Commercial and Universal Banking, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 30, 426-468.
    Demirguc-Kunt A., and H. Huizinga, (2010). Bank Activity and Funding Strategies: The Impact on Risk and Returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 626-650.
    Duarte P., J.F. Low, and A. Schiffauerova, (2018), Balancing Risk and Revenue: Cost of Quality within the Banking Industry, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 35(10), 2181-2194.
    Gasbarro D., I.G.M. Sadguna, and J K. Zumwalt, (2002). The Changing Relationship between CAMEL Ratings and Bank Soundness During the Indonesian Banking Crisis, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19(3), 247-260.
    Hays F.H., S.A.De Lurgio, and A.H. Gilbert, (2009). Efficiency Ratios and Community Bank Performance, Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 1(1), 1-15.
    Hughes J.P., and L.J. Mester, (2013). Measuring the Performance of Banks: Theory, Practice, Evidence, and Some Policy Implications, Working Paper, 13-31.
    Kurum. ME, and E Öztürk, (2020). A CAMELS Analysis of Selected Banks in Turkey After the Crisis in 2008, Contributions to Management Science, 301-321
    Muhmad S.N, and H.A Hashim, (2015). Using The CAMEL Framework in Assessing Bank Performance in Malaysia, International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 23(1), 109-127.
    Munir B.B.M, and U.S.A. Bustamam, (2017). Camel Ratio on Profitability Banking Performance (Malaysia versus Indonesia), International Journal of Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Research, 3(1), 30-39.
    Rahman S., L.H. Tan, O.L. Hew, and Y.S. Tan, (2004). Identifying Financial Distress Indicators of Selected Banks in Asia, Journal of Asian Economics, 18(1), 45-57.
    Sangmi M.U.D., and T. Nazir, (2010). Analyzing Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in India: Application of CAMEL Model, Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 4(1), 40-55.
    Scholtens.B, and S.Van 't Klooster, (2019). Sustainability and Bank Risk. Palgrave Communications,5(105),1-8.
    Shaddady.A, and T.Moore, (2019), Investigation of the effects of financial regulation and supervision on bank stability: The application of CAMELS-DEA to quantile regressions, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 58, 96-116
    Shrieves R., and D. Dahl, (1992), The Relationship between Risk and Capital in Commercial Banks, Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(2), 439-457.
    Siems T.F., (1992). Quantifying Management’s Role in Bank Survival, Economic Review, 29-41.
    West R.C., (1985). A Factor-Analytic Approach to Bank Condition, Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(2), 253-266.
    Whitaker R.B., (1999). The Early Stages of Financial Distress. Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 123-132
    Youngdahl W.E., and D.L. Kellogg, (1997). The Relationship between Service Customers' Quality Assurance Behaviors, Satisfaction, and Effort: A Cost of Quality Perspective, The Journal of Operations Management, 15(1), 19-32.
    Mustafa E.K, and O. Eray, (2020). A CAMELS Analysis of Selected Banks in Turkey After the Crisis in 2008, Strategic Priorities in Competitive Environments, 301-321.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/07/20 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/07/20 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/07/20 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE