隨著世界各國對於氣候議題日漸重視，身為島國的我們須更注重資源的使用，因此我國透過各產業綠色轉型，研發淨零技術、綠色金融等，帶動新一次的經濟成長。而台灣的建築產業貴為經濟的火車頭，不僅牽動的全國GDP產值還影響整個供應鏈，但同時也是高耗能產業,國際能源總署提出建築產業為全球最大的碳排放來源，有27％的碳排放是來自房屋使用的期間，而有10％則是來自於建造時所產生的碳排放，造就建築產業朝向零碳排放還有相當大的努力空間。
隨著使用者需求的調整變化，既有的土地、建物空間就將產生變動，因此伴隨著大量的建築行動，對於地球環境也造成不可復原的破壞，而相較於傳統建築工法，循環式建築能讓建築富有彈性、消耗的資源也能回收再生，在維護住宅安全及品質下，對於地球環境的保護也能夠有所貢獻，因此本研究主要目的為探討台灣循環建築目前所面臨的窒礙因素，並提出相關推動策略以落實建築產業發展，雖然循環式建築在台灣雖已行之有年，相關理論及技術都已逐步發展，但在產業界中，卻只有零星個案採用，未見大規模的產業變革，很明顯與市場端有所脫鉤。因此本研究透過文獻回顧對國內外案例進行分析，以建築生命週期(設計階段、施工階段、使用階段、處置階段)整理出發展策略的評估因子，並透過量化分析(針對循環建築在成本面、技術面、市場面及法規面四個面向)及訪談方式探討建築產業推動上可能出現之窒礙因素，用以擬定未來推動的相關策略，提供政府在推行相關技術應用及新創概念時的參考依據。

With the increasing global focus on climate issues, our island nation must pay more attention to resource usage. Therefore, our country is promoting green transformation in various industries, developing net-zero technologies, green finance, and driving a new wave of economic growth. Taiwan's construction industry, as a leading driver of the economy, not only affects the national GDP but also the entire supply chain. However, it is also a high-energy-consuming industry. The International Energy Agency has identified the construction industry as the largest source of global carbon emissions, with 27% of emissions coming from building use and 10% from construction activities. This highlights the significant room for effort in achieving zero-carbon emissions in the construction industry.
As user demands and adjustments change, existing land and building spaces undergo modifications. Consequently, with extensive construction activities, irreversible damage to the Earth's environment occurs. In comparison to traditional construction methods, circular construction allows for flexibility in buildings and the recycling and regeneration of consumed resources. By ensuring housing safety and quality, it also contributes to the protection of the Earth's environment. Therefore, this study aims to explore the current obstacles faced by circular construction in Taiwan and propose relevant strategies to implement the development of the construction industry.
Although circular construction has been practiced in Taiwan for several years, with the gradual development of related theories and technologies, its adoption in the industry has been sporadic, and there has been no large-scale industrial transformation. This clearly indicates a disconnection from the market. Therefore, through a literature review and analysis of domestic and international cases, this study evaluates the factors influencing the development strategies in the architectural life cycle (design stage, construction stage, use stage, disposal stage). It also employs quantitative analysis (focusing on cost, technology, market, and regulations) and interviews to investigate potential obstacles to promoting circular construction in the industry. This research aims to formulate relevant strategies for future promotion and provide a reference for the government in implementing related technology applications and new concepts.

1. Accenture. (2014). Circular Advantage Innovative Business Models and
Technologies to Create Value in a World without Limits to Growth.
2. Achterberg, E., Hinfelaar, J., Bocken, N.M.P. (2016). Master Circular Business with
the Value Hill. Circle Economy & Sustainable Finance Lab. (Chang & Hsieh, 2019;
Hart et al., 2019a; Hossain et al., 2020a)
3. Ajayabi, A., Chen, H.-M., Zhou, K., Hopkinson, P., Wang, Y., & Lam, D. (2019).
REBUILD: Regenerative Buildings and Construction systems for a Circular
Economy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 225(1), 012015.
4. Barros, M. V., Salvador, R., do Prado, G. F., de Francisco, A. C., & Piekarski, C. M.
(2021). Circular economy as a driver to sustainable businesses.
5. Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. do C. D., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy
in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. In Journal of Cleaner
Production (Vol. 260, p. 121046).
6. Calogirou, C., Sorensen, S. Y., Bjorn Larsen, P., & Alexopoulou, S. (2010). SMEs 4
and the environment in the European Union. PLANET SA and DanishTechnological
Institute, Published by European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.
7. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2012). Towards the Circular Economy. Economic
and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
8. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Growth within: A Circular Economy Vision
for a Competitive Europe
9. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2016). Intelligent Assets: Unlocking the circular
economy potential.
10. Grafström, J., & Aasma, S. (2021). Breaking circular economy barriers. In Journal
of Cleaner Production (Vol. 292, p. 126002). Elsevier Ltd.
11. Hollins, O. (2011). The Further Benefits of Business Resource Efficiency, Research
report completed for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
12. Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Sarkis,
Joseph & Filho, Moacir Godinho,( 2019.), Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 546-552.
13. OECD. (2010b). Regulatory Policy and the Road to Sustainable Growth, Paris.
14. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for
visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
15. Pomponi, Francesco and Moncaster, Alice (2017). Circular economy for the built
environment: A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143 pp.
16. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Kafyeke, T., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M.,& loannou, A. (2015).
The Circular Economy: Barriers and Opportunities for SMEs. CEPS Working
Documents.
17. Studer, S., Welford, R., & Hills, P. (2006). Engaging Hong Kong businesses in
environmental change: drivers and barriers.
18. Wycherley, I. (1999). Greening supply chains: the case of the Body Shop
International. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8 (2), 120.
19. 馬鴻文、劉柏定、李芸英(2016)。台灣中小企業轉型至循環經濟的挑戰與
契機。中技社，2016-05
20. 黃育徵(2017)循環經濟。臺北:天下雜誌。
21. 游振偉等18人(2018)。研析荷蘭及英國循環經濟發展趨勢與推動策略。經
濟部
22. 臺北市政府(2020)台北循環城市2.0白皮書。台北市政府產業發展局。
23. 呂良正、林玟慧、張芸翠(2019)。「建立新建築循環設計之策略營建知
訊」。營建知訊，201910 (441期)
24. 呂良正、紀維德(2019)。「荷謂循環-從花博荷蘭館看台灣營建業」白皮書。
營建知訊，201910 (441期)
25. 阮怡凱(2022)。台灣建築產業邁向循環經濟的需求、挑戰及發展策略。財
團法人臺中市建築文化教育基金會
26. 賴姿羽（2018）。臺灣建築產業之循環經濟發展策略評估因子研究。國立
臺北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士班碩士論文，台北市。
27. 洪佩妤（2018）。應用循環經濟於社區規劃評估策略之研究。國立臺北科
技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士班碩士論文，台北市。
28. 洪沛芸(2022)。以循環經濟概念評定社會住宅評估要項之研究。東方設計
大學室內設計系住居整合設計碩士班碩士學位論文。
29. 張文綺(2022)。以循環經濟策略建構營建廢棄物管理轉型之評估架構。國
立臺灣大學工學院環境工程學研究所
30. 胡又慧(1996)。質性研究,台北巨流圖書公司
31. 陳新豐(2015) 。 量化資料分析 : SPSS與EXCEL, 五南圖書出版股份有限公
司。