研究生: |
歐宜蓁 YI-JEN OU |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
校園創業環境與智慧財產權制度建置對大專校院衍生新創公司發展影響之探討 Discussion on the Impact of Campus Entrepreneurship Environment and the Establishment of Intellectual Property Rights System on the Development of Colleges and Universities Spin-off Start-up Companies |
指導教授: |
耿筠
Yun Ken |
口試委員: |
鐘建屏
Chien-Ping Chung 林季陽 Chi-Yang Lin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
應用科技學院 - 專利研究所 Graduate Institute of Patent |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 62 |
中文關鍵詞: | 創業 、智慧財產權 、衍生新創 、新創公司 、U-Start創新創業計畫 |
外文關鍵詞: | New Venture Creation, intellectual property rights, spin off startups, startups, U-start |
相關次數: | 點閱:699 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣政府推動人民創業上不遺餘力,大專校院青年學子擁有豐沛的知識與逐漸成熟的技術能力,在學校與教授的研究引導下,發揮創新創意投入創業行列。教育部在創業教育一直扮演著重要的角色,特別重視青年創業及就業之問題,並授予許多大專校院紛紛開課教授創業課程,強化創新創業的基礎教育、成立創業育成中心與加速器,輔導新創團隊0到1及舉辦各式創新創業競賽等,使得各類型創新創業活動大量崛起,就是為了提倡青年創業的風氣。這些創新研發的知識以及開發設計的能力,不僅要商業模式規劃、研擬市場策略與公司財會財務資產佈局,於無形資產上智慧財產權建置布局亦同等重要。本研究訪談了六家由教育部U-start創新創業計畫選拔出的第二階段績優團隊所成立之新創公司為基礎樣本。目的在於探討智慧財產制度建置對於大專校院新創公司設立與經營過程中的智慧財產相關機制作為與其對於該公司的影響。透過文獻收集與深度訪談分析發現,這些青年學子所創立的新創公司於智慧財產權建置管理,主要分為兩種模式,第一種模式以技術研發導向創業之新創公司以及第二種模式以商業產品導向創業之新創公司。多數認同智財建置管理是重要的,然而第一種模式較積極據以適時規劃行動申請保護,而第二種模式則屬消極被動的規劃管理方式,整體智財保護布局偏弱。因此,於新創公司智財權管理,尚有許多面向仍有再努力的空間。
The Taiwan government has spared no effort in promoting people's entrepreneurship. Young students in colleges and universities have abundant knowledge and mature technical capabilities. Under the guidance of the research and guidance of the school and professors, they will give full play to innovation and creativity to enter the ranks of entrepreneurship. The Ministry of Education has always played an important role in entrepreneurship education, paying particular attention to the issue of youth entrepre-neurship and employment, and awarded many colleges and universities to teach entre-preneurship courses, strengthen the basic education of innovation and entrepreneur-ship, establish entrepreneurship incubation centers and accelerators, and guide new entrepreneurs. Teams 0 to 1 and holding various innovation and entrepreneurship competitions have led to the rise of various types of innovation and entrepreneurship activities in order to promote youth entrepreneurship. These innovative R&D knowledge and development and design capabilities require not only business model planning, market strategy research, and company accounting and financial asset lay-out, but also the layout of intellectual property rights in intangible assets. This re-search interviewed six startup companies established by the second-tier high-performance team selected by the U-start Innovation and Entrepreneurship Pro-gram of the Ministry of Education as a basic sample. The purpose is to discuss the in-tellectual property system establishment and the intellectual property related mecha-nism in the establishment and operation of colleges and universities, and its impact on the company. Through literature collection and in-depth interview analysis, it is found that the new startups established by these young students are mainly divided into two models for the management of intellectual property rights. The first model is a startup company with technology research and development-oriented entrepreneurship and the second model Start-up companies with commercial product-oriented entrepreneurship. Most of them agree that the management of the establishment of intellectual property is important. However, the first type of model is more active based on timely planning and action to apply for protection, while the second type of model is a passive applica-tion management method, and the overall intellectual property protection layout is weak. Therefore, in the management of intellectual property rights of start-up compa-nies, there is still much room for further efforts.
Baldridge, R., & Curry, B. (2021). What Is A Startup? Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/what-is-a-startup/#544a2a9a4c63
Barnett, G. (2014). AUTM Startups and UW Reporting. Retrieved from https://researchenterprise.org/2014/07/23/autm-startups-and-uw-reporting/
Biggadike, R. (1989). The risky business of diversification. In Readings in strategic management (pp. 177-190): Springer.
Birley, S., & Muzyka, D. F. (2000). Mastering entrepreneurship: Prentice Hall.
Blank, S. (2020). The four steps to the epiphany: successful strategies for products that win: John Wiley & Sons.
Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic management journal, 12(1), 33-48.
Dollinger, M. J., & Chang-Yung Liu. (2006). Entrepreneurship: strategies and resources, 3rd ed.). Taipei: bestwise.
Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabiliites to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 14(8), 607-618.
Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 14(4), 7-17.
Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor. 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011, 7.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research: Sage publications.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods: SAGE Publications, inc.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses: Currency.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data: sage.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
Singh, R., Barden, A., Mori, T., & Beilin, L. (2001). Advanced glycation end-products: a review. Diabetologia, 44(2), 129-146.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Sage publications.
Timmons, J. A., Spinelli, S., & Tan, Y. (2004). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century (Vol. 6): McGraw-Hill/Irwin New York.
中央通訊社. (2009). 教育部投資你創業,U-START「大專畢業生創業服務方案」北中南巡迴說明會開跑. Retrieved from https://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/28869.aspx
王文科, & 王智弘. (2019). 教育研究法 (Vol. 10): 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
吳振宇. (1998). 候選人競選策略之研究--1997年新竹縣長選舉之分析. (碩士). 國立中正大學, 嘉義縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/69a9mp
李天任, & 藍莘. (1995). 大眾媒體研究: 導論. 台北: 亞太.(原書 Wimmer, RD & Dominick, JR [1991]. Mass media reasearch-an Introduction. Wadsworth.).
林晉寬. (1995). 從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係. (博士). 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/24g6mh 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 database. (083NCCU0121005)
邱映慈. (1999). 整合行銷傳播在選舉行銷上之運用--以1998年台北市長選舉為例. (碩士). 輔仁大學, 新北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/38mm5t
邵正宏. (2001). 非營利電視台之行銷策略研究. In: 國立台灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文.
徐宗國. (1996). 紮根理論研究法, 載於胡幼慧主編, 質性研究. 台北: 巨流, 47-73.
國立臺灣師範大學. (2016). 青年職涯發展趨勢研究成果報告. 教育部青年發展署 Retrieved from https://www.yda.gov.tw/content/messagess/contents.aspx?&SiteID=563426067575657313&MmmID=563640231711543470&CatID=&MSID=1036501314555323620
教育部. (2019). U-start 創新創業計畫核定文書. 教育部青年發展署
教育部青年發展署. (2019). U-start創新創業計畫補助要點. 教育部青年發展署
教育部青年發展署. (2021). 教育部青年發展署U-start創新創業計畫網. Retrieved from https://ustart.yda.gov.tw/bin/home.php
维基百科编者. (2021). 中小型企業. In 维基百科,自由的百科全書.
郭良文, & 林素甘. (2001). 質化與量化研究方法之比較分析. 資訊傳播與圖書館學 7, 4.
黃俊英. (1999). 行銷研究管理與技術 第八版. 台北: 華泰.
黃寶園. (2006). 心理教育與研究法. 台北: 華立圖書股份有限公司, 480.
萬文隆. (2004). 深度訪談在質性研究中的應用. 生活科技教育月刊, 三十七卷(4), 17-23.
資誠PwCTaiwan, & 台灣經濟研究院. (2019). 2019 台灣新創生態圈大調查. 經濟部中小企業處
劉常勇, & 謝如梅. (2006). 創業管理研究之回顧與展望: 理論與模式探討. 創業管理研究, 第一卷第一期, 1-43.
簡春安, & 鄒平儀. (2004). 社會工作研究法. 台北: 巨流. Jian, CA, & Zou, PY (2004). She Huei Gong Zuo Yan Jiou Fa. Taipei: Jyu Liou.[in Chinese, phonetic translation].